References
- Abramson, S. (2017). Ten basic principles of metamodernism. Huffpost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tenkey-principles-in-met_b_7143202
- Andres Mora, D. (2023). Metaxis and metamodernity. https://www.whatisemerging.com/opinions/metaxis-metamodernity
- Baciu, C., Opre, D., & Riley, S. (2016). A new way of thinking in the era of virtual reality and artificial intelligence. Educatia 21 Journal, 14, 43–48.
- Baxter, J. (2020). Health and environmental risk. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed.) (pp. 303–307). Elsevier.
- Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity Press.
- Begg, B. E. (2019). Science as a social practice. MIT News. MIT. https://news.mit.edu/2019/marion-boulicault-science-social-0117
- Bernstein, S., & Goldschmidt, T. (Eds.). (2021). Non-being: New essays on the metaphysics of nonexistence. Oxford Academic, 22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846222.001.0001
- Biddlecome, L., & Rowson, J. (2023). Perspectiva in 10 premises. Perspectiva. https://perspecteeva.substack.com/p/perspectiva-in-10-premises
- Blumenstyck, G. (2015). American higher education in crisis? What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
- Bowman, S., Salter, J., Stephenson, C., & Humble, D. (2024). Metamodern sensibilities: Toward a pedagogical framework for a wicked world. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(5), 1361–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2151835
- Cascio, J. (2020). Facing the age of chaos. Medium. https://medium.com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d
- Cella, L. J. C., & Restaino, J. (Eds.). (2012). Unsustainable: Re-imagining community literacy, public writing, service-learning, and the university. Lexington books.
- Chang, H. (2012). Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Springer.
- Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest editorial: Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), 141–142. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2628678
- Clarke, B., & Parsons, J. (2013). Becoming rhizomatic researchers. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 4(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.685
- Clasquin-Johnson, M. (2017). Towards a metamodern academic study of religion and a more religiously informed metamodernism. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 73(3), a4491. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3
- Cooper, B. (2017). “Beyond” metamodernism. The meta-turn has come full circle. Medium. https://medium.com/the-abstract-organization/beyond-metamodernism-c595c6f35379
- Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
- Cumming, G., & Norwood, C. (2012). The Community Voice Method: Using participatory research and filmmaking to foster dialog about changing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(4), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.018
- D’Andrade, R. (1995). Moral models in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 36(3), 399–407. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744050
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. The University of Minnesota Press.
- Derrida, J. (1992). Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–66). Routledge.
- Dumitrescu, A. (2016). What is metamodernism and why bother? Meditations on metamodernism as a period term and as a mode. Electronic Book Review. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/what-is-metamodernism-and-why-bother-meditations-on-metamodernism-as-a-period-term-and-as-a-mode/
- Fergnani, A., & Cooper, B. (2023). Metamodern futures: Prescriptions for metamodern foresight. Futures, 149, 103135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103135
- Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vintage Books. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
- Freinacht, H. (2021). Metamodern sociology: An ironically sincere invitation to future scholars. In J. Rowson & P. Layman (Eds.), Dispatches from a time between worlds: Crisis and emergence in metamodernity (pp. 135–156). Barnes & Noble.
- Gadamer, H. G. (1980). Dialogue and dialectic. Eight hermeneutical studies on Plato. Yale University Press.
- Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (1998). The third way. Polity Press.
- Gigliotti, R. (2020). The perception of crisis, the existence of crisis: Navigating the social construction of crisis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(5), https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2020.1820553
- Gormley, K. J. (2003). Dialogue between “academic” and “community” researchers: The possibilities and challenges of participatory research. In M. B. Ginsburg & J. Gorostiaga (Eds.), Limitations and possibilities of dialogue among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners (pp. 162–182). Routledge.
- Grix, J. (2002). Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research. Politics, 22(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00173
- Hay, C. (2007). Does ontology trump epistemology. Notes on the directional dependence of ontology and epistemology in political analysis. Politics, 27(2), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00287.x
- Hall, B. L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Participatory research: Where have we been, where are we going? – A dialogue. Research for All, 1(2), 365–374.https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.01.2.12
- Hamilton-Burge, G. (2019, November, 12). Is sustainability an outdated term? [Post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sustainability-outdated-term-grace-hamilton-burge/
- Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chtthulucene. Duke University Press.
- Hashemi, A., & Hosseini, D. (2023). Ontological pluralism and ontological category. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 19(1), 1–16.
- Heffernan, A., Bright, D., Kim, M., Longmuir, F., & Magyar, B. (2022). ‘I cannot sustain the workload and the emotional toll’: Reasons behind Australian teachers’ intentions to leave the profession. Australian Journal of Education, 66(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221086654
- Hofweber, T. (2023). Logic and ontology. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/logic-ontology/
- Iliško, Dz. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9
- Iliško, Dz., Skrinda, A., & Mičule, I. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and master’s degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0013
- Johnson, B. (1992). Polarity management: Identifying and managing unsolvable problems. Human Resource Development Press.
- Kidd, J. (2010). Specialisation, postgraduate research and philosophical eclecticism. Discourse, 7, 235–249.
- Kilicoglu, G., & Kilicoglu, D. (2020). The birth of a new paradigm: Rethinking education and school leadership with a metamodern ‘lens’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39, 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09690-z
- Klein, J. (2023, June 10). Truth theories, uses & examples. Study.com. https://study.com/academy/lesson/truth-overview-theories-objectivity.html
- Kuehl, R. A., Anderson, J., Mehltretter Drury, S. A., Holman, A., Hunt, C., & Leighter, J. L. (2020). Creating a multidisciplinary dialogue about community-based participatory research partnerships of health and medicine. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, 3(1), 93–132. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/752906
- Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press.
- Maragakis, A., Dobbelsteen, A., & Maragakis, A. (2016). Is higher education economically unsustainable? An exploration of factors that undermine sustainability assessments of higher education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Development, 7(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0012
- Martinich, A., & Stroll, A. (2024). Epistemology. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/epistemology
- Mason, E. (2018). Value pluralism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
- Mārtinsone, K. (2011). Zinātne un pētniecība: Jautājumi ievirzei [Science and research: Questions for introduction]. In K. Mārtinsone & A. Pipere (Eds.), Ievads pētniecībā: Stratēģijas, dizaini, metodes [Introduction to research: Strategies, designs, methods] (pp. 14–32). RaKa.
- Mārtinsone, K., & Pipere, A. (Eds.). (2021). Zinātniskās darbības metodoloģija: Starpdisciplināra perspektīva [Methodology of scientific work: Interdisciplinary perspective]. RSU Publishing House.
- McKinley, B. (2000). Postmodernism certainly is not science, but could it be religion? CSAS Bulletin, 36(1), 16–18.
- Melero, E., & Palomeras, N. (2015). The Renaissance Man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Research Policy, 44(1), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.005
- Metamoderna. (2022, March 12). What is metamodernism? https://metamoderna.org/metamodernism/
- Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, III, F., & Redman, C. L. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: Reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 46.
- Philo-Notes. (2022, June 24). What is grand narrative? http://philonotes.com/2022/11/what-is-grand-narrative
- Pipere, A., & Lorenzi, F. (2021). The dialogical potential of transdisciplinary research: Challenges and benefits. World Futures, 77(8), 559–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1875673
- Pipere, A., & Mārtinsone, K. (2022). Metamodernism and social sciences: Scoping the future. Social Sciences, 11, 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100457
- Pipere, A., & Mārtinsone, K. (2023). Shaping an image of science in the 21st century: The perspective of metamodernism. Societies, 13, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13120254
- Piro, J. S. (2018). Integral education within metamodernism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1466–1467. Research Process. Sage.
- Ramadan, T. (2010). The quest for meaning: Developing a philosophy of pluralism. Penguin Books Ltd.
- Ryan, A., & Tilbury, D. (2013). Flexible pedagogies: New pedagogical ideas. Higher Education Academy.
- Robertson, M. (2023). Sustainability principles and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Roseneau, P. M. (1993). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton University Press.
- Sahlins, M. (1993). Waiting for Foucault. Prickly Pear Press.
- Salīte, I., Briede, L., Drelinga, E. & Ivanova, O. (2021). The false self from the pedagogical perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0022
- Sarmiento, I., Zuluaga, G., Paredes-Solís, S., Chomat, A. M., Loutfi, D., Cockcroft, A., & Andersson, N. (2020). Bridging Western and Indigenous knowledge through intercultural dialogue: Lessons from participatory research in Mexico. BMJ Global Health, 5(9), e002488. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002488
- Schroeder, M. (2021). Value theory. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/value-theory/
- Spiro, M. E. (1996). Postmodernist anthropology, subjectivity, and science. A modernist critique. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(1), 759–780.
- Stone, B. (2022). Holistic identity development in STEAM. International Journal of the Whole Child, 7(1), 75–83.
- Sykes, A. (2023). Sustainability is about our relationships. Extract. https://www.extrakt.se/en/sustainability-is-about-our-relationships/
- Tellings, A. (2001). Eclecticism and integration in educational theories: A metatheoretical analysis. Educational Theory, 51(3), 277.
- Vermeulen, T., & van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2, 56–77.
- Wagle, S. K. (2022). Towards participatory worldview in education and research: A philosophical inquiry on the question-why participatory? Journal of Transformative Praxis, 3(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.51474/jrtp.v3i1.579
- Wegerhoff, D., Ward, T., & Dixon, L. (2021). A pluralistic approach to the definition, classification, and explanation of gangs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101546
- Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophische Untersuchungen [Philosophical investigations] (revised 4th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
- Yousef, T. (2017). Modernism, postmodernism, and metamodernism: A critique. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5, 33–43.