Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital manipulation versus real one: learning and motivation in a case study on Storytelling Cover

Digital manipulation versus real one: learning and motivation in a case study on Storytelling

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Adamo, A., Bertacchini, P. A., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P., & Tavernise, A. (2010). Connecting art and science for education: learning through an advanced virtual theater with ‘Talking Heads’. Leonardo Journal, MIT press, 43(5), 442–448.10.1162/LEON_a_00036
  2. Akins, L., & Burghardt, D. (2006). Improving K-12 mathematics understanding with engineering design projects. Paper presented at the 2006 Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego.10.1109/FIE.2006.322435
  3. Astrachan, O., Hambrusch, S., Peckham, J., & Settle, A. (2009). The present and future of computational thinking. Paper presented at the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, Chattanooga, TN, USA.10.1145/1508865.1509053
  4. Barrett, H. (2006). Researching and Evaluating Digital Storytelling as a Deep Learning Tool. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 647-654).
  5. Bertacchini, P.A., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P., Battiato, S., Cronin, M., Di Blasi, G., Talarico, A., Tavernise, A. (2007). Modelling and Animation of Theatrical Greek Masks in an Authoring System. Paper presented at the Eurographics Italian Chapter 2007 Conference, Trento (Italy), pp. 191-198.
  6. Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., Pantano, P., & Tavernise, A. (2012). Motivating the learning of science topics in secondary school: A constructivist edutainment setting for studying Chaos, Computers & Education, 59 (4), 1377–1386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.001.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.001
  7. Bertacchini, F., & Tavernise, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing for Cultural Heritage 2.0: prosumers in a “digital agora”, International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking (IJVCSN), (6)2, 24-36. Hershey, USA: IGI Global Publishing.10.4018/ijvcsn.2014040102
  8. Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers.10.1515/transcript.9783839423820.203
  9. Blikstein, P., Fuhrmann, T., Greene, D., & Salehi, S. (2012). Bifocal modeling: mixing real and virtual labs for advanced science learning. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Bremen, Germany.10.1145/2307096.2307150
  10. Bourgonjon J., M. Valcke, Soetaert R., Schellens T. (2010), Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom, Computers & Education, 54, 1145-1156.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022
  11. Bull, G., Knezek, G., & Gibson, D. (2009). Editorial: A rationale for incorporating engineering education into the teacher education curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 222-225.
  12. Burghardt, D., & Hacker, M. (2008). Development of a math infusion model for middle school engineering/technology education. Paper presented at the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga, NY.10.18260/1-2--3163
  13. Burghardt, M.D., & Krowles, C. (2006). Enhancing mathematics instruction with engineering design. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id1070.
  14. Cavazza, M., & Donikian, S. (2008). Virtual Storytelling: Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference, ICVS 2007.10.1007/978-3-540-77039-8
  15. Alexander, C., Tillman, D., Cohen, J. D., Ducamp, G. J., & Kjellstrom, W. (2013). Piloting Innovative Learning Experiences: Measuring Outcomes of Digital Fabrication Activities across Five Classes. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1165-1173.
  16. Drigas, A., & Karyotaki, M. (2014). Learning Tools and Applications for Cognitive Improvement. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 71-77.10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3665
  17. Gershenfeld, N. (2005). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop – from personal computers to personal fabrication. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  18. Hu, P. J., Clarkb, T. H. K., & Mab, W.W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study, Information & Management, 41, 227–241.10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8
  19. Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  20. Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K., & Chen, Z. (2005), Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, Information & Management 42, pp. 1095-1104.10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
  21. Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J., & Toprac, P. (2011). A study of learning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 249 – 265.10.1007/s11423-011-9192-7
  22. Machado, I., Prada, R., Paiva, A. (2000). Bringing Drama into a Virtual Stage. Paper presented at the III International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, San Francisco, USA.10.1145/351006.351026
  23. McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1987). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48-58.10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
  24. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  25. Perlin, K. (1997). Layered compositing of facial expression. ACM/SIGGRAPH Technical Sketch, http://mrl.nyu.edu/perlin/experiments/facedemo.10.1145/259081.259313
  26. Piaget, J. (1970). The Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. NY: Grossman.
  27. Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: An investigation of internally-controlling styles. Journal of Personality, 53, 435-449.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x
  28. Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Varied forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185-205.10.1007/BF00995170
  29. Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.736
  30. Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42, 317-327.10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
  31. Tavernise, A. (2012). Narrazione e Multimedia - Ricerca educativa e applicazioni didattiche. Roma: Ed. Meti.
  32. Tavernise, A, & Bertacchini, F. (2017). Learning through Drama: Guidelines for Using Storytelling and Virtual Theatres in Classrooms. Journal of Education Research, 10(2), pp. 163-174.
  33. Vygotsky, Lev (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2019-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2037-0849 | Journal ISSN: 2037-0830
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 41
Published on: Dec 26, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Assunta Tavernise, Francesca Bertacchini, Pietro Pantano, Eleonora Bilotta, published by SIREM (Società Italiana di Ricerca sull’Educazione Mediale)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.