Navigating AI sustainability: A life cycle assessment approach toward viable future solutions
By: Marco Ruggeri, Sorin Anagnoste and Marco Savastano
References
- Afrinaldi, F., & Nilda, T. (2024). A benefit-loss analysis of electricity generation in Indonesia: Life cycle assessment and economic input-output analysis application. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 50, 208–227. doi: 10.37934/araset.50.2.208227.
- Alzoubi, Y., & Mishra, A. (2024). Green artificial intelligence initiatives: Potentials and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, 143090. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143090.
- Anagnoste, S., Biclesanu, I., D’Ascenzo, F., & Savastano, M. (2021). The role of chatbots in end-to-end intelligent automation and future employment dynamics. In Business Revolution in a Digital Era: 14th International Conference on Business Excellence, ICBE 2020, Bucharest, Romania (pp. 287–302). Springer International Publishing.
- Azarifar, M., Arik, M., & Chang, J. Y. (2024). Liquid cooling of data centers: A necessity facing challenges. Applied Thermal Engineering, 247, 123112. doi: 10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2024.123112.
- Baldassarre, B., & Carrara, S. (2025). Critical raw materials, circular economy, sustainable development: EU policy reflections for future research and innovation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 215, 108060. doi: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2024.108060.
- Bennagi, A., AlHousrya, O., Cotfas, D. T., & Cotfas, P. A. (2024). Comprehensive study of the artificial intelligence applied in renewable energy. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54, 101446. doi: 10.1016/J.ESR.2024.101446.
- Chen, K., Xu, W., & Li, X. (2025). The potential of Gemini and GPTs for structured report generation based on free-text 18F-FDG PET/CT breast cancer reports. Academic Radiology, 32(2), 624–633. doi: 10.1016/J.ACRA.2024.08.052.
- Chen, L., Miller, S. A., & Ellis, B. R. (2017). Comparative human toxicity impact of electricity produced from shale gas and coal. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(21), 13018–13027. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03546.
- Cho. (2023). AI’s growing carbon footprint. Retrieved from: https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2023/06/09/ais-growing-carbon-footprint/.
- Coglianese, C., & Lehr, D. (2019). Transparency and algorithmic governance. Administrative Law Review, 71(1), 1–56.
- de Vries, A. (2023). The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, 7(10), 2191–2194. doi: 10.1016/J.JOULE.2023.09.004.
- Dokic, D., Groen In’T Woud, F., & Maass, W. (2024). Towards sustainability of AI: A systematic review of existing life cycle assessment approaches and key environmental impact parameters of artificial intelligence. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2024 (HICSS-57) (p. 2).
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2024). Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle. Retrivied from: https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle.
- Eurostat. (2024). Water statistics. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Water_statistics.
- Ghoroghi, A., Rezgui, Y., Petri, I., & Beach, T. (2022). Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: A literature review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27(3), 433–456.
- Gupta, P. (2018). Radioactive materials. Illustrated Toxicology, 13, 357–371. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813213-5.00013-4.
- Gupta, S., Tarapore, R., Haislup, B., & Fillar, A. (2024). Microsoft Copilot provides more accurate and reliable information about anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair than ChatGPT and Google Gemini; However, no resource was overall the best. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 7(2), 101043. doi: 10.1016/J.ASMR.2024.101043.
- Hess, J. C. (2024). Chip production’s ecological footprint: Mapping climate and environmental impact. Retrieved from: https://www.interface-eu.org/publications/chip-productions-ecological-footprint.
- Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan.
- Hosseini, M., Gao, P., & Vivas-Valencia, C. (2024). A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Environmental Science & Ecotechnology, 23, 100520. doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100520.
- International Energy Agency. (2020). Data and statistics. Retrieved from: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics.
- Lamnatou, C., Cristofari, C., & Chemisana, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in relation to environmental life-cycle assessment, photovoltaics, smart grids and small-island economies. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 71, 104005. doi: 10.1016/J.SETA.2024.104005.
- Li, P., Yang, J., Islam, M. A., & Ren, S. (2023). Making AI less “Thirsty”: Uncovering and addressing the secret water footprint of AI models. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 68, pp. 54–61, ArXiv, abs/2304.03271.
- Liang, P., Sun, X., & Qi, L. (2024). Does artificial intelligence technology enhance green transformation of enterprises: Based on green innovation perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 21651–21687.
- Ligozat, A. L., Lefevre, J., Bugeau, A., & Combaz, J. (2022). Unraveling the hidden environmental impacts of AI solutions for environment life cycle assessment of AI solutions. Sustainability, 14(9), 5172.
- Lv, Z. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence in the metaverse era. Cognitive Robotics, 3, 208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cogr.2023.06.001.
- Miglietta, P. P., Toma, P., Fanizzi, F. P., De Donno, A., Coluccia, B., Migoni, D., Bagordo, F., & Serio, F. (2017). A grey water footprint assessment of groundwater chemical pollution: Case study in Salento (Southern Italy). Sustainability, 9(5), 799. doi: 10.3390/su9050799.
- Muley, D., & Singh, B. (2024). Environmental impacts of COVID–19 responses on passenger vehicle transport scenarios: A life cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 455, 142309. doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.142309.
- Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production. Science of the Total Environment, 631, 1279–1294.
- OECD/IEA. (2014). Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita). Retrivied from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE.
- Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
- Plociennik, C., Watjanatepin, P., Acker, K. van, & Ruskowski, M. (2025). Life cycle assessment of artificial intelligence applications: Research gaps and opportunities. Procedia CIRP, 135, 924–929. doi: 10.1016/J.PROCIR.2025.01.079.
- Płoszaj-Mazurek, M., & Ryńska, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and digital tools for assisting low-carbon architectural design: Merging the use of machine learning, large language models, and building information modeling for life cycle assessment tool development. Energies, 17(12), 2997. doi: 10.3390/en17122997.
- Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Land use per kilogram of food product. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/land-use-per-kg-poore.
- Popowicz, M., Katzer, N. J., Kettele, M., Schöggl, J. P., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2025). Digital technologies for life cycle assessment: A review and integrated combination framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30, 405–428.
- Qaadan, S., Ahmed, A., Tiemann, M., Popp, A., & Schmuelling, B. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for advanced diagnostics and life cycle assessment of traction batteries. Third International Conference on Sustainable Mobility Applications, Renewables and Technology (SMART) (pp. 1–8). doi: 10.1109/SMART63170.2024.10815545.
- Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations, and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. doi: 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
- Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, 100005. doi: 10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005.
- Sætra, H. S. (2019). The ghost in the machine. Human Arenas, 2, 60–78. doi: 10.1007/s42087-018-0039-1.
- Sætra, H. S. (2023). Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good? Technology in Society, 75, 102372. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102372.
- Salla, J. V. E., de Almeida, T. A., & Silva, D. A. L. (2025). Integrating machine learning with life cycle assessment: A comprehensive review and guide for predicting environmental impacts. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30, 2423–2445. doi: 10.1007/s11367-025-02437-8.
- Samsami, Z., Jafari, A. J., Delnavaz, M., Naderi, A., Rashvanlou, R. B., Inchehboroun, B. M., & Dehghanifard, E. (2025). Environmental impact assessment of Southern Tehran wastewater treatment plant using life cycle assessment (LCA). Scientific Reports, 15, 294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81380-4.
- Savastano, M., Biclesanu, I., Anagnoste, S., Laviola, F., & Cucari, N. (2025). Enterprise chatbots in managers’ perception: A strategic framework to implement successful chatbot applications for business decisions. Management Decision, 63(10), 3300–3322.
- Shehabi, A., Smith, S. J., Hubbard, A., Newkirk, A., Lei, N., Siddik, M. A. B., Holecek, B., Koomey, J., Masanet, E., & Sartor, D. (2024). 2024 United States data center energy usage report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-2001637.
- Tulchinsky, T. H., Varavikova, E. A., & Cohen, M. J. (2023). Environmental and occupational health. In, The New Public Health, Academic Press, vol. 9, pp. 681–750. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822957-6.00016-8.
- United Nations. (2024). Digital economy report 2024: Shaping an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital future. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/der2024_en.pdf.
- Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 9. doi: 10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8.
- Yu, J., & Li, G. (2025). Evaluating artificial intelligence-based industrial wastewater anaerobic ammonium oxidation treatment optimization and its environmental, economic, and social benefits using a life cycle assessment–system dynamics model. Processes, 13(1), 59. doi: 10.3390/pr13010059.
- Zhang, J., Zhuge, C., Huang, Q., Wang, B., Li, Y., & Oosterveer, P. (2025). Farmers’ decisions on crop residues utilization, greenhouse gases reduction and subsidy of crop residue-based bioenergy: An agent-based life cycle model. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 55, 24–36. doi: 10.1016/J.SPC.2025.02.001.
- Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 203–213). Routledge.
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 155
Submitted on: Jun 23, 2025
Accepted on: Dec 15, 2025
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
Published by: Society for Business Excellence
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Marco Ruggeri, Sorin Anagnoste, Marco Savastano, published by Society for Business Excellence
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.