Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Investigation of the relationship between teachers’ inquiry-based teaching self-efficiency for STEM+S and their computational thinking skills Cover

Investigation of the relationship between teachers’ inquiry-based teaching self-efficiency for STEM+S and their computational thinking skills

By: Mehmet Başaran and  Merve İlter  
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Akyol, B.E. (2020). STEM etkinliklerinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilgi işlemsel, eleştirel, yaratıcı düşünme ve problem çözme becerilerine etkisi [The effect of STEM activities on pre-service science teachers’ computational, critical, creative thinking and problem-solving skills], Unpublished Master Thesis, Erciyes Üniversitesi.
  2. Avcı, M., Yenilmez Türkoğlu, A., & Eş, H. (2020). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inançlarının araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı fen öğretimi ve bilimsel tutum üzerine etkilerinin çoklu regresyon ile analizi [Analysis of the effects of science teacher candidates’ epistemological beliefs on inquiry-based science teaching and scientific attitude with multiple regression]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 80-93.
  3. Banchi, H. &Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26-29.
  4. Barr, D., Harrison, J. ve Conery, L.(2011). Computational thinking: a digital age skill for everyone, Learning & Leading with Technology Magazine.
  5. Bilici, O. ve Güler, Ç. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerileri ile akademik öz yeterlikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (1), 107-119.
  6. Calderon A. (2018). Susceptibility to learn computational thinking against STEM attitudes and aptitudes. In Khine M. (Eds.), Computational Thinking in the STEM disciplines. Springer, Cham.
  7. Curzon, P., Black, J., Meagher, L. R., & McOwan, P. (2009). cs4fn. org: Enthusing students about Computer Science. Proceedings of Informatics Education Europe IV, 73-80.
  8. Çevik, M. ve Ata, R. (2020). Understanding predictor effects of computational thinking skills and media and technology use and attitudes of pre-service teachers for STEM awareness, KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 17(1):101-123.
  9. Dolmacı, A., & Akhan, N. E. (2020). Bilişimsel düşünme becerileri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The development of computational thinking skills scale: Validity and reliability study]. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Research, 9(3), 3050-3071.
  10. Ercan, E. (2017). Araştırma Sorgulamaya Dayalı Laboratuvarın Öğrencilerin Özyeterlik, Yaratıcılık Algısı ve Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  11. Exploring Computational Thinking. (2015). Google for education: Computational thinking. Exploring computational thinking. https://edu.google.com/resources/programs/exploring-computational-thinking/
  12. Friesen, S. & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-Based Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. Paper prepared for the Alberta Ministry of Education.
  13. Gezer, U. S. (2014). Yansıtıcı sorgulamaya dayalı genel biyoloji laboratuvarı etkinliklerinin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının laboratuvar kullanımı özyeterlik algıları, eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ve bilimsel süreç becerileri üzerine etkisi [The effect of reflective inquiry-based general biology laboratory activities on prospective science teachers’ laboratory use self-efficacy perceptions, critical thinking dispositions and scientific process skills.]. Unpublished Master Thesis, Marmara Üniversitesi.
  14. Grover, S. (2013). OPINION: Learning to Code Isn’t Enough, from https://www.edsurge.com/n/2013-05-28-opinion-learningto-code-isn-t-enough
  15. Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and teach computational Thinking: Suggestions based on a literature review. Computers & Education, 126, 296–310.
  16. Ifeanyi-Uche, U.P. & Ejabukwa, C. (2013). Inquiry-based method and student academic achievement in secondary school home economics. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(4).
  17. İbili, E., Günbatar, M. S., & Sırakaya, M. (2020). Bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerilerinin incelenmesi: Meslek liseleri örneklemi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28(2), 1067-1078.
  18. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) (2015). Computational Thinking.
  19. Jacob, S. R., Nguyen, H., Garcia, L., Richardson, D., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Teaching computational thinking to multilingual students through inquiry-based learning: A cross-case analysis. IEEE Annual International Conference on Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT’20). jacob_et_al_2020_respect.pdf
  20. Kayacan, K. & Selvi, M. (2017). Öz Düzenleme Faaliyetleri İle Zenginleştirilmiş Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Dayalı Öğretim Stratejisinin Kavramsal Anlamaya ve Akademik Öz Yeterliğe Etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25 (5), 1771-1786 .
  21. Psycharis, S. & Kotzampasaki, E. (2019). The impact of a STEM inquiry game learning scenario on computational thinking and computer self-confidence. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 15(4), 1-18.
  22. Roth, W. & Alfredo, J. (2013). Toward a Theory of Experience. Science Education, 98, 106–126.
  23. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.C., & C. Jiménez-Fernández (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678-691.
  24. Saad, A. (2020). Students’ computational thinking skills through cooperative learning based on hands-on,inquiry-based, and student-centric learning approaches, Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(1): 290-296.
  25. Sarıtepeci, M. (2017). Ortaöğretim düzeyinde bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerisinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. ITTES conference, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  26. Sırakaya, D. A. (2019). Programlama öğretiminin bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerisine etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 23(2), 575-590.
  27. Sulistiyo, M. A. S. & Wijaya, A. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on high school students’ computational thinking skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, 1–10.
  28. S. Chookaew, S. Howimanporn, P. Pratumsuwan, S. Hutamarn, W. Sootkaneung, & C. Wongwatkit. (2018). “Enhancing High-School Students’ Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics Learning,” 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2018, pp. 204-208.
  29. Tanın, K. (2021). STEM etkinliklerinin okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarinin bilgi işlemsel, eleştirel ve çok boyutlu 21.yüzyil becerilerine etkisi [The effect of STEM activities on pre-school teacher candidates’ computational, critical and multidimensional 21st century skills], Unpublished Master Thesis. Kastamonu Üniversitesi.
  30. Uslu, N. A., Mumcu, F. ve Eğin, F. (2018). Görsel programlama etkinliklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Ege Eğitim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(1), 19-31.
  31. Yildirim, I., Basaran, M., Cucuk, E., & Yokus, E. (2018). Development of inquiry-based teaching self-efficacy scale for STEM+S education: Validity and reliability study. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 40-55.
  32. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Published on: Dec 14, 2023
Published by: SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Mehmet Başaran, Merve İlter, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.