Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The methodological problems of creating a digital thematic repository of historical cartographic and textual sources. Case study Cover

The methodological problems of creating a digital thematic repository of historical cartographic and textual sources. Case study

Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Arcanum. (n.d.). https://maps.arcanum.com
  2. Armbruster, C., & Romary, L. (2010). Comparing repository types: challenges and barriers for subject--based repositories, research repositories, national repository systems and institutional repositories in serving scholarly communication. International Journal of Digital Library Systems (IJDLS), 1(4), 61–73. http://doi.org/10.4018/jdls.2010100104
  3. Bednarek-Michalska, B. (2017). Polish digital libraries and repositories. Origins, operation and usage. Przegląd Biblioteczny, 85, 46–69. https://doi.org/10.36702/pb.854
  4. Bidney, M. (2010). Can geographic coordinates in the catalog record be useful? Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 6(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2010.492304
  5. Cannon, M., Kelly, A., & Freeman, C. (2022). Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy – A case study in the earth and environmental sciences. Learned Publishing, 35(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1442
  6. Centrum Archiwistyki Społecznej. (n.d.). https://cas.org.pl
  7. David Rumsey Historical Map Collection. (n.d.). https://www.davidrumsey.com
  8. Degbelo, A. (2022). FAIR geovisualizations: definitions, challenges, and the road ahead. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 36(6), 1059–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2021.1983579
  9. Dublin Core. (n.d.). http://dublincore.org
  10. Dzięglewski, M., Guzik, A., & Juza, M. (2017). Digitalizacja dziedzictwa kulturowego w Polsce. Repozytoria cyfrowe jako potencjalne źródło dostępu do zasobów kulturowych. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 16(2), 89–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/human.2017.16.2.89
  11. Europeana Collections. (n.d.). https://www.europeana.eu/pl
  12. Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych. (n.d.). https://fbc.pionier.net.pl/
  13. Fenlon, K. (2017). Thematic research collections: libraries and the evolution of alternative digital publishing in the humanities. Library Trends, 65(4), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2017.0016
  14. Fleet, C., & Pridal, P. (2012). Open source technologies for delivering historical maps online – case studies at the National Library of Scotland. The Liber Quarterly, 22(3), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8052
  15. Gazicka-Wójtowicz, D., Dudzicka, G., & Nowacka, E. (2013). Udostępnianie zbiorów kartograficznych w dobie przemian technologicznych na przykładzie Repozytorium Cyfrowego Instytutów Naukowych (RCIN). Z dziejów kartografii, 17, 427–438. http://www.maphist.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ZDK_17_427-438.pdf
  16. Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9340-3
  17. Harvey, F., Szady, B., Zaninović, T., Gochna, M., Duży, W., Panecki, T., Kuna, J., Kuźma, M., & Kwiecińska, E. (2022). The Warsaw Statement on spatial data in cultural heritage (Version 2 uploaded on the 13th of April, version 3 uploaded on the 9th of July, 2022. Both versions include formal corrections from the funding agency and do not differ in the general part of the text.). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6814297
  18. Hixson, C., & Cracknell, L. (2007). How to implement an institutional repository. The Serials Librarian, 52(1–2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v52n01_05
  19. Konopska, B. (2016). The cartographic materials auxiliary in the determination of the borders of Poland during the Paris Peace Conference (1919–1920) in the light of archival records. Polish Cartographical Review, 48(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/pcr-2016-0006
  20. Konopska, B., & Barwiński, M. (2021). Kształtowanie granic Polski po pierwszej wojnie światowej. Metodyczne problemy badań źródeł kartograficznych i tekstowych. Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne.
  21. Konopska, B., Barwiński, M., Kościk, E., Kawalec, K., Suleja, W., Lupa, M., & Zawadzki, M. (2023). Kształtowanie granic niepodległej Polski w świetle dokumentów kartograficznych. Polskie Towarzystwo Historyczne.
  22. KRONIK@. (n.d.). Krajowe Repozytorium Obiektów Nauki i Kultury. https://kronika.gov.pl
  23. Kuźma, M. & Mościcka, A. (2020). Evaluation of metadata describing topographic maps in a National Library. Heritage Science, 8(113), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00455-3
  24. Kuźma, M. (2020). The use of GIS tools in the automation of examining the cartometry of old maps. Polish Cartographical Review, 52(4), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2020-0013
  25. Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0039
  26. Mikuła, M. (2023). Repository for digital editions of legal historical sources: ‘IURA. Sources of Law from the Past’. Zeitschrift der Savigny­Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung, 140(1), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgg-2023-0018
  27. Mills, T., Moody, K., & Rodden, K. (1997). Providing world wide access to historical sources. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 29, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(97)00056-1
  28. Mobo, F. (2021). The development of an online database for historical archiving of primary sources. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(3), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.03.01
  29. Nahotko, M. (2004). Metadane. Sposób na uporządkowanie internetu. Uniwersytet Jagielloński. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/65176/nahotko_metadane_sposob_na_uporzadkowanie_internetu_2000.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  30. Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe. (n.d.). https://www.nac.gov.pl
  31. National Library of Scotland. (n.d.). https://maps.nls.uk/view/74490564
  32. Old Maps Online. (n.d.). https://www.oldmapsonline.org/
  33. Palavitsinis, N., Manouselis, N., & Sánchez-Alonso, S. (2014). Metadata quality in digital repositories: Empirical results from the cross-domain transfer of a quality assurance process. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23045
  34. Panecki, T. (2019). Stan i perspektywy badań geograficzno-historycznych w Polsce. Cyfrowe edycje map dawnych. Studia Geohistorica, 7, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.12775/SG.2019.10
  35. Park, J., & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections: criteria, semantics, and mechanisms. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(8), 696–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.508711
  36. Polona. (n.d.). https://polona.pl
  37. Poślada, U. (2020). Rozwój idei otwartej nauki na przykładzie ośrodków uniwersyteckich w Polsce. Folia Bibliologica, 62, 45–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/fb.2020.62.45-69
  38. Purday, J. (2009). Think culture: Europeana.eu from concept to construction. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 33(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1515/bfup.2009.018
  39. Repozytorium Cyfrowe Instytutów Naukowych. (n.d.). https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra
  40. Rosa, I. (2019). Digital library Polona: digitization, technology, cooperation. Slavic & East European Information Resources, 20(1–2), 23–30, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228886.2019.1628495
  41. Rydberg-Cox, J. A. (2005). Digital libraries and the challenges of digital humanities. Chandos Publishing.
  42. Sójkowska, I. (2023). Bibliotekarze i naukowcy jako inicjatorzy i realizatorzy otwartego dostępu do zasobów naukowych. In A. Gałecka-Golec (Ed.), Repozytorium Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. Wspólna droga do otwierania nauki (pp. 11–31). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. https://doi.org/10.15290/10latRUB.2023.01
  43. Sweeney, S. J., Flanders, J., & Levesque, A. (2017). Community-enhanced repository for engaged scholarship: a case study on supporting digital humanities research. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2–4), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336144
  44. Timár, G., Biszak, S., Székely, B., & Molnár, G. (2010). Digitized Maps of the Habsburg Military Surveys – Overview of the Project of ARCANUM Ltd. (Hungary). In M. Jobst (Ed.), Preservation in Digital Cartography. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 273–283). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12733-5_14
  45. Torou, E., Katifori, A., Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., & Halatsis, C. (2010). Historical research in archives: user methodology and supporting tools. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 11, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-010-0062-4
  46. USGS Historical Topographic Map Explorer. (n.d). https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/topoexplorer/
  47. Zawadzki, M. (2021). Development of metadata for historical cartographic resources associated with the Paris Peace Conference (1919−1920). Polish Cartographical Review, 53(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2021-0007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2023-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2450-6966 | Journal ISSN: 0324-8321
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 140
Submitted on: Dec 27, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 5, 2024
Published on: Feb 24, 2024
Published by: Polish Geographical Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Mateusz Zawadzki, published by Polish Geographical Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.