Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Linguistic Analysis of Statements Concerning Paintings Viewed Under Different Instructions by Experts and Novices in the Visual Arts Cover

Linguistic Analysis of Statements Concerning Paintings Viewed Under Different Instructions by Experts and Novices in the Visual Arts

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill & Wang.
  2. Belke, B., Leder, H., Strobach, T., & Carbon, C. -C. (2010). Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 214–222. doi: 10.1037/a001964810.1037/a0019648
  3. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.10.1037/11164-000
  4. Bubić, A., Sušac, A., & Palmović, M. (2017). Observing individuals viewing art: The effects of titles on viewers eye-movement profiles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 35(2), 194-213. doi: 10.1177/027623741668349910.1177/0276237416683499
  5. Cooper, J. M., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Opposing art: Rejection as an action tendency of hostile aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.f10.2190/EM.27.1.f
  6. Cupchik, G. C. (2011). The digitized self in the internet age. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 318–328. doi: 10.1037/a002482010.1037/a0024820
  7. Cupchik, G. C. (2016). The aesthetics of emotion: Up the down staircase of the mind-body. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139169301
  8. Cupchik, G. C., & Gignac, A. (2007). Layering in art and in aesthetic experience. Visual Arts Research, 33(1), 56–71.
  9. Cupchik, G. C., & László, J. (1992). Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology and philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. de Paiva Vieira, M. (2011). Ekphrasis in “Girl with a Pearl Earring.” Scripta Uniandrade, 9(2), 11–29.10.18305/1679-5520/scripta.uniandrade.v9n2p10-28
  11. DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 790–811. doi: 10.1080/135062 8090279384310.1080/13506280902793843
  12. Di Dio, C., & Gallese, V. (2009). Neuroaesthetics: A review. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 682–687. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.00110.1016/j.conb.2009.09.001
  13. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.21510.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
  14. Francuz, P., Jankowski, T., & Augustynowicz, P. (in the review). What do you mean when you say you like this painting?
  15. Francuz, P., Zaniewski, I., Augustynowicz, P., Kopiś, N., & Jankowski, T. (2018). Eye movement correlates of expertise in visual arts. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(87), 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087/full10.3389/fnhum.2018.00087/full
  16. Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.00310.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003
  17. Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2015). Titles change the esthetic appreciations of paintings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(464), 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.0046410.3389/fnhum.2015.00464
  18. Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The story of art (16th ed.). London: Phaidon Press.
  19. Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 524–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.00610.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.006
  20. Jahoda, G. (2005). Theodor Lipps and the shift from “sympathy” to “empathy.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(2), 151–163. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.2008010.1002/jhbs.20080
  21. Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105–2112. doi: 10.1080/1747021090303897410.1080/17470210903038974
  22. Jucker, J. -L., Barrett, J. L., & Wlodarski, R. (2014). “I just don’t get it”: Perceived artists’ intentions affect art evaluations. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 149–182. doi: 10.2190/EM.32.2.c10.2190/EM.32.2.c
  23. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 59–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.x10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.x
  24. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Keplinger, C. (2006). Mystery appeal: Effects of uncertainty and resolution on the enjoyment of mystery. Media Psychology, 8(3), 193–212. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0803_110.1207/s1532785xmep0803_1
  25. Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3): 156–163. doi: 10.1037/a001446410.1037/a0014464
  26. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. doi: 10.1348/000712604236981110.1348/0007126042369811
  27. Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121(2), 176–198. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.00510.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005
  28. Leder, H., Gerger, G., Brieber, D., & Schwarz, N. (2014). What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition & Emotion, 28(6), 1137–1147. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.87013210.1080/02699931.2013.870132
  29. Levinson, J. (1985). Titles. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 44(1), 29–39. doi: 10.2307/43053710.2307/430537
  30. Locher, P., Krupinski, E. A., Mello-Thoms, C., & Nodine, C. F. (2007). Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. Spatial Vision, 21(1–2), 55–77. doi: 10.1163/15685680878271376210.1163/156856808782713762
  31. Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., & Marchetti, A. (2012). When art moves the eyes: A behavioral and eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.003728510.1371/journal.pone.0037285
  32. McSorley, E., & McCloy, R. (2011). The impact of domain and expertise on aesthetic experience: An eye movement study. In Poster to the European Conference of Visual Perception (Toulouse, France).
  33. Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 857–870. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.85710.1037/0022-3514.84.4.857
  34. Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1(3), 320–329. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.32010.1037/1528-3542.1.3.320
  35. Mills, M., Hollingworth, A., van der Stigchel, S., Hoffman, L., & Dodd, M. D. (2011). Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations. Journal of Vision, 11(8), 1–15. doi: 10.1167/11.8.1710.1167/11.8.17
  36. Mullennix, J. W., & Robinet, J. (2018). Art expertise and the processing of titled abstract art. Perception, 47(4), 359–378. doi: 10.1177/030100661775231410.1177/0301006617752314
  37. Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgment of art compositions. Leonardo, 26(3), 219–227. doi: 10.2307/157581510.2307/1575815
  38. Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.00310.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
  39. Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Lauring, J. O., & Leder, H. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1–21. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.0016010.3389/fnhum.2016.00160
  40. Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.129610.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
  41. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. [Computer software]. Austin: LIWC.net.
  42. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2007. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  43. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4): 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_310.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  44. Roald, T. (2007). Cognition in emotion: An investigation through experiences with art. New York: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401205344
  45. Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 99–110. doi: 10.1348/00071260376284213810.1348/000712603762842138
  46. Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In T. Johnstone (Ed.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York: Oxford University Press.
  47. Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In: P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski and E.T. Higgins (Eds). Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446249215.n15
  48. Silvia, P. J. (2005). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9, 342–357. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.34210.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342
  49. Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001
  50. Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 48–51. doi: 10.1037/a001463210.1037/a0014632
  51. Silvia, P. J., & Brown, E. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 100–106. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.10010.1037/1931-3896.1.2.100
  52. Stamatopoulou, D. (2017). Empathy and the aesthetic: Why does art still move us? Cognitive Processing, 19(2), 169–186. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0836-310.1007/s10339-017-0836-3
  53. Stamps, A. (2004). Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-910.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9
  54. Swami, V. (2013). Context matters: Investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 285–295. doi: 10.1037/a003096510.1037/a0030965
  55. Szymczyk, B., Żakowicz, W., & Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K. (2012). Computerized text analysis: Polish adaptation of James Pennebaker’s LIWC dictionary. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 55(2): 195–209.
  56. Tatler, B. W., Wade, N. J., Kwan, H., Findlay, J. M., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2010). Yarbus, eye movements, and vision. I-Perception, 1(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1068/i038210.1068/i0382
  57. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X0935167610.1177/0261927X09351676
  58. Thömmes, K., & Hübner, R. (2014). A picture is worth a word: The effect of titles on aesthetic judgments. In A. Kozbelt (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-third Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 599–603).
  59. Vogt, S., & Magnussen, S. (2007). Expertise in pictorial perception: Eye-movement patterns and visual memory in artists and laymen. Perception, 36(1), 91–100. doi: 10.1068/p526210.1068/p5262
  60. Waligórska, A. (2006). The eye and narration. Relations of artistic expertise and mode of interpretation of narrative and non-narrative paintings. Psychology of Language and Communication, 10(1), 45–64.
  61. Weston, S. J., Cox, K. S., Condon, D. M., & Jackson, J. J. (2016). A comparison of human narrative coding of redemption and automated linguistic analysis for understanding life stories. Journal of Personality, 84(5), 594–606. doi: 10.1111/jopy.1218310.1111/jopy.12183
  62. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2019-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2083-8506 | Journal ISSN: 1234-2238
Language: English
Page range: 357 - 379
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2019 Piotr Jan Francuz, Anna Szymańska, Marcin Wojtasiński, published by University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.