Research on Preventive Maintenance Strategies and Systems for in-Service Ship Equipment

Song, Tingxin; Tan, Taiyang; Han, Guochen

doi:10.2478/pomr-2022-0009

Abstract

With continuous improvements in the function and performance of ship equipment, mechanisms of failure have become more and more complicated. To avoid over-maintenance or under-maintenance in existing routine ship maintenance strategies, a ship-level method for repair decisions based on the preventive maintenance concept is proposed in this paper. First, the anticipated repair demand levels of key components are calculated using an improved failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) method; second, a Weibull distribution model is established, and the parameters are estimated using the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to predict the characteristic life of the equipment; then, logical decision principles and rule-based reasoning (RBR) are used to determine the ship repair level and repair timing. Finally, the feasibility and application value of the proposed repair strategy were verified by case studies, and a ship-level system for repair decisions was established.

References

1. E. Skjong, R. Volden, E. Rodskar, et al., “Past, Present, and Future Challenges of the Marine Vessel’s Electrical Power System”, IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., vol. 2, pp. 522–537, 2016.10.1109/TTE.2016.2552720
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. R. Ahmad, S. Kamaruddin, “An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 135-149, 2012.10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. X. Li, Y.X. Jia, Y.S. Bai, “Study on Optimal Maintenance Level Based on Preventive Group Maintenance Police”, Fire Control & Command Control, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 35-39, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. X.C. Li, J.B. Hu, Z.H. Zhang, “Simulation analysis of warship deployability with maintenance structures involved”, Chinese Journal of Ship Research, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 123-128, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. V.J. Jimenez, N. Bouhmala, A.H. Gausdal, “Developing a predictive maintenance model for vessel machinery”, Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 358-386, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2020.03.003.10.1016/j.joes.2020.03.003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. I. Emovon, R.A. Norman, A.J. Murphy, “Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 519-531, 2018.10.1007/s10845-015-1133-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. P. Bzura, “Diagnostic Model of Crankshaft Seals”, Polish Marit. Res., vol. 26, no. 3, 2019, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0044.10.2478/pomr-2019-0044
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. J. Girtler, “Limiting Distribution of the Three-State Semi-Markov Model of Technical State Transitions of Ship Power Plant Machines and its Applicability in Operational Decision-Making”, Polish Marit. Res., vol. 27, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2020-0035.10.2478/pomr-2020-0035
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. R.X. Wei, C. Lin, T.J. Jiang, “Optimization method of condition-based maintenance decision-making for task-oriented ship fleet”, Journal of Naval University of Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 83-89, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. P. He, W. Zuo, Y. Wang, “Modeling for Repair Level of Air and Missile Defense Equipment Under Multi-constraints”, Fire Control & Command Control, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 42-47, 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. J. Girtler and J. Rudnicki, “The matter of decision-making control over operation processes of marine power plant systems with the use of their models in the form of semi-Markov decision-making processes”, Polish Marit. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2021-0011.10.2478/pomr-2021-0011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. R. Zagan, I. Paprocka, M.-G. Manea, and E. Manea, “Estimation of Ship Repair Time Using the Genetic Algorithm”, Polish Marit. Res., vol. 28, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2021-0036.10.2478/pomr-2021-0036
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. M.C. Lin, Z. Tang, M.Q. Ning, and C.Y. Wang, “Condition-Based Maintenance Strategy for Dynamic Performance Detection Based on Wiener Process”, Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 40-45, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. M. Hashemi, M. Asadi, “Optimal preventive maintenance of coherent systems: A generalized Pólya process approach”, IISE Transactions, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1266-128, 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. D.P. Niu, L. Guo, et al., “Preventive maintenance period decision for elevator parts based on multi-objective optimization method”, Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 44, 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.102984.10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102984
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. A. Sa’ad, A.C. Nyoungue, Z. Hajej, “Improved Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for a Photovoltaic Plant under Environmental Constraints”, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 10472-10472, 2021.10.3390/su131810472
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Z. Luo, X. Zhou, Y.D. Shi, “Research on method of warship maintenance structure designing based on requirement of assignment and maintenance”, Journal of Naval University of Engineering, vol. 15, no. 04, pp. 60-64, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Y. Geum, Y. Cho, Y. Park, “A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach”, Mathematical & Computer Modelling, vol. 54, no. 11-12, pp. 3126-3142, 2011.10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.042
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. P. Mahdad, A.B. Mohammad, G. Kamran, “An integrated approach for healthcare services risk assessment and quality enhancement”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 37, no. 9/10, pp. 1183-1208, 2019.10.1108/IJQRM-11-2018-0314
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. P.B. Southard, S. Kumar, C.A. Southard, “A modified Delphi methodology to conduct a failure modes effects analysis: a patient-centric effort in a clinical medical laboratory”, Quality Management in Health Care, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 131-51, 2011.10.1097/QMH.0b013e318213b07921467901
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Y. Melih, G. Muhammet, C. Erkan, “A holistic FMEA approach by fuzzy-based Bayesian network and best–worst method”, Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, pp. 1547-1564, 2011.10.1007/s40747-021-00279-z
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. S. Boral, S. Chakraborty, “Failure analysis of CNC machines due to human errors: An integrated IT2F-MCDM-based FMEA approach”, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 130, 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2021.105768.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105768
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. E. Kulcsár, I.G. Gyurika, T. Csiszér, “Increasing the Reliability of FMEA Evaluation by Modifying Rating Scales and Applying Pairwise Comparison Method”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1190, no. 1, 2021.10.1088/1757-899X/1190/1/012003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. V. Behnam, M. Salimi, M. Charkhchian, “A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 77, no. 1-4, pp. 357-368, 2015.10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. B. Marcia, S. Shankar, et al., “Forecasting fault events for predictive maintenance using data-driven techniques and ARMA modeling”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 41-53, 2018.10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.033
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. G. Kai, D. Matthew, et al., Prognostics: The Science of Making Predictions. California, USA, 2017, pp. 123-135.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. E.M. Assis, E.P. Borges, “Generalized q-Weibull model and the bathtub curve”, The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 720-736, 2013.10.1108/IJQRM-Oct-2011-0143
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. A.A. Ahmed, A.R. Zahran, M.A. Ismail, “On maximum likelihood estimation of the general projected normal distribution”, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 91, no. 16, pp. 3453-3472, 2021.10.1080/00949655.2021.1929984
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. P. Nasiri, A.A. Azarian, “Estimation of the Parameters of Generalized Inverse Weibull Geometric Distribution and its Application”, Fluctuation and Noise Letters, vol. 20, no. 05, 2021.10.1142/S0219477521500437
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. B.H. Jia, Y.W. Ma, et al., “Continued Operational Safety Assessment of Civil Aircraft Structural Events Based on TARAM”, Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1-9, 2021, doi: 10.16615/j. cnki.1674-8190.2021.05.04
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. B. Yang, Y. Chen, M.H. Wang, “Discussion about maintenance mode decision method for warship weapon equipments”, Journal of Gun Launch & Control, vol. 35, no. 01, pp. 83-87, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. A. Ngamnij, A. Somjit, “Semantic Ontology Mapping for Interoperability of Learning Resource Systems using a rule-based reasoning approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 7428-7443, 2013.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.027
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. E. Ramadhani, H.R. Pratama, E.G. Wahyuni, “Web-based expert system to determine digital forensics tool using rule-based reasoning approach”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1918, no. 4, 2021.10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. K. Ljubica, K. Zoltan, “Using Ontology and Rule-Based Reasoning for Conceptual Data Models Synonyms Detection: A Case Study”, Journal of Database Management (JDM), vol. 30, no. 1, pp.1-21, 2019.10.4018/JDM.2019010101
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Research on Preventive Maintenance Strategies and Systems for in-Service Ship Equipment

Abstract

Paradigm

My account