Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changes in chemical composition of peridotite olivine crystals as a result of xenolith–host rock interaction (Jeziorna, Lower Silesia, SW Poland) Cover

Changes in chemical composition of peridotite olivine crystals as a result of xenolith–host rock interaction (Jeziorna, Lower Silesia, SW Poland)

By: Monika Nowak  
Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Location of the study site: (a) Occurrences of Cenozoic basalts in Poland against the background of the Central European Volcanic Province. Outcrops with xenoliths described in the literature in recent years are marked in red. 1. Księginki, 2. Wilcza Góra, 3. Krzeniów, 4. Winna Góra 5. Plichowice 6. Lutynia 7. Ostrzyca 8. Grodziec 9. Grodziec 2 and 10. Nowa Cerekwia (Ćwiek et al., 2018; Matusiak-Małek et al., 2010, 2017a, 2017b, 2021; Mazurek et al., 2025; Puziewicz et al., 2015, 2020). (b) Location of the studied Jeziorna outcrop against the background of geological divisions (Baranowski et al., 1990; Sawicki, 1967).

Figure 2

(a) Size distribution of collected xenoliths, and (b) petrographic classification of the studied xenoliths.

Figure 3

Maps of the studied xenoliths made in ArcGIS together with the research profiles, s.p. – starting point of the research profile, e.p. – ending point of the research profile. Other – analyses performed in minerals other than olivine.

Figure 4

(a) Scan of sample J3-1, the largest of the studied xenoliths, showing degree of weathering changes, (b) Scan of sample J3_4 (Clinopyroxenite), BSE images showing (c) a ‘selvage’ on the xenolith-sample edge, (d) diffusion-rim zones occurring at the xenolith–volcanic rock edge and inside the xenolith near the cracks, (e) diffusion-rim zones that occur in olivine crystals and around the ‘mp’ changing the chemical composition of practically the entire sample J3-6-I, (f) diffusion-rim zones not covering the melt-pockets area in one of the larger xenoliths) J3-12, zone with Fo values (ca. 89) – darker BSE image, (g) diffusion-rim zone only on the xenolith edge in xenolith J3-12, area of the xenolith with lower Fo values (ca. 81) – lighter BSE image, and (h) secondary minerals with ‘selvage’ in sample J3-1.

Figure 5

(a) Fluctuations of Fo content in olivine crystals along the research profiles, together with the division into groups A, B and C (sensu Matusiak-Małek et al., 2010, 2014, 2017a, 2017b); (b) fluctuations of Ca (ppm) content in olivine crystals along the research profiles, and (c) fluctuations of Ni (ppm) content in olivine crystals along the research profiles.

Figure 6

(a) Fluctuations of CaO (wt%) content in the tested samples, the dashed lines refer to the ranges recorded in other outcrops from Lower Silesia (Matusiak-Małek et al., 2014, 2017a, 2017b). (b) Fluctuations of NiO (wt%) content in the tested samples to the ranges recorded in outcrops from Lower Silesia (Mazurek et al., 2025).

Figure 7

(a) Variations in Al content (a. pfu) versus magnesium number (#Mg) in the studied orthopyroxenes from Jeziorna, compared with samples from Krzeniów, Grodziec, and Wilcza Góra (Matusiak‑Małek et al., 2014, 2017a, 2017b). (b) Variations in Ca content (a. pfu) versus magnesium number (Mg#) in the studied orthopyroxenes from Jeziorna, compared with samples from Krzeniów and Wilcza Góra (Matusiak‑Małek et al., 2014, 2017b). (c) Temperatures calculated using the T1: Witt-Eickschen & Seck (1991) and T2: Brey & Köhler (1990) thermometers for orthopyroxenes. (d) Variations in Ca content (a. pfu) versus magnesium number (Mg#) in the studied clinopyroxenes from Jeziorna. (e) Classification diagram of orthopyroxenes from Jeziorna (after Morimoto et al., 1988). (f) Classification diagram of clinopyroxenes from Jeziorna (after Morimoto et al., 1988).

Figure 8

Division of the obtained data for olivine depending on the processes that may represent: (a) regional variability of xenoliths also related to metasomatic changes; (b) changes related to final stage host–rock interactions.

Detailed information on research profiles_

Thin-section No.Xenolith IDNumber of the xenolithsXenolith size on the thin-section (cm)Number of measurement profilesLength of measurement profile (mm)Distance between measurement points (mm)Number of measurement points
Jeziorna
1J3_111.0–1.319.550.3330
2 27.980.4420
2 J3_4
3J3_5_I2 13.880.5310
27.510.3325
J3_5_II 12.220.3010
4J3_6_I20.5–0.914.820.3415
26.030.5115
J3_6_II 0.1–0.111.350.218
5J3_7_I20.2–0.716.720.8010
J3_7_II
6J3_ 810.4–0.716.390.7310
23.620.4410
7J3_1010.1–0.212.070.238
21.350.2110
8J3_11b10.3–0.615.950.3720
23.580.4210
9J3_1210.5–0.918.831.3830
24.891.0010

Classification of chemical analyses of olivine (n = 185) according to geological processes that may have affected the studied xenoliths_

Geological processRegional variability among samples Final-stage interactionsOther: analytical uncertaintiesOther: weatheringOther: heating
Chemical composition of olivine (n = 185)GroupTotal analyses (n), Percentage of Group (%)Geochemical composition Q2 Median (range Fo–3%, Ca + 400 ppm, Ni–400 ppm); (Aa, Ba, Ca)Geochemical variation from Q2 (Fo decrease, Ca + 400 ppm, Ni–400 ppm) with diffusion rim in BSE image (Ac, Bc, Cc)Geochemical variations from Q2 near Ca-bearing minerals (Ca + 400 ppm, Ni–400 ppm); (Bb1,Cb1) Geochemical variations from Q2 near secondary minerals (Ca + 400 ppm, Ni–400 ppm); (Ab2, Bb2, Cb2)Geochemical variations from Q2 (Ca + 400 ppm, Ni–400 ppm) – analyses without contact with Ca-bearing minerals (Bb3, Cb3)
Total number of analyses (n), Percentage (%)A (Fo > 90) 55, 29.7 43, 23.310, 5.52, 1.1
Crystal core (n), percentage (%)21, 12.317, 9.24, 2.1
Crystal rim (n), percentage (%)34, 17.426, 14.16, 3.22, 1.1
Total number of analyses (n), percentage (%)B (Fo 80–90) 106, 57.3 68, 36.818, 9.78, 4.34, 2.28, 4.3
Crystal core (n), percentage (%)50, 27.034, 18.48, 4.38, 4.3
Crystal rim (n), percentage (%)56, 30.334, 18.410, 5.48, 4.34, 2.2
Total number of analyses (n), percentage (%)C (Fo < 80) 24, 13.0 11, 65, 2.74, 2.12, 1.12, 1.1
Crystal core (n), percentage (%)13, 7.19, 4.92, 1.12, 1.1
Crystal rim (n), percentage (%)11, 5.92, 1.13, 1.64, 2.12, 1.1

Modal composition of minerals in the studied xenoliths based on planimetric analysis_

Sample nameOl (%)Opx (%)Cpx (%)Amp (%)Spl (%)‘Melt pockets’ (%)‘Secondary minerals’ (%)Cpx- rim crystals (%)
1J3_154.33.30.00.00.00.042.10.3
2J3_43.60.081.70.00.05.80.09.0
3J3_5_I70.33.70.70.00.111.89.63.6
4J3_5_II29.434.10.80.00.00.90.034.8
5J3_6_I49.38.40.10.00.026.97.67.6
6J3_6_II96.10.00.00.00.03.90.00.0
7J3_7_I28.68.50.10.00.035.01.526.2
8J3_7 _II8.50.067.70.00.023.90.00.0
9J3_887.80.00.00.00.08.31.42.5
10J3_1013.30.081.30.00.05.40.00.0
11J3_11b77.20.03.70.00.00.019.10.0
12J3_1256.125.95.20.00.55.60.56.2

Basic information about the studied xenolith samples_

Xenolith nameXenolith diameter (cm)Macroscopic observationRock nameRock textureOlivine in Xenoliths (mm)Orthopyroxene in xenoliths (mm)Clinopyroxene in xenoliths (mm)Melt pockets in xenoliths (mm)Reaction rim between host rock and pyroxene (μm)Diffusion rim in olivine (μm)
1J3_11.15CumulateDuniteProtogranular0.38–1.770.28–1.31114–28368–75
2J3_41.1ClinopyroxeniteClinopyroxenitePorphyroclastic0.21–1.580.19–0.321.96–7.910.48–4.77250–480
3J3_5_I1.1CumulateDunitePorphyroclastic0.22–2.940.57–1.790.18–1.281.2952–23236–58
4J3_5_II0.235HarzburgiteProtogranular0.13–1.140.63–1.381.76179–67220–52
5J3_6_I0.55Ultramafic xenolithHarzburgiteEquigranular0.2–0.650.29–0.980.18–0.760.52–1.54120–390
6J3_6_II0.12DuniteEquigranular0.21–1.2247–73
7J3_7_I0.65Ultramafic xenolithHarzburgiteEquigranular0.16–1.330.29–0.700.4100.51–0.94150–83018–138
8J3_7 _II0.15Olivine clinopyroxeniteEquigranular0.14–0.20.97–1.190.62
9J3_80.8Ultramafic xenolithDuniteProtogranular0.26–3.291.5210–25730–156
10J3_100.6Crustal xenolithOlivine clinopyroxeniteEquigranular0.13–0.370.26–1.440.3711–28
11J3_11b0.45Ultramafic xenolithDuniteProtogranular0.20–2.830.21–0.3831–139
12J3_120.5Ultramafic xenolithLherzoliteProtogranular0.30–3.200.36–1.570.29–1.230.24–0.92199–40332–250

Abbreviations used in the article_

AbbreviationDescription
AnAnorthite
AmpAmphibole
EnEnstatite
DiDiopside
OlOlivine
Ol-IaOlivine – group Ia (main minerals in peridotites)
Ol-IbOlivine – group Ib (main minerals in pyroxenites)
OpxOrthopyroxene
Opx-IaOrthopyroxene – group Ia (main minerals in peridotites)
CpxClinopyroxene
Cpx-IbClinopyroxene – group Ib (main minerals in pyroxenites)
Cpx-IIaClinopyroxene – group IIa (in melt pockets, peridotites)
Cpx-IIbClinopyroxene – group IIb (in melt pockets, pyroxenites)
Cpx-IIIaClinopyroxene – group IIIa (selvage, late generation, peridotites)
Cpx-IIIbClinopyroxene – group IIIb (selvage, late generation, pyroxenites)
SplSpinel
Spl-IaSpinel – group Ia (main minerals in peridotites)
Spl-IIaSpinel – group IIa (in melt pockets, peridotites)
Spl-IIbSpinel – group IIb (in melt pockets, pyroxenites)
CarbCarbonate group mineral
Carb-IIaCarbonate group minerals – group IIa (in melt pockets, peridotites)
FsFeldspar
Fs-IIbFeldspar – group IIb (in melt pockets, pyroxenites)
mpMelt pockets (fine-grained zones/intergranular aggregates)
FoForsterite content in olivine (Mg/(Mg + Fe)*100)
Mg#Magnesium number (Mg/(Mg + Fe)*100) in pyroxenes
apfuAtoms per formula unit
BSEBack-Scattered Electron (image in backscattered electrons)
Q1, Q2, Q3Quartile values used in statistical analysis
R Crystal rim
C Crystal core
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mipo-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1899-8526 | Journal ISSN: 1899-8291
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 35
Submitted on: Sep 22, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 9, 2026
Published on: Mar 19, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Monika Nowak, published by Mineralogical Society of Poland
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.