Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Motives for and Barriers to the Use of Electric Moped Scooter Sharing Services Cover

Motives for and Barriers to the Use of Electric Moped Scooter Sharing Services

Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. 1. Abduljabbar, R. L., Liyanage, S. & Dia, H. (2021). The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10273410.1016/j.trd.2021.102734
  2. 2. Aguilera-García, Á., Gomez, J., Sobrino, N., & Díaz, J. J. V. (2021). Moped Scooter Sharing: Citizens’ Perceptions, Users’ Behavior, and Implications for Urban Mobility. Sustainability, 13(12), 6886. https://doi:10.3390/su1312688610.3390/su13126886
  3. 3. Aguilera-García, Á., Gomez, J. & Sobrino, N. (2020). Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in Spanish urban areas. Cities, 96, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.10242410.1016/j.cities.2019.102424
  4. 4. Bieliński, T., & Ważna, A. (2020). Electric Scooter Sharing and Bike Sharing User Behaviour and Characteristics. Sustainability, 12(22), 9640. https://doi:10.3390/su1222964010.3390/su12229640
  5. 5. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C-C. (2018). Exploring Consumer Reasoning in Usage Intention for E-Scooter Sharing. Transportation Planning Journal, 47(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.6402/TPJ
  6. 6. Eccarius, T., & Lu, C-C. (2020). Adoption intentions for micro-mobility — Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.10232710.1016/j.trd.2020.102327
  7. 7. Flores, P. J., & Jansson, J. (2021). The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on?green innovation use: The case of shared e-bikes and e-scooters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.195710.1002/cb.1957
  8. 8. Franckle, R. L., Dunn, C. G., Vercammen, K. A., Dai, J., Soto, M. J. & Bleich, S. N. (2020). Facilitators and barriers to bikeshare use among users and non-users in a socioeconomically diverse urban population. Preventive Medicine Reports, 20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.10118510.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101185
  9. 9. Jurczak M. (2019). Koncepcje zrównoważonej logistyki miejskiej w wybranych polskich miastach [Concepts of Sustainable Urban Logistics in Selected Polish Cities]. Ekonomika i Organizacja Logistyki 4(2), DOI: 10.22630/EIOL.2019.4.2.1110.22630/EIOL.2019.4.2.11
  10. 10. Lee, H., Baek, K., Chung, J-H. & Kim, J. (2021). Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10275110.1016/j.trd.2021.102751
  11. 11. Liao, F. & Correia, G. (2020). Electric carsharing and micromobility: A literature review on their usage pattern, demand, and potential impacts. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.186139410.1080/15568318.2020.1861394
  12. 12. Machado, C., de Salles Hue, N., Berssaneti, F., & Quintanilha, J. (2018). An Overview of Shared Mobility. Sustainability, 10(12), 4342. http://doi:10.3390/su1012434210.3390/su10124342
  13. 13. Malarska A. (2005). Statystyczna analiza danych wspomagana programem SPSS [Statistical Data Analysis Aided by SPSS]. Wydawnictwo SPSS Polska, Kraków.
  14. 14. Milakis, D., Gebhardt, L., Ehebrecht, D. & Lenz, B. (2020) Is micro-mobility sustainable? An overview of implications for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity and subjective wellbeing. In: Carey Curtis (red.), Handbook of Sustainable Transport, 180–189. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.10.4337/9781789900477.00030
  15. 15. Mitra, R. & Hess, P. M. (2021). Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society, 23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.00410.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004
  16. 16. Reck, D. J. & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Who uses shared micro-mobility services? Empirical evidence from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.10280310.1016/j.trd.2021.102803
  17. 17. Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M. & Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.00910.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009
  18. 18. Sojkin, B. & Michalak, S. (2019). Innowacyjność zachowań mieszkańców aglomeracji poznańskiej na rynku usług transportowych [Innovative Behavior of the Inhabitants of Poznań Agglomeration on the Market of Transport Services]. Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych, 33, DOI: 10.2478/minib-2019-0040
  19. 19. Wortmann, C., Syré, A. M., Grahle, A., & Göhlich, D. (2021). Analysis of Electric Moped Scooter Sharing in Berlin: A Technical, Economic and Environmental Perspective. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(3), 96. doi:10.3390/wevj1203009610.3390/wevj12030096
  20. 20. Zhu, R., Zhang, X., Kondor, D., Santi, P. & Ratti, C. (2020). Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.10148310.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2021-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 34
Published on: Feb 2, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Paweł Bartkowiak, Szymon Michalak, Maciej Młodzik, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.