Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Economic and Environmental Effects of Innovative Potato Cultivation with the Use of Beneficial Microorganisms in Poland Cover

Economic and Environmental Effects of Innovative Potato Cultivation with the Use of Beneficial Microorganisms in Poland

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. ALENGEBAWY A., ABDELKHALEK S.T., QURESHI S.R., WANG M.Q. 2021. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics 9, 3:42. doi: 10.3390/toxics9030042.
  2. ALORI E.T., BABALOLA O.O. 2018. Microbial inoculants for improving crop quality and human health in Africa. Frontiers in Microbiology, Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions 9. doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02213
  3. BISHT N., CHAUHAN P.S. 2020. Excessive and disproportionate use of chemicals cause soil contamination and nutritional stress. In: Larramendy, M.L.; Soloneski, S. (eds.). Soil Contamination. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.94593.
  4. BOGUSZ P., RUSEK P., BRODOWSKA M.S. 2021. Suspension fertilizers: How to reconcile sustainable fertilization and environmental protection. Agriculture 11, 10: 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11101008
  5. BUDDOLLA V. 2019. Recent Developments in applied microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-04612-8
  6. ÇALIŞKAN M.E., YOUSAF M.Y., YAVUZ C., M. ZIA A.B., ÇALIŞKAN S. 2023. History, production, current trends, and future prospects. Potato Production Worldwide, 1–18. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822925-5.00016-5.
  7. CHEN G., WU C., WANG F. et al. 2022. Microbial community changes in different underground compartments of potato affected yield and quality. 3 Biotech 12: 106. doi. org/10.1007/s13205-022-03167-6
  8. CONTRERAS-LIZA S., RAMÍREZ R.M., BELISARIO D.L.O. 2022. Production of potato seed tubers under the effect of Trichoderma sp. and rhizobacteria in greenhouse conditions. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 21, 4. doi: 10.5965/223811712142022419
  9. DICKINSON D., BALDUCCIO L., BUYSSE J., RONSSE F., VAN HUYLENBROECK G., PRINS W. 2015. Cost-benefit analysis of using biochar to improve cereals agriculture. GCB Bioenergy 7: 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12180
  10. DURLINGER B., TYSZLER M., SCHOLTEN J., BROEKEMA R., BLONK H. 2014. Agri-footprint: A Life Cycle Inventory database covering food and feed production and processing. Conference: 9th International Conference LCA of Food, San Francisco, USA.
  11. EKINS P., ZENGHELIS D. 2021. The costs and benefits of environmental sustainability. Sustainability Science 16: 949–965. /doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00910-5.
  12. ERTANI A., FRANCIOSO O., TINTI A., SCHIAVON M., PIZZEGHELLO D., NARDI S. 2018. Evaluation of seaweed extracts from Laminaria and Ascophyllum nodosum spp. As biostimulants in Zea mays L. using a combination of chemical, biochemical and morphological approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 428. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00428
  13. ERTANI A., PIZZEGHELLO D., FRANCIOSO O., SAMBO P., SANCHEZ-CORTES S., NARDI S. 2014. Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: Chemical and metabolomic approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science 5: 375. doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00375.
  14. FAO. 2020. Statistical databases FAOSTAT. http://faostat3.fao.org.
  15. FASUSI O.A., CRUZ C., BABALOLA O.O. 2021. Agricultural sustainability: Microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 11: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020163
  16. GARCIA A. 2020. The Environmental impacts of agricultural intensification technical. Standing Panel on Impact Assessment Note N. 9. https://iaes.cgiar.org
  17. GOŁĘBIEWSKA B., PAJEWSKI T. 2016. The negative effects of agricultural production and the possibility of its limitation. Annals PAAAE 18, 3: 76–81.
  18. GOPINATH K.A., VENKATESH G., MANJUNATH M., JAYALAKSHMI M., PRASAD T.V., RAJKUMAR B., VENUGOPALAN V.K., RAJU B.M.K., PRABHAKAR M., CHARY G.R., SINGH V.K. 2023. Impact of organic and integrated production systems on yield and seed quality of rainfed crops and on soil properties. Frontiers in Nutrition 10: 1127970. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1127970
  19. GRUCZEK T. 2004. Przyrodnicze i agrotechniczne aspekty uprawy ziemniaka. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 500: 11–44.
  20. HARA P. 2019. Znaczenie biostymulantów w uprawie ziemniaka (The role of bio-stimulators in popato cultivation). Ziemniak Polski2.
  21. HEDIGER W., LEHMANN B. 2007. Multifunctional agriculture and the preservation of environmental benefits. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 143, 4: 449–470. doi: 10.1007/bf03399246
  22. HIJRI M. 2016. Analysis of a large dataset of mycorrhiza inoculation field trials on potato shows highly significant increases in yield. Mycorrhiza 26: 209–214. doi.org/10.1007/s00572-015-0661-4
  23. HUSSAIN T. 2016. Potatoes: Ensuring food for the future. Advances in Plants and Agriculture Research 3, 6:178–182. doi: 10.15406/apar.2016.03.00117
  24. ISLAM S. 2018. Microorganisms in the rhizosphere and their utilization in agriculture: A mini review. PSM Microbiology 3, 3: 105–110.
  25. KALOGIANNIDIS S., KALFAS D., CHATZITHEODORIDIS F., PAPAEVANGELOU O. 2022. Role of crop protection technologies in sustainable agricultural productivity and management. Land 11: 1680. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101680
  26. KIRCHMANN H. 2019. Why organic farming is not the way forward. Outlook on Agriculture 48, 1: 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019831702
  27. LANKOSKI J., OLLIKAINEN M. 2003. Agri-environmental externalities: A framework for designing targeted policies. European Review of Agricultural Economics 30: 51–75. doi.org/10.1093/erae/30.1.51
  28. LI J., WANG J., LIU H., MACDONALD C.A., SINGH B.K. 2022. Application of microbial inoculants significantly enhances crop productivity: A meta-analysis of studies from 2010 to 2020. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment 1: 216–225. doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12028
  29. ŁUCZKA W. 2020. Procesy rozwojowe rolnictwa ekologicznego i ich ekonomiczno-społeczne uwarunkowania. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  30. MACIEJCZAK M., FILIPIAK T. 2020. Economic, social and environmental impacts of the potato and its beneficial microorganism interactions. Annals PAAAE XXII, 4: 140–150. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.6032.
  31. Manual for Designers. Eco-indicator 99. 2020. A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment Communications Directorate.
  32. OTERO I., FARRELL K.N., PUEYO S., KALLIS G., KEHOE L., HABERL H., PLUTZAR CH., HOBSON P., GARCÍA-MÁRQUEZ J., RODRÍGUEZ-LABAJOS B., MARTIN J-L., ERB K-H., SCHINDLER S., NIELSEN J., SKORIN T., SETTELE J., ESSL F., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., BROTONS L., RABITSCH W., SCHNEIDER F., PE`ER G. 2020. Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conservation Letters 13, 4:e12713: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12713.
  33. PAWLAK J. 2015. Rolnictwo a środowisko naturalne (Agriculture and Environment). Problemy Inżynierii Rolniczej (Problems of Agricultural Engineering) 1, 87: 17–28.
  34. PIOTROWSKA K., KRUSZELNICKA W., BAŁDOWSKA-WITOS P., KASNER R., RUDNICKI J., TOMPOROWSKI A., FLIZIKOWSKI J., OPIELAK M. 2019. Assessment of the environmental impact of a car tire throughout its lifecycle using the LCA method. Materials 12, 24: 4177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244177.
  35. POPP J., PETŐ K., NAGY J. 2013. Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33: 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0105-x.
  36. RITCHIE H., ROSADO P., ROSER M. 2022. Environmental impacts of food production. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food.
  37. SOLANKI M.K., SOLANKI A.CH., SINGH A., BRIJENDRA KASHYAP B., RAI S., MALVIYA M.K. 2023. Microbial endophytes’ association and application in plant health: an overview—Chapter 1. In: Solanki et al. (eds). Microbial Endophytes and Plant Growth, Beneficial Interactions and Applications, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90620-3.00014-3.
  38. SONG J., KONG Z.Q., ZHANG D.D., CHEN J.Y., DAI X.F., LI R. 2021. Rhizosphere microbiomes of potato cultivated under bacillus subtilis treatment influence the quality of potato tubers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 21:12065. doi: 10.3390/ijms222112065.
  39. STRUIK P.C., KUYPER T.W. 2017. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0445-7.
  40. SUNDSTRÖM J.F., ALBIHN A., BOQVIST S. et al. 2014. Future threats to agricultural food production posed by environmental degradation, climate change, and animal and plant diseases—A risk analysis in three economic and climate settings. Food Security 6: 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0331-y.
  41. The Ecoinvent Database. A Life Cycle Inventory for transparency in environmental assessments. https://ecoinvent.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ecoinvent-sectorial-Brochure-2022.
  42. TORRES-VITE H., CONTRERAS-LIZA S.E. 2019. Use of microbial inoculants for production of potato tuber seed in greenhouse conditions. Peruvian Agricultural Research 1, 2: 40–47. doi: 10.51431/par.v1i2.581.
  43. TRAWCZYŃSKI C. 2020. The effect of biostimulators on the yield and quality of potato tubers grown in drought and high temperature conditions. Biuletyn Instytutu Hodowli Aklimatyzacji Roślin 289: 11–19.
  44. TREDER K., MICHAŁOWSKA D., PAWŁOWSKA A., URBANOWICZ J., PANEK J., FRĄC M., FALCAO-SALLES J. 2021. International project potatoMETAbiome—Description of the work performer. Ziemniak Polski 2: 3–9.
  45. VAN DIJK M., MORLEY T., RAU M.L. et al. 2021. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature Food 2: 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9.
  46. VIANA C.M., FREIRE D., ABRANTES P., ROCHA J., PEREIRA P. 2022. Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: A systematic review. Science of The Total Environment 806, 3: 150718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150718.
  47. VISHNU J.K. 2022. Chapter 8—Bacterial inoculants for rhizosphere engineering: Applications, current aspects, and challenges. Rhizosphere Engineering, 129–150. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-89973-4.00004-1.
  48. WANG Z., LI Y., ZHUANG L., YU Y., LIU J., ZHANG L., … WANG, Q.A. 2019. Rhizosphere-derived consortium of bacillus subtilis and trichoderma harzianum suppresses common scab of potato and increases yield. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 17: 645–653. doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.003.
  49. WANG Z., LI Y., ZHAO Y., ZHUANG L., YU Y., WANG M., LIU J., WANG Q. 2021. A microbial consortium-based product promotes potato yield by recruiting rhizosphere bacteria involved in nitrogen and carbon metabolisms. Microbial Biotechnology 14, 5: 1961–1975. doi. org/10.1111/1751-7915.13876.
  50. YU J., WU J. 2018. The sustainability of agricultural development in China: The agriculture–environment nexus. Sustainability 10: 1776. doi.org/10.3390/su10061776.
  51. ZHANG H., XU F., WU Y., HU H., DAI X. 2017. Progress of potato staple food research and industry development in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 16, 12: 2924–2932. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(17)61736-2.
  52. ZHICHKIN K., NOSOV V., ZHICHKINA L., DIBROVA ZH., CHEREPOVA Y. 2019. Development of evaluation model effectiveness of modern technologies in crop production. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 315: 022023. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/315/2/022023.
  53. ZIĘTARA W., OLKO-BAGIEŃSKA T. 1986. Zadania z analizy działalności gospodarczej i planowania w gospodarstwie rolnym. PWRiL, Warszawa.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/oszn-2023-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8589 | Journal ISSN: 1230-7831
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 18
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
Published by: National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2023 Barbara Gołębiewska, Mariusz Maciejczak, Tadeusz Filipiak, Agnieszka Sobolewska, Janusz Urbanowicz, Jerzy Osowski, Krzysztof Treder, published by National Research Institute, Institute of Environmental Protection
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.