Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“How is he entitled to say this?”: Constructing the identities of experts, ordinary people, and presenters in Swedish television series on climate change Cover

“How is he entitled to say this?”: Constructing the identities of experts, ordinary people, and presenters in Swedish television series on climate change

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Andreasen, A. R. (1995) Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass.
  2. Arén, S. (Executive Producer). (2019). Koll på klimatet [Checking on the climate]. [TV series]. SVT.
  3. Becken, S., Friedl, H., Stantic, B., Connolly, R. M., & Chen, J. (2021). Climate crisis and flying: Social media analysis traces the rise of “flightshame.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(9), 1450–1469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1851699
  4. Berglez, P., Höijer, B., & Olausson, U. (2009). Individualisation and nationalisation of the climate issue: Two ideological horizons in Swedish news media. In T. Boyce, & J. Lewis (Eds.), Climate change and the media (pp. 211–223). Peter Lang Publishing Group.
  5. Berkowitz, D. (2009). Reporters and their sources. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 122–135). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167497
  6. Berkowitz, D., Limor, Y., & Singer, J. (2004). A cross-cultural look at serving the public interest: American and Israeli journalists consider ethical scenarios. Journalism, i(2), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490452001
  7. Boykoff, M. T. (2013). Public enemy no. 1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 796–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213476846
  8. Carpentier, N. (2005). Identity, contingency and rigidity: The (counter-)hegemonic constructions of the identity of the media professional. Journalism, 6(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905051008
  9. Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Intellect Books.
  10. Carpentier, N. (2014). Reality television’s construction of ordinary people: Class-based and nonelitist articulations of ordinary people and their discursive affordances. In L. Ouellette (Ed.), A companion to reality television (pp. 345–366). John Wiley and Sons.
  11. Carpentier, N., & De Cleen, B. (2007). Bringing discourse theory into media studies: The applicability of discourse theoretical analysis (DTA) for the study of media practises and discourses. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
  12. Carvalho, A. (2010). Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis) engagement. WIREs Climate Change, 1(2), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.13
  13. Chen, Y. (2020). The construction of the professional identity of the TV news presenter in two Chinese news programmes: A discourse-theoretical analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University]. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-408687
  14. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (2014). The nature of expertise. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315799681
  15. Chiambaretto, P., Mayenc, E., Chappert, H., Engsig, J., Fernandez, A.-S., & Le Roy, F. (2021). Where does flygskam come from? The role of citizens’ lack of knowledge of the environmental impact of air transport in explaining the development of flight shame. Journal of Air Transport Management, 93, 102049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102049
  16. Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press.
  17. Coen, S., Meredith, J., Woods, R., & Fernandez, A. (2021). Talk like an expert: The construction of expertise in news comments concerning climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520981729
  18. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
  19. Duvall, J. A. (2017). The environmental documentary: Cinema activism in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Academic.
  20. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  21. Eriksson, G., & Thornborrow, J. (2016). Editorial: Mediated forms of ordinary expertise. Discourse, Context & Media, 13, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.05.003
  22. Filimonov, K. (2021). The performance of participation in Russian alternative media: Discourse, materiality and affect in grassroots media production in contemporary Russia. Uppsala University. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-427501
  23. Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934753
  24. Grundmann, R., & Scott, M. (2014). Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter? Public Understanding of Science, 23(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512467732
  25. Hall, S. (1981). Notes on deconstructing ‘the popular’. In R. Samuel (Ed.), People’s history and socialist theory (pp. 227–240). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617091
  26. Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x
  27. Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048511412279
  28. Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. P. (2018). Journalism beyond democracy: A new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism, 19(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673386
  29. Hermann, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
  30. Hermann, A. T., Pikl, M., & Bauer, A. (2017). Alerters, critics, and objectivists: Researchers in Austrian newspaper coverage of climate change. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Politikwissenschaft, 4, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.2388.vol46iss4
  31. Hess, K., & Waller, L. (2014). The digital pillory: Media shaming of ‘ordinary’ people for minor crimes. Continuum, 28(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2013.854868
  32. Höppner, C. (2010). Rereading opinion polls on climate change in the UK press. International Journal of Communication, 4, 997–1005.
  33. Johri, A. (2015). Impressions in action: The socially situated construction of expertise in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-04-2014-0008
  34. Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso Books.
  35. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed). Verso Books. (Original work published 1985)
  36. Mao, Z. (1997). Report of the central executive committee and the council of people’s commissars of the Chinese Soviet Republic to the second national soviet congress. In S. R. Schramm (Ed.), Mao’s road to power: Revolutionary writings 1912–1949 (Vol. 4) (pp. 656–713). East Gate.
  37. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. Sage.
  38. Mkono, M. (2020). Eco-anxiety and the flight shaming movement: Implications for tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 6(3), 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-10-2019-0093
  39. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870112
  40. Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Gramsci and Marxist theory (pp. 178–214). Routledge. (Original work published 1979) https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794396
  41. O’Mahoney, J. (2017) Making the real: Rhetorical adduction and the Bangladesh Liberation War. International Organization, 71, 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000054
  42. Raeijmaekers, D., & Maeseele, P. (2017). In objectivity we trust? Pluralism, consensus, and ideology in journalism studies. Journalism, 18(6), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884915614244
  43. Reichertz, J. (2019). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory – An updated review. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 259–281). Sage.
  44. Schmid-Petri, H., & Arlt, D. (2016). Constructing an illusion of scientific uncertainty? Framing climate change in German and British print media. Communications, 41(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2016-0011
  45. Sundström, P. (Executive producer). (2019). Briljanta forskare [Brilliant scientists]. [TV series]. Patrik Sthlm Production; UR.
  46. SVT. (n.d.). Koll på klimatet [Checking on the climate]. https://www.svtplay.se/koll-pa-klimatet
  47. Syvertsen, T. (2001). Ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances: A study of participants in television dating games. Media, Culture & Society, 23(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344301023003003
  48. Taddicken, M., & Reif, A. (2016). Who participates in the climate change online discourse? A typology of Germans’ online engagement. Communications, 41(3), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2016-0012
  49. Thornborrow, J. (2001). Authenticating talk: Building public identities in audience participation broadcasting. Discourse Studies, 3(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004008
  50. Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Žižek. Blackwell Publishers.
  51. Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. Sage.
  52. UR. (n.d.). Briljanta forskare [Brilliant scientists]. https://urplay.se/serie/213611-briljanta-forskare
  53. Van Brussel, L., Carpentier, N., & De Cleen, B. (Eds.). (2019). Communication and discourse theory: Collected works of the Brussels discourse theory group. Intellect Books.
  54. Waller, L., & Hess, K. (2011). The pillory effect: Media, the courts and the punitive role of public shaming in Australia. Media and Arts Law Review, 16(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2013.854868
  55. Westerståhl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting: General premises. Communication Research, 10(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010003007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 128
Published on: Apr 25, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Kirill Filimonov, Nico Carpentier, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.