Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021 Cover

The uses of the term polarisation in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021

Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. Amréus, L. (2013, June 17). Höga hus men lågt i tak [Tall houses but low ceilings]. Dagens Industri.
  2. Arborelius, A., Atas, B., Jackelén, A., Svensson, L., & Wiborn, K. (2018, June 21). Vi ser dagligen hur familjer slits isär [We see daily how families are torn apart]. Aftonbladet. https://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/a/wEQP0M/vi-ser-dagligen-hur-familjer-slits-isar
  3. Bolling, A. (2019, September 27). DN/Ipsos: Så mycket har Greta Thunberg påverkat synen på klimatet [DN/Ipsos: So much has Greta Thunberg affected the view of the climate]. Dagens Nyheter. http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/dnipsos-sa-mycket-har-greta-thunberg-paverkat-synen-pa-klimatet/
  4. Dalton, R. J., & Berning, C. C. (2022). Ideological polarization and far-right parties in Europe. In H.U. Brinkmann, & K. H. Reuband (Eds.), Rechtspopulismus in Deutschland: Wahlverhalten in Zeiten politischer Polarisierung [Right-wing populism in Germany: Voting behaviour in times of political polarisation] (pp. 13–35). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33787-2_2
  5. De Vreese, C. H., & Lecheler, S. (2012). News framing research: An overview and new developments. In H. A. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 292–306). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446201015
  6. Desilet, G., & Appel, E. C. (2011). Choosing a rhetoric of the enemy: Kenneth Burke’s comic frame, warrantable outrage, and the problem of scapegoating. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 41(4), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2011.596177
  7. Ekman, H. (2013, January 19). Brist på acceptans är största hotet mot vargen [Lacking acceptance is the biggest threat against the wolf]. Svenska Dagbladet. https://www.svd.se/a/02372599-072e-3ce0-813c-c8e49c75602e/brist-pa-acceptans-ar-storsta-hotet-mot-vargen
  8. Engzell-Larsson, L. (2020, March 27). Corona kan minska polarisering [Corona can reduce polarisation]. Dagens Industri. http://www.di.se/ledare/corona-kan-minska-polarisering/
  9. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
  10. Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x
  11. Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563–588. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836
  12. Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). How polarized are online and offline news audiences? A comparative analysis of twelve countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219892768
  13. Fortuna, A. (2019). Polarization: Rhetorical strategies in the Tea Party network. De Gruyter.
  14. Fuchs, C. (2020). Everyday life and everyday communication in coronavirus capitalism. TripleC, 18(1), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1167
  15. Gelin, M. (2016, January 24). Den som förstår frustrationen blir en vinnare [Whoever understands the frustration is a winner]. Dagens Nyheter. https://www.dn.se/nyheter/varlden/martin-gelin-den-som-forstar-frustrationen-blir-en-vinnare/
  16. Grande, E., Schwarzbözl, T., & Fatke, M. (2019). Politicizing immigration in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1444–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1531909
  17. Goldberg, Y., & Levy, O. (2014). word2vec explained: Deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3722. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1402.3722
  18. Gross, P. (2011). The starting point: Studies on European foreign correspondents and correspondence. In P. Gross, & G. G. Kopper (Eds.), Understanding foreign correspondence: A Euro-American perspective of concepts, methodologies and theories (pp. 1–28). Peter Lang.
  19. Hagevi, M., Blombäck, S., Demker, M., Hinnfors, J., & Loxbo, K. (2022). Ideological contestation in western European party systems. In M. Hagevi, S. Blombäck, M. Demker, J. Hinnfors, & K. Loxbo. Party realignment in western Europe: Electoral drivers and global constraints (pp. 78–100). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884731.00008
  20. Hammarlund, J., & Riegert, K. (2011). Understanding the prime mover: Ambivalent Swedish press discourse on the USA from 1984 to 2009. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877910384181
  21. Harteveld, E., Mendoza, P., & Rooduijn, M. (2022). Affective polarization and the populist radical right: Creating the hating? Government and Opposition, 57(4), 703–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.31
  22. Huddy, L., Bankert, A., & Davies, C. (2018). Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12482
  23. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2017). Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: The silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111
  24. King, A. A., & Anderson, F. D. (1971). Nixon, Agnew, and the “silent majority”: A case study in the rhetoric of polarization. Western Speech, 35(4), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317109373712
  25. Kinneavy, J. L. (1980). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Norton.
  26. Kubin, E. & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
  27. Källbäck, T. (2014, April 6). Var kritisk till miljökritiken [Be critical of environmental criticism]. Expressen.
  28. Laclau, E. (2008). Articulation and the limits of metaphor. In J. Bono, T. Dean, & E. Plonowska Ziarek (Eds.), A time for the humanities (pp. 61–83). Fordham University Press.
  29. Levendusky, M., & Malhotra, N. (2016). Does media coverage of partisan polarization affect political attitudes? Political Communication, 33(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1038455
  30. Levin, S. A., Milner, H. V., & Perrings, C. (2021). The dynamics of political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), e2116950118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116950118
  31. Madsen, C. (2003). Astronomy and space science in the European print media. In A. Heck, & C. Madsen (Eds.), Astronomy communication (pp. 67–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0801-2_6
  32. Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
  33. Mellgren, F. (2011, March 21). Juholt formar sin nya ledning [Juholt forms his new management]. Svenska Dagbladet. http://www.svd.se/a/06334c71-d061-3151-ba5b-1aaba2b43b63/juholt-formar-sin-nya-ledning
  34. Nicholls, T., & Culpepper, P. D. (2021). Computational identification of media frames: Strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities. Political Communication, 38(1–2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1812777
  35. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
  36. Oscarsson, H., Bergman, T., Bergström, A., & Hellström, J. (2021). Demokratirådets rapport 2021: polariseringen i Sverige [The Democracy Council’s report 2021: Polarisation in Sweden]. SNS. https://www.sns.se/artiklar/demokratiradets-rapport-2021-polarisering-i-sverige-2/
  37. OSF. (2023, September 15). The uses of the term ‘polarization’ in Swedish newspapers, 2010–2021 [Data depository]. https://osf.io/4zjtc/?view_only=331e565541754a57b960776b646e160c
  38. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca L. (1971). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.
  39. Peruzzi, B. (2020, January 15). Årets hemtrender: Rosa, gult och vanilj [Home trends of the year: Pink, yellow and vanilla]. Aftonbladet. http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/70gnXo/arets-hemtrender-rosa-gult-och-vanilj
  40. Robinson, J., & Mullinix, K. J. (2016). Elite polarization and public opinion: How polarization is communicated and its effect. Political Communication, 33(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1055526
  41. Runsten, I. (2015, April 22). Trångt? Inte I mitten [Crowded? Not in the middle]. Sydsvenskan.
  42. Secko, D. M., Amend, E., & Friday, T. (2013). Four models of science journalism: A synthesis and practical assessment. Journalism Practice, 7(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.691351
  43. Urman, A. (2020). Context matters: Political polarization on Twitter from a comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876541
  44. Uvell, M. (2020, February 17). Tankesmedjor måste vara obekväma [Think tanks must be uncomfortable]. Göteborgs-posten. https://www.gp.se/ledare/gastkolumn/tankesmedjor-maste-vara-obekvama.1e93777f-5b43-44cf-80e3-561936344cd3
  45. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329_3.x
  46. Walter, D., & Ophir, Y. (2019). News frame analysis: An inductive mixed-method computational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 13(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1639145
  47. Wikström, T. (2020, November 11). USA:s demokrati håller [America’s democracy holds]. Dagens Industri. http://www.di.se/ledare/usa-s-demokrati-haller/
  48. Winkler, H. (2019). The effect of income inequality on political polarization: Evidence from European regions, 2002–2014. Economics & Politics, 31(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12129
  49. Wojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqx010
  50. Ölmedal, I. (2019, March 3). Kulturminister Amanda Lind om dubbla smällen mot skånsk kultur [Minister of Culture Amanda Lind on the double blow to Scanian culture]. Sydsvenskan. https://www.sydsvenskan.se/2019-03-03/kulturminister-amanda-lind-om-dubbla-smallen-mot-skansk-kultur
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2024-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 34
Published on: Jan 19, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Mike Farjam, Tommy Bruhn, Nils Gustafsson, Anamaria Dutceac Segesten, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.