Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Structural and biomedical evaluation of Capsicum annuum-assisted green synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles Cover

Structural and biomedical evaluation of Capsicum annuum-assisted green synthesis of CuFe2O4 nanoparticles

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

FESEM images of CuFe2O4 NPs at different magnifications: (a) low magnification showing agglomerated nanoparticles 10k×, (b) higher magnification showing semi-spherical/ellipsoidal morphology 20k×, and (c) particle size measurement image showing nanoparticles in the range of 110–170 nm, 50k×.

Figure 2

Structural, magnetic, and optical properties of Capsicum annuum extract-assisted synthesized CuFe2O4 nanoparticles sintered at 800℃ for 2 h: (a) XRD pattern, (b) Rietveld refinement of XRD data, (c) magnetic hysteresis loop derived from VSM analysis, (d) FTIR-ATR spectroscopy, (e) UV-Vis absorption spectrum of NPs dispersed in distilled water, and (f) Tauc plot for bandgap energy determination.

Figure 3

Antibacterial activity of CuFe₂O₄ NPs against (a and b) S. aureus and (c and d) E. coli at different concentrations: (A) control case (deionized water (DIW)), (B) 62.5 µg/mL, (C) 125 µg/mL, (D) 250 µg/mL, and (E) 500 µg/mL.

Figure 4

Biofilm formation in E. coli and S. aureus at different concentrations of CuFe₂O₄ NPs: (A) control case, (B) 62.5 µg/mL, (C) 125 µg/mL, (D) 250 µg/mL and (E) 500 µg/mL.

Figure 5

Biofilm formation in (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus treated with CuFe₂O₄ NPs at different concentrations: (A) control case, (B) 62.5 µg/mL, (C) 125 µg/mL, (D) 250 µg/mL, and (E) 500 µg/mL.

Figure 6

Cytotoxicity effect of CuFe₂O₄ substance in MCF-10 cells.

Figure 7

MTT assay: (a) untreated MCF-10 cells and (b) MCF-10 cells after being treated with CuFe₂O₄ NPs.

Figure 8

Hemolysis analysis of CuFe₂O₄ NPs at 12.5 and 25 µg/mL.

Antibacterial activity of CuFe₂O₄ NPs against S_ aureus and E_ coli at different ratios_

SampleControl (DIW)62.5 µg/mL125 µg/mL250 µg/mL500 µg/mL
S. aureus 6 ± 0.029.33 ± 3.2133 ± 2.6436 ± 2.6438.66 ± 2.30
E. coli 6 ± 0.022.66 ± 2.0826 ± 1.7331.66 ± 2.0833.66 ± 1.52

Phasic composition and crystallographic parameters of the synthesized CuFe2O4 sample_

Spinel ferritePhasic chemical compositionEstimated weight fraction (%)Crystal systemSpace groupLattice parameters
CuFe2O4 CuFe2O4 ≈75CubicFd-3m a = b = c = 8.39 Å; α = β = γ = 90°
Fe2O3 ≈12Rhombohedral (hexagonal setting)R-3c a = b = 5.03 Å, c = 13.75 Å; α = β = 90°, γ = 120°
FeO≈8CubicFm-3m a = b = c = 4.33 Å; α = β = γ = 90°
CuO≈5MonoclinicC2/c a = 4.68 Å, b = 3.42 Å, c = 5.13 Å; α = γ = 90°, β ≈ 99.5°

Hemolysis data of CuFe₂O₄ NPs_

SamplesResult of deviceResult after
25 µg/mL0.0454.83
12.5 µg/mL0.0423.39
Negative control0.035ـــ
Positive control0.241ـــ

Cations distribution derived from Rietveld refinement of CuFe2O4 sintered at 800°C for 2 h_

Spinel ferrite a (Å) χ 2 R wp (%) R exp (%)Cell volume (V), (Å3)A-site (tetrahedral)B-site (octahedral)Final chemical formulaInversion parameter (ϕ)
CuFe2O4 8.391.89.36.88590.59( Fe 1.0 + 3 {{\rm{Fe}}}_{1.0}^{+3} )[ Cu 1.0 + 2 Fe 1.0 + 3 {{\rm{Cu}}}_{1.0}^{+2}{{\rm{Fe}}}_{1.0}^{+3} ]( Fe 1.0 + 3 {{\rm{Fe}}}_{1.0}^{+3} )A [ Cu 1.0 + 2 Fe 1.0 + 3 {{\rm{Cu}}}_{1.0}^{+2}{{\rm{Fe}}}_{1.0}^{+3} ]B O 4 2 {{\rm{O}}}_{4}^{-2} 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2026-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 164 - 179
Submitted on: May 8, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2026
Published on: Jul 10, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Sara H. Shahatha, Rihab Jabbar, Mohammed Hayder Ismail Alluaibi, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.