Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Enacting teaching and learning in the interaction process: “Keys” for developing skills in piano lessons through four-hand improvisations Cover

Enacting teaching and learning in the interaction process: “Keys” for developing skills in piano lessons through four-hand improvisations

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 5 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jul 2014
References

References

  1. Auvray, M., Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2009). Perceptual interactions in a minimalist environment. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 79-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Barandiaran, X., Di Paolo, E. A., & Rohde, M. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17 (5), 367-386.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1994). The mindreading system: New directions for research. Current Psychology of Cognition, 13, 724-750.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movements. London: Pergamon Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183, 99-101.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. C. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. De Jaegher, H. (2006). Social interaction rhythm and participatory sense-making. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sussex.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. De Jaegher, H. (2009). Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. Consciousness and Cognition, 18 (2), 535-542.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E.A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6 (4), 485-507.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.A., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (10), 441 - 447.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 97-125.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Overcoming autopoiesis: An enactive detour on the way from life to society. Advanced Series in Management, 6, 43-68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48 (3-4), 329-354.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Froese, T., Virgo, N., & Izquierdo, E. (2007). Autonomy: a review and a reappraisal. In F. Almeida e Costa et al. (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 455-464). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Froese, T., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2009). Sociality and the life-mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 439-463.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Froese, T., & Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11 (2), 205-235.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Froese, T., & Gallagher, S. (2012). Getting interaction theory (IT) together: Integrating developmental, phenomenological, enactive, and dynamical approaches to social interaction. Interaction Studies, 13 (3), 436-468.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sensemaking and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 465-486.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 83-108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher, S. (2008). Inference or interaction: Social cognition without precursors. Philosophical Explorations, 11 (3), 163-73.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Gratier, M. (2003). Expressive timing and interactional synchrony between mothers and infants: Cultural similarities, cultural differences, and the immigration experience. Cognitive Development, 18, 553-554.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Gratier, M. (2008). Les rythmes de l’intersubjectivité. Spirale, 4, 47-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Gratier, M., & Apter-Danon, G. (2009). The musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant vocal interaction. In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (Eds.), Communicative musicality: narratives of expressive gesture and being human. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Gratier, M., & Magnier, J. (2012). Sense and synchrony: Infant communication and musical improvisation. Intermédialités: Histoire et Théorie des Arts, des Lettres et des Techniques, 19, 45-64.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Hane, A. A., Feldstein, S., & Dernetz, V. H. (2003). The relation between coordinated interpersonal timing and maternal sensitivity with four-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (5), 525-539.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Heidegger, M. (1927). Etre et temps. Trad. François Vezin. Paris: Gallimard.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. London: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Husserl, E. (1952). Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phénoménologique pures. Tome 2: Recherches phénoménologiques pour la constitution. Trad. Escoubas, E. Paris: PUF.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. L., & Jasnow, M. D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66 (2), i-149.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Kaddouch, R., & Miravète, S. (2012). Des mimes et des murs. Paris: éditions Gruppen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Kaddouch, I., & Laroche, J. (2014). Trois études de cas d’improvisations. Gruppen, 8, 42-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrom, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Kostrubiec, V., Zanone, P. G., Fuchs, A., & Kelso, J. S. (2012). Beyond the blank slate: Routes to learning new coordination patterns depend on the intrinsic dynamics of the learner - experimental evidence and theoretical model. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Kelso, J. A. S. (1981). On the oscillatory basis of movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18 (63), 9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Kelso J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Coordination dynamics. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems sciences (pp. 1537-1564). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Kelso, J. A. S., Dumas, G., & Tognoli, E. (2012). Outline of a general theory of behavior and brain coordination. Neural Networks, 37, 120-131.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 100-125.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time- varying events. Psychological Review, 106 (1), 119.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Laroche, J. (2013). Le processus d’interaction comme attracteur dans la coordination temporelle entre les personnes. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Metz.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Lenay, C. (2010). “It’s so touching”: Emotional value in distal contact. International Journal of Design, 4 (2), 14-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Lenay, C., Stewart, J., Rohde, M., & Amar, A. A. (2011). You never fail to surprise me: The hallmark of the other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing. Interaction Studies, 12 (3), 373-396.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Lenay, C., & Stewart, J. (2012). Minimalist approach to perceptual interactions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Malloch, S. N. (1999). Mothers and infants and communicative musicality. Musicae Scientiae. Special issue 1999-2000, 29-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. McGann, M. (2010). Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17 (1-2), p. 1-2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. McGann, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Self-other contingencies: Enacting social perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8 (4), 417-437.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Murray, L., & Trevarthen, C. (1985). Emotional regulations of interactions between two- month-olds and their mothers. In T. Field & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Social Perception in Infants, (pp. 177-197). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Morowitz, H. J. (1979). Energy Flow in Biology. Woodbridge : OxBow Press. Nijholt, A., Reidsma, D., van Welbergen, H., op den Akker, H. J. A., & Ruttkay, Z.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. M. (2008). Mutually coordinated anticipatory multimodal interaction. In Nonverbal features of human-human and human-machine interaction. Lecture notes in computer science, 5042, 73- 93. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Oullier, O., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2009). Social coordination from the perspective of coordination dynamics. In R. Meyers (Ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 8198- 8212). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Shockley, K. (2008). Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics, and communication. In G. Knoblich (Ed.), Embodied communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York: Hyperion.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4 (4), 407-427.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In Margaret Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: the beginning of interpersonal communication, Cambridge: CUP.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Trevarthen, C. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue 1999-2000, 155- 215.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Trevarthen, C. (2011). What is it like to be a person who knows nothing? Defining the active intersubjective mind of a newborn human being. Infant and Child Development, 20 (1), 119- 135.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. Varela, F. J. (1988). Invitation aux sciences cognitives. Paris: Seuil.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Varela, F. J. (1996). The specious present. In J. Petitot, F. J. Varela, B. J. Pachoud & M. Roy (Eds.), Naturalizing Phenomenology, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and cognition, 34 (1), 72-87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  65. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jped-2014-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 (formerly 1338-1563) | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 47
Published on: Jul 10, 2014
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
enaction,
interaction,
coordination,
teaching,
learning
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2014 Julien Laroche, Ilan Kaddouch, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 5 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article