A narrative review of mentors’ roles and responsibilities regarding ethical aspects of student research with human participants

Kušević, Barbara

doi:10.2478/jped-2025-0006

Abstract

The objective of this narrative review was to systematize different mentors’ roles and responsibilities regarding ethical aspects of student research with human participants. The qualitative analysis of eight identified studies published since 2015 depicts the mentors in the roles of guiding, teaching, coaching, protecting, anticipating, modelling, and supporting while standing in direct relations with the mentees, the IRB, and their institution, and indirectly with research participants. Each relation results in different responsibilities for the mentors. The results portray the complex issue of power vs. responsibility distribution in the pedagogical relation between various subjects in the research process, as well as the issues of interpreting research ethics as a technocratic instrument of individual responsibilization or as a fundamentally relational, micropedagogical endeavour. The concluding part offers a comprehensive reflective framework for institutions currently facing challenges in mentoring student research with human participants, which can also serve mentors in guiding students in conducting such research.

References

Åkerlind, G., & McAlpine, L. (2017). Supervising doctoral students : Variation in purpose and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1686–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALLEA (2023). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised edition 2023. https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/European-Code-of-Conduct-Revised-Edition-2023.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2006). Mastering the dissertation : Lecturers’ representations of the purposes and processes of Master’s level dissertation supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Böttcher, F., & Thiel, F. (2018). Evaluating research-oriented teaching : A new instrument to assess university students’ research competences. Higher Education, 75, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0128-y.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees : Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 747–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bukusi, E. A., Manabe, Y. C., & Zunt, J. R. (2019). Mentorship and ethics in global health : Fostering scientific integrity and responsible conduct of research. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0562.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burke, R., Baker, S., Molla, T., Cabiles, B., & Fox, A. (2024). How do higher degree research students and supervisors navigate ethics-in-practice for educational research in sensitive or ‘fragile’contexts? British Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3945.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burner-Fritsch, I., & Schwertel, T. (2023). Of newcomers and supervisors : Ethical issues in supervising newcomers in qualitative health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231171105.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clay, S., & Treharne, G. J. (2022). The ethics of drug use research and ‘wild self-care’ : A dialogue between a postgraduate student and their supervisor. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(4), 1094–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.2003493.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Čulinović Herc, E., Fabijanić Gagro, S., & Kunda, I. (2016). Vodič za mentore. Doktorski studij Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci. Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci. [A guide for mentors. Doctoral studies at the Faculty of Law at University in Rijeka. Faculty of Law, University of Rijeka.] https://pravri.uniri.hr/files/ridoc/Vodic-za-mentore.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission : Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2021). Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions guidelines on supervision. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/508311.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission. (2005). The European charter for researchers. The code of conduct for the recruitment of researchers. https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/brochures/am509774cee_en_e4.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Mentoring and Coaching Council, International Coach Federation, Association for Coaching, Société Française de Coaching. (2021). The professional charter for coaching, mentoring, and supervision of coaches, mentors, and supervisors. https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/resources/docs/142-private-act--2.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fox, A., & Busher, H. (2022). Democratising ethical regulation and practice in educational research. Education Sciences, 12(10), 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100674.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorski, P. C. (2008). Good intentions are not enough : A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802568319.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals : Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guerin, C., Walker, R., Aitchison, C., Mattarozzi Laming, M., Chatterjee Padmanabhan, M., & James, B. (2017). Doctoral supervisor development in Australian universities : Preparing research supervisors to teach writing. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 11(1), 88–103. https://scispace.com/pdf/doctoral-supervisor-development-in-australian-universities-296a5x7vty.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halse, C., & Bansel, P. (2012). The learning alliance : Ethics in doctoral supervision. Oxford Review of Education, 38(4), 377–392. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41702764.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hamid, M. O., Hanna, B., Gannaway, D., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2024). The ethics and epistemology of researching higher degree by research supervision : An encounter with institutional ethics review. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2023.2299973.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hopman, J. (2021). Fieldwork supervision : Supporting ethical reflexivity to enhance research analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(1), 41–52. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/39966/7/FieldworkSupervision-Hopman-2019.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humphreys, S. J. (2008). Does student research require a lower standard of ethical scrutiny? Research Ethics Review, 4(4), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400403.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kodeks etike psihološke djelatnosti [Code of Ethics for Psychological Practice] (2005). Narodne novine, 13/2005. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2005_01_13_217.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kušević, B. (2025). Mentoring research projects in the Croatian higher education document framework. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 14(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-11-2023-0109.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lakušić, S., Ed. (2024). Vodič kroz doktorske studije Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Akademska godina 2024./2025. Sveučilište u Zagrebu. [Ordinance on doctoral studies of the University of Zagreb. Academic year 2024./2025. University of Zagreb.] https://www.unizg.hr/fileadmin/rektorat/Istrazivanja/Poslijediplomski/Ured_za_doktorske_studije_i_programe/Publikacije/Vodic_kroz_doktorske_studije_2024-2025_WEB.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lenton, L. A., Smith, V., Bacon, A. M., May, J., & Charlesford, J. (2021). Ethical considerations for committees, supervisors and student researchers conducting qualitative research with young people in the United Kingdom. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100050.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lotto, R. R. (2018). Post-graduate students’ perception of research ethics training : A qualitative study. Innovations in Practice, 12(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.iip.vol12iss2article234.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Ethical use of qualitative data and findings. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 510–523). SAGE.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moe, C., Uhrenfeldt, L., & Kymre, I. G. (2024). Facilitating research ethics in qualitative research through doctoral supervision in the context of European Commission funding. Research Ethics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241232816.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Novak, D. (2016). Profesionalizacija doktorske izobrazbe. Vodič za mentore i doktorande. Fakultet prometnih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. [Professionalization of doctoral education. Guide for supervisors and doctoral students. Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb.] https://www.fpz.unizg.hr/file/ea71dade883c8a5504d79576028b7ca5.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nuis, W., Segers, M., & Beausaert, S. (2023). Conceptualizing mentoring in higher education : A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Odbor za završne i diplomske radove. (n.d.). Vodič za mentore. Fakultet za dentalnu medicinu i zdravstvo Osijek, Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku. [Committee for final and graduate theses. (n.d.). A guide for mentors. Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek.] https://www.fdmz.hr/images/studenti/zavrsni_i_diplomski_radovi/2022/vodic_za_mentore.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Petillion, W., Melrose, S., Moore, S. L., & Nuttgens, S. (2017). Graduate students’ experiences with research ethics in conducting health research. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116677635.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Richards, G. (2010). Tips for the postgraduate supervisor : Integrating ethics with research supervision. The fourth seminar organized by the AREC University Sector Committee, London, 2010. Research Ethics Review, 6(4), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600410.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rissanen, M., & Löfström, E. (2014). Students’ research ethics competences and the university as a learning environment. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v10i2.1004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romano, A. (2016). Ethical review as a tool for enhancing postgraduate supervision and research outcomes in the creative arts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(13), 1368–1380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1111130.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scott, J., Rodham, K., Taylor, G., & Turner-Cobb, J. (2008). ‘You can’t stop undergraduates asking silly questions’ : Academics’ views on submission of undergraduate student projects for ethical review. Research Ethics Review, 4(4), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610800400404.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In P. Leavy (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. 1st Ed. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shore, C. (2024). The bureaucratization of ethical integrity : Research ethics committees and imaginaries of risk. Anthropology Today, 40(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12872.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sveučilišni odjel za stručne studije. (2024). Vodič za mentore. Sveučilište u Splitu. [University Department of Professional Studies. (2024). A guide for mentors. University Department of Professional Studies, University of Split.] https://www.oss.unist.hr/Portals/0/adam/Contents/DtQjdmjxl0uNZoNc-Bzi8A/Text/Vodi%C4%8D%20za%20mentore.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The World Medical Association. (1964). WMA declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turković, V. (n.d.). Pravila i smjernice za mentore i doktorande na Akademiji likovnih umjetnosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. [Rules and guidelines for mentors and doctoral students at the Academy of Fine Arts at the University of Zagreb.] https://www.alu.unizg.hr/alu/cms/upload/dokumenti/pds/pravilnici/PRAVILA_I_SMJERNICE_za_mentore_i_doktorande_na_ALU_u_Zagrebu.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vican, D., Čuka, A., & Baždarić, T. (n.d.). Priručnik za mentore u visokoobrazovnim institucijama. Sveučilište u Zadru. [Handbook for mentors in higher education institutions. University of Zadar.] https://morepress.unizd.hr/books/index.php/press/catalog/view/93/99/1754.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vizek Vidović, V., Brajdić Vuković, M., & Matić, J. (2014). IDIZ-ov priručnik za mentoriranje mladih istraživača. Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu. [IDIZ’s manual for mentoring young researchers. Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.] https://wwwadmin.idi.hr/uploads/10_20240802_hrv_4e343122da.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wade, D. T. (2005). Ethics, audit, and research : All shades of grey. BMJ, 330, 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7489.468.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wästerfors, D., Åkerström, & Jacobsson, K. (2014). Reanalysis of Qualitative Data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 467–480). SAGE.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weston, K. M., Mullan, J., Hu, W., Thomson, C., Rich, W. C., Knight-Billington, P., Marjadi, B., & McLennan, P. L. (2016). Academic guidance in medical student research : How well do supervisors and students understand the ethics of human research? Journal of Academic Ethics, 14, 87–102. 10.1007/s10805-015-9248-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Willis, R. (2010). Advice for supervising PhD students during the ethical approval process : A research student’s perspective. Research Ethics, (6)2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611000600205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wynn, L. L. (2016). The impact of ethics review on a research-led university curriculum : Results of a qualitative study in Australia. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616636234.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zentgraf, L. L. (2020). Mentoring reality : From concepts and theory to real expertise and the mentor’s point of view. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-12-2017-0077.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Žižak, A. (2014). Izazovi mentoriranja kvalitativnih istraživanja. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada, 21(3), 367–392. https://hrcak.srce.hr/134769.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

A narrative review of mentors’ roles and responsibilities regarding ethical aspects of student research with human participants

Abstract

Paradigm

My account