References
- Åkerlind, G., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Supervising doctoral students : Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031.
- ALLEA (2023). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition 2023. https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/European-Code-of-Conduct-Revised-Edition-2023.pdf.
- Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation : Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of Master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572017.
- Böttcher, F., & Thiel, F. (2018). Evaluating research-oriented teaching : A new instrument to assess university students’ research competences. Higher Education, 75, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0128-y.
- Brown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees : Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654.
- Bukusi, E. A., Manabe, Y. C., & Zunt, J. R. (2019). Mentorship and ethics in global health : Fostering scientific integrity and responsible conduct of research. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0562.
- Burke, R., Baker, S., Molla, T., Cabiles, B., & Fox, A. (2024). How do higher degree research students and supervisors navigate ethics-in-practice for educational research in sensitive or ‘fragile’contexts? British Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3945.
- Burner-Fritsch, I., & Schwertel, T. (2023). Of newcomers and supervisors : Ethical issues in supervising newcomers in qualitative health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231171105.
- Clay, S., & Treharne, G. J. (2022). The ethics of drug use research and ‘wild self-care’ : A dialogue between a postgraduate student and their supervisor. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(4), 1094–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.2003493.
- Čulinović Herc, E., Fabijanić Gagro, S., & Kunda, I. (2016). Vodič za mentore. Doktorski studij Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci. Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci. [A guide for mentors. Doctoral studies at the Faculty of Law at University in Rijeka. Faculty of Law, University of Rijeka.] https://pravri.uniri.hr/files/ridoc/Vodic-za-mentore.pdf.
- European Commission : Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2021). Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions guidelines on supervision. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/508311.
- European Commission. (2005). The European charter for researchers. The code of conduct for the recruitment of researchers. https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/brochures/am509774cee_en_e4.pdf.
- European Mentoring and Coaching Council, International Coach Federation, Association for Coaching, Société Française de Coaching. (2021). The professional charter for coaching, mentoring, and supervision of coaches, mentors, and supervisors. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/142-private-act--2.pdf.
- Fox, A., & Busher, H. (2022). Democratising ethical regulation and practice in educational research. Education Sciences, 12(10), 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100674.
- Gorski, P. C. (2008). Good intentions are not enough : A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802568319.
- Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals : Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.
- Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Mattarozzi Laming, M., Chatterjee Padmanabhan, M., & James, B. (2017). Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities : Preparing research supervisors to teach writing. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 11(1), 88–103. https://scispace.com/pdf/doctoral-supervisor-development-in-australian-universities-296a5x7vty.pdf.
- Halse, C., & Bansel, P. (2012). The learning alliance : Ethics in doctoral supervision. Oxford Review of Education, 38(4), 377–392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41702764.
- Hamid, M. O., Hanna, B., Gannaway, D., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2024). The ethics and epistemology of researching higher degree by research supervision : An encounter with institutional ethics review. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2023.2299973.
- Hopman, J. (2021). Fieldwork supervision : Supporting ethical reflexivity to enhance research analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(1), 41–52. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/39966/7/FieldworkSupervision-Hopman-2019.pdf.
- Humphreys, S. J. (2008). Does student research require a lower standard of ethical scrutiny? Research Ethics Review, 4(4), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400403.
- Kodeks etike psihološke djelatnosti [Code of Ethics for Psychological Practice] (2005). Narodne novine, 13/2005. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2005_01_13_217.html.
- Kušević, B. (2025). Mentoring research projects in the Croatian higher education document framework. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 14(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-11-2023-0109.
- Lakušić, S., Ed. (2024). Vodič kroz doktorske studije Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Akademska godina 2024./2025. Sveučilište u Zagrebu. [Ordinance on doctoral studies of the University of Zagreb. Academic year 2024./2025. University of Zagreb.] https://www.unizg.hr/fileadmin/rektorat/Istrazivanja/Poslijediplomski/Ured_za_doktorske_studije_i_programe/Publikacije/Vodic_kroz_doktorske_studije_2024-2025_WEB.pdf.
- Lenton, L. A., Smith, V., Bacon, A. M., May, J., & Charlesford, J. (2021). Ethical considerations for committees, supervisors and student researchers conducting qualitative research with young people in the United Kingdom. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100050.
- Lotto, R. R. (2018). Post-graduate students’ perception of research ethics training : A qualitative study. Innovations in Practice, 12(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.iip.vol12iss2article234.
- Mertens, D. M. (2014). Ethical use of qualitative data and findings. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 510–523). SAGE.
- Moe, C., Uhrenfeldt, L., & Kymre, I. G. (2024). Facilitating research ethics in qualitative research through doctoral supervision in the context of European Commission funding. Research Ethics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241232816.
- Novak, D. (2016). Profesionalizacija doktorske izobrazbe. Vodič za mentore i doktorande. Fakultet prometnih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. [Professionalization of doctoral education. Guide for supervisors and doctoral students. Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb.] https://www.fpz.unizg.hr/file/ea71dade883c8a5504d79576028b7ca5.pdf.
- Nuis, W., Segers, M., & Beausaert, S. (2023). Conceptualizing mentoring in higher education : A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565.
- Odbor za završne i diplomske radove. (n.d.). Vodič za mentore. Fakultet za dentalnu medicinu i zdravstvo Osijek, Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku. [Committee for final and graduate theses. (n.d.). A guide for mentors. Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek.] https://www.fdmz.hr/images/studenti/zavrsni_i_diplomski_radovi/2022/vodic_za_mentore.pdf.
- Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635.
- Richards, G. (2010). Tips for the postgraduate supervisor : Integrating ethics with research supervision. The fourth seminar organized by the AREC University Sector Committee, London, 2010. Research Ethics Review, 6(4), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600410.
- Rissanen, M., & Löfström, E. (2014). Students’ research ethics competences and the university as a learning environment. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v10i2.1004.
- Romano, A. (2016). Ethical review as a tool for enhancing postgraduate supervision and research outcomes in the creative arts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(13), 1368–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1111130.
- Scott, J., Rodham, K., Taylor, G., & Turner-Cobb, J. (2008). ‘You can’t stop undergraduates asking silly questions’ : Academics’ views on submission of undergraduate student projects for ethical review. Research Ethics Review, 4(4), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400404.
- Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In P. Leavy (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. 1st Ed. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.001.
- Shore, C. (2024). The bureaucratization of ethical integrity : Research ethics committees and imaginaries of risk. Anthropology Today, 40(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12872.
- Sveučilišni odjel za stručne studije. (2024). Vodič za mentore. Sveučilište u Splitu. [University Department of Professional Studies. (2024). A guide for mentors. University Department of Professional Studies, University of Split.] https://www.oss.unist.hr/Portals/0/adam/Contents/DtQjdmjxl0uNZoNc-Bzi8A/Text/Vodi%C4%8D%20za%20mentore.pdf.
- The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html.
- The World Medical Association. (1964). WMA declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/.
- Turković, V. (n.d.). Pravila i smjernice za mentore i doktorande na Akademiji likovnih umjetnosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. [Rules and guidelines for mentors and doctoral students at the Academy of Fine Arts at the University of Zagreb.] https://www.alu.unizg.hr/alu/cms/upload/dokumenti/pds/pravilnici/PRAVILA_I_SMJERNICE_za_mentore_i_doktorande_na_ALU_u_Zagrebu.pdf.
- Vican, D., Čuka, A., & Baždarić, T. (n.d.). Priručnik za mentore u visokoobrazovnim institucijama. Sveučilište u Zadru. [Handbook for mentors in higher education institutions. University of Zadar.] https://morepress.unizd.hr/books/index.php/press/catalog/view/93/99/1754.
- Vizek Vidović, V., Brajdić Vuković, M., & Matić, J. (2014). IDIZ-ov priručnik za mentoriranje mladih istraživača. Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu. [IDIZ’s manual for mentoring young researchers. Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.] https://wwwadmin.idi.hr/uploads/10_20240802_hrv_4e343122da.pdf.
- Wade, D. T. (2005). Ethics, audit, and research : All shades of grey. BMJ, 330, 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7489.468.
- Wästerfors, D., Åkerström, & Jacobsson, K. (2014). Reanalysis of Qualitative Data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 467–480). SAGE.
- Weston, K. M., Mullan, J., Hu, W., Thomson, C., Rich, W. C., Knight-Billington, P., Marjadi, B., & McLennan, P. L. (2016). Academic guidance in medical student research : How well do supervisors and students understand the ethics of human research? Journal of Academic Ethics, 14, 87–102. 10.1007/s10805-015-9248-0.
- Willis, R. (2010). Advice for supervising PhD students during the ethical approval process : A research student’s perspective. Research Ethics, (6)2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600205.
- Wynn, L. L. (2016). The impact of ethics review on a research-led university curriculum : Results of a qualitative study in Australia. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616636234.
- Zentgraf, L. L. (2020). Mentoring reality : From concepts and theory to real expertise and the mentor’s point of view. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2017-0077.
- Žižak, A. (2014). Izazovi mentoriranja kvalitativnih istraživanja. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada, 21(3), 367–392. https://hrcak.srce.hr/134769.