Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Teaching Methods Influencing the Sustainability of the Teaching Process in Technology Education in General Education Schools

By:
Open Access
|Sep 2014

References

  1. Banks, F. (2009). Research on teaching and learning in technology education. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 373–389). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  2. Burton, D. (2009). Why pupils learn. In S. Capel, M. Leask & T. Turner (Eds.), Learning to teach in the secondary school: A companion to school experience (5th ed.) (pp. 251–266). London: Routledge.
  3. Doherty, R. A., & Canavan, B. (2006). Mapping reform in Scotlandís technology education curriculum: Change and curriculum policy in the compulsory sector. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 347–375). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  4. Gómez Puente, S. M., van Eijk, M. W., & Jochems, W. M. (2012). A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 717–732. doi: 10.1007/ s10798-012-9212-x 10.1007/s10798-012-9212-x
  5. Jones, A. (2009). Looking back to look forward: The future of technology education. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 685–692). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  6. Jones, A., & Compton, V. (2009). Reviewing the field of technology education in New Zealand. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 93–104). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  7. Järvinen, E. M., Karsikas, A., & Hintikka, J. (2007). Children as innovators in action – a Phase of microcontrollers in Finnish comprehensive schools. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 18(2), 37–52.
  8. Kellough, R. D., & Kellough, N. G. (2011). Secondary school teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.
  9. Koch, D., & Sanders, M. (2011). The effects of solid modeling and visualization on technical problem solving. Journal of Technology Education, 22(2), 3–21.10.21061/jte.v22i2.a.1
  10. Kyriacou, C. (2012). Teaching. In J. Arthur & A. Peterson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to education (pp. 107–114). New York: Routledge.
  11. Layton, D. (1993). Technologyís challenge to science education: Cathedral, quarry or company store? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  12. Marsh, C. J. (1997). Planning, management and ideology: Key concepts for understanding curriculum 2. London: Falmer Press.
  13. Meriläinen, M. (2006). Guidelines on ìhow to approach teaching and learning?î Joensuu: Joensuun yliopiston kirjasto.
  14. Mita, S., Matsuda, T., Iwaki, J., & Furuta, T. (2006). A change of industrial technology education curriculum and development of a design learning support system for technology education. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 241–252). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  15. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2005). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London, England: Sage Publications.
  16. Niglas, K. (2013). Faktoranal¸¸s [Factoranalysis]. Retrieved from http://minitorn.tlu.ee/~katrin/cmsSimple/uploads/opmat/faktor.pdf Novakova, H. (2006). Innovative of the concept and content of technology education in the Czech Repuplic in context with their development in the countries of central Europe. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 463–475). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  17. Owen-Jackson, G., & Steeg, T. (2007). The role of technical knowledge in design & technology. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design & technology – for the next generation (pp. 171–185). Whitchurch, England: Cliffe & Company.
  18. Parikka, M. (1998). Teknologiakompetenssi. Teknologiakasvatuksen uudistamishaasteita peruskoulussa ja lukiossa [Technological competence. Challenges of reforming technology education in the Finnish comprehensive and upper secondary school]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän Yliopisto.
  19. Parikka, M., & Kantola, J. (2001). Kasvatusoppillisesta veistosta teknologiakasvatukseen [From educational science to technology education]. Tekninen Opettaja [Technology teacher], 1, 18–19.
  20. Parikka, M., & Ojala, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship and technology education in the context of information society. Journal of the Japan Society of Technology Education, 50(1), 9–16.
  21. Parikka, M., & Rasinen, A. (2009). Teknologiakasvatus tutkimuskohteena [Technology education as a research object]. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
  22. Parikka, M., Rasinen, A., & Ojala, A. (2011). Technology education. In M. De Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 133–143). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  23. Pavlova, M. (2006). Comparing perspectives: Comparative research in technology education. In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education (pp. 19–32). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  24. Pıhikooli riiklik ıppekava [National curriculum for basic schools]. (2011). Retrieved December 12, 2012, from https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001?leiaKehtiv
  25. Rasinen, A. (2000). Developing technology education: In search of curriculum elements for Finnish general education schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/13388/9513924017.pdf?sequence=1
  26. Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., & Miyakawa, H. (2009). Analysis of technology education in the curricula of five EU countries and challenges of technology education – the Finnish perspective. In G. Hoepken, L. S. Lee, H. Miyakawa & A. Ojala (Eds.), Cross border: International cooperation in industrial technology education (pp. 67– 83). Aichi: Aichi University of Education.
  27. Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 35–55.10.21061/jte.v12i2.a.3
  28. Sillaots, M. (2012). Innovaatilised ıpistsenaariumid iTec projekti näitel [Innovative learning scenarios basing on the example of the iTec project]. E-ıppe Uudiskiri [E-learning newsletter]. Retrieved from http://uudiskiri.e-ope.ee/?p=2771
  29. Tooding, L. M. (2007). Andmete anal¸¸s ja tılgendamine sotsiaalteadustes [Data analysis and interpretation in social sciences]. Tartu: Tartu ‹likooli Kirjastus.
  30. Watkins, C., Carnell, E., & Lodge, C. (2007). Effective learning in classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. 10.4135/9781446211472
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 101
Published on: Sep 12, 2014
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Mart Soobik, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.