Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Training Future Kindergarten Teachers on Ecocentric Action Cover

Training Future Kindergarten Teachers on Ecocentric Action

Open Access
|Feb 2024

References

  1. Alves, F. R. V. (2020). The Professional Didactics (PD): Implications for teacher education and the teaching of specific disciplines in Brazil. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudos em Educação, 15 (4), 1–22.
  2. Akyeampong, K., Lussier, K., Pryor, J., & Westbrook, J. (2013). Improving teaching and learning of basic maths and reading in Africa: Does teacher preparation count? International Journal of Educational Development, 33(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.006
  3. Azevedo, J. (2012). Nota de Apresentação: Supervisão, colegialidade e Avaliação [Editorial: Supervision, collegiality and evaluation]. Revista Portuguesa de Investigação, 12, 3–5.
  4. Barrable, A. (2019). Refocusing environmental education in the early years: A brief introduction to a pedagogy for connection. Education Sciences, 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010061
  5. Bedford, T. (2022). Constructing a transformative sustainability pedagogy: Teacher empowerment for a sustainable future. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0002
  6. Bing-You, R. G., Blondea, W., Dreher, G. K., & Irby, D. M. (2017). T2 (teaching & thinking)- in-action skills of highly rated medical teachers: How do we help faculty attain that expertise? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1093425
  7. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2010). Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos [Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods]. Porto editor.
  8. Branco, S. M. (2002). Iara e a poluição das águas [Iara and water pollution]. Moderna Literatura.
  9. Carbo, L, Torres, F. S., Zaqueo, K. D., & Berton, A. (2019). Practical activities and teaching games in chemistry contents as an auxiliary tool in science teaching. Revista de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática, 10(5), 53–69.
  10. Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452.
  11. Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10128
  12. Clark, C. (1993). Transformative learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 57, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.36719935707
  13. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
  14. Collado, S., Corraliza, J. A., Staats, H., & Ruíz, M. (2015). Effect of frequency and mode of contact with nature on children’s self-reported ecological behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.001
  15. Correia, N., Camilo, C., Aguiar, C., & Amaro, F. (2019). Children’s right to participate in early childhood education settings: A systematic review. Children and Youth Services Review, 100(7), 6–88.
  16. Dabaja, Z. F. (2022). The Forest School impact on children: Reviewing two decades of research. Education 3–13, 50(5), 640–653.
  17. Dunn, M., Harrison, L. J., & Coombe, K. (2008). In good hands: Preparing research-skilled graduates for the early childhood profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 703–714.
  18. Engel, G. I. (2000). Pesquisa-ação [Action Research]. Educar, 16, 181–191.
  19. Esteves, M. L. (2008). Visão panorâmica da investigação-acção [Overview of action research]. Porto Editora.
  20. Farias, M., & Cândido, L. (2019). Use of ludic didactic-pedagogical materials by PROFMAT effects and its influence on learning in mathematics in Alagoas. Revista de Ensino de Ciências e Matemática, 10(6), 340–359.
  21. Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Iliško, D., & Ivanova, O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the Anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0010
  22. Feldman, A., Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2018). Teachers investigate their work. An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398822
  23. Ferreira, M. E., André, A. C., & Pitarma, R. (2019). Potentialities of thermography in ecocentric education of children: An experience on training of future primary teachers. Sustainability, 11(9), 2668. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0010
  24. Ferreira, M. E., & Pitarma, R. (2021). Enhancing ecocentric environmental attitudes: An experience of science teaching to inspire students to value trees. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0010
  25. Fontes, P. J. (2004). Action competence as an integrating objective for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 148–162.
  26. Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0002
  27. Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children’s engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.24.2.0010
  28. Giusti, M., Svane, U., Raymond, C. M., & Beery, T. H. (2018). A framework to assess where and how children connect to nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02283
  29. González-Weil, C., Cortéz, M., Bravo, P., Ibaceta, Y., Cuevas, K., Quiñones, P., Maturana, J., & Abarca, A. (2012). Approach to inquiry as orientation to science teaching: A study about innovative practices of science teachers in secondary education classrooms of the Region of Valparaiso, Chile. Estudios Pedagogicos, 38(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052012000200006
  30. Gustafsson, P. E., Szczepanski, A., Nelson, N., & Gustafsson, P. A. (2011). Effects of an outdoor education intervention on the mental health of schoolchildren. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 12(1), 63–79.
  31. Gutierez, S. B., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Peer coaching in a research-based teachers’ professional learning method for lifelong learning: A perspective. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 214–221.
  32. Hansen, A. S., & Sandberg, M. (2020). Reshaping the outdoors through education: Exploring the potentials and challenges of ecological restoration education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 23, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-00045-3
  33. Harvey, D. J., Montgomery, L. N., Harvey, H., Hall, F., Gange, A. C., & Watling, D. (2020). Psychological benefits of a biodiversity-focussed outdoor learning program for primary school students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101381
  34. Heasly, B., Lindner, J., Iliško, Dz., & Salīte, I. (2020). From initiatives, to insights, to implementation of the sustainability and securitability agenda for 2030. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0001
  35. Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Open University Press.
  36. Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (2006). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 12, 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600943053 (Original work published 1997)
  37. Jimenez, M. P., DeVille, N. V., Elliott, E. G., Schiff, J. E., Wilt, G. E., Hart, J. E., & James, P. (2021). Associations between Nature Exposure and Health: A Review of the Evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094790
  38. Kyle, W. C. (2020). Expanding our views of science education to address sustainable development, empowerment, and social transformation. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2, 2.
  39. Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
  40. Mata, A., Hernández, P., & Centeno, G. (2018). Reflective practice in postgraduate teachers, understand to transform. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 4(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2018.v4i1.3594
  41. DGE (Direção Geral da Educação). (2016). Orientações Curriculares para a Educação Pré-Escolar [Curriculum Guidelines for Preschool Education]. Ministério da Educação.
  42. O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Lesson observation and quality in primary education as contextual teaching and learning processes. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.07.016
  43. Pegalajar-Palomino, M., Burgos-García, A., & Martinez-Valdivia, E. (2021). What does education for sustainable development offer in initial teacher training? A systematic review. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0008
  44. Perrenoud, P., Altet, M., Lessard, C., Paquay, L. (dir.). (2008). Conflits de savoirs en formation des enseignants. Entre savoirs issus de la recherche et savoirs issus de l’expérience [Knowledge conflicts in teacher training. Between knowledge derived from research and knowledge derived from experience]. De Boeck.
  45. Piaget, J. (1970). Epistemologia Genética [Genetic Epistemology]. Petrópolis.
  46. Piasentin, F. B., & Roberts, L. (2018). What elements in a sustainability course contribute to paradigm change and action competence? A study at Lincoln University, New Zealand. Environmental Education Research, 24(5), 694–715.
  47. Pyle, R. M. (1993). The thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland. Houghton Mifflin.
  48. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
  49. Riel, M. (2017). Understanding action research. Pepperdine University, Center for Collaborative Action Research. https://base.socioeco.org/docs/center_for_collaborative_action_research.pdf
  50. Robinson, L., & Vaealiki, S. (2018). Ethics and pedagogy at the heart of early childhood education for sustainability. In J. M. Davis (Ed.), Young children and the environment. Early education for sustainability (pp. 103–123). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845390.007
  51. Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, D., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0020
  52. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2020). Editorial: Does the JTES help us create deeper personal meanings for sustainable education? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0011
  53. Salīte, I, Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). Editorial: Towards more personal and integrated understanding of the sustainability phenomenon Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0001
  54. Salīte, I, Fjodorova, I., Butlere, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). More personal knowledge for more sustainable higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0011
  55. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2022). Editorial: When our will is big, the obstacles are small! Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0001
  56. Santana, E. M., & Rezende, D. B. (2007). Alchemical speedway: The use of games in chemistry teaching in the light of the Vygotsky´s theories and content analysis. In Encontro de Pesquisa em Ensino de Química, 4, São Paulo (USP), Anais: São Paulo.
  57. Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
  58. Sumaryanta, Mardapi, S., Sugiman, & Herawan, T. (2019). Community-based teacher training: Transformation of sustainable teacher empowerment strategy in Indonesia. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0004
  59. Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P., & Montarzino, A. (2008). The childhood factor: Adult visits to green places and the significance of childhood experience. Environment and Behavior, 40(1), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507300119
  60. Trigo, E., & Santoli. (1982). O Belo Riozinho [The Beautiful River]. Cedibra: Rio de Janeiro.
  61. Tsevreni, I. (2021). Nature journaling as a holistic pedagogical experience with the more-than-human world. Journal of Environmental Education, 52(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1724854
  62. UNESCO. (2008). Education for sustainable development policy dialogue: EFA ESD dialogue: Educating for a sustainable world. UNESCO.
  63. UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development: Sourcebook. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216383
  64. UNESCO. (2018). Issues and trends in education for sustainable development. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/issues_0.pdf
  65. UNESCO. (2019). Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on education for sustainable development. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002305/230514e.pdf
  66. UNESCO. (2021). Learn for our planet – A global review of how environmental issues are integrated in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377362
  67. UNESCO. (2021a). Repenser nos futurs ensemble: un nouveau contrat social pour l’éducation. Rapport de la commission internationale sur les futurs de l’éducation [Rethinking our futures together: A new social contract for education. Report of the International Commission on the Future of Education.]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379705
  68. Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). A formação social da mente [The social formation of the mind]. Martins Fontes.
  69. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). Pensamento e linguagem [Thought and language]. Martins Fontes.
  70. Wals, A. E. J. (2015). Beyond unreasonable doubt. Education and learning for socio- ecological sustainability in the Anthropocene. Wageningen University.
  71. Wals, A. E. J., & Lenglet, F. (2016). Sustainability citizens: Collaborative and disruptive social learning. In R. Horne, J. Fien, B. Beza & A. Nelson (Eds.), Sustainability citizenship in cities: Theory and practice (pp. 52–66). Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 106 - 127
Published on: Feb 22, 2024
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Maria Eduarda Ferreira, Catarina Delgado, Rui Pitarma, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.