Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Students’ Participation in Search for Sustainability: A Case Study from Lithuania Cover

Students’ Participation in Search for Sustainability: A Case Study from Lithuania

Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446268353
  2. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
  3. Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
  4. Durmuşoğlu Saltali., N., & Arslan, E. (2013). The rules pre-school teachers establish for their classes and their application. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 1032–1040. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ilkonline/article/view/5000037741/5000036599
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
  6. Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Iliško, D., & Ivanova O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157–179.10.2478/jtes-2018-0010
  7. Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., Smith, A., & Taylor, N. (2010). Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition: Exploring the promise of dialogue. In Percy-Smith, B. & Thomas, N. (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation. New York: Routledge.
  8. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academic Management Review, 39, 463–487.10.5465/amr.2012.0341
  9. Hargreaves, L. G. (2008). The whole-school approach to education for sustainable development: From pilot Projects to systemic change. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 6, 69–73.
  10. Hart, C. S., & Brando, N. (2018). A capability approach to children’s well-being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 293–309.10.1111/ejed.12284
  11. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage Publications.
  12. Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1998). Kaita ir mokyklos tobulinimas [Change and school improvement]. Vilnius: Tyto alba.
  13. Jenlink, P. M., Reigeluth, C. M., Carr, A. A., & Nelson, L. M. (1998). Guidelines for facilitating systemic change in school districts. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~syschang/decatur/new_members/pdf_documents/gste_systems-research.pdf10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199805/06)15:3<217::AID-SRES223>3.0.CO;2-N
  14. Kairienė, B. (2017). Mokinio pareigos: ·gyvendinimo problema [The duties of a pupil: The implementation problem]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 126(2), 130–142.10.15823/p.2017.24
  15. Kılıç, A., & Öztürk, A. (2018). An analysis of children’s right to participation at primary schools in Turkey: A case study. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(3), 265–303.10.17583/qre.2018.3528
  16. King, N., & Horrocks, Ch. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
  17. Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Hendelsman, Y. (2016). The history of children’s rights. New York: Springer.
  18. Lansdown, G., Jimerson, S. R., & Shahroozi, R. (2014). Children’s rights and school psychology: Children’s right to participation. Journal of School Psychology, 52(1), 3–12.10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.006
  19. Lietuvos Respublikos Esimo 2013 m. gruodžio 23 d. nutarimas Nr. XII-745 “Dėl valstybinės švietimo 2013–2022 metų strategijos patvirtinimo” [Approval of the National Education Strategy 2013–2022]. Valstybės žinios, 2013-12-30, Nr. 140-7095.
  20. Mason, M. (2016). Is thorough implementation of policy change in education actually possible? What complexity theory tells us about initiating and sustaining change. European Journal of Education, 51(4). doi: doi.org/10.1111/ejed.1219310.1111/ejed.12193
  21. Morin, E. (1999). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris: UNESCO.
  22. Nevin, E. (2008). Education and sustainable development. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 6, 49–62.
  23. Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the futurein teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6
  24. Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers’ views on the aim of education. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 1, 68–80.
  25. Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, D., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152.10.1515/jtes-2016-0020
  26. Sargeant, J. (2018). Towards voice-inclusive practice: Finding the sustainability of participation in realising the child’s rights in education. Children & Society, 32(4), 314–324.10.1111/chso.12247
  27. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research – a guide for researchers in education. 4th ed. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
  28. Seitz, S. (2015). Pixilated partnership, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 1–7.
  29. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015). United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org
  30. Tulin, D. (2018). The relationship of organisational value frames with the configuration of alliance portfolios: Cases from electricity utilities in Great Britain. Sustainability, 10, 2–29.
  31. Vaikų teisės – kaip jas suvokia vaikai [Children have the rights to how they are perceived by children]. (2011). Liuksemburgas: Europos Sajungos leidiniu biuras. Retrieved from www.moodlevda.lt/.../Vaiku%20teises%20-%20kaip%20jas%20suvokia%20vaikai.pdf
  32. Wissink, I. B., Dekovi„, M., Stams, G., Asscher, J. J., Rutten, E., & Zijlstra, B. H. (2014). Moral orientation and relationships in school and adolescent pro- and antisocial behaviors: A multilevel study. Journal of School Nursing (Sage Publications Inc.), 30(3), 216–225.10.1177/1059840513497402
  33. Yan, X., Lin, H., & Clarke, A. (2018). Cross-sector social partnerships for social change: The roles of non-governmental organizations. Sustainability, 10(2), 558.10.3390/su10020558
  34. Želvys, R. (2003). Švietimo organizacijų vadyba [Management of educational organizations]. Vilnius: VU leidykla.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 72
Published on: Feb 13, 2020
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Asta Valackienė, Brigita Kairienė, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.