References
- 1. Revised ISM code, Effective from 1 January 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/pdf/activities/statutory/ism/ISM_Cd/ISM-Code-e.pdf. [Accessed: Sept. 2, 2022].
- 2. V. Knežević, L. Stazić, J. Orović, and L. Mihanović, “Use of PMS continuous improvement scheme for maintenance adjustments in shipping industry,” Book of Proceedings -8th International Maritime Science Conference,12.04.2019., pp. 415-420, Budva, Montenegro.
- 3. C. Karatuğ and Y.Arslanoğlu, “Importance of early fault diagnosis for marine diesel engines: a case study on efficiency management and environment”, Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 17, pp. 472-480, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1835077.
- 4. A. Prajapati, J. Bechtel, and S. Ganesan, “Condition based maintenance: a survey”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 384-400, 2012, doi.org/10.1108/13552511211281552.10.1108/13552511211281552
- 5. Ç. Karatuğ and Y. Arslanoğlu, “Development of condition-based maintenance strategy for fault diagnosis for ship engine systems,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 256, 2022, doi.org/10.1016/j. oceaneng.2022.111515.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111515
- 6. F. Vera-García, J. A. Pagán Rubio, J. Hernández Grau, D. Albaladejo Hernández, “Improvements of a failure database for marine diesel engines using the RCM and simulations,” Energies, vol. 13, p. 104, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010104.10.3390/en13010104
- 7. T. O. Alamri and J. P. T. Mo, “Optimisation of preventive maintenance regime based on failure mode system modelling considering reliability,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 49, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07174-w.10.1007/s13369-022-07174-w
- 8. T. Song, T. Tan, and G. Han, “Research on preventive maintenance strategies and systems for in-service ship equipment,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 85-96, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2022-0009.10.2478/pomr-2022-0009
- 9. H. Nguyen, “Fuzzy methods in risk estimation of the ship system failures based on the expert judgments,” Journal of KONBiN, vol. 43, pp. 393-403, 2017, doi: 10.1515/jok-2017-0058.
- 10. M. Bayraktar and M. Nuran, “Reliability, availability, and maintainability analysis of the propulsion system of a fleet,” Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej w Szczecinie, vol. 70, no. 142, pp. 63-70, 2022.
- 11. C. Velasco-Gallego and I. Lazakis, “RADIS: A real-time anomaly detection intelligent system for fault diagnosis of marine machinery,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 204, p. 117634, 2022.10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117634
- 12. J. Cullum et.al., “Risk-based maintenance scheduling with application to naval vessels and ships,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 148, 2018, pp. 476-485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.044.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.044
- 13. B. Vučinić, “MA-CAD, Maintenance Concept Adjustment and Design,” University of Delft, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, 1994.
- 14. A. Bukša, I. Šegulja, and V. Tomas, “The adjustment of the maintenance approach for improved operability and safety of ship navigation,” Promet—Traffic & Transportation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 95-103, 2010, doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v22i2.168.10.7307/ptt.v22i2.168
- 15. L. Stazić, et al., “Maintenance interval adjustment based on the experience: Case study of marine air compressor system,” Naše More: International Journal of Maritime Science and Technology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 146-152, 2020, doi: 10.17818/NM/2020/2.7.
- 16. L. Vogdrup-Schmidt, “The shipping industry is too conservative and passive.” [Online] Available: https://shippingwatch.com/Services/article7817989.ece. [Accessed: Sept. 13, 2022].
- 17. M. E. Manuel, “Maritime risk and organizational learning,” ebook (1st ed.). CRC Press, 2012, doi: 10.1201/9781315593937.
- 18. T. Teijl, “Innovating in the maritime cluster,” Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 2014.
- 19. A. Bukša, D. Martinović, and M. Vidaković, “Failure analysis of the diesel engine ship propulsion system,” Pomorstvo: Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 391-404, 2009.
- 20. MAN B&W: Volume II Maintenance: S70MC-C, E[Online] Available: https://engine.od.ua/man-70m [Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022].
- 21. Lloyd’s Register, “Rules and regulations for the classification of ships, Part 5: Main and auxiliary machinery,” London, United Kingdom, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://docshare04.docshare.tips/files/30667/306670934.pdf. [Accessed: Sept. 12, 2022].
- 22. Amos Business Suite version 9.0 – Maintenance software program, [Online] Available: https://amos-business-suite.software.informer.com/ [Accessed: Dec. 2, 2022].
- 23. C. E. Ebeling, An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering, 3rd ed. Waveland Press: Long Groove, IL, USA, 2019. ISBN 978-1-4786-3933-6.
- 24. O. Dinu and A. M. Ilie, “Maritime vessel obsolescence, life cycle cost and design service life,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 95, 2015.10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012067
- 25. D. Matika and L. Mihanović, “Reliability of a light high speed marine diesel engine,” Shipbuilding: An International Journal of Research and Development, vol. 62, pp. 28-36, 2011.
- 26. Life Data Analysis: Weibull Analysis. [Online]. Available: https://www.weibull.com/basics/lifedata.htm. [Accessed: Sept. 12, 2022].
- 27. 1st Classification Society Event 2017: ME Fundamentals and Critical Principles. [Online]. Available: https://pbm.hr/media/1100/man-me-hcu.pdf. [Accessed: Sept. 21, 2022].