Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting stakeholder perspective of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry using ordinary least square regression Cover

Predicting stakeholder perspective of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry using ordinary least square regression

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 17 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Abd Jamil, A. H., &amp; Fathi, M. S. (2020). Enhancing BIM-based information interoperability: Dispute resolution from legal and contractual perspectives. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146</em>(7), p. 05020007. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001868" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001868</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Abwunza, A. A. (2020). Influence of fairness perceptions on cooperative behavior in construction arbitration. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12</em>(4), pp. 04520033. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000422" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000422</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Abwunza, A. A., Peter, T. K., &amp; Muigua, K. (2021). Explaining time performance of construction arbitration. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13</em>(2), pp. 04521001. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000460" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000460</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Agdas, D., &amp; Ellis, R. D. (2013a). Analysis of construction dispute review boards. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 5</em>(3), pp. 122-127. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000118" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000118</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Agdas, D., &amp; Ellis, R. D. (2013b). Analysis of construction dispute review boards. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 5</em>, pp. 122-127. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000118" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000118</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Alozn, A., &amp; Galadari A. (2019). Can machines replace the human brain? A review of litigation outcome prediction methods for construction disputes. March.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Arditi, D., &amp; Pulket, T. (2005). Predicting the outcome of construction litigation using boosted decision trees. <em>Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 19</em>(4), pp. 387-393. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005)19</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Ayhan, M., Dikmen, I., &amp; Birgonul, M. T. (2021). Predicting the occurrence of construction disputes using machine learning techniques. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147</em>(4), p. 04021022. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002027" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002027</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Bagherian-Marandi, N., Ravanshadnia, M., &amp; Akbarzadeh-T, M.-R. (2021). Two-layered fuzzy logic-based model for predicting court decisions in construction contract disputes. <em>Artificial Intelligence and Law, 29</em>(2), pp. 1-32. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09281-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10506-021-09281-9</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Branting, K., McLeod, S., Howell, S., Weiss, B., Profitt, B., Tanner, J., et al. (2023). A computational model of facilitation in online dispute resolution. <em>Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31</em>(3), pp. 465-490. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09318-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10506-022-09318-7</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cakmak, E., &amp; Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process. <em>Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109</em>(January), pp. 183-187. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.441</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Chaphalkar, N., &amp; Iyer, K. C. (2014). Factors influencing decisions on delay claims in construction contracts for Indian scenario. <em>Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 14</em>(1), pp. 32-44. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5130/ajceb.v14i1.3766" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5130/ajceb.v14i1.3766</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Chaphalkar, N. B., &amp; Patil, S. K. (2012). Decision support system for dispute resolution in construction contracts. <em>KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16</em>, pp. 499-504. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1303-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s12205-012-1303-4</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Cheeks, J. R. 1998. ADR_In_Construction.Pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Cheung, S. O., Chow, P. T., &amp; Yiu, K. T. W. (2009). Contingent use of negotiators’ tactics in construction dispute negotiation. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135</em>(6), pp. 466-476. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Cheung, S. O., Yiu, K. T. W., &amp; Yeung, S. F. (2007). A study of styles and outcomes in construction dispute negotiation. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132</em>(8), pp. 805-814. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Chou, J. S., Hsu, S. C., Lin, C. W., &amp; Chang, Y. C. (2016). Classifying influential for project information to discover rule sets for project disputes and possible resolutions. <em>International Journal of Project Management, 34</em>(8), pp. 1706-1716. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.001</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Chou, J. S., Tsai, C. F., &amp; Lu, Y. H. (2013). Project dispute prediction by hybrid machine learning techniques. <em>Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19</em>(4), pp. 505-517. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.768544" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3846/13923730.2013.768544</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Christie, A. F., &amp; Rotstein, F. (2015). The evolution of precedent in mandatory arbitration – Lessons from a decade of domain name dispute resolutions.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. El-Sewafy, T. S., Waly, A. F., &amp; El-Monayeri, O. D. (2022). Framework for the successful implementation of dispute boards in construction projects. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 14</em>(1), pp. 04521049. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000520" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000520</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Elziny, A. A., Mohamadien, M. A., Ibrahim, H. M., &amp; Abdel Fattah, M. K. (2016). An expert system to manage dispute resolutions in construction projects in Egypt. <em>Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 7</em>(1), pp. 57-71. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.002</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Fan, H., &amp; Li, H. (2013). Retrieving similar cases for alternative dispute resolution in construction accidents using text mining techniques. <em>Automation in Construction, 34</em>, pp. 85-91. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.014" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.014</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Fenn, P., Lowe, D., &amp; Speck, C. (1997). Conflict and dispute in construction. <em>Construction Management and Economics, 15</em>(6), pp. 513-518. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997372719" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/014461997372719</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Getahun, A. (2017). Assessment of construction dispute resolution in Ethiopian Somali regional state road projects: A case study on road projects in the region. <em>American Journal of Civil Engineering, 4</em>(6), p. 282. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20160406.13" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.11648/j.ajce.20160406.13</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Giwa, F., Omotayo, T., Tzortzopoulos, P., &amp; Malalgoda, C. (2024). BIM-enabled claims management concept: Implications for dispute avoidance and management. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16</em>(3), p. 04524009. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1112" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1112</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Hansen, S. (2019). Challenging arbitral awards in the construction industry: Case study of infrastructure disputes. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11</em>(1), p. 06518004. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000281" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000281</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Harmon, K. M. (2009). Case study as to the effectiveness of dispute review boards on the central artery/tunnel project. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 1</em>(1), pp. 18-31. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1943-4162(2009)1:1(18)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)1943-4162(2009)1:1(18)</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Harmon, K. M. J. (2003a). Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies. <em>Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3</em>(4), pp. 187-201. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Harmon, K. M. J. (2003b). Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies. <em>Leadership Management Engineering, 3</em>(4), pp. 187-201. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:4(187)</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Harmon, K. M. J. (2011). To be or not to be – That is the question: Is a DRB right for your project? <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 3</em>(1), pp. 10-16. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000051" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000051</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Hayes, A. F., &amp; Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. <em>Behavior Research Methods, 39</em>(4), pp. 709-722. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192961" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3758/bf03192961</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Hemanth Sai Kalyan, B., &amp; Arokia Prakash, A. (2019). Case studies on dispute resolutions in construction projects for framing an expert solution. <em>International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8</em>(1), pp. 476-483.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Hemanth Sai Kalyan, B., Anandh, S., &amp; Sindhu Nachiar, S. (2024). Categorization and assessment of combination causes in construction disputes using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). <em>Engineered Science, 29</em>, p. 1109. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.30919/es1109" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.30919/es1109</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Hemanth Sai Kalyan, B., Sekar, A., Sindhu Nachiar, S., &amp; Ravichandran, P. T. (2022). Discerning recurrent factors in construction disputes through judicial case studies – An Indian perspective. <em>Buildings, 12</em>(12), p. 2229. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122229" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/buildings12122229</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Ilter, D., &amp; Dikbas, A. (2009). A review of the artificial intelligence applications in construction dispute resolution. <em>Managing IT in Construction/Managing Construction for Tomorrow, 449</em>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Ilter, D. A. (2016). A system of systems (SOS) approach to dispute management systems.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Iyer, K. C., Chaphalkar, N. B., &amp; Patil, S. (2012). Use of artificial intelligence techniques for construction dispute resolution – An overview.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Lee, C. K., Yiu, T. W., &amp; Cheung, S. O. (2016). Selection and use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in construction projects – Past and future research. <em>International Journal of Project Management, 34</em>(3), pp. 494-507. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.</a> ijproman.2015.12.008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Lee, J., Ham, Y., &amp; Yi, J. S. (2021). Construction disputes and associated contractual knowledge discovery using unstructured text-heavy data: Legal cases in the United Kingdom. <em>Sustainability (Switzerland), 13</em>(16), p. 9403. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169403" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/su13169403</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Mahfouz, T., &amp; Kandil, A. (2012). Litigation outcome prediction of differing site condition disputes through machine learning models. <em>Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26</em>(3), pp. 298-308. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000148" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000148</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Menassa, C., &amp; Peña Mora, F. (2010). Hybrid model incorporating real options with process centric and system dynamics modeling to assess value of investments in alternative dispute resolution techniques. <em>Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24</em>(5), pp. 414-429. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000044" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000044</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Menkel-Meadow, C. J. (2015a). Mediation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR). <em>International Encyclopedia of the Social &amp; Behavioral Sciences</em>, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 70-74. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86083-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86083-3</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Menkel-Meadow, C. J. (2015b). Mediation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution (ADR). <em>International Encyclopedia of the Social &amp; Behavioral Sciences</em>, Elsevier Ltd. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86083-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86083-3</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Mohamed, H. H., Ibrahim, A. H., &amp; Soliman, A. A. (2014). Reducing construction disputes through effective claims management. <em>American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2</em>(6), pp. 186-196. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.12691/ajcea-2-6-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.12691/ajcea-2-6-2</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Mostofi, F., Toğan, V., &amp; Başağa, H. B. (2022). Real-estate price prediction with deep neural network and principal component analysis. <em>Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, 14</em>(1), pp. 2741-2759. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2022-0016" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/otmcj-2022-0016</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Najafzadeh, M., Abbasianjahromi, H., &amp; Zomorodi, S. (2024). Industry 4.0 and construction contract management: A bibliometric survey. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16</em>(3), p. 03124001. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-988" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-988</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Nylund, A. (2014). Access to justice: Is ADR a help or hindrance? In: Ervo, L., &amp; Nylund, A. (eds.), <em>The Future of Civil Litigation – Access to Courts and Court-annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries</em>. Springer, Cham, pp. 325-344.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Okudan, O., Budayan, C., &amp; Dikmen, I. (2021). A knowledge-based risk management tool for construction projects using case-based reasoning. <em>Expert Systems with Applications, 173</em>(January), p. 114776. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114776" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114776</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Padhy, J., Jagannathan, M., &amp; Kumar Delhi, V. S. (2021). Application of natural language processing to automatically identify exculpatory clauses in construction contracts. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13</em>(4), p. 04521035. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000505" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000505</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Pena-Mora, F., &amp; Wang, C-Y. (1998). Computer-supported collaborative negotiation methodology. <em>Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 12</em>(2), pp. 64-81.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Quapp, U., &amp; Holschemacher, K. (2020). Further legal training for architects, civil engineers, and construction managers. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12</em>(1), p. 05019009. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000347" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000347</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Rijnhart, J. J. M., Twisk, J. W. R., Chinapaw, M. J. M., de Boer, M. R., &amp; Heymans, M. W. (2017). Comparison of methods for the analysis of relatively simple mediation models. <em>Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 7</em>(June), pp. 130-135. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.06.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.conctc.2017.06.005</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Sabri, O. K., &amp; Torp, O. (2022). Corrective and preventive action plan (CAPA) for disputes in construction projects: A Norwegian perspective. <em>Infrastructures, 7</em>(5), p. 63. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures7050063" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3390/infrastructures7050063</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Saeb, A., Mohamed, O., Mohd Danuri, M. S., &amp; Zakaria, N. (2018). Critical factors for selecting a neutral to support alternative dispute resolution methods in the construction industry. <em>Civil Engineering Journal, 4</em>(1), pp. 11-23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Senarath, N. B., &amp; Francis, M. (2024). Dispute avoidance in the construction industry: A perspective of procurement methods. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16</em>(3), p. 04524011. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-976" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-976</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Shash, A. A., &amp; Habash, S. I. (2021). Disputes in construction industry: Owners and contractors’ Views on causes and remedies. <em>Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 11</em>(1), pp. 37-51. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/jeppm-2021-0005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/jeppm-2021-0005</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Surve, V. G., &amp; Delhi, V. S. K. (2024). Stakeholder-induced disputes and resolution strategies in the infrastructure industry. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16</em>(3), p. 04524012. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1087" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1087</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. <em>Research in Science Education, 48</em>(6), pp. 1273-1296. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Tayeh, B. A., Alaloul, W. S., Alkurdi, M. H., Aisheh, Y. I. A., &amp; Musarat, M. A. (2022). Evaluation of biases in construction project dispute resolution: Case study. <em>Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 14</em>(1), pp. 05021009. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000525" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000525</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Wen, Z., Liao, H., Zavadskas, E. K., &amp; Antuchevičienė, J. (2021). Applications of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making methods in civil engineering: A state-of-the-art survey. <em>Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27</em>(6), pp. 358-371. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15252" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3846/jcem.2021.15252</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. Yousefi, M. P. J. (2017). An integrated expert model for delay management in construction projects. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management 7</em>(3), pp. 1-14.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Zhang, Y. R., Minchin, E., &amp; Agdas, D. (2017). Forecasting completed cost of highway construction projects using LASSO regularized regression. <em>Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143</em>(10), pp. 1-12. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001378" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001378</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Zhu, X., Meng, X., &amp; Zhang, M. (2021). Application of multiple criteria decision making methods in construction: A systematic literature review. <em>Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27</em>(6), pp. 372-403. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15260" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3846/jcem.2021.15260</a>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1847-6228 | Journal ISSN: 1847-5450
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 23
Submitted on: Dec 11, 2023
Accepted on: Jan 22, 2025
Published on: Mar 11, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
alternative dispute resolution,
construction management,
disputes,
ordinary least square regression,
prediction analysis
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Introductions and overviews,
Engineering, other

© 2025 B. Hemanth Sai Kalyan, S. Anandh, S. Sindhu Nachiar, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 17 (2025): Issue 1 (January 2025)Next article