Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From symbols to strategy: Cover
By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Aiello, G. (2020). Visual Semiotics: Key Concepts and New Directions. In: The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, Luc Pauwels and Dawn Mannay Editors, Second ed., 55 City Road, London, SAGE Publications, Inc. 367–380 Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529721485.n23. (Accessed: 20 December 2025).
  2. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Rev. ed. London and New York, Verso. [Originally published 1983].
  3. Barber, J.D. (2025). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the White House, Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351223706.
  4. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies, New York, The Noonday Press.
  5. Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography, New York, Hill and Wang.
  6. Battista, D. (2025). The evolution of digital communication: Zelensky and the use of Instagram in wartime, Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajss.12-1-3.
  7. Bleiker, R. and Hutchison, E. (2008). Fear no more: Emotions and world politics, Review of International Studies, 34(S1), 115–135. doi: 10.1017/S0260210508007821.
  8. Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  9. Burns, J.M. (2003). Transforming leadership: The pursuit of happiness, Atlantic Monthly Press.
  10. Bucy, E. and Seigmund, C. (2024). Mediatization and mystique: Volodymyr Zelensky’s self-presentation on Instagram, Horyzonty Polityki, 15(51), https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.2501.
  11. Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power, 2nd ed. New York, Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001.
  12. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). Th e ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?-book_slug=the-ironic-spectator-solidarity-in-the-age-of-post-humanitarianism--9780745642116.
  13. Domínguez-García, R., Pérez-Curiel, C., and Casero-Ripollés, A. (2024). Zelenskyy’s leadership in Telegram and its impact on citizens: internationalisation, mobilisation and emotions in the Ukrainian war, Tripodos. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.56.04.
  14. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
  15. Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election, European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802
  16. Farkas, J. (2023). Visual populism and digital politics, Media, Culture & Society, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3660.
  17. Foss, S. K. (2005). Theory of visual rhetoric. In Smith, K. Ken, Moriarty, S. Sandra, Barbatsis, G. Gretchen and Kenney, K. Keith (eds.) Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 141–152. doi: 10.4324/9781410611581-18.
  18. Grabe, M. E. and Bucy, E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections, Oxford, Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:o-so/9780195372076.001.0001.
  19. Koschut, S., Hall, T. H., Wolf, R., Solomon, T., Hutchison, E., and Bleiker, R. (2017). Discourse and emotions in international relations, International Studies Review, 19(3), 481–508. doi: 10.1093/isr/vix033.
  20. Krämer, B. (2018). Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism, Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328520
  21. Kryvenko, S. (2021). Symbols in the Ukrainian public discourse (analysis of presidential speeches on the occasion of Constitution Day), Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 7, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.18523/kmlpj249911.2021-7.109-127. (Accessed: 19 December 2025).
  22. Lebow, R. (2005). Reason, emotion, and cooperation, International Politics, 42(3), 283–313. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800113.
  23. Longoni, A. (2010). Photographs and silhouettes: Visual politics in the human rights movement of Argentina, Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry, 25, 5–17. doi: 10.1086/657458.
  24. López-Rabadán, P. (2023). Selfies and speeches of a president at war: Volodymyr Zelensky’s strategy of spectacularization on Instagram, Media and Communication, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6366.
  25. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R. and MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
  26. Mejova, Y., Capozzi, A., Monti, C., and De Francisci Morales, G. (2023). Narratives of war: Ukrainian memetic warfare on Twitter, ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.08363.
  27. O’Neill, S. J. & Smith, N. (2014). Climate change and visual imagery, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, Climate Change, 5(1), 73–87. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.249.
  28. Olivares García, F. J., Román San Miguel, A., and Méndez Majuelos, I. (2022). Social networks as a journalistic communication tool: Volodímir Zelenski’s Digital Communication Strategy during the Ukraine war, VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review/Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v9.3660.
  29. Peirce, C. S. (2010 [1905]). The logic of signs. In Favareau, D. (ed.) Essential readings in biosemiotics. Dordrecht, Springer, 115–148. [Originally published 1905]. Available at: https://circulosemiotico.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/favareau-essential-readings-in-biosemiotics.pdf. (Accessed: 20 December 2025).
  30. Rodriguez, L. and Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing, Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ931651. (Accessed: 21 December 2025).
  31. Sánchez-Castillo, S., Galán-Cubillo, E. and Drylie-Carey, L. (2023). Unmuting leadership: the impact of Zelensky’s social media strategy at the onset of the Ukrainian war, Journal of Risk Research, 26(6), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2194900.
  32. Saussure, F. de (1959). Course in general linguistics. Edited by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, in collaboration with A. Reidlinger. Translated by W. Baskin. New York, Philosophical Library.
  33. Schill, D. (2012). The visual image and the political image: A review of visual communication research in the field of political communication, Review of Communication, 12(2), 118–142. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2011.653504.
  34. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others, New York, Picador.
  35. Sontag, S. (2005). On photography, Electronic edn. New York, RosettaBooks. [Originally published 1973].
  36. Treré, E. (2018). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. 1st ed. London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177.
  37. Veneti, A., Jackson, D., and Lilleker, D. G. (eds.) (2019). Visual political communication, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
  38. Wang, L. and Wang, R. (2024). Cyber warfare: Zelenskyy’s social media political performance strategies and effects, Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1478639.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/medok-2026-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2601-503X | Journal ISSN: 1842-2498
Language: English, Hungarian, Romanian
Page range: 41 - 58
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: Medea Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Bogdan Podar, published by Medea Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.