Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Towards precision medicine in obstructive sleep apnoea: A meta-analysis linking endotypic traits to disease severity Cover

Towards precision medicine in obstructive sleep apnoea: A meta-analysis linking endotypic traits to disease severity

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Flowchart Illustrating the Search Strategy.

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

Study or subgroupStudy designSample sizeAge (mean)Male (%)Diagnosis of OSAOSA severity/AHI (events/h)Endotypes measuredNOS score
Brooker 2023 (13)Cross-sectional3449.961PSG22.3Upper airway collapsibility, muscle compensation, loop gain, arousal threshold9
Brooker 2024 (14)Cross-sectional2771.7100PSG23.6Upper airway collapsibility, muscle compensation, loop gain, arousal threshold9
Wang 2024a (9)Cross-sectional56241.084PSG57.2Upper airway collapsibility, muscle compensation, loop gain, arousal threshold6
Wang 2024b (9)Cross-sectional47440.083PSG26.3Upper airway collapsibility, muscle compensation, loop gain, arousal threshold6

1 AHI, apnoea–hypopnoea index; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa score; OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea; PSG, polysomnography.

1a NPOSA subgroup.

1b POSA subgroup.

Figure 2.

Forest Plots Illustrating Correlation of OSA Severity with Endotypes.

Figure S1.

Funnel plot for upper airway collapse and OSA severity. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Figure S2.

Funnel plot for loop gain and OSA severity. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Figure S3.

Funnel plot for arousal threshold and OSA severity. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Figure S4.

Funnel plot for muscle compensation and OSA severity. OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Table S1.

Quality assessment of the studies based on NOS

StudiesSelectionComparabilityOutcomeTotal
RepresentativenessSample sizeResponse rateAscertainment of the screening toolAssessmentStatistical test
Brooker 2023 (13)*********9
Brooker 2024 (14)*********9
Wang 2024 (9)******6

1 NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa scale.

Table S2.

Publication bias assessment for upper airway collapse and OSA severity

Test NameValueP
Fail-Safe N140.000<0.001
Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation–0.3330.750
Egger’s Regression0.8220.411
Trim and Fill Number of Studies1.000

1 Note. Fail-safe N calculation using the Rosenthal Approach.

1 OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Table S3.

Publication bias assessment for loop gain and OSA severity

Test NameValueP
Fail-Safe N101.000<0.001
Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation0.0001.000
Egger’s Regression0.6720.502
Trim and Fill Number of Studies1.000

1 Note. Fail-safe N calculation using the Rosenthal Approach.

1 OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Table S4.

Publication bias assessment for arousal threshold and OSA severity

Test NameValueP
Fail-Safe N83.000<0.001
Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation0.0001.000
Egger’s Regression0.2320.817
Trim and Fill Number of Studies1.000

1 Note. Fail-safe N calculation using the Rosenthal Approach.

1 OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

Table S5.

Publication bias assessment for muscle compensation and OSA severity

Test NameValueP
Fail-Safe N0.0000.147
Begg and Mazumdar Rank Correlation0.0001.000
Egger’s Regression–0.1850.853
Trim and Fill Number of Studies2.000

1 Note. Fail-safe N calculation using the Rosenthal Approach.

1 OSA, obstructive sleep apnoea.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pneum-2026-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2247-059X | Journal ISSN: 2067-2993
Language: English, Romanian
Page range: 1 - 11
Published on: Mar 4, 2026
Published by: Romanian Society of Pneumology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Sandy Nur Vania Putri, Devin Elsya Praditama, Reviono Reviono, published by Romanian Society of Pneumology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.