Have a personal or library account? Click to login
AI and Animal Communication: A Generative Zoosemiotics Perspective Cover

AI and Animal Communication: A Generative Zoosemiotics Perspective

By: Nicola Zengiaro  
Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Andreas, J. et al., 2022. Toward understanding the communication in sperm whales. iScience, 25(6), 104393, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104393.
  2. Beguš, G., Dabkowski, M., Sprouse, R. L. et al., 2025. The phonology of sperm whale codas vowels. bioRxiv, 1–13, available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.09.658556.
  3. Bernardi della Rosa, S., Zengiaro, N., 2025. The Biosemiotic Glossary Project: Habit. Biosemiotics, 18, 5–30, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-025-09594-1.
  4. Cerrone, M., Mäekivi, N., 2021. A zoosemiotic approach to the transactional model of communication. Semiotica, 242, 39–62, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0052.
  5. Cimatti, F., 1998. Mente e linguaggio negli animali. Introduzione alla zoosemiotica cognitiva. Roma: Carocci.
  6. Delahaye, P., 2021. Use of Quantitative Measures in Zoosemiotics: How Machines Are Becoming a New Pair of Ears and Eyes for Researchers. Biosemiotics, 14, 287–294, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09440-0.
  7. Dondero, M. G., 2025. Semiotics of artificial intelligence: enunciative praxis in image analysis and generation. Semiotica, 262, 111–146, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2024-0195.
  8. Eco, U., 1973. Segno. Milano: ISEDI.
  9. Farina, A., 2014. Soundscape Ecology. Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer. Farina, A., Villa, A., 2023. On the semantics of ecoacoustic codes. BioSystems, 232, 105002, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105002.
  10. Fontanille, J., 2003. Semiotics of discourse. Berlin: Peter Lang.
  11. Genette, G., 1982. Palimpseste. La littérature au second degré. Paris: Seuil.
  12. Gero, S., Whitehead, H., Rendell, L., 2016. Individual, unit, and vocal clan level identity cues in sperm whale codas. Royal Society Open Science, 3(11), 150372, available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150372.
  13. Goldwasser, S., Gruber, D. F., Tauman Kalai, A., Paradise, O., 2023. A Theory of Unsupervised Translation Motivated by Understanding Animal Communication. arXiv, 37th Conference on Neuronal Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 1–35, available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.11081.
  14. Greimas, A. J., 1966. Sémantique structurale: Recherche de méthode. Paris: Larousse.
  15. Greimas, A. J., Courtés, J., 1979. Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
  16. Hagiwara, M., Miron, M., Liu, Y., 2024. ISPA: Inter-Species Phonetic Alphabet for Transcribing Animal Sounds. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW). Seoul, Korea, pp. 828–832, available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03269.
  17. Héjja-Brichard, Y., Million, K., Renoult, J., Mendelson, T. C., 2023. Using generative artificial intelligence to test hypotheses about animal signal evolution: A case study in an ornamented fish. HAL Id: hal-04276927, available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.13.532060.
  18. Héjja-Brichard, Y., Million, K., Renoult, J., Mendelson, T. C., 2024. Using neural style transfer to study the evolution of animal signal design: A case study in an ornamented fish. Ecological Informatics, 84, 102881, 1–11, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102881.
  19. Helbo, A., 1997. L’adaptation. Du théâtre au cinéma. Paris: Colin.
  20. Hernández-Fernández, A., 2021. Qualitative and Quantitative Examples of Natural and Artificial Phenomena. Biosemiotics, 14, 377–390, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09423-1.
  21. Hjelmslev, L., 1961. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  22. Jakobson, R., 1959. On linguistic aspects of translation. In Brower, R. (Ed.), On translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 232–239.
  23. Jakobson, R., 1960. Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. In Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.), Style in Language. Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 350–77.
  24. Kull, K., 2010. Umwelt and modeling. In Cobley, P. (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics. London, NY: Routledge, pp. 43–56.
  25. Kull, K., 2014. Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing. Semiotica, 198, 47–60, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0101.
  26. Kull, K., Torop, P., 2003. Biotranslation: Translation between umwelten. In Petrilli, S. (Ed.), Translation Translation. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 313–328.
  27. Leone, M., 2025. Sémiotique de l‘agriculture numérique. In Chatenet, L., Thierry Giuliana, G. (Eds.), Semiovers. Pour une sémiotique des mondes virtuels et numériques. Roma: Aracne, pp. 25–46.
  28. Lewis, A., 2021. A Semiotic Modern Synthesis: Conducting Quantitative Studies in Zoosemiotics and Interpreting Existing Ethological Studies through a Semiotic Framework. Biosemiotics, 14, 295–327, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09435-x.
  29. Lotman, Y., 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  30. Maran, T., 2014. Place and sign. Locality as a foundational concept for ecosemiotics. In Siewer, K. A. (Ed.), Re-Imagining Nature: Environmental Humanities and Ecosemiotics. Lewinsburg: Bucknell University Press, pp. 79–89.
  31. Maran, T., 2020. Ecosemiotics: The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Maran, T., Martinelli, D., Turovski, A., 2011. Introduction. In Id. (Eds.), Readings in Zoosemiotics, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 51–61.
  33. Marrone, G., Mangano, D. (Eds.), 2018. Semiotics of Animals in Culture. Zoosemiotics 2.0. Cham: Springer. Martinelli, D., 2007. Zoosemiotics: Proposals for a Handbook. Helsinki: International Semiotics Institute.
  34. Martinelli, D., 2010. A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics: People, Paths, Ideas. Dordrecht: Springer.
  35. Martinelli, D., 2011. Let’s Get Physical! – On the Zoosemiotics of Corporeality. Biosemiotics, 4, 259–279, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9098-5.
  36. Metz, C., 1971. Language et cinema. Paris: Larousse.
  37. Robinson, J., Miron, M., Hagiwara, M., Pietquin, O., 2025. NatureLM-audio: An Audio-Language Foundation Model for Bioacustic. arXiv, Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025, 1–15, available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.07186.
  38. Rutz, C., Bronstein, M., Raskin, A. et al., 2023. Using machine learning to decode animal communication. Science, 381(6654), 152–155, available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7314.
  39. Scott-Phillips, T., Heintz, C., 2023. Animal Communication in Linguistic and Cognitive Perspective. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9, 93–111, available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030421-061233.
  40. Sebeok, T. A., 1965. Animal Communication. Science, 147 (3661), 1006–14, available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.147.3661.1006.
  41. Sebeok, T. A., 1972. Perspective in Zoosemiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  42. Sebeok, T. A., 1977. How Animals Communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  43. Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.), 1990. Essays in Zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
  44. Sebeok, T. A., 1994. Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  45. Sebeok, T. A., 2001. The Swiss pioneer in nonverbal communication Studies: Heini Hediger (1908–1992). New York: Legas.
  46. Sebeok, T. A., Danesi, M., 2000. The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  47. Sehgal, A., Tumar, I., Schönwälder, J., 2010. Effects of climate change and anthropogenic ocean acidification on underwater acoustic communications. In: OCEANS‘10 IEEE SYDNEY. Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 1–6.
  48. Simondon, G., 2020. Individuation in light of notions of form and information. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  49. Stjernfelt, F., 2013. The generality of signs: The actual relevance of anti-psychologism. Semiotica, 194, 77–109.
  50. Uexküll von, J., 1929. Theoretical Biology. New York: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
  51. Wittgenstein, L., 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  52. Yovel, Y., Rechavi, O., 2023. AI and the Doctor Dolittle challenge. Current Biology, 33(15), 783–787, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.063.
  53. Zengiaro, N., 2023. The circulation of meaning: a biosemiotic perspective on the functional circle. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 9(2), 209–225.
  54. Zengiaro, N., 2024. En búsqueda de los límites de la semiótica: desde el umbral inferior de Eco hasta la ecosemiótica materialista. Metatheoria – Revista De Filosofía E Historia De La Ciencia 14(2), 75–92, available at: https://doi.org/10.48160/18532330me14.365.
  55. Zengiaro, N., 2025. Towards an Ecosystemic Biosemiotics: the semiotic threshold between life and non-life. In Dentico, M. (Ed.), Semiotics, Life, Ecology and Sustainability. Biosemiotic Critics. Bogotà: E. Editorial, pp. 67–96.
  56. Zengiaro, N., Jaramillo, T. J., 2025. Mythology and Zoosemiotics: Exploring Snake Narratives in Greek, Aztec, and Amazonian Cultures. Biosemiotics, 18, 1–15, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-025-09598-x.
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 11, 2025
|
Accepted on: Aug 19, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 22, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Nicola Zengiaro, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT