References
- Akçay, A., & Şahin, A. (2012). Webquest (Web Macerası) öğrenme yönteminin Türkçe dersindeki akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 33–45.
- Arthur, N.,Patton, W., & Giancarlo, C. (2007). International Project participation by women academics. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 323–348.10.2307/20466637
- Aytan, T., Başal, A. (2015).Türkçe Öğretmen Adaylarının Web 2. 0 Araçlarına Yönelik Algılarının İncelenmesi, Turkish Studies, 10 (7), 149–166.
- Balta, Y. ve Türel, Y.K. (2013). Çevrimiçi Uzaktan Eğitimde Kullanılan Farklı Ölçme Değerlendirme Yaklaşımlarına İlişkin Bir İnceleme. Turkish Studies, 8(3), 37-45.
- Bingimlas, K.A. (2017). Learning and Teaching with Web 2.0 Applications in Saudi K-12 Schools. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 100–115.
- Boulos, M.N.K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: A new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1472-6920-6-41.
- Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47, 177–198.10.1080/09523987.2010.518811
- Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
- Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers’ classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 361–385.10.1080/03626784.1985.11075976
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1993). On narrative method, biography and narrative unities in the study of teaching. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 15-29.
- Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & Helen, M. F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the Professional knowledge landscape. Teaching & Teacher Education, 13(7), 665–674.10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00014-0
- Çelik, T. (2020). “Dijital Çağda Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmeni Yetiştirme: Bir Eylem Araştırması” Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, sayı 38, Denizli, s. 211–229.
- Day, C., A. Kington, G. Stobart, and P. Sammons. (2006). ‘The personal and Professional selves of teachers: Stable and unstable identities.’ British Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 601–616.10.1080/01411920600775316
- Ekıċı̇, G. (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarının “Bilgisayar” Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları . Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15 (3), 755–781
- Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937–945.
- Garner, R. (2005). Radical pedagogy. Retrieved 01.02.2019 from http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue62/garner.html
- Graham, C. (2012). Transforming space sand identities: The contributions of Professional staff to learning spaces in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34 (4): 437–452. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2012.69632610.1080/1360080X.2012.696326
- Green, J. C., Krayder, H., & Mayer, E. (2005). Combining Qualitative And Quantitative Methods in Social Inquiry. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.). Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 275–282). London: Sage.
- Grosseck,G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education?, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478–482.10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.087
- Guley, J. (2019). Using Web 2.0 tools to engage learners. Erişim: 09.02.2019, https://www.collegestar.org/modules/using-web-2-0-tools-to-engage-learners
- Gülcü, A., Solak, M., Aydın, S., & Koçak, Ö. (2013). İlköğretimde görev yapan branş öğretmenlerinin eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(6), 195–213.10.7827/TurkishStudies.4899
- Henkel, M. 2000. Academic identities and policy changes in higher education. London: JessicaKingsley.
- Holcomb, L.B. Beal, C.M. (2010). Capitalizing on Web 2.0 in the Social Studies Context. TechTrends, 54(4), 28–33. doi:10.1007/s11528-010-0417-010.1007/s11528-010-0417-0
- Hurlburt, S. (2008). Defining tools for a new learning space: Writing and reading class blogs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4 (2),182–189.
- Koç, E.,S. (2014) Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öğretmen ve Öğretmenlik Mesleği Kavramlarına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları10.17679/iuefd.79408
- Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2004) Displacing Metaphorical Analysis: Reading with and against metaphors. Qualitative Research, 4(3), pp. 339–360.10.1177/1468794404047233
- Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaforlar, hayat, anlam ve dil.İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
- Levine, P. (2005). Metaphors and images of class rooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41 (4), 172–175.10.1080/00228958.2005.10532066
- Majhi S, Maharana B (2011). Familiarity of Web2.0 and its application in learning: A case study of two Indian Universities. Int. Lib. Inf. Sci., 3:120–129.
- MEB, (2018). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programı, Erişim Adresi: (http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812103847686SOSYAL%20B%C4%B0LG%C4%B0LER%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%20.pdf).
- Miles, M. B.,&Huberman, A. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). CA: Sage Publications Inc.
- Nichol, D., Hunter, J., Yaseen, J. & Prescott-Clements, L. (2012) A simple guide to enhancing learning through web 2.0 technologies, European Journal of Higher Education, 2:4, 436–446, DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2012.73456110.1080/21568235.2012.734561
- O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved November 22, 2007, from http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
- Pearson Education (2015). Student mobile device survey 2015 national report: College students. Boston MA: Pearson Education.
- Reynard, R. (2009). 3 Challenges to wiki use in instruction. Campus Technology, Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/articles/, 09.02.2020
- Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Richardson, W. (2006). The educator’s guide to the read-write web. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 24–27.
- Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21.8: 1006-1021. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2016.121322910.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
- Tyagi, S. 2012. Adoption of Web 2.0 technology in higher education: A case study of universities in the National Capital Region, India. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(2), 28–43.
- Ülgen, G. ve Sünbül, A.M. (1999). Öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı algılarına göre, öğrenme sürecinde öğrenci ve öğretim elemanı sorumlulukları ve öğrencilerin akademik başarı düzeyleri. H.Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 21–29.
- Yıldırım, A.,& Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Yılmaz, M. B. (2017). Dijital Değerlendirme Araçlarının Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Derse Bağlılıklarına Etkisi: İki Farklı Okulda Durum. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (3), 1606–1620.10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338850
- Waycott J, Gray K, Clerehan R, Hamilton M, Richardson J, Sheard J, Thompson C (2010). Implications for academic integrity of using web 2.0 for teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. Int. J. Edu. Integrity, 6:8–18.
- Williams, G. (2005, January). Using metaphor in teachingandlearning; A literaturereviewandsynthesis. Paperpresented at theSixth Learning andTeaching Conference, University of Nottingham. Retrieved 05.02. 2020 from.http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/teaching/resources/curriculum/learning/usingmet113/