References
- Al-Diban, S. (2002). Diagnose mentaler Modelle. Dr. Kovač.
- Austin, J. L. (1964). Sense and Sensibilia. Reconstructed from the Manuscript Notes by G. J. Warnock. Oxford University Press.
- Bal, M. (2002). Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. University of Toronto Press.
- Boden, M. A. (1999). What is interdisciplinarity? In R. Cunningham (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and the organization of knowledge in Europe (pp. 13–24). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxembourg.
- Bohlmann, M. (2014). Experimental Philosophy, Analytic Philosophy and Conceptual Change. In J. Rohbeck (Ed.), Experimentelle Philosophie und Philosophiedidaktik (pp. 11–25). Thelem.
- Bohlmann, M. (2016). Science Education. Empirie, Kulturen und Mechanismen der Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften. Logos. https://www.zenodo.org/record/228163
- Bohlmann, M. (2017). Die experimentelle Erforschung philosophischer Konzepte - Aufriss eines fachdidaktischen Forschungsprogramms. In J. Rohbeck, J. Dietrich, & C. Brand (Eds.), Empirische Forschung in der Philosophie- und Ethikdidaktik (pp. 51–71). Thelem.
- Bohlmann, M., & Verfers, V. (2019). Vorstellungen von Philosophielernenden zum Konzept der Tat. Ergebnisse einer experimentellen Studie im Design-Based Research. In B. Bussmann & M. Tiedemann (Eds.), Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft (pp. 141–162). Thelem.
- Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
- Burkard, A., Franzen, H., Löwenstein, D., Romizi, D., & Wienmeister, A. (2021). Argumentative Skills: A Systematic Framework for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy, 5(2), 72–100.
- Burkard, A., Pohl, T., Schindler, K., & Köster, M. (2018). Basiserkenntniskonzepte als Instrumente fachlichen Lernens: Ein interdisziplinäres Forschungsprojekt zu den Fächern Deutsch, Geschichte und Philosophie. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Gesellschaftswissenschaften, 2, 108–124.
- Burkard, A., & Martena, L. (2018). Zur Erforschung von Schülervorstellungen im Philosophieunterricht: Eine programmatische Skizze. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie und Ethik, 39(3), 80–86.
- Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814719.001.0001
- diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
- Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual Change: A Powerful Framework for Improving Science Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000076652
- Floridi, L. (2019). The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design. Oxford University Press.
- Fodor, J. A. (1994). The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics. MIT Press.
- Fodor, J. A., & Garrett, M. F. (1975). The Psychological Unreality of Semantic Representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(4), 515–531. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177898
- Glasgow, J., Haslanger, S., Jeffers, C., & Spencer, Q. (2019). What Is Race?: Four Philosophical Views. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190610173.001.0001
- Gropengießer, H., & Marohn, A. (2018). Schülervorstellungen und Conceptual Change - Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 49–67). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56320-5_4
- Haslanger, S. (2000). Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be? Noûs, 34(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201
- Heidegger, M. (2009). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Vorbemerkungen und Erläuterungen an den >Grundbegriffen< der Wissenschaften. In Leitgedanken zur Entstehung der Metaphysik, der neuzeitlichen Wissenshaft und der modernen Technik. Gesamtausgabe Band 76 (pp. 53–281). Klostermann.
- Henke, R. (2015). Die Förderung philosophischer Urteilskompetenz durch kognitive Konflikte. In J. Nida-Rümelin, I. Spiegel, & M. Tiedemann (Eds.), Handbuch Philosophie und Ethik. Band 1: Didaktik und Methodik (pp. 86–95). Schöningh.
- Höppner, N. (2022). Dialektisches Verstehen und Philosophische Präkonzepte. Unpublished manuscript of the PhD thesis.
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). The History of Mental Models. In K. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of Reasoning. Theoretical and Historical Perspectives (pp. 179–212). Psychology Press.
- Kant, I. (1959). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Lewis White Beck. Bobbs-Merrill.
- Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion - Ein Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3–18.
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
- Lin, J.-W., Yen, M.-H., Liang, J., Chiu, M.-H., & Guo, C.-J. (2016). Examining the Factors That Influence Students’ Science Learning Processes and Their Learning Outcomes: 30 Years of Conceptual Change Research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617–2646.
- Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy Within its Proper Bounds. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807520.001.0001
- Margolis, E. (1994). A Reassessment of the Shift from the Classical Theory of Concepts to Prototype Theory. Cognition, 51(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90009-4
- Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (2022). Concepts. In E. N. Zelta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/concepts/
- Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3349
- Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating Scientific Concepts. MIT Press.
- Nitz, S., & Fechner, S. (2018). Mentale Modelle. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 69–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56320-5_5
- Potvin, P. (2021). Response of science learners to contradicting information: a review of research. Studies in Science Education, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.2004006
- Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), From a Logical Point of View (pp. 20–46). Harvard University Press.
- Reinfried, S., Mathis, C., & Kattmann, U. (2009). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Eine innovative Methode zur fachdidaktischen Erforschung und Entwicklung von Unterricht. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 27, 404–414.
- Riegel, U., & Rothgangel, M. (2021). Research Designs of Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning. Research in Subject-Matter Teaching and Learning, 4, 1–36.
- Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
- Sherin, B. (2021). Where Are We? Syntheses and Synergies in Science Education Research and Practice. In O. Levrini, G. Tasquier, T. G. Amin, L. Branchetti, & M. Levin (Eds.), Engaging with Contemporary Challenges through Science Education Research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2019 Conference (pp. 211–224). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74490-8_17
- Sinatra, G. M. (2022). Motivational and emotional impacts on public (mis)understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1975121
- Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 147–176). University of New York Press.
- Suppe, F. (2000). Understanding Scientific Theories: An Assessment of Developments, 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science, 67(3), 102–115.
- Thein, C. (2020a). From Pre-Concepts to Reasons. Empirically-Based Reconstruction of a Philosophical Learning Scenario. Journal of Didactics of Philosophy, 4(1), 5–13.
- Thein, C. (2020b). Verstehen und Urteilen im Philosophieunterricht. Zweite erweiterte Auflage. Barbara Budrich.
- Vaughn, A. R., Brown, R. D., & Johnson, M. L. (2020). Understanding Conceptual Change and Science Learning through Educational Neuroscience. Mind, Brain, and Education, 14(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12237
- von Uexküll, J. (2001). The new concept of Umwelt: A link between science and the humanities. Semiotica, 1(134), 111–123. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/semi.2001.018
- Vosniadou, S. (2019). The Development of Students’ Understanding of Science. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 4). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fe duc.2019.00032
- Zimmermann, P. (2016). Fachliche Klärung und didaktische Rekonstruktion. In J. Pfister & P. Zimmermann (Eds.), Neues Handbuch des Philosophie-Unterrichts (pp. 61–78). Haupt.