References
- Ahchong, K., & Dodds, R. (2012). Anthropogenic climate change coverage in two Canadian newspapers, the Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail, from 1988 to 2007. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 48–59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.008 - Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
https://gephi.org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09.pdf - Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492 - Ben-David, A. (2020). Counter-archiving Facebook. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 249–264.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922069 - Birkbak, A. (2013, May). From networked publics to issue publics: Reconsidering the public/private distinction in web science. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 24–32.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464489 - Borra, E., & Rieder, B. (2014). Programmed method: Developing a toolset for capturing and analyzing tweets. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 262–278.
https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0094 - Bruns, A. (2019). After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1544–1566.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1637447 - Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks (pp. 13–28). Peter Lang.
- Density Design Research Lab. (2013). RAWGraphs.
http://rawgraphs.io/ - Dewey, J., & Rogers, M. L. (2012). The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. Penn State Press.
- Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129–150.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938 - Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., & Huibers, T. (2011). Social media and political participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube democratizing our political systems? In E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh, & H. de Bruijn (Eds.), Electronic Participation, ePart 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6847 (pp. 25–35) Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_3 - Freelon, D. (2018). Computational research in the post-API age. Political Communication, 35(4), 665–668.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506 - Google Cloud Platform. (2018). Detect labels | Google Cloud Vision API documentation.
https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/labels - Gruzd, A. (2016). Netlytic: Software for automated text and social network analysis.
https://netlytic.org/home/?page_id=10834 - Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62.
https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332 - Hopke, J. E., & Hestres, L. E. (2018). Visualizing the Paris climate talks on Twitter: Media and climate stakeholder visual social media during COP21. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 2056305118782687.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118782687 - Hu, Y., Manikonda, L., & Kambhampati, S. (2014, May 16). What we Instagram: A first analysis of Instagram photo content and user types. Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8118 - Ihde, D. (2000). Epistemology engines. Nature, 406(6791), 21.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35017666 - Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98679.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 - Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter Big Data. Global Environmental Change, 32(Supplement C), 11–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010 - Kangas, J. (2019). Picturing two modernities: Ecological modernisation and the media imagery of climate change. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 61–74.
https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0003 - Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Harvard University Press.
- Latour, B. (2005a). From realpolitik to dingpolitik, or how to make things public. In B. Latour, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 4–31). MIT Press.
- Latour, B. (2005b). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford University Press.
- Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
- Lindgren, S. (2020). Data theory: Interpretive sociology and computational methods. John Wiley & Sons.
- Mahony, M., & Hulme, M. (2012). The colour of risk: An exploration of the IPCC's “burning embers” diagram. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 75–89.
https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16075 - Manzo, K. (2010). Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area, 42(1), 96–107.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00887.x - Marres, N. (2005). Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In B. Latour, & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 208–217). MIT Press.
- Marres, N. (2012). The environmental teapot and other loaded household objects: Reconnecting the politics of technology, issues and things. In P. Harvey, E. Casella, G. Evans, H. Knox, C. McLean, E. Silva, N. Thoburn, & K. Woodward (Eds.), Objects and materials: A Routledge companion (12 pp.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203093610 - Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655–686.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915574602 - Marres, N., & Gerlitz, C. (2016). Interface methods: Renegotiating relations between digital social research, STS and sociology. The Sociological Review, 64(1), 21–46.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12314 - Mislove, A., Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Onnela, J.-P., & Rosenquist, J. (2011). Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), Article 1.
https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14168 - Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Harvard University Press.
- Müller, M. G., Özcan, E., & Seizov, O. (2009). Dangerous depictions: A visual case study of contemporary cartoon controversies. Popular Communication, 7(1), 28–39.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15405700802598361 - Munk, A. K. (2014). Mapping wind energy controversies online: Introduction to methods and datasets. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595287 - Niederer, S., & Colombo, G. (2019). Visual methodologies for networked images: Designing visualizations for collaborative research, cross-platform analysis, and public participation. Revista Diseña, 14, 40–67.
https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.14.40-67 - Oberoi, G. (2016, July 11). Comparing the Top Five Computer Vision APIs. Gaurav Oberoi.
https://goberoi.com/comparing-the-top-five-computer-vision-apis-98e3e3d7c647 - O’Neill, S. J. (2013). Image matters: Climate change imagery in US, UK and Australian newspapers. Geoforum, 49(Supplement C), 10–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.030 - O’Neill, S. J., & Hulme, M. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 402–410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004 - O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201 - Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 161–180.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871 - Perriam, J., Birkbak, A., & Freeman, A. (2019). Digital methods in a post-API environment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(3), 277–290.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1682840 - Ricci, D., Colombo, G., Meunier, A., & Brilli, A. (2017, June 29). Designing digital methods to monitor and inform urban policy: The case of paris and its urban nature initiative [Conference presentation]. 3rd International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3), Singapore.
- Rodrigues, S. B., & Collinson, D. L. (1995). ‘Having fun’? Humour as resistance in Brazil. Organization Studies, 16(5), 739–768.
https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600501 - Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. The MIT Press.
- Rogers, R. (2018). Social media research after the fake news debacle. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 11(2), 2035–6609.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i2p557 - Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
- Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941 - Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443 - Schwemmer, C., Knight, C., Bello-Pardo, E. D., Oklobdzija, S., Schoonvelde, M., & Lockhart, J. W. (2020). Diagnosing gender bias in image recognition systems. Socius, 6, 2378023120967171.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120967171 - Simonite, T. (2018, January 11). When it comes to gorillas, Google photos remains blind. Wired.
https://www.wired.com/story/when-it-comes-to-gorillas-google-photos-remains-blind/ - Veltri, G. A., & Atanasova, D. (2017). Climate change on Twitter: Content, media ecology and information sharing behaviour. Public Understanding of Science, 26(6), 721–737.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515613702 - Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509102694 - Venturini, T., Jacomy, M., & Jensen, P. (2019). What do we see when we look at networks: An introduction to visual network analysis and force-directed layouts. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3378438 - Venturini, T., & Latour, B. (2010). The social fabric: Digital traces and quali-quantitative methods. Proceedings of Future En Seine 2009.
https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/publications/Venturini_La-tour-The_Social_Fabric.pdf