Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Continuous or discontinuous? Empirical study on animated maps Cover

Continuous or discontinuous? Empirical study on animated maps

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Battersby S., Goldsberry K.P., 2010, Considerations in design of transition behaviors for dynamic thematic maps. “Cartographic Perspectives” Vol. 65, pp. 16-32, 67-69.10.14714/CP65.127
  2. Biswas S., 2004, A conceptual design for visualisation of spatio-temporal data using animation with linked graphics. http://www.itc.nl/library/Papers_2004/msc/gfm/biswas.pdf
  3. Cutler M.E., 1998, The effects of prior knowledge on children’s abilities to read static and animated maps (M.S. thesis), University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
  4. Edsall R.M., Kraak M.-J., MacEachren A.M., Peuquet D.J., 2003, Assessing the effectiveness of temporal legends in environmental visualization. In: GIS/LIS ‘97, Cincinnati, Oct. 28-30, pp. 677-685.
  5. Elektroniczny podręcznik statystyki, StatSoft. http://www.statsoft.pl/textbook/stathome_stat.html?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.statsoft.pl%2Ftextbook%2Fstanman.html
  6. Fabrikant S.I., Rebich-Hispanha S., Andrienko N., Andrienko G., Montello D.R., 2008. Novel method to measure inference affordance in static smallmultiple map displays representing dynamic processes. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 201-215.10.1179/000870408X311396
  7. Fish C., Goldsberry K.P., Battersby S., 2011, Change blindness in animated choropleth maps: An empirical study. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 350-362.10.1559/15230406384350
  8. Gershon N., 1992, Visualization of fuzzy data using generalized animation. In: Proceedings, Visualization ‘92, Boston, Massachusetts, Oct. 19-23, pp. 268-273.10.1109/VISUAL.1992.235199
  9. Goldsberry K., Battersby S., 2009, Issues of change detection in animated choropleth maps. “Cartographica” Vol. 44, Issue 3, pp. 201-215.10.3138/carto.44.3.201
  10. Harrower M., 2003, Tips for designing effective animated maps. “Cartographic Perspectives” No. 44, pp. 63-65.10.14714/CP44.516
  11. Harrower M., 2007, The cognitive limits of animated maps. “Cartographica” Vol. 42, Issue 4, pp. 349-357.10.3138/carto.42.4.349
  12. Johnson H., Nelson E.S., 1998, Using flow maps to visualize time-series data: Comparing the effectiveness of a paper map series, a computer map series, and animation. “Cartographic Perspectives” No. 30, pp. 47-64.10.14714/CP30.663
  13. Köbben B., Yaman M., 1995, Evaluating dynamic visual variables. In: Proceedings of the seminar on teaching animated cartography. International Cartographic Association, Madrid.
  14. Koussoulakou A., Kraak M.-J., 1992, Spatio-temporal maps and cartographic communication. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 101-108.10.1179/caj.1992.29.2.101
  15. Kraak M.-J., Ormeling F., 2013, Cartography: Visualization of Spatial Data. Routledge, London and New York.10.4324/9781315847184
  16. Lai P.-C., Yeh A.G.-O., 2004, Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic symbols in cartographic communication. “The Cartographic Journal” Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 229-244.10.1179/000870404X13300
  17. Opach T., 2007, Sprawność map animowanych prezentujących dynamikę zjawisk. http://www.wgsr.uw.edu.pl/kartografia/Opach_autoreferat/rysunki/Opach_Tomasz_doktorat.pdf.
  18. Oxford Dictionaries. https://www.oxforddictionaries.com
  19. Patton D.K., Cammack R.G., 1996, An examination of the effects of task type and map complexity on sequenced and static choropleth maps. In: Cartographic design: theoretical and practical perspectives, ed. by C.H. Wood and C.P. Keller, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 237-52.
  20. Rutkowski J., 1984, Przegląd metod i niektóre problemy związane z kartograficzną prezentacją dynamiki zjawisk w geografii. In: Teoretyczne i metodyczne problemy współczesnej kartografii. Lublin, Sept. 11-12, „Materiały Ogólnopolskich Konferencji Kartograficznych” T. 10, pp. 144-152.
  21. Slocum T.A., Blok C., Jiang B., Koussoulakou A., Montello D.R., Fuhrmann S., Hedley N.R., 2001, Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 61-75.10.1559/152304001782173998
  22. Slocum T.A., Egbert S.L., 1993, Knowledge acquisition from choropleth maps. “Cartography and Geographic Information Science” Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 83-95.10.1559/152304093782610351
  23. Slocum T.A., Robeson S.H., Egbert S.L., 1990, Traditional versus sequenced choropleth maps: an experimental investigation. “Cartographica” Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 67-88.10.3138/CG7N-0158-1537-6177
  24. Tversky B., Morrison J.B., Bétrancourt M., 2002, Animation: Can it facilitate? 262 http://serc.carleton.edu/files/NAGTWorkshops/visualize04/Tversky_2002.pdf#search=%22Animation%3A%20Can%20It%20Facilitate%3F%22
  25. Wieczorkowska G., Kochański P., Eljaszuk M., 2004, Statystyka. Wprowadzenie do analizy danych sondażowych i eksperymentalnych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2018-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2450-6966 | Journal ISSN: 0324-8321
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 140
Submitted on: Jul 20, 2018
Accepted on: Sep 28, 2018
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: Polish Geographical Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Kamila Łucjan, Paweł Wojtanowicz, published by Polish Geographical Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.