Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Do alternative media users distrust all mainstream news or only some? Assessing Danish left-wing and right-wing alternative media users’ trust in news at the outlet-specific level Cover

Do alternative media users distrust all mainstream news or only some? Assessing Danish left-wing and right-wing alternative media users’ trust in news at the outlet-specific level

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Agency for Digital Government. (n.d.). ICT-use in Denmark – 2020. Retrieved September 10, 2025, from https://en.digst.dk/numbers-and-statistics/
  2. Albæk, E. Hopmann, D. N., & De Vreese, C. H. (2010). Kunsten at holde balancen: Dækningen af folketingsvalgkampe i tv-nyhederne På DR1 og TV 2 1994–2007 [The art of keeping the balance: Coverage of parliamentary election campaigns in the TV news o DR1 and TV 2 1994–2007]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  3. Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., Pihl-Tingvad, S., Skovsgaard, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). Den danske journalist: værdier, produktion, indhold [The Danish journalist: Values, production, content]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
  4. Andersen, K., De Vreese, C. H., & Albæk, E. (2016). Measuring media diet in a high-choice environment – Testing the list-frequency technique. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2-3), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1150973
  5. Andersen, K., Shehata, A., & Andersson, D. (2021a). Alternative news orientation and trust in mainstream media: A longitudinal audience perspective. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1986412
  6. Andersen, K., van Dalen, A., Hopmann, D. N., Skovsgaard, M., & Albæk, E. (2021b). Tilliden til de danske journalister og nyhedsmedier: I forfald eller ej? [Trust in Danish journalists and news media: Declining or not?]. Politica, 53(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130383
  7. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001
  8. Berry, M., Garcia-Blank, I., & Moore, K. (2015). Press coverage of the refugee and migrant crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries [Report prepared for the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (December 2015)]. Cardiff School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies.
  9. Blach-Ørsten, M., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). Det politiske informationslandskab i Danmark 2.0. [The political information landscape in Denmark 2.0]. Politica, 53(2), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i2.130381
  10. Brems, M. K. (2023). From stark opposition to partial adaption: How 12 Danish alternative media construct and position themselves vis-à-vis the media- and political mainstream. Journalistica, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v17i1.134823
  11. Brems, M. K. (2024a). Who are the users of Danish alternative media? A survey study on the prevalence of alternative news use in Denmark and profiles of the users. Nordicom Review, 45(1), 81–113. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0014
  12. Brems, M. K. (2024b). A left-right divide? Alternative news use and political trust, populist attitudes, and populist vote intentions in the case of Denmark. The International Journal of Press/Politics, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241301647
  13. Brems, M. K. (2025). Divisions of labor: Why alternative news users seek out mainstream news media in Denmark and how they combine mainstream and alternative content. Journalism, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849251337727
  14. Bächler, C., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Denmark: The rise of the Danish People’s Party. In T. Aalberg, C. de Vreese, J. Strömbäck, F. Esser, & C. Reinemann (Eds.), Populist political communication in Europe (pp. 29–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
  15. Coleman, S. (2012). Believing the news: From sinking trust to atrophied efficacy. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112438806
  16. Cushion, S. (2022). UK alternative left media and their criticism of mainstream news: Analysing the canary and evolve politics. Journalism Practice, 16(8), 1695–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1882875
  17. Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D., & Thomas, R. (2021). Why national media systems matter: A longitudinal analysis of how UK left-wing and right-wing alternative media critique mainstream media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795
  18. Engelke, K. M., Hase, V., & Wintterlin, F. (2019). On measuring trust and distrust in journalism: Reflection of the status quo and suggestions for the road ahead. Journal of Trust Research, 9(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1588741
  19. Fawzi, N., Steindl, N., Obermaier, M., Prochazka, F., Arlt, D., Blöbaum, B., Dohle, M., Engelke, K. M., Hanitzsch, T., Jackob, N., Jakobs, I., Klawier, T., Post, S., Reinemann, C., Schweiger, W., & Ziegele, M. (2021). Concepts, causes and consequences of trust in news media – A literature review and framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(2) 154–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1960181
  20. Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2019). Challenging journalistic authority: Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1221–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500868
  21. Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023). Alternative counter-news use and fake news recall during the COVID-19 crisis. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 80–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259
  22. Guess, A. M., Barberá, P., Munzert, S., & Yang, J. (2021). The consequences of online partisan media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013464118
  23. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
  24. Hanitzsch, T., van Dalen, A., & Steindl, N. (2018). Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695
  25. Heft, A., Mayerhöffer, E., Reinhardt, S., & Knüpfer, C. (2020). Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six western democracies. Policy & Internet, 12(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.219
  26. Hetzel, N., Klawier, T., Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2022). How do COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, exposure to alternative sources and social media correlate in Germany? Studies in Communication and Media, 11(4), 508–535. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2022-4-508
  27. Hjarvard, S. (2007). Den politiske presse. En analyse af danske avisers politiske orientering [The political press: An analysis of Danish newspapers’ political leaning]. Journalistica, 5, 27–53. https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v2i5.1808
  28. Hjarvard, S. (2010). The views of the news: The Role of political newspapers in a changing media landscape. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 8(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.25_1
  29. Holt, K. (2020). Right-wing alternative media. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454691
  30. Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715
  31. Hovden, J. F., & Mjelde, H. (2019). Increasingly controversial, cultural, and political: The immigration debate in Scandinavian newspapers 1970–2016. Javnost - The Public, 26(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1589285
  32. Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., Eldridge, S. A., Frischlich, L., Cushion, S., & Holt, K. (2022). Understanding alternative news media and its contribution to diversity. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134165
  33. Ihlebæk, K. A., & Holter, C. R. (2021). Hostile emotions: An exploratory study of far-right online commenters and their emotional connection to traditional and alternative news media. Journalism, 22(5), 1207–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920985726
  34. Kristensen, I. T., Kjeldsen, C., & Dalgaard, T. (2007). Landdistriktskommuner - Indikatorer for Landdistrikt [Rural district municipalities – Indicators for rural district]. Danmarks Jordbrugsforskning Afdeling for Jordbrugsproduktion og Miljø.
  35. Mandag Morgen. (n.d.). Skellet mellem land og by [The cleavage between countryside and city]. Tænketanken Mandag Morgen. Retrieved September 16, 2025, from https://voresstemmer.mm.dk/?page_id=2667
  36. Mayerhöffer, E. (2021). How do Danish Right-wing alternative media position themselves against the mainstream? Advancing the study of alternative media structure and content. Journalism Studies, 22(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1814846
  37. McDowell-Naylor, D., Cushion, S., & Thomas, R. (2021). A typology of alternative online political media in the United Kingdom: A longitudinal content analysis (2015–2018). Journalism, 24(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211059585
  38. Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., Chen, W., & Tham, S. M. (2018). Media repertoires and news trust during the early trump administration. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1945–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1500492
  39. Müller, P., & Bach, R. L. (2021). Populist alternative news use and its role for elections: Web-tracking and survey evidence from two campaign periods. New Media & Society, 25(10), 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032969
  40. Müller, P., & Schulz, A. (2021). Alternative media for a populist audience? Exploring political and media use predictors of exposure to Breitbart, Sputnik, and Co. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1646778
  41. Müller, P., & Freudenthaler, R. (2022). Right-wing, populist, controlled by foreign powers? Topic diversification and partisanship in the content structures of German-language alternative media. Digital Journalism, 10(8), 1363–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2058972
  42. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Reuters Institute digital news report 2018. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/digital-news-report-2018
  43. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2021
  44. Noppari, E., Hiltunen, I., & Ahva, L. (2019). User Profiles for populist counter-media websites in Finland. Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00041_1
  45. Pedersen, L., Ihlebæk, K. A., Figenschou, T. U., & Mayerhöffer, E. (2024). Boundary work in the Nordic media model: Metajournalistic discourse on alternative media in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Journalism Studies, 25(14), 1757–1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2385925
  46. Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp002
  47. Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755835
  48. Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
  49. Schrøder, K. C., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2021). Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier 2021 [The Danes’ use of news media 2021]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5749233
  50. Schrøder, K. C., Blach-Ørsten, M., & Eberholst, M. K. (2022). Danskernes brug af nyhedsmedier 2022 [The Danes’ use of news media 2022]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7040876
  51. Schudson, M. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American civic life. Free Press.
  52. Schudson, M. (2008). Why democracies need an unlovable press. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.8.25_1
  53. Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2018). We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research, 47(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854
  54. Schulze, H. (2020). Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics and Governance, 8(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i3.2925
  55. Slater, M. D., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2020). Reinforcing spirals model. In J. Bulck (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media psychology (1st ed.) (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0134
  56. Steppat, D., Castro, L., & Esser, F. (2023). What news users perceive as ‘alternative media’ varies between countries: How media fragmentation and polarization matter. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 741–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1939747
  57. Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001
  58. Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500131950
  59. Strömbäck, J. (2023). Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947
  60. Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R., & Lindholm, L. (2020). News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338
  61. Tandoc, E. C. (2018). Journalism as gatekeeping. In T. P. Vos (Ed.), Journalism (pp. 235–254). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500084-012
  62. Theorin, N., & Strömbäck, J. (2020). Some media matter more than others: Investigating media effects on attitudes toward and perceptions of immigration in Sweden. International Migration Review, 54(4), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319893292
  63. Thorbjørnsrud, K., & Figenschou, T. U. (2022). The alarmed citizen: Fear, mistrust, and alternative media. Journalism Practice, 16(5), 1018–1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1825113
  64. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Exploring the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
  65. Tsfati, Y., Strömbäck, J., Lindgren, E., Damstra, A., Boomgaarden, H., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). Going beyond general media trust: An Analysis of topical media trust, its antecedents and effects on issue (mis)perceptions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 34(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edac010
  66. Tsfati, Y., Vliegenthart, R., Strömbäck, J., & Lindgren, E. (2024). An asymmetrical reinforcing spiral? Disentangling the longitudinal dynamics of media use and mainstream media trust. Journal of Communication, 75(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqae039
  67. Usher, N. (2018). Re-thinking trust in the news: A Material approach through “objects of journalism”. Journalism Studies, 19(4), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1375391
  68. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.49.3.577
  69. van Dalen, A. (2020). Journalism, trust, and credibility. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 356–371). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 20 - 51
Published on: Feb 9, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Miriam Kroman Brems, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.