Research Into the Bee Population (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes) in the Grassland Habitats of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park as Reinforcement for Educational Awareness of a Society

No.	Areas	FI		ME		RE		XG		Total	%
No.	Species	t	p	t	p	t	p	t	p	Total	%
1.	Hylaeus cardioscapus Cock.					1				1	0,06
2.	Hy. communis Nyl.					1		1		2	0,11
3.	Hy. confusus Nyl.					1				1	0,06
4.	Colletes cunicularius (L.)					5	10			15	0,85
5.	C. hyalinatus Smith					1				1	0,06
6.	C. similis Schck.	2				2				4	0,23
7.	Andrena barbilaris (K.)							2		2	0,11
8.	A. bicolor F.	1	1			1	1			4	0,23
9.	A. carbonaria (F.)					1				1	0,06
10.	A. cineraria (L.)	2	3	7	6	10	10	1	1	40	2,27
11.	A. clarkella (K.)					2				2	0,11
12.	A. combinata (Christ.)	2						2		4	0,23
13.	A. denticulata (K.)	4		1						5	0,28
14.	A. dorasta (K.)	1						1		2	0,11
15.	A. falsifica Perk.	3						5		8	0,45
16.	A. flavipes Panz.	3	2			4	1	10		20	1,14
17.	A. fulva (Müll.)	3	2	2	3		1	3	1	15	0,85
18.	A. fulvago (Christ.)	1	1			1		1		4	0,23
19.	A. gelriae Vecht.	4								4	0,23
20.	A. gravida Imh.							2		2	0,11
21.	A. haemorrhoa (F.)	10	18	16	16	9	22	8	8	107	6,08
22.	A. hattorfiana (F.)		2	2				1		5	0,28
23.	A. helvola (L.)		2							2	0,11
24.	A. jakobi Perk.							1		1	0,06
25.	A. labialis (K.)						1			1	0,06
26.	A. labiata (F.)	6		2		2		2		12	0,68
27.	A. nigriceps (K.)	4		2						6	0,34
28.	A. nigroaenea (K.)		1			3		2		6	0,34
29.	A. nitida (Müll.)	2				1				3	0,17
30.	A. ovatula (K.)	1		1		1				3	0,17
31.	A. praecox (Scop.)					4				4	0,23
32.	A. subopaca Nyl.	1	2					2		5	0,28
33.	A. tibialis (K.)	1					1	1		3	0,17
34.	A. vaga Panz.	2	8			1				11	0,62
35.	A. varians (Rossi)					1	1			2	0,11
36.	Panurgus banksianus (K.)							3	1	4	0,23
37.	P. calcaratus (Scop.)	8		8	1			12	12	41	2,33
38.	Halictus confuses perkinsii Blüth.	4		2		1			1	8	0,45
39.	H. leucaheneus arenosus Ebmer	1		1		1		2		5	0,28
40.	H. maculatus Smith	5						9		14	0,8
41.	H. quadricinctus (F.)	2	1							3	0,17
42.	H. rubicundus (Christ.)							1		1	0,06
43.	H. sexcinctus (F.)	20	5	28		5				58	3,29
44.	H. subauratus (Rossi)	3	4	1				14	6	28	1,59
45.	H. tumulorum (L.)	1	4	5		5		10	3	28	1,59
46.	Lasioglossum albipes (F.)	6	4	2	1	5	7		1	26	1,48
47.	L. calceatum (Scop.)	2		4	2	8	8	3	2	29	1,65
48.	L. leucozonium (Schranck.)	2		2		7		2		13	0,74
49.	L. majus (Nyl.)	7	8	1	11			7		34	1,93
50.	L. malachurum (K.)							2		2	0,11
51.	L. morio (F.)			1				8		9	0,51
52.	L. pauxillum (Schenck.)	3	2	2		2		3		12	0,68
53.	L. sexnotatum (K.)			2						2	0,11
54.	L. sexstrigatum (Schenck.)	5		3		1		1		10	0,57
55.	L. villosulum (K.)		2			2		2		6	0,34
56.	L. zonulum (Smith)					1				1	0,06
57.	Sphecodes albilabris (F.)					1	1			2	0,11
58.	Rophites canus Ever.	1		1				2		4	0,23
59.	R. quinquespinosus Spinola			1				1	1	3	0,17
60.	Melitta leporina (Panz.)	7	2	10	2	4		7	1	33	1,87
61.	M. nigricans Alfk.				1	1				2	0,11
62.	M. tricincta K.					2				2	0,11
63.	Dasypoda hirtipes (F.)	20	1	25	11	23	2	1		83	4,71
64.	Macropis europaea Warncke			18	5	10	8			41	2,33
65.	M. fulvipes (F.)			2		2				4	0,23
66.	Trachusa byssina (Panz.)	4		2		8			1	15	0,85
67.	Anthidium punctatumLatr.	1						2		3	0,17
68.	Proanthidium oblongatum (lll.)			1		1				2	0,11
69.	Anthidiellum strigatum (Panz.)	1						1		2	0,11
70.	Stelis punctulatissima (K.)							1		1	0,06
71.	Heriades crenulatus Nyl.	2				2				4	0,23
72.	Heriades truncorum (L.)			1	1			3		5	0,28
73.	Chelostoma maxillosum (L.)					4				4	0,23
74.	Ch. rapunculi (Lep.)			2	1			1		4	0,23
75.	Osmia aurulenta (Panz.)					2				2	0,11
76.	O. cerinthidis Mor.					3				3	0,17
77.	O. emarginata Lep.					1			1	2	0,11
78.	O. parietina Curtis	2						8	1	11	0,62
79.	O. rufa (L.)			5		5	4			14	0,8
80.	Hoplitis adunca (Panz.)	3						1		4	0,23
81.	H. anthocopoides (Schenck.)		1					2		3	0,17
82.	H. claviventris (Thoms.)	2								2	0,11
83.	H. leucomelana (Smith)					1				1	0,06
84.	H. papaveris (Duf.)	3						1		4	0,23
85.	H. spinulosa (K.)			1				10		11	0,62
86.	Megachile alpicola Alf.			1		1				2	0,11
87.	M. argentata (F.)	2								2	0,11
88.	M.centuncularis (L.)	1	2							3	0,17
89.	M. circumcincta (K.)	5	1	1		2			2	11	0,62
90.	M. ericetorum Lep.					5				5	0,28
91.	M. lagopoda (L.)	1		1						2	0,11
92.	M. ligniseca (K.)					1				1	0,06
93.	M. maritima K.	8						1		9	0,51
94.	M. willughbiella (K.)		1							1	0,06
95.	M.versicolor Smith	2		2		1				5	0,28
96.	Coelioxys conoidea (lll.)	4								4	0,23
97.	C.elongata Lep.	3	1					2		6	0,34
98.	C. quadridentata (L.)	4	1	1						6	0,34
99.	Epeolus variegatus (L.)	5		2	4			2		13	0,74
100.	Eucera longicornis (L.)	1		1						2	0,11
101.	A. bimaculata (Panz.)	2		2		4				8	0,45
102.	A. furcata (Panz.)			1				2		3	0,17
103.	A. plumipes (Pall.)					2	5	1		8	0,45
104.	Ceratina cyanea (K.)	1	1	1		1		1		5	0,28
105.	Bombus confusus Schenck.	1		3						4	0,23
106.	B. hortorum (L.)	1		1		6			2	10	0,57
107.	B. humilis lll.	8				2		7	3	20	1,14
108.	B. hypnorum (L.)					3				3	0,17
109.	B. jonellus (K.)	2					1			3	0,17
110.	B. lapidarius (L.)	33	23	11		10		36	7	120	6,81
111.	B. lucorum (L.)	29	6	40	16	13	7	19	5	135	7,67
112.	B. muscorum (F.)	1								1	0,06
113.	B. pascuorum (Scop.)	36	6	15	16	14	4	7	13	111	6,3
114.	B. pratorum (L.)			10	5			1	1	18	1,02
115.	B.ruderarius (Müll.)	6		21	10	20		3	2	62	3,52
116.	B. semenoviellus Skor.					1				1	0,06
117.	B. sylvarum (L.)	42	6	13	3	41	8	31	8	152	8,63
118.	B. terrestris (L.)	16	8	4	2	1	2	16	3	52	2,95
119.	B. (Ps.) barbutellus (K.)		4	1	1					6	0,34
120.	B. (Ps.) bohemicus (Seidl.)	1		15					2	18	1,02
121.	B. (Ps.) campestris (Panz.)	2		8		1	1	2	2	16	0,91
122.	B. (Ps.) norvegicus Sp.-Schn.			3			1			4	0,23
123.	B. (Ps.) rupestris (F.)	2		5					1	8	0,45
124.	B. (Ps.) sylvestris Lep.			4				2		6	0,34
125.	B. (Ps.) vestalis (Geoffr.)			2						2	0,11
Number of species sampled by the use of transects and traps.		387	136	333	118	290	108	297	92	1761
Total number of species on research areas.		523		451		398		389		1761

[i] t - transect

[ii] p - trap

[iii] FI - field

[iv] ME - meadow

[v] RE – ruderal ecosystem

[vi] XG – xerothermic grassland

Table 2.

Biocenotic parameters of bee communities in plant areas of C-OLP

Research areas		S	Σ	N	Σ	H’	Σ	J’	Σ
FI	transect	71	78	387	523	4.41	4.38	0.63	0.64
FI	trap	34	78	136	523	2.98	4.38	0.41	0.64
ME	transect	60	56	333	451	4.38	4.32	0.62	0.62
ME	trap	21	56	118	451	3.18	4.32	0.37	0.62
RE	transect	68	73	290	398	4.35	4.24	0.63	0. 60
RE	trap	24	73	108	398	2.83	4.24	0.41	0. 60
XG	transect	61	68	297	389	4.29	4.18	0.61	0.57
XG	trap	28	68	92	389	2.81	4.18	0.40	0.57

[i] n – number of samples

[ii] S – number of species

[iii] N – number of specimens

[iv] Σ – total

[v] H’ – species diversity index

[vi] J’ – equivalence index

Proportion of bees sampled by the use of two methods in the field (FI) of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park

Table 3.

Number of bee species from individual families sampled by means of transect (t) and Moericke traps (p) on research areas of C-OLP

Research areas	FI		ME		RE		XG		Total
Families	t	p	t	p	t	p	t	p
Colletidae	1	-	-	-	6	1	1	-	6
Andrenidae	19	11	9	4	16	8	17	5	31
Halictidae	14	8	15	3	12	3	15	5	22
Melittidae	2	2	4	4	6	2	2	1	6
Megachilidae	17	6	11	2	14	1	12	4	33
Apidae	19	8	22	8	15	9	15	13	28

Proportion of bees sampled by the use of two methods in the meadow (ME) of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park

Proportion of bees sampled by the use of two methods in the ruderal ecosystems (RE) of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park

Proportion of bees sampled by the use of two methods in the xerothermic grassland (XG) of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park

Table 4.

Correlation coefficients calculated for transects and traps

Variables	r_t	r_p
H’ & S	0.816	0.882
J’ & S	0.361	0.501
H’ & J’	0.665	0.762

[i] r_t– Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for transects

[ii] r_p – Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for traps

Dependence between H’ and S for transects
H’ – species diversi ty
S – number of bee species

Dependence between H’ and S for traps
H’ – species diversity
S – number of bee species

Dependence between J’ and S for transects
J’ – species equivalence
S – bee species number

Dependence between J’ and S for traps
J’ – species equivalence
S – bee spec ies number

Dependence between J’ and H’ for transects
J’ – species equivalence
H’ – species diversity

Dependence between J’ and H’ for traps
J’– species equivalence
H’ – species diversity

References

Authors

Metrics

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2024-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 1 - 19

Published on: Nov 26, 2024

Published by: National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

structure of communities,

Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park

Related subjects:

Life sciences,

Ecology

© 2024 Jolanta Bąk-Badowska, Ilona Żeber-Dzikowska, Ligia Tuszyńska, Jarosław Chmielewski, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 35 (2024): Issue 2 (June 2024)

Research Into the Bee Population (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes) in the Grassland Habitats of Cisowsko-Orłowiński Landscape Park as Reinforcement for Educational Awareness of a Society

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Table 1.

Table 2.

Figure 2.

Table 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Table 4.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

Paradigm

My account