Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Mediating Role of Organizational Ostracism in the Effect of Supervisor Support on Ambivalent Identification: Evidence from a Collectivist Industrial Context Cover

The Mediating Role of Organizational Ostracism in the Effect of Supervisor Support on Ambivalent Identification: Evidence from a Collectivist Industrial Context

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Aguirre-Urreta, M.I., & Hu, J. (2019). Detecting common method bias. The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 50(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330472.3330477
  2. Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
  3. Ashforth, B.E., Rogers, K.M., Pratt, M.G., & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science, 25(5), 1453–1478. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
  4. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards Conceptual Refinement and Operationalization. In K.S. Yang, K.K. Hwang, & U. Kim, (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (pp.445–466). London: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
  5. Aydın Göktepe, E. (2017). Perceived Supervisor Support Scale; Development, Validation and Reliability. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46, 31–48. Available at: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/ibr/article/algilanan-yonetici-destegi-olcegi-gelistirilmesi-gecerliligi-ve-guvenirliligi
  6. Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  7. Bilger, D., & Özdemir, F. (2021). Sosyal kimlik kuramı. In M.B. Bulut (Ed.), Sosyal psikoloji kuramları II (pp. 83–120). İstanbul: Nobel Yayıncılık,.
  8. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203792643
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2023). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analiz El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  10. Caprar, D.V., Walker, B.W., & Ashforth, B.E. (2022). The dark side of strong identification in organizations: A conceptual review. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 759–805. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0338
  11. Chen, C., Zhang, Z., & Jia, M. (2021). Stretch goals and unethical behavior: role of ambivalent identification and competitive psychological climate. Management Decision, 59(8), 2005–2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2019-0433
  12. Ciampa, V., Sirowatka, M., Schuh, S.C., Fraccaroli, F., & van Dick, R. (2021). Ambivalent identification as a moderator of the link between organizational identification and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 169, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0
  13. Coşar, B. (2023). The mediating role of organizational synergy in the effect of ambivalent identification on cognitive flexibility. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.976048
  14. Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  15. Çalışkan, A., & Pekkan, N.Ü. (2020). Organizational ostracism: A study of scale adaptation. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 6(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.29131/uiibd.736413
  16. Duffy, M.K., Ganster, D.C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069350
  17. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  18. Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T.E., Gonzalez-Morales, M.G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2014). Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036223
  19. Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
  20. Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S.A. (2012). Social identity theory. In Van Lang et al. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology II (pp. 379–398). Sage: London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n45
  21. Ferris, D.L., Brown, D.J., Berry, J., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012743
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  23. Fuller, J.B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Frey, L., Relyea, C., & Beu, D. (2006). Perceived external prestige and internal respect: New insights into the organizational identification process. Human Relations, 59(6), 815–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706067148
  24. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning EMEA.
  25. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.001.0001
  26. Hayes, A.F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. USA: Guilford Publications.
  27. Heyns, M.M., McCallaghan, S., & Roos, C.E. (2021). Creative leadership and employee work wellness: Supervisor support as a mediator. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 31(1), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2020.1871233
  28. Hitlan, R.T., Cliffton, R.J., & DeSoto, M.C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 217–236. Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-09074-004
  29. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  30. Hogg, M.A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental social psychology (pp. 1–52). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01001-3
  31. Howard, M.C., Cogswell, J.E., & Smith, M.B. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 577–596. http://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000453
  32. Huck, S.W. (2012). Reading statistics and research. Boston: Pearson.
  33. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2012). Günümüzde insan ve insanlar: Sosyal psikolojiye giriş. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınları.
  34. Kalaycı, Ş. (2018). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayınevi.
  35. Kalliath, P., Kalliath, T., Chan, X.W., & Chan, C. (2020). Enhancing job satisfaction through work-family enrichment and perceived supervisor support: The case of Australian social workers. Personnel Review, 49(9), 2055–2072. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2018-0219
  36. Kazmi, S.W., & Javaid, S.T. (2022). Antecedents of organizational identification: implications for employee performance. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(2), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-02-2020-0017
  37. Kenny, D.A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D.B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological methods & research, 44(3), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114543236
  38. Kim, J.H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 7 (6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097%2Fkja.19087
  39. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  40. KOS - Konya Organized Industrial Zone (2024) Available at: https://www.kos.org.tr/about [Accessed: 17.6.2024].
  41. Kreiner, G.E., & Ashforth, B.E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.234
  42. Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M.T., Buffardi, L.C., Stewart, K.A., & Adis, C.S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  43. Lee, J., & Peccei, R. (2007). Perceived organizational support and affective commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(6), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.431
  44. Lee, J.L.-M., Siu, N.Y.-M., Zhang, T.J., & Tsui, S.W.-L. (2024). The role of ambivalent identification on service recovery: A study of the hotel industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, Online First, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655241255004
  45. Li, M., Xu, X., & Kwan, H.K. (2021). Consequences of workplace ostracism: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 641302. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641302
  46. Li, S., Jain, K., & Tzini, K. (2021). When supervisor support backfires: The link between perceived supervisor support and unethical pro-supervisor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04797-1
  47. Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983433
  48. Merriam-Webster Dictionaries (n.d.). Identification. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved December 16, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/identification
  49. Merriam-Webster Dictionaries (n.d.). Ambivalent. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved December 16, 2024, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ambivalent
  50. Meydan, C.H., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik model-lemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  51. Mlika, M., Khelil, M.B., & Salem, N.H. (2017). Organizational ostracism: A potential framework in order to deal with it. Safety and Health at Work, 8(4), 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2017.03.001
  52. Moors, J.J.A. (1986). The meaning of kurtosis: Darlington reexamined. The American Statistician, 40 (4), pp. 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475415
  53. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  54. Robinson, S.L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A.M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The role of antisocial norms in workgroup deviance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256963
  55. Robinson, S.L., O’Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work: An integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, 39(1), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312466141
  56. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  57. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  58. Shoss, M.K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S.L.D., & Zagenczyk, T.J. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030687
  59. Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C., & Härter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the autonomy-preference-index (API). Health Expectations, 13(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x
  60. Sluss, D.M., & Ashforth, B.E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463672
  61. Spector, P.E. (2019). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. Wiley.
  62. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson.
  63. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press.
  64. Tak Meydan, B. (2019). Sosyal kimlik kuramı. In S. Yürür (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış kuramları (pp. 45–108). Beta Basım Yayım.
  65. Tavares, S.M., van Knippenberg, D., & van Dick, R. (2016). Organizational identification and “currencies of exchange”: Integrating social identity and social exchange perspectives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12329
  66. Teo, T., Tsai, L.T., & Yang, C.C. (2023). Applying SEM in educational research. In M.S. Khine (Ed.), Application of structural equation modeling in educational research and practice (pp. 3–21). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4_1
  67. Uzun, T. (2018). Correlation between organizational justice, supervisor support and organizational identification perceived in schools. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(4), 776–789. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.366093
  68. Ülbeği, İ.D., Dağtekin, H., & Yalçın, A. (2021). The role of organizational identification in the effect of perceived supervisor support on job performance. Süleyman Demirel University Visionary Journal, 12(32), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.907084
  69. van Knippenberg, D., van Dick, R., & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00168.x
  70. Williams, K.D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R.M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133–170). The Springer Series in Social/Clinical Psychology, Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9354-3_7
  71. Wu, C.-H., Liu, J., Kwan, H.K., & Lee, C. (2016). Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000063
  72. Yanık, G., & Karaca, A. (2023). What if I feel ambivalent? The role of psychological safety on the relationship between ambivalent identification and proactive work behaviors. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.1251527
  73. Yarmacı, N. (2018). The impact of employees perceptions of organizational ostracism on organizational silence and whistleblowing: Hotel establishments case. PhD Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Türkiye. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
  74. Zhang, L., Liu, Z., & Li, X. (2023). Impact of co-worker ostracism on organizational citizenship behavior through employee self-identity: The moderating role of ethical leadership. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 18(16), 3279–3302. http://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S415036
  75. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J.G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2026-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1581-1832 | Journal ISSN: 1318-5454
Language: English
Page range: 167 - 182
Submitted on: Oct 24, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 16, 2025
Published on: May 27, 2026
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Hande Ulukapi Yilmaz, Abdullah Yilmaz, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.