Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The perceptions of intermediate EFL learners to the lexical instructional intervention Cover

The perceptions of intermediate EFL learners to the lexical instructional intervention

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Abdulqader, H. B., Murad, I. H. & Abdulghani, M. I. (2017). The Impact of the Application of Lexical Approach on Developing Students’ Writing Skills at a University Level. European Scientific Journal, 13(32).10.19044/esj.2017.v13n32p130
  2. Abebe Lolamo (2013). A study of design and implementation of Grammar Tasks/activities: The Case of English grammar in use I at Hossana College of Teacher Education (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  3. Allotte, R. (2001). The Natural Origin of Language. Knebworth: Able Publishers.
  4. Attar, E. M. & Allami, H. (2013). The Effects of Teaching Lexical Collocations on Speaking Ability of Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6).10.4304/tpls.3.6.1070-1079
  5. Addisu Sewbihon (2020). Evaluating Ninth Graders’ EFL Textbook in the Ethiopian EFL Context: Vocabulary and Grammar in Focus. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 7(1).10.15408/ijee.v7i1.15738
  6. Barcroft, J. (2004). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Lexical Input Processing Approach. Foreign Language Annals, 37 (2), 200-208.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02193.x
  7. Bayissa Gedefa (2013). Exploring the Implementation of CLT in Teaching Grammar at Fre- Hewot No 2 Secondary and Preparatory School (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  8. Becker, J. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In Nash-Webber, B&R. Schank (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing (p. 70-73). Cambridge, Masss: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.10.3115/980190.980212
  9. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, England: Longman.
  10. Bircan, P. (2010). Lexical Approach in teaching vocabulary to young language Learners. Andolu University, Turkey.
  11. Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199161
  12. Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). ‘Experimental and intervention studies on formulaic sequences in a second language’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110.10.1017/S0267190512000050
  13. BonJour, L. (2006). Epistemological problems of perception. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on January 18, 2018 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-episprob/. Collins Essential English Dictionary. New York: HarperCollins.
  14. Brown, D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Longman Press.
  15. Burn, A. (2009). Grammar and Communicative Language Teaching: Why, when, and how to teach it? Camtesol Conference.
  16. Carter, R. (2001). Vocabulary. In Ronald Carter and David Nunan (eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. (pp. 42-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667206.007
  17. Chao, L. (2016). A Lexical-Chunk Based Study of Business English Correspondence Writing. Sino-US English Teaching, 13(4).10.17265/1539-8072/2016.04.005
  18. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  19. Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511811937
  20. Chun-guang, T. (2014) An Empirical Research on the Corpus-Driven Lexical Chunks Instruction. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2).
  21. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
  22. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  23. Cruse, D. A. (1984). Lexical Semantics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Cullen, R. (2008). Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal, 62(3), 221-230.10.1093/elt/ccm042
  25. De Graaff, R. (1997). The Esperanto experiment. Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249-276.10.1017/S0272263197002064
  26. De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M. Long, & C. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726-755). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444315783.ch38
  27. DeKeyser, R. (2005). What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 54, 1-25.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x
  28. Dellar, H. & Walkley, A. (2016). Teaching Lexically: Principles and Practice. United Kingdom: Delta Publishing.
  29. Dokchandra, D. (2019). Thai EFL Learners’ Collocational Competence and Their Perceptions of Collocational Difficulty. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(7), 776-784.10.17507/tpls.0907.04
  30. Dornyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Eidian, F. Gorjian, B. & Aghvami, F. (2013). The Impact of Lexical Collocation Instruction on Developing Writing Skill among Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4 (3).
  32. Ellis, N. C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 124-125). CUP.
  33. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.10.2307/40264512
  34. Fang, X. (2014). Chunking-A Good Way of Memorizing and Teaching Vocabulary. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2).
  35. Fillmore, C. J, Kay, P. & O’Connor, C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501-538.10.2307/414531
  36. Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Folse, K. S. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.23925
  38. Folse, K. S. (2010). Is explicit vocabulary focus the reading teacher’s job? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22, 139-160.
  39. Gebreezabhar, G/hiwet (2016). An Evaluation of the Design of Vocabulary Tasks and Their Implementation with Reference to Grade Nine English Textbook (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  40. Ghezelseflou, M. & Seyedrezaei, S. H. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Collocations on the Vocabulary Retention of Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 4 (3), 162-170.
  41. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  42. Gregg, K. (1984). Krashen’s monitor and Occam’s razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79-100.10.1093/applin/5.2.79
  43. Halliday, M. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In C. E. Bazell, J. C. Caford, M.A.K. Halliday & R. H. Robinso (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp.148-162). London: Longman.
  44. Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Arnold.
  45. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson/Longman.10.1177/003368820103200109
  46. Hailu Mulissa (2007). A Study of Vocabulary Teaching Techniques via Plasma TV and Students’ Attitudes towards the Techniques: A Case of Three Government High Schools in Addis Ababa with References to Grade Nine (unpublished). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University
  47. Hoey, M. (2000). The Hidden Lexical Clues of Textual Organisation: A Preliminary Investigation into an Unusual Text from a Corpus Perspective. In: Burnard, L., McEnery, T. (Eds.), Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective (pp. 31-41). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  48. Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming. A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
  49. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524773
  50. Hyun-Jeong, N. (2013). Implementing the Lexical approach to Teaching English Grammar to Korean L2 Learners. Modern Studies in English Language and Literature, 57(3), 324-47.
  51. Ismael Ali. (2007). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Contextual Guessing Activities: Grade 11 in Focus (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  52. Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Medical Education, 38, 1212-1218.10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x
  53. Jiemin, D. (2006). A survey on Students’ Attitude toward Teaching and Learning in Lexical Approach. CELEA Journal, 129(3).
  54. Junying, Z. & Xuefei, W. (2007). Chunking- An Effective Approach to Vocabulary Teaching and Learning in College Classrooms. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly), 30(3).
  55. Kalivoda, T. (1981). Developing advanced listening comprehension skill in a foreign language: Problems and possibilities. Hispania, 64(1), 80-85.10.2307/340336
  56. Kidist Yohannes (2007). An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Teaching Grammar through Literary Texts (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  57. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
  58. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Lincolnwood: Ladero Publishing.
  59. Krashen, S. D. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
  60. Krashen, S. D., & Terrel, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
  61. Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.101644110.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
  62. Langacker, R. W. (1987a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  63. Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward. Hove, England: Language Teaching Publications.
  64. Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.
  65. Lewis, M. (2008). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
  66. Lightbown, P.M. & Pienemann, M. (1993). Comments on Stephen D. Krashen’s “Teaching Issues: Formal grammar instruction.” TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 717-722.10.2307/3587404
  67. Lubke, G. H. & Muthen, B. O. (2004). Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514-534.10.1207/s15328007sem1104_2
  68. Mackey, A., & Gass, S.M. (2005) Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  69. Martin, J. (2001). Language, register and genre. In Burns, A. & Coffin, C. (Eds.), Analyzing English in a Global Context (pp. 149-166). London: Routledge.
  70. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
  71. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.10.1093/applin/11.2.113
  72. Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics 13, 221-245. Retrieved on November19, 2017 from http://www.10.1017/S026144480000887910.1017/S0261444800008879
  73. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.b.). Perception. Retrieved from www.merrium-webster.com/thesaurus/perception
  74. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.10.1037/h0043158
  75. Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. UK: Multilingual Matters10.21832/9781847692092
  76. Minda, M. (2003). The Effectiveness of Current Vocabulary Teaching Techniques in Facilitating Production in Junior Secondary Schools: Grade Seven in Focus (Unpublished MA thesis) Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  77. Moeller, A. J., Ketsman, O. & Masmaliyeva, L. (2009). The Essentials of Vocabulary Teaching: From Theory to Practice. Central States Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
  78. Montgomery, D. & Runger, G. (2006). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. NJ: Wiley, John and Sons.
  79. Mousavi, S. M. & Heidari D. L. (2018). Effect of collocations on Iranian EFL learners’ writing: Attitude in focus. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 8(4), 131–145.10.18844/gjflt.v8i4.3568
  80. Nassaji, H. &Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.10.1017/S0267190504000066
  81. Nattinger, J. and DeCarrico, J. (1992). Lexical Phrases in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
  82. Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
  83. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524759
  84. Nation, I. S. P. (2005). Teaching vocabulary. Asian EFL Journal. 7(3), 47-54.
  85. Newell, A. (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  86. Newell, A. & Rosenbloom, P.S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.). Cognitive Skills and their acquisition (pp.1-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  87. Norman, F. (2017). To what extent is a lexically focused ELT course book more effective than a grammar focused one? : A comparative analysis of teachers’ attitudes to, and the effectiveness of, the course books Outcomes Second Edition and Speak Out at a private language school chain in the UK (MA Dissertation, unpublished). The University of Sussex.
  88. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), pp. 625-632.10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  89. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-52810.1111/0023-8333.00136
  90. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  91. Pawley, A. & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (eds.), Language and communication. London: Longman.
  92. Qader, H.B.A. (2016). The Effect of Lexical Chunks on Kurdish EFL Learners’ Writing Skill. Education. 6(4),101-106.
  93. Rahimi, M., Momeni, G. & Nejati, R. (2012). The Impact of Lexically-based Language Teaching on Students’ Achievement in Learning English as Foreign Language. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 31-36.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.012
  94. Rahimi, M. & Momeni, G. (2012). The effect of teaching collocations on English language proficiency. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 37 – 42.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.013
  95. Rahimkhani, M. & Hemmati, F. (2016). The Impact of Message Units as ‘Chunks’ on EFL Production. Social Sciences & Humanities. 24 (4), 1503 – 1522.
  96. Reza, K. & Ashouri, S. (2016). The Effect of Lexical Collocation Instruction on Intermediate EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Size. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 6(1).
  97. Richards, J.C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  98. Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. (2nd. Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667305
  99. Romer, U., & Schulze, R. (Eds.). (2009). Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface. John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.35
  100. Rosenbloom, P.S. & Newell, A. (1987). An integrated computational model of stimulus-response compatibility and practice. In J. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (vol. 21), (pp. 19-89). London: Academic Press.
  101. Sahragard, R. & Sadighi, S. (2013). The Effect of Lexical Collocational Density on the Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5 (1).
  102. Schmidt, R.W. (1992). Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 357-385.10.1017/S0272263100011189
  103. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  104. Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (2000). Vocabulary, Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  105. Scrivener, T. (2011). Learning Teaching: The Essential Guide to Language Teaching (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Macmillan.
  106. Setegn, M. (2007). Investigating Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by Somali-Speaking Students: Preparatory Classes in Focus (unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University
  107. Seyedrezaei, S, H. & Ghezelseflou, M. (2015). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Collocations on the Vocabulary Learning of Iranian EFL Students. Journal of Language Sciences & Linguistics. 3(1), 9-16.
  108. Shooshtari, Z.G. & Karami, N. (2013). Lexical Collocation Instruction and Its Impact on Iranian Non-academic EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4).10.4304/jltr.4.4.767-776
  109. Sinclair, J. M. (1991), Corpus Concordance Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  110. Sinclair, J. M. & Renouf, A. (Eds.) (1988). A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 140-158). Harlow: Longman.
  111. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263-308.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
  112. Sullivan, G. & Artino Jr., A. R. (2013). Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 5(4), 541-542.10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
  113. Swan, M. (2006). Chunks in the classroom: Let‘s not go overboard‘. Teacher Trainer, 20(3), 5-6.
  114. Tang, J. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of the Lexical Approach to Improving Writing in SLA. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3).10.4304/jltr.3.3.578-583
  115. Tang, J. (2013). Input of Chunks and its effects on L2 Learners’ Listening Competency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7).10.4304/tpls.3.7.1264-1269
  116. Thornbury, S. (1998). The Lexical Approach: a journey without maps? MET, 7(4), 7-13.
  117. Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569-613.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00622.x
  118. Tuan, N. H. & Nguyen, N. B. (2014).The Use of Lexical Approach in Enhancing Learners’ Oral Communication Performance at Nguyen Hue University. Journal of Science Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 2(10).
  119. Westfall, T. & Weber, C. (2005). English to go: Lexical Approach Methodology. Retrieved from https://www.oebv.at/system/files/celum/371891_developing_sense.pdf
  120. Widdowson, H. (1989). Proper Words in Proper Places. ELT News 8, British Council, Vienna.
  121. Willis, D. (2003). Rules, Patterns and Words: grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511733000
  122. Woodrow, L. (2014). Writing about Quantitative Research in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230369955
  123. Woolfolk, A. E. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Needham: Allyn & Bacon.
  124. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice. Applied Linguistic, 21(4), 463-489.10.1093/applin/21.4.463
  125. Xu, R., Mao, Z., and Liu, Y. (2012). Lexical Approach and Its Application in College English Classes. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10).10.4304/tpls.2.10.2090-2095
  126. Yemeserach, B. (2015). Grammar Learning Strategies Use of Grade 11 Students at Medhanealem Preparatory School: Gender in Focus (Unpublished MA). Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University.
  127. Yu, X. (2013). From Memorized Chunks to Rule Formation: A Study of Adult Chinese Learners of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(1).10.7575/ijalel.v.2n.1p.98
  128. Zafarghandi, A. M., Tahriri, A. & Bandari, M. D. (2015). The Impact of Teaching Chunks on Speaking Fluency of Iranian EFL Learners. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1).
  129. Ziafar, M. (2015). Good Language Learners and their Use of Lexical İtems and L1 in Second Language Acquisition. International Scientific Research Journal, 1(5). DOI: 10.18483/IRJSci.110.18483/IRJSci.1
  130. Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Canadian Psychology, 34, 390-400.10.1037/h0078865
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2020-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1339-4584 | Journal ISSN: 1339-4045
Language: English
Page range: 19 - 60
Published on: Jun 17, 2021
Published by: SlovakEdu, o.z.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2021 Addisu Sewbihon Getie, Dawit Amogne, Zewdu Emiru, published by SlovakEdu, o.z.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.