Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results Cover

A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results

Measurement Science Review
Volume 13 (2013): Issue 1 (February 2013)
By: M. Kušnerová,  J. Valíček,  M. Harničárová,  T. Hryniewicz,  K. Rokosz,  Z. Palková,  V. Václavík,  M. Řepka and  M. Bendová  
Open Access
|Feb 2013

References

  1. [1] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (1995). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008. International Standardization Organization. Geneva, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Bich, W., Cox, M. G., Harris, P. M. (2006). Evolutionof the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty inMeasurement. Metrologia, 43(4), 161-166.10.1088/0026-1394/43/4/S01
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Ellison, R. L.S., Rosslein, M. & Williams, A. (2000). Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. EURACHEM/CITAC. (Tech. Rep. Guide CG4).
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Taylor, J.R. (1997). An Introduction to Error Analysis. The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements (2nd ed.). Sausalito, USA: University Science Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] European Cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories. (1997). Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration. EAL-R2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] European Co-operation for Accreditation. (1999). Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement inCalibration. EA 4/02.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Yadav, S., Gupta, V.K., Prakash, O., & Bandyopadhyay, A.K. (2005). Evaluation of associated uncertainties in calibration of direct pressure indicating electromechanical devices. Measurement Science Review, 5(3), 104-114.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Fornasini, P. (2008). The Uncertainty in PhysicalMeasurements. An Introduction to Data Analysis inthe Physics Laboratory. New York, USA: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.10.1007/978-0-387-78650-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Yadav, S., Gupta, V. K. & Bandyopadhyay, A. K. (2010). Investigations on Measurement Uncertainty and Stability of Pressure Dial Gauges and Transducers. Measurement Science Review, 10(4), 130-135.10.2478/v10048-010-0021-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Dudek, E., Mosiadz, M., & Orzepowski, M. (2007). Uncertainties of resistors temperature coefficients. Measurement Science Review, 7(3), 23-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Ferson, S., Kreinovich, V., Hajagos, J., Oberkampf., W. & Ginzburg, L. (2007). Experimental UncertaintyEstimation and Statistics for Data Having IntervalUncertainty. Sandia National Laboratories. (SAND2007-0939).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Kallner, A. (2006). Uncertainty in Measurement: Introduction and Examples. Journal of theInternational Federation of Clinical Chemistry andLaboratory Medicine, 13, 103-109.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2013-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 6
Published on: Feb 9, 2013
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Measurements,
relative nonstandard uncertainty,
verification
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2013 M. Kušnerová, J. Valíček, M. Harničárová, T. Hryniewicz, K. Rokosz, Z. Palková, V. Václavík, M. Řepka, M. Bendová, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 1 (February 2013)Next article