Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography: Comparing True and Virtual Non Contrast Enhanced Images

Širůčková, Kateřina; Marcoň, Petr; Dostál, Marek; Širůčková, Anna; Dohnal, Přemysl

doi:10.2478/msr-2022-0033

Abstract

Spectral computed tomography (CT) imaging is one of several image reconstruction techniques based on the use of dual-layer CT. The intensity and attenuation of the radiation are measured in relation to different wavelengths, and such a procedure results in complex three-dimensional (3D) imaging and (pseudo) color adjustment of the soft tissue. This paper compares true non-contrast (TNC) enhanced images with virtual non-contrast (VNC) enhanced ones. Virtual native images are acquired by means of spectral computed tomography, and it has been suggested that VNCs could potentially substitute real native images to reduce significantly the total radiation dose from multiphase spectral CT. A comparison was performed by defining certain parameters that represent the difference between the measured and the calculated values in the images. The parameters included the mean value and standard deviation of the computed tomography number, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All of these items were analyzed via statistical tests using p-value. The results are interpreted and correlated with those presented by other authors, who, however, did not make an examination on a comprehensive basis - five tissues simultaneously by using a single device. Prospectively, if analogies were found between the two types of images, it would be possible to skip the TNC image, thus markedly reducing the radiation dose for the patient.

References

[1] Sauter, A.P., Muenzel, D., Dangelmaier, J., Braren, R., Pfeiffer, F., Rummeny, E.J., Noël, P.B., Fingerle, A.A. (2018). Dual-layer spectral computed tomography: Virtual non-contrast in comparison to true non-contrast images. European Journal of Radiology, 104, 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] Hua, C.H., Shapira, N., Merchant, T.E., Klahr, P., Yagil, Y. (2018). Accuracy of electron density, effective atomic number, and iodine concentration determination with a dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography system. Medical Physics, 45 (6), 2486-2497. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12903
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Si-Mohamed, S., Dupuis, N., Tatard-Leitman, V. et al. (2019). Virtual versus true non-contrast dual-energy CT imaging for the diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma. European Radiology, 29, 6762-6771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06322-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Fieselmann, A., Kowarschik, M., Ganguly, A., Hornegger, J., Fahrig, R. (2011). Deconvolution-based CT and MR brain perfusion measurement: Theoretical model revisited and practical implementation details. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2011, 467563. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/467563
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Coche, E. (2019). Spectral CT Clinical Case Collection: Technical Aspects of Spectral CT. Philips Health System.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Murphy, A., Haouimi, A. (2020). Image reconstruction (CT). Radiopaedia.org. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-51829
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Klosowski, G., Rymarczyk, T., Kozlowski, E. (2019). Tomographic image correction with noise reduction algorithms. MATEC Web of Conferences, 252, 09001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925209001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Tan, L.-G., Xu, C., Wang, Y.-F., Wei, H.-N., Zhao, K., Song, S.-M. (2020). Gaussian recursive filter for nonlinear systems with finite-step correlated noises and packet dropout compensations. Measurement Science Review, 20 (2), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2020-0011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Zou, X., Li, K., Pan, B. (2020). The effect of low-pass pre-filtering on subvoxel registration algorithms in digital volume correlation: A revisited study. Measurement Science Review, 20 (5), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2020-0025
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Andris, P., Frollo, I. (2020). Sensitivity analysis of the simply noise-matched receiving coil for NMR experiments. Measurement Science Review, 20 (5), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2020-0030
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Hsu, C.C.-T., Kwan, G.N.C., Singh, D., Pratap, J., Watkins, T.W. (2016). Principles and clinical application of dual-energy computed tomography in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science, 6 (27). https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.185003
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Nicolaou, S., Liang, T., Murphy, D.T., Korzan, J.R., Ouellette, H., Munk, P. (2012). Dual-energy CT: A promising new technique for assessment of the musculoskeletal system. American Journal of Roentgenology, 199 (5 Suppl), S78-S86. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.12.9117
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Murphy, A., Worsley, C. (2021). Virtual non-contrast imaging. Radiopaedia.org. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-66311
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Ananthakrishnan, L., Rajiah, P., Ahn, R., Rassouli, N., Xi, Y., Soesbe, T.C., Lewis, M.A., Lenkinski, R.E., Leyendecker, J.R., Abbara, S. (2017). Spectral detector CT-derived virtual non-contrast images: Comparison of attenuation values with unenhanced CT. Abdominal Radiology, 42 (3), 702-709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1036-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Toepker, M., Moritz, T., Krauss, B., Weber, M., Euller, G., Mang, T., Wolf, F., Herold, C.J., Ringl, H. (2012). Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: Reliability of attenuation values. European Journal of Radiology, 81 (3), e398-e405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Yoo, S.Y., Kim, Y., Cho, H.H., Choi, M.J., Shim, S.S., Lee, J.K., Baek, S.Y. (2013). Dual-energy CT in the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes: Comparative study of virtual non-contrast and true non-contrast images. Korean Journal of Radiology, 14 (3), 532-539. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.532
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Choi, W.-J., Choi, T.-S. (2013). Automated pulmonary nodule detection system in computed tomography images: A hierarchical block classification approach. Entropy, 15 (2), 507-523. https://doi.org/10.3390/e15020507
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Bartusek, K., Gescheidtova, E., Mikulka, J. (2010). Data processing in studying biological tissues, using MR imaging techniques. In 33th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing, 171-175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Mikulka, J., Burget, R., Říha, K., Gescheidtová, E. (2013). Segmentation of brain tumor parts in magnetic resonance images. In 2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP). IEEE, 565-568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.6613997
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Beigelman-Aubry, C., Hill, C., Guibal, A., Savatovsky, J., Grenier, P.A. (2005). Multi-detector row CT and postprocessing techniques in the assessment of diffuse lung disease. RadioGraphics, 25 (6), 1639-1652. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.256055037
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Flohr, T., Ohnesorge, B. (2007). Image visualization and post-processing techniques. In Multi-slice and Dual-source CT in Cardiac Imaging. Springer, 151-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-49546-8_6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Xiang, Z., Huang, F., Liang, C., Xu, X., Tan, L. (2008). Application of imaging postprocessing of spiral CT in the staging of lung cancer. The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology, 7 (5), 254-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-008-0026-y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] Su, K.-H., Kuo, J.-W., Jordan, D.W. et al. (2018). Machine learning-based dual-energy CT parametric mapping. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 63 (12), 125001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aac711
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] Rassouli, N., Chalian, H., Rajiah, P., Dhanantwari, A., Landeras, L. (2017). Assessment of 70-keV virtual monoenergetic spectral images in abdominal CT imaging: A comparison study to conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images. Abdominal Radiology, 42, 2579-2586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1151-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] McCollough, C.H., Leng, S., Yu, L., Fletcher, J.G. (2015). Dual- and multi-energy CT: Principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology, 276 (3), 637-653. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142631
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] Padole, A., Singh, S., Lira, D., Blake, M.A., Pourjabbar, S., Khawaja, R.D.A., Choy, G., Saini, S., Do, S., Kalra, M.K. (2015). Assessment of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical, and model-based iterative reconstruction for reduced dose abdominal computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 39 (4), 462-467. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000231
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] Jamali, S., Michoux, N., Coche, E., Dragean, C.A. (2019). Virtual unenhanced phase with spectral dual-energy CT: Is it an alternative to conventional true unenhanced phase for abdominal tissues? Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 100 (9), 503-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.04.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] Lazar, M., Ringl, H., Baltzer, P. et al. (2020). Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions. European Radiology, 30, 4295-4305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06806-9
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography: Comparing True and Virtual Non Contrast Enhanced Images

Abstract

Paradigm

My account