Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hydromagnesite from the efflorescence of the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice, the Western Carpathians, Poland Cover

Hydromagnesite from the efflorescence of the Stone Town Nature Reserve in Ciężkowice, the Western Carpathians, Poland

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Geological map and distribution of the sandstone tors of the STNR, Ciężkowice area (after Alexandrowicz, 1970; Cieszkowski et al., 1991; Leszczyński, 1981, modified). Quaternary deposits: 1, alluvial clays; 2, alluvial and diluvial loams. Paleogene flysch sequences: 3, Hieroglyphic Beds (green shales and sandstones); 4, Ciężkowice Sandstones (conglomeratic sandstones, conglomerates); 5, Variegated and Red Shales (shales), 6, Upper Istebna Shales (shales); 7, fault.
Geological map and distribution of the sandstone tors of the STNR, Ciężkowice area (after Alexandrowicz, 1970; Cieszkowski et al., 1991; Leszczyński, 1981, modified). Quaternary deposits: 1, alluvial clays; 2, alluvial and diluvial loams. Paleogene flysch sequences: 3, Hieroglyphic Beds (green shales and sandstones); 4, Ciężkowice Sandstones (conglomeratic sandstones, conglomerates); 5, Variegated and Red Shales (shales), 6, Upper Istebna Shales (shales); 7, fault.

Figure 2.

The Ratusz tor (Town Hall tor) in the STNR showcasing the niche with white hydromagnesite efflorescence (A, B), and Czarownica tor (Witch tor) (C). (For location details, see Figure 1).
The Ratusz tor (Town Hall tor) in the STNR showcasing the niche with white hydromagnesite efflorescence (A, B), and Czarownica tor (Witch tor) (C). (For location details, see Figure 1).

Figure 3.

Characteristic X-ray patterns of the spring-formed hydromagnesite-rich efflorescence from the Ratusz tor (A) and the hydromagnesite reflections used for the refining unit-cell parameters (B). Gp, gypsum; Hex, hexahydrite; Hmg, hydromagnesite; Qz, quartz.
Characteristic X-ray patterns of the spring-formed hydromagnesite-rich efflorescence from the Ratusz tor (A) and the hydromagnesite reflections used for the refining unit-cell parameters (B). Gp, gypsum; Hex, hexahydrite; Hmg, hydromagnesite; Qz, quartz.

Figure 4.

STA (DTA, TG and DTG) patterns for the spring efflorescence samples from the Ratusz tor (STNR).
STA (DTA, TG and DTG) patterns for the spring efflorescence samples from the Ratusz tor (STNR).

Figure 5.

Temperature-dependent IC curves of the volatile decomposition products formed under heating of the spring efflorescence samples from the Ratusz tor (STNR) in air. IC curves for m/z = 18 (H2O), m/z = 44 (CO2) and m/z = 64 (SO2) are presented in relation to the TG curve.
Temperature-dependent IC curves of the volatile decomposition products formed under heating of the spring efflorescence samples from the Ratusz tor (STNR) in air. IC curves for m/z = 18 (H2O), m/z = 44 (CO2) and m/z = 64 (SO2) are presented in relation to the TG curve.

Figure 6.

Backscattered electron (BSE) images of hydromagnesite from the Ratusz tor (STNR) efflorescence: general view showing thin, acicular crystals with lengths of several tens of micrometres and clusters of flocculent aggregates (A); Clusters of flocculent and flame-bladed crystals (B); Acicular crystals with irregular surfaces coated by flaky grains and loose flocculent aggregates (C). Representative EDS elemental composition of hydromagnesite crystals showing the presence of magnesium (Mg), carbon (C), and oxygen (O) (D).
Backscattered electron (BSE) images of hydromagnesite from the Ratusz tor (STNR) efflorescence: general view showing thin, acicular crystals with lengths of several tens of micrometres and clusters of flocculent aggregates (A); Clusters of flocculent and flame-bladed crystals (B); Acicular crystals with irregular surfaces coated by flaky grains and loose flocculent aggregates (C). Representative EDS elemental composition of hydromagnesite crystals showing the presence of magnesium (Mg), carbon (C), and oxygen (O) (D).

Figure 7.

Unit-cell parameters of the STNR hydromagnesite compared to data in the literature: 1—Akao et al. (1974); 2—Akao and Iwai (1977); 3—https://webmineral.com/data/Hydromagnesite.shtml; 4—Kruszewski et al. (2020); 5—this paper.
Unit-cell parameters of the STNR hydromagnesite compared to data in the literature: 1—Akao et al. (1974); 2—Akao and Iwai (1977); 3—https://webmineral.com/data/Hydromagnesite.shtml; 4—Kruszewski et al. (2020); 5—this paper.

Figure 8.

Typical Raman spectra of hydromagnesite from the Ratusz tor in STNR.
Typical Raman spectra of hydromagnesite from the Ratusz tor in STNR.

Figure 9.

Raman spectra of the STNR hydromagnesite in the 500–1800 cm−1 region.
Raman spectra of the STNR hydromagnesite in the 500–1800 cm−1 region.

Figure 10.

Raman spectra of the STNR hydromagnesite in the 3000–3600 cm−1 region.
Raman spectra of the STNR hydromagnesite in the 3000–3600 cm−1 region.

Representative chemical compositions of the STNR hydromagnesite

Analysis number2182426303132353934Average n = 10SD
wt%
SO31.311.801.384.982.571.591.521.561.141.341.921.14
P2O50.000.000.000.000.040.000.010.010.020.000.010.01
SiO20.220.290.220.240.160.140.180.160.250.250.210.05
Al2O30.130.070.000.020.000.000.000.090.080.060.050.05
PbO0.010.000.000.030.000.000.020.040.050.000.010.02
ZnO0.020.000.000.020.000.010.000.020.030.000.010.01
SrO0.010.030.070.050.080.020.020.000.020.030.030.03
MnO0.010.000.020.000.020.000.010.000.000.010.010.01
FeO0.040.000.000.010.000.030.000.030.000.000.010.01
CaO0.110.080.080.130.060.070.070.130.110.080.090.03
BaO0.000.000.000.020.000.020.010.000.020.020.010.01
MgO41.7743.2940.6539.7441.0941.3843.6540.1542.3338.8041.281.53
Na2O0.000.000.050.030.050.060.070.030.010.030.030.02
K2O0.040.060.070.070.050.040.070.010.000.010.040.03
Total-143.6645.6142.5445.3344.1143.3645.6242.2544.0640.6243.721.61
MgO41.7743.2940.6539.7441.0941.3843.6540.1542.3338.8041.281.53
CO2*36.4837.8135.5034.7135.8936.1538.1235.0836.9733.8936.061.34
H2O**21.7618.9023.8525.5523.0222.4718.2324.7720.7027.3122.662.86
Total-2100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
Apfu or mpfu [five cations basis]
Mg2+5.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00
(CO3)2−***4.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00
OH***2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00
H2O****4.833.895.576.205.275.083.685.914.476.885.141.01
Unit-cell parameters
a[Å]b[Å]c[Å]β[°]V[Å3]
10.050(8)8.921 (7)8.384 (6)114.291 (25)685.06
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mipo-2025-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1899-8526 | Journal ISSN: 1899-8291
Language: English
Page range: 74 - 93
Submitted on: Jul 29, 2025
|
Accepted on: Oct 10, 2025
|
Published on: Nov 10, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Mariola Marszałek, published by Mineralogical Society of Poland
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.