Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental accuracy verification of the common practice analysis of doubly reinforced shallow concrete beams reinforced by steel grade 500 Cover

Experimental accuracy verification of the common practice analysis of doubly reinforced shallow concrete beams reinforced by steel grade 500

Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Analysis of a doubly reinforced rectangular beam [9]. (a) Cross-section, (b) Strain distribution, (c) Stress and forces, (d) Forces from Part 1, and (e) Forces from Part 2.
Analysis of a doubly reinforced rectangular beam [9]. (a) Cross-section, (b) Strain distribution, (c) Stress and forces, (d) Forces from Part 1, and (e) Forces from Part 2.

Figure 2

Alternate live loadings for minimum and maximum effects.
Alternate live loadings for minimum and maximum effects.

Figure 3

Bars in the compression area acting as stirrup hangers.
Bars in the compression area acting as stirrup hangers.

Figure 4

Minimum net tensile strain 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    ε
                                 
                                 
                                    t
                                    ,
                                    min
                                 
                              
                           
                           {\varepsilon }_{{\rm{t}},\min }
                        
                      for tension-controlled sections.
Minimum net tensile strain ε t , min {\varepsilon }_{{\rm{t}},\min } for tension-controlled sections.

Figure 5

Flowchart for the analysis of a doubly reinforced concrete section.
Flowchart for the analysis of a doubly reinforced concrete section.

Figure 6

Schematic longitudinal and cross sections of the tested beams: (a) B1, (b) B2, and (c) B3 (all dimensions in mm).
Schematic longitudinal and cross sections of the tested beams: (a) B1, (b) B2, and (c) B3 (all dimensions in mm).

Figure 7

Loading, shear force, and bending moment diagrams of the tested beams.
Loading, shear force, and bending moment diagrams of the tested beams.

Figure 8

Concrete pouring of the beam specimens and cylinders.
Concrete pouring of the beam specimens and cylinders.

Figure 9

Reinforcement cages of beam specimens.
Reinforcement cages of beam specimens.

Figure 10

Positions of strain gauges.
Positions of strain gauges.

Figure 11

Test setup.
Test setup.

Figure 12

Compression-controlled failure of all the tested beams.
Compression-controlled failure of all the tested beams.

Figure 13

The relationship between load and maximum deflection for the tested beams.
The relationship between load and maximum deflection for the tested beams.

Figure 14

The relationship between load and maximum concrete compressive strain for the tested beams.
The relationship between load and maximum concrete compressive strain for the tested beams.

Figure 15

The relation between load and strain in tensile steel for the tested beams.
The relation between load and strain in tensile steel for the tested beams.

Figure 16

The relation between load and strain in compressive steel for the tested beams.
The relation between load and strain in compressive steel for the tested beams.

Figure 17

Initial, tangent, and secant moduli of elasticity of concrete [9].
Initial, tangent, and secant moduli of elasticity of concrete [9].

Figure 18

Typical concrete stress–strain curves in compression [9].
Typical concrete stress–strain curves in compression [9].

Figure 19

Analytical approximation to the compressive stress–strain curve for concrete [9].
Analytical approximation to the compressive stress–strain curve for concrete [9].

Figure 20

Proposed analytical model for shallow beams. (a) Cross-section, (b) Strain distribution, and (c) Stress and forces.
Proposed analytical model for shallow beams. (a) Cross-section, (b) Strain distribution, and (c) Stress and forces.

Compression steel in the tested beams_

Beam ID A s {A}_{{\rm{s}}} A s {A}_{{\rm{s}}}^{^{\prime} } A s / A s {A}_{{\rm{s}}}^{^{\prime} }{\boldsymbol{/}}{A}_{{\rm{s}}} Details
B1 2Ø222Ø100.2 Figure 6(a)
B2 2Ø223Ø100.3 Figure 6(b)
B3 2Ø222Ø221.0 Figure 6(c)

Concrete mix proportion (m3)_

CementDolomiteSandWaterAdmixture
350 kg1,292 kg646 kg175 L5.4 kg

Comparison of experimental and proposed method results_

Point of comparisonB1 beamB2 beamB3 beam
ExperimentalAnalytical%ExperimentalAnalytical%ExperimentalAnalytical%
Failure load (kN)118.4105.9+11.8%122.0111.1+9.8%166.0150.2+10.5%
Nominal moment strength* (kN m)42.9238.39+11.8%44.2340.27+9.8%60.1854.45+10.5%
Concrete compressive strain at failure0.0015260.001507+1.3%0.0014130.001507−6.2%0.0015180.001507+0.7%
Strain in tension steel at failure0.0013760.001365+0.8%0.0014600.001446+1.0%0.0017650.001729+2.1%
Strain in compressive steel at failure0.0013440.001330+1.1%0.0012110.001194+1.4%0.0009790.001054−7.1%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2025-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 124 - 145
Submitted on: Aug 7, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 6, 2025
Published on: Oct 25, 2025
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Hassan M. Magbool, Ahmed A. El-Abbasy, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.