Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Feedback in the Distance Learning Process Cover
Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. Adcroft, A. (2011). The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(4), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.526096">https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.52609610.1080/07294360.2010.526096
  2. Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019">https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251100362001910.1080/13562511003620019
  3. Bangert, A. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217–232.10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
  4. Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135">https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507100373113510.1080/03075071003731135
  5. Bernard, M. R., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.10.3102/0034654309333844
  6. Bernath, U., & Vidal, M. (2007). The theories and the theorists: Why theory is important for research. Distances et savoirs, 5(3), 427–458.
  7. Bonnel, W., Ludwig, C., & Smith, J. (2007). Providing feedback in online courses: What do students want? How do we do that? Annual Review of Nursing Education, 6, 205–221.
  8. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for a learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728">https://doi.org/10.1080/71369572810.1080/713695728
  9. Boud, B., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712.10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  10. Canning, J. (2013). Feedback: A short academic literature review. http://blog.soton.ac.uk/gmoof/files/2013/07/Feedback-literature-review2.pdf
  11. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.10.1080/03075070600572132
  12. Chetwynd, F., & Dobbyn, C. (2011). Assessment, feedback and marking guides in distance education. Open Learning, 26(1), 67–78.10.1080/02680513.2011.538565
  13. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7.
  14. Cole, S., Coates, M., & Lentell, H. (1986). Towards good teaching by correspondence. Open Learning, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051860010105">https://doi.org/10.1080/026805186001010510.1080/0268051860010105
  15. Costello, J., & Crane, D. (2010). Providing learner-centered feedback using a variety of technologies. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Liberal Arts, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, New Brunswick. https://www.stu.ca/media/stu/site-content/about/publications/2010-conference-on-the-liberal-arts/Providing-Learner-centered-Feedback-Using-a-Variety-of-Technologies.pdf
  16. Davies, P. (2003). Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer-assessment of essays. Research in Learning Technology, 11(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i1.11266">https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v11i1.1126610.3402/rlt.v11i1.11266
  17. Delling, R. (1966). Versuch der Grundlegung zu einer systematischen Theorie des Fernunterrichts [Attempt to lay the foundations for a systematic theory of distance learning]. In L. Sroka (Ed.), Fernunterricht (pp. 181–211). Hamburger Fernlehrinstitut.
  18. Dohmen, G. (1967). Das Fernstudium, Ein neues padagogisches Forschungsund Arbeitsfeld [Distance learning, a new pedagogical research and field of work]. DIFF.
  19. Epstein, M. L., Lazarus, A. D., Calvano, T. B., Matthews, K. A., Hendel, R. A., Epstein, B. B., & Brosvic, G. M. (2002). Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. The Psychological Record, 52(2), 187–201.10.1007/BF03395423
  20. Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-410.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
  21. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350">https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431247435010.3102/0034654312474350
  22. Garrison, D. R., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 3–15.10.1080/08923648709526593
  23. Garrison, D. R. (1989). Understanding distance education: A framework for the future. Routledge.
  24. Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2/2210.19173/irrodl.v1i1.2
  25. Glover, C., & Brown, E. (2006). Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.07000004">https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2006.0700000410.3108/beej.2006.07000004
  26. Hanson, D., Maushak, N. J., Schlosser, C. A., Anderson, M. L., Sorenson, C. & Simonson, M. (1997). Distance education: Review of the literature (2nd ed.). Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Research Institute for Studies in Education.
  27. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
  28. Herek, G. (1995). Developing a theoretical framework and rationale for a research proposal. In W. Pequegnat & E. Stover (Eds.), How to write a successful research grant application: A guide for social and behavioral scientists (pp. 85–91). Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4757-2393-9_11
  29. Holmberg, B. (1960). On the methods of teaching by correspondence. C. W. K. Gleerup.
  30. Holmberg, B. (1977). Distance education: A survey and bibliography. ERIC.
  31. Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and structure of distance education. Croom Helm.
  32. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. Routledge.
  33. Howard, D. C. (1987). Designing learner feedback in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 1(3), 2440.10.1080/08923648709526595
  34. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication, 18, 549–574.10.1177/0741088301018004005
  35. Izglītības likums [Education Law]. (1998). https://likumi.lv/ta/id/50759-izglitibas-likums
  36. Keegan, D. (Ed.) (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  37. Leibold, N., & Schwartz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.
  38. Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275.10.1080/02602930701292548
  39. Martínez Agudo, J. de D. (2018). Introduction and overview. In J. de D. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching. Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 1–16). Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3_1
  40. Mendela, M., Puhovska, M., Zielka, S., Sagana, I., Sadovņika, A., Dimnicka, M. (...) Ridens, L. (2008). Izglītība pārmaiņām: Ilgtspējīgas attīstības mācīšanas un mācīšanās rokasgrāmata [Education for change: A Handbook for teaching and learning sustainable development]. Vides vēstis.
  41. Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning. In A. J. Kezar (Ed.), ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29 (pp. 1–134). Jossey – Bass.
  42. Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr. 103 [Cabinet Regulation No 103]. Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu [On the declaration of a state of emergency]. Rīg‚, 2020. gada 12. martā (prot. Nr. 11 1. § ). https://www.vestnesis.lv/op/2020/51A.1
  43. Mirķe, E., Cakula, S., & Tzivian, L. (2019). Measuring teachers-as-learners’ digital skills and readiness to study online for successful e-learning experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0013">https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-001310.2478/jtes-2019-0013
  44. Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76–88.
  45. Moore, M. (1990). Background and overview of contemporary American distance education. In M. Moore (Ed.), Contemporary issues in American distance education (pp. 12–26). Pergamon.
  46. Moore, M. G. (1994) Autonomy and interdependence. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 1–4.10.1080/08923649409526851
  47. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth.
  48. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Waxmann.
  49. Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
  50. Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238–255.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x
  51. Perraton, H. (1988). A theory for distance education. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 34–45). Routledge.10.1201/9781003033950-4
  52. Peters, O. (1967). Distance education and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Otto Peters on distance education. The industrialization of teaching and learning (pp. 107–127). Routledge Studies in Distance Education.
  53. Peters, O. (1973). Die Didaktische Struktur des Fernunterrichts [The didactic structure of distance learning]. Beltz.
  54. Peters, O. (1993). Distance education in a post-industrial society. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 220–240). Routledge.
  55. Peters, O. (1998). Learning and teaching in distance education. Analyses and interpretations from an international perspective. Kogan Page.
  56. Peters, O. (2000). The transformation of the university into an institution of higher learning. In T. Evans & S. Nation (Eds.), Changing university teaching: Reflections on creating educational technologies (pp. 10–23). Kogan Page.
  57. Portway, P., & Lane, C. (Eds.). (1994). Guide to teleconferencing and distance learning. Applied Business Communications.
  58. Price, B. (1997). Defining quality student feedback in distance learning. Journal of Advances Learning, 26(1), 154–160.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026154.x
  59. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.10.1080/02602930903541007
  60. Rodway-Dyer, S., Knight, J., & Dunne, E. (2010). A case study on audio feedback with geography undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(2), 217–231.10.1080/03098265.2010.524197
  61. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., & Ivanova, O. (2021). Does the JTES help us create deeper personal meanings for sustainable education? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0012">https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-001210.2478/jtes-2020-0012
  62. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 3–32.10.3102/0034654307313795
  63. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 33, 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082">https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.166308210.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
  64. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), 69–75.10.1080/03075079412331382153
  65. Tsagari, D. (2013). Contact sessions in distance education: Students’ perspective. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, & M. Sougari (Eds), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics: Selected papers from the 20th ISTAL (International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics), vol. 3 (pp. 385–405). Versita de Gruyter.
  66. UNESCO. (2016). Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
  67. UNESCO. (2019). Framework for the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) beyond 2019. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370215
  68. USDLA (US American Distance Education Association). (2004). Definition of distance learning. http://www.usdla.org
  69. Weaver, M. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 379–394.10.1080/02602930500353061
  70. WHO. (2020). Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2021-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 105
Published on: Jan 21, 2022
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2022 Pāvels Jurs, Elita Špehte, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.