Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The performance of CFRP-strengthened heat-damaged metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete cylinders containing reclaimed asphalt aggregate Cover

The performance of CFRP-strengthened heat-damaged metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete cylinders containing reclaimed asphalt aggregate

By: Aref A. Abadel  
Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Sarker P, Kelly S, Yao Z. Effect of fire exposure on cracking, spalling and residual strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater Des. 2014;29:584–592. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.059
  2. Abdellatief M, Elrahman MA, Abadel AA, Wasim M, Tahwia A. Ultra-high performance concrete versus ultrahigh performance geopolymer concrete: Mechanical performance, microstructure, and ecological assessment. J Build Eng. 2023;79:107835. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.202 3.107835
  3. Pradhan P, Dwibedy S, Pradhan M, Panda S, Panigrahi SK. Durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete – Progress and perspectives. J Build Eng. 2022;59:105100. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.105100
  4. Wardhono A, Law DW, Strano A. The strength of alkali-activated slag/fly ash mortar blends at ambient temperature. Procedia Eng. 2015;125:650–656. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.095
  5. Alrshoudi F, Abbas H, Abadel A, Albidah A, Altheeb A, Al-Salloum Y. Compression behavior and modeling of FRP-confined high strength geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2021;283:122759. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.122759
  6. Turner LK, Collins FG. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;43:125–130. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.01.023
  7. Wasim M, Abadel A, Abu Bakar BH, Alshaikh IMH. Future directions for the application of zero carbon concrete in civil engineering – A review. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;17:e01318. doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01318
  8. Qaidi S, Al-Kamaki YSS, Al-Mahaidi R, Mohammed AS, Ahmed HU, Zaid O, Althoey F, Ahmad J, Isleem HF, Bennetts I. Investigation of the effectiveness of CFRP strengthening of concrete made with recycled waste PET fine plastic aggregate. PLoS One. 2022;17:1– 27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269664
  9. Alsaif A, Albidah A, Abadel A, Abbas H, Almusallam T, Al-Salloum Y. Behavior of ternary blended cementitious rubberized mixes reinforced with recycled tires steel fibers under different types of impact loads. Structures. 2022;45:2292–2305. doi: 10.1016/J.ISTRUC.202 2.10.049
  10. Singh S, Ransinchung GDRN, Monu K, Kumar P. Laboratory investigation of RAP aggregates for dry lean concrete mixes. Constr Build Mater. 2018;166:808–816. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.01.131
  11. Brand AS, Roesler JR. Bonding in cementitious materials with asphalt-coated particles: Part I – The interfacial transition zone. Constr Build Mater. 2017;130:171–181. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.10.019
  12. Widayanti A, Soemitro Ria AA, Ekaputri JJ, Suprayitno H. Characterization of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) as a road pavement material (National Road Waru, Sidoarjo). MATEC Web Conf. 2018;181:05001. doi: 10.1051/MATECCONF/201818105001
  13. Federal Highway Administration. User Guidelines for Waste and By-product Materials in Pavement Construction. Washington, DC: FHWA; 2008.
  14. Tarsi G, Tataranni P, Sangiorgi C. The challenges of using reclaimed asphalt pavement for new asphalt mixtures: A review. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:4052. doi: 10.3390/MA13184052
  15. Albidah AS. Influence of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2023;402:132945. doi: 10.1 016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.132945
  16. Albidah A, Altheeb A, Alrshoudi F, Abadel A, Abbas H, Al-Salloum Y. Bond performance of GFRP and steel rebars embedded in metakaolin based geopolymer concrete. Structures. 2020;27:1582–1593. doi: 10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2020.07.048
  17. Mukhtar F, Deifalla A. Shear strength of FRP reinforced deep concrete beams without stirrups: Test database and a critical shear crack-based model. Compos Struct. 2023;307:116636. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.202 2.116636
  18. Elsanadedy HM, Al-Salloum YA, Almusallam TH, Alshenawy AO, Abbas H. Experimental and numerical study on FRP-upgraded RC beams with large rectangular web openings in shear zones. Constr Build Mater. 2019;194:322–343. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.1 0.238
  19. El-Sayed TA, Shaheen YB, AbouBakr MM, Abdelnaby RM. Behavior of ferrocement water pipes as an alternative solution for steel water pipes. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;18:e01806. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.202 2.e01806
  20. Mariam Boban J, Susan John A. A review on the use of ferrocement with stainless steel mesh as a rehabilitation technique. Mater Today Proc. 2021;42:1100–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.490
  21. Yang X, Zhang B, Zhou A, Wei H, Liu T. Axial compressive behaviour of corroded steel reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with a basalt fibre reinforced polymer-ultrahigh performance concrete jacket. Compos Struct. 2023;304:116447. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.202 2.116447
  22. Xiao S-H, Lin J-X, Li L-J, Guo Y-C, Zeng J-J, Xie Z-H, Wei F-F, Li M. Experimental study on flexural behavior of concrete beam reinforced with GFRP and steel-fiber composite bars. J Build Eng. 2021;43:103087. doi: 10.1 016/j.jobe.2021.103087
  23. Alkhateeb MY, Hejazi F. Reinforced concrete beams externally strengthened by CFRP rods with steel plate, anchorage bolts, and concrete jacketing. Structures. 2022;46:1994–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.024
  24. Jin L, Jiang X, Xia H, Chen F, Du X. Size effect in shear failure of lightweight concrete beams wrapped with CFRP without stirrups: Influence of fiber ratio. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;199:108257. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108257
  25. Rùžek V, Dostayeva AM, Walter J, Grab T, Korniejenko K. Carbon fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites: A review. Fibers. 2023;11:17. doi: 10.3390/FIB11020017
  26. Matsui K. Effects of curing conditions and test temperatures on the strength of adhesive-bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1990;10:277–284. doi: 10.1016/0143-7496(90)90046-Z
  27. Nguyen TC, Bai Y, Zhao XL, Al-Mahaidi R. Curing effects on steel/CFRP double strap joints under combined mechanical load, temperature and humidity. Constr Build Mater. 2013;40:899–907. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.11.035
  28. Hollaway L, Teng JG, M. Strengthening and rehabilitation of civil infrastructures using fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier, 2008.
  29. Wang JJ, Zhang SS, Nie XF, Yu T. Compressive behavior of FRP-confined ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) and ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Compos Struct. 2023;312:116879. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116879
  30. Zeng X, Deng K, Liang H, Xu R, Zhao C, Cui B. Uniaxial behavior and constitutive model of reinforcement confined coarse aggregate UHPC. Eng Struct. 2020;207:110261. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110261
  31. Abadel AA, Alharbi YR. Confinement effectiveness of CFRP strengthened ultra-high performance concrete cylinders exposed to elevated temperatures. Mater Sci. 2021;39:478–490. doi: 10.2478/MSP-2021-0040
  32. Al-Bayati G, Kalfat R, Al-Mahaidi R, Hashemi J. Experimental study on crack propagation of CFRP- strengthened RC beams subjected to torsion. Aust J Struct Eng. 2018;19:279–297. doi: 10.1080/13287982.2018.1523293
  33. Raouf S, Ibraheem O, Tais A. Confinement effectiveness of CFRP strengthened concrete cylinders subjected to high temperatures. Adv Concr Constr. 2020;9:7. doi: 10.12989/acc.2020.9.6.529
  34. Alzeebaree R, Xevik A, Mohammedameen A, Ni° A, Eren M, Xan G. Mechanical performance of FRP- confined geopolymer concrete under seawater attack. Adv Struct Eng. 23 (2019). doi: 10.1177/1369433219886964
  35. Chen GM, He YH, Jiang T, Lin CJ. Behavior of CFRP- confined recycled aggregate concrete under axial compression. Constr Build Mater. 2016;111:85–97.
  36. McSwain AC, Berube KA, Cusatis G, Landis EN. Confinement effects on fiber pullout forces for ultra- high-performance concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2018; 91:53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.04.011
  37. Yazdanbakhsh A, Bank LC. A critical review of research on reuse of mechanically recycled FRP production and end-of-life waste for construction. Polymers (Basel). 2014;6:1810–1826.
  38. Gao C, Huang L, Yan L, Kasal B, Li W. Behavior of glass and carbon FRP tube encased recycled aggregate concrete with recycled clay brick aggregate. Compos Struct. 2016;155:245–254.
  39. Mastali M, Dalvand A. The impact resistance and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete reinforced with recycled CFRP pieces. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;92:360–376.
  40. Makhlouf M, Torsional behavior of RC beams with opening using (CFRP – GFRP – Steel) stirrups. Adv Res. 2016;8:1–10. doi: 10.9734/AIR/2016/30247
  41. Elwan SK. Torsion strengthening of RC beams using CFRP (parametric study). KSCE J Civ Eng. 2017;21:1273–1281. doi: 10.1007/s12205-016-0156-7
  42. Aules WA, Saeed YM, Al-Azzawi H, Rad FN. Experimental investigation on short concrete columns laterally strengthened with ferrocement and CFRP. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2022;16:e01130. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01130
  43. Wang G, Wei Y, Shen C, Huang Z, Zheng K. Compression performance of FRP-steel composite tube-confined ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) columns. Thin-Walled Struct. 2023;192:111152. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111152
  44. Zhang H, Wu J, Jin F, Zhang C. Effect of corroded stirrups on shear behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber- reinforced polymer. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;161:357– 368. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.074
  45. Ma K, Cao X, Song J, Meng X, Qiao L. Axial compressive behavior of concrete-filled steel tubes with GFRP-confined UHPC cores. J Constr Steel Res. 2023;200:107632. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107632
  46. Li W, Lu Y, Wang P, Jiang Y, Wang L, Shi T, Zheng K. Comparative study of compressive behavior of confined NSC and UHPC/UHPFRC cylinders externally wrapped with CFRP jacket. Eng Struct. 2023;292:116513. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116513
  47. Nanni A. Flexural behavior and design of RC Members using FRP reinforcement. J Struct Eng. 1993;119. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3344)
  48. Hung C-C, Hsiao H-J, Shao Y, Yen C-H. A comparative study on the seismic performance of RC beam-column joints retrofitted by ECC, FRP, and concrete jacketing methods. J Build Eng. 2023;64:105691. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105691
  49. Xiang D, Hou Z, Liu Y, Li Y, Xu X. Flexural behavior and crack width prediction of UHPC slabs reinforced with FRP bars. J Build Eng. 2023;77:107548. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107548
  50. Borrie D, Al-saadi S, Zhao XL, Singh Raman RK, Bai Y. Bonded CFRP/steel systems, remedies of bond degradation and behaviour of CFRP repaired steel: An overview. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13:1533. doi: 10.3390/POLYM13091533
  51. Hollaway LC, Cadei J. Progress in the technique of upgrading metallic structures with advanced polymer composites. Prog Struct Eng Mater. 2002;4:131–148. doi: 10.1002/PSE.112
  52. Abadel AA. Rehabilitation of post-heated rectangular reinforced concrete columns using different strengthening configuration. Struct Concr. 2023. doi: 10.1002/SU CO.202300521
  53. Abadel A, Abbas H, Albidah A, Almusallam T, Al- Salloum Y. Effectiveness of GFRP strengthening of normal and high strength fiber reinforced concrete after exposure to heating and cooling. Eng Sci Technol an Int J. 2022;36:101147. doi: 10.1016/J.JESTCH.2022.1011 47
  54. Abadel AA, Alharbi YR. Confinement effectiveness of CFRP strengthened ultra high performance concrete cylinders exposed to elevated temperatures. Mater Sci- Pol. 2022. doi: 10.2478/msp-2021-0040
  55. ASTM D3039/D3039M -08. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA; 2008 (n.d.)
  56. Alghannam M, Albidah A, Abbas H, Al-Salloum Y. Influence of critical parameters of mix proportions on properties of MK-based geopolymer concrete. Arab J Sci Eng. 2021;46:4399–4408. doi: 10.1007/S13369-020-04970-0/FIGURES/10
  57. A.-C. ASTM C39/C39M-17. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International: West Conshohocken; 2017.
  58. Albidah A, Alqarni AS, Abbas H, Almusallam T, Al- Salloum Y. Behavior of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2022;317:125910. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125910
  59. Thomas RJ, Fellows AJ, Sorensen AD. Durability analysis of recycled asphalt pavement as partial coarse aggregate replacement in a high-strength concrete mixture. J Mater Civ Eng. 2018;30:04018061. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002262
  60. Khodair Y, Raza M. Sustainable self-consolidating concrete using recycled asphalt pavement and high volume of supplementary cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater. 2017;131:245–253. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILD MAT.2016.11.044
  61. Hassan KE, Brooks JJ, Erdman M. The use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) aggregates in concrete. Waste Manag Ser. 2000;1:121–128. doi: 10.1016/S0713-2743(00)80024-0
  62. Erdem S, Blankson MA. Environmental performance and mechanical analysis of concrete containing recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) and waste precast concrete as aggregate. J Hazard Mater. 2014;264:403–410. doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2013.11.040
  63. Kong DLY, Sanjayan JG. Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Compos. 2008;30:986–991. doi: 10.1016/J.CE MCONCOMP.2008.08.001
  64. Zhang HY, Kodur V, Qi SL, Cao L, Wu B. Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Constr Build Mater. 2014;55:38–45. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.01.040
  65. Vora PR, Dave UV. Parametric studies on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Procedia Eng. 2013;51:210–219. doi: 10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.01.030
  66. Sarkar M, Dana K. Partial replacement of metakaolin with red ceramic waste in geopolymer. Ceram Int. 2021;47:3473–3483. doi: 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2020.09.191
  67. Aly AM, El-Feky MS, Kohail M, Nasr ESAR. Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber. Constr Build Mater. 2019;207:136–144. doi: 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.02.121
  68. Bisby LA, Chen JF, Li SQ, Stratford TJ, Cueva N, Crossling K. Strengthening fire-damaged concrete by confinement with fibre-reinforced polymer wraps. Eng Struct. 2011;33:3381–3391. doi: 10.1016/J.ENGSTR UCT.2011.07.002
  69. Abadel AA, Masmoudi R, Iqbal Khan M. Axial behavior of square and circular concrete columns confined with CFRP sheets under elevated temperatures: Comparison with welded-wire mesh steel confinement. Structures. 2022;45:126–144. doi: 10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2022.09.026
  70. Khaloo AR, Dehestani M, Rahmatabadi P. Mechanical properties of concrete containing a high volume of tire–rubber particles. Waste Manag. 2008;28:2472– 2482. doi: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2008.01.015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2024-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 142
Submitted on: Jun 9, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2024
|
Published on: Aug 30, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Aref A. Abadel, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.