Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental Phonetics and Phonology in Indo-Aryan & European Languages Cover

Experimental Phonetics and Phonology in Indo-Aryan & European Languages

Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Abbasi, A. M. (2010). The production of English consonants by Sindhi ESL learners. Munich. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. Germany.
  2. Abbasi, A. M. (2012). A phonetic-acoustic study of Sindhi-accented English for better English pronunciation. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(2), 146-157.
  3. Abbasi, A. M. (2017). The stress pattern of Sindhi and English. Munich. Lincom Europa, Germany.
  4. Abbasi, A. M., & Hussain, S. (2012). Syllable structure and syllabification in Sindhi-English loanwords. International Journal of Researchers, 1(4), 120-134.
  5. Abbasi, A. M., & Hussain, S. (2015). Phonetic analysis of lexical stress in Sindhi. Sindh University Research Journal, 47(4), 749-756.
  6. Abbasi, A. M., & Hussain, S. (2015). The role of pitch between stress and intonation in Sindhi. Annual Research Journal of English Language Forum, 17, 9-24.
  7. Abbasi, A. M., & Kimball, A. (2014). Word stress in Sindhi and English: Implications for learners of English. In poster session presented at the meeting of Sixth Annual Second Language Acquisition and Teacher Education (SLATE) Graduate Research Symposium. Department of linguistics & foreign languages, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA.
  8. Abbasi, A. M., Channa, M. A., John, S., Memon., M. A., Anwar, R. (2018). An Acoustic Investigation of Pakistani and American English Vowels. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p11510.5539/ijel.v8n4p115
  9. Abbasi, A. M., Channa, M. A., Kakepoto, I., Ali, R., & Mehmood, M. (2017). A perceptual study of phonological variations in Pakistani English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n2p9210.5539/ijel.v8n2p92
  10. Abbasi, A. M., Memon, M. A., Channa, M. A., & Stephen, J. (2018). Awareness of L2 American English word stress: Implications for teaching speakers of Indo-Aryan languages. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n3p10110.5539/ijel.v8n3p101
  11. Allana, G.A. (1996). Papers on Sindhi language and linguistics (1st ed.). Jamshoro, Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology, University of Sindh.
  12. Allana, G.A. (2009). Sindhi phonetics (2nd ed.). Hyderabad, Pakistan: Sindhi Language Authority.
  13. Ashby, M., & Maidment, J. (2008). Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110874020
  15. Beckman, M., & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255-309.10.1017/S095267570000066X
  16. Beckman, M. & G. Ayers Elam. (1993). Guidelines for ToBI labelling. Columbus: Ohio State University Research Foundation. Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/8594926-Guidelines-for-tobi-labelling-version-3-0-march-1997-by-mary-e-beckman-and-gayle-ayers-elam.html
  17. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.69) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
  18. Bosch, A. R. K. (2011). Syllable-internal structure: The Blackwell Companion to Phonology.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0033
  19. Broselow, E. (1992). Transfer and universals in second language epenthesis. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  20. Broselow, E. (1999). Loanwords and learn-ability. [Handout of a talk given at the University of Maryland]. Retrieved from http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/491-0102/491-0102-gouskova-0-0.pdf
  21. Bughio, M. Q. (2001-2004). A comparative study of socio-linguistics of Sindhi (Pakistani ed.). Germany: Lincom Europe.
  22. Bukhari & Pervez. (2000-2002). Syllabification & re-syllabification in Urdu. In CRULP Annual Student Report, 2001-2002. Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/resources/reports/streport02.htm#script
  23. Carr, P. (2008). A glossary of phonology. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748629671
  24. Cole, J. (2001). Sindhi. In J. Garry & C. Rubino (Eds.), Facts about the world’s languages: An encyclopedia of the world’s major languages, past and present (pp. 647-653). New York, NY: The H.W. Wilson Company.
  25. Cole, J. (2005). Sindhi. In P. Strazny (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.
  26. Cole, J. (2006). The Sindhi language. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., electronic version, Vol. 2, pp.384-386). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Retrieved from http://www.linguistics.uiuc.edu/jscole/Sindhi%20work.htm10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02241-0
  27. Crosswhite, K. M. (2001a). Vowel reduction. In Phonetically based phonology (B. Hayes, R. Kirchner & D. Steriade, editors) (pp. 191-231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486401.007
  28. Crosswhite, K. M. (2001b). Stress placement in Dihovo Macedonian. Ms., U. of Rochester.
  29. Crystal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (4th ed.). Cornwall, England: MPG Book Ltd.
  30. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). ISBN: 978-1-405-15296-9.10.1002/9781444302776
  31. Davenport, M., & Hannahs. S. J. (1998). Introducing phonetics and phonology. London, UK: Arnold.
  32. De Lacy, P. (2007). The interaction of tone, sonority, and prosodic structure. In Paul de Lacy (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch.12 (pp. 281-307).10.1017/CBO9780511486371.013
  33. Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). A grammar of Yidin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139085045
  34. Dogil, G. (1995). Phonetic correlates of word stress. Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung - Phonetik, Universität Stuttgart, 2 (2), 1-60.
  35. Dogil, G. & Williams, B. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe (H. van der Hulst, editor) (pp. 273-334). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197082.1.273
  36. Duanmu, S., Kim, Y., & Stiennon. N. (2005). Stress and syllable structure in English: Approaches to phonological variations. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 3.2, 45-78. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~duanmu/Variations05.pdf
  37. Dyrud, L. (1997). Hindi-Urdu: Stress accent or non-stress accent? (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND. Retrieved from https://arts-sciences.und.edu/summer-institute-of-linguistics/theses/_files/docs/2001-dyrud-lars.pdf
  38. Feinstein, M. (1979). Pre-nasalization and syllable structure. Linguistic Inquiry, (10), 245–278.
  39. Flemming, E. (2002). Auditory representations in phonology. Routledge, New York.
  40. Flemming, Edward (2005). Target less schwa revisited. Poster presented at the 149th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Vancouver.
  41. Fleischhacker, H. (2000). The location of epenthetic vowels with respect to consonant clusters: An auditory similarity account (Unpublished master’s thesis). UCLA, Los Angelos, CA.
  42. Fry, D. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 765-8.10.1121/1.1908022
  43. Fry, D. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 120-52.10.1177/002383095800100207
  44. Fujisaki, H. & Hirose, K. (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 5, 233-242.10.1250/ast.5.233
  45. Gay, T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 63, 223-230.10.1121/1.381717
  46. Giegrich, H. J. (1998). English phonology (4th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Gordon, M. (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, and typology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA, Los Angelos, CA.
  48. Gordon, M. (2002a). A phonetically-driven account of syllable weight. Language, 78, 51-80.10.1353/lan.2002.0020
  49. Gordon, M. (2002b). Weight-by-position adjunction and syllable structure. Lingua 112, 901-931.10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00052-9
  50. Gordon, M. (2004). A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70, 1-32.10.1086/422264
  51. Gordon, M. (2005). A perceptually-driven account of onset-sensitive stress. University of California, Santa Barbara. Journal of Springer Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23, 595–653. DOI 10.1007/s11049-004-8874-910.1007/s11049-004-8874-9
  52. Gordon, M, Carmen J, Carlos N, and Nobutaka T. (2008). Vowel and consonant sonority and coda weight: A cross-linguistic study. In Proceedings of the 26th West coast conference on formal linguistics, (ed.), Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie, 208-216. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla proceedings project. www.lingref.com, document 1674.
  53. Gordon, M. (2010). Disentangling stress and pitch accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. Paper presented at the University of Connecticut workshop on stress and accent, Storrs, CT.
  54. Gordon, M, J, Nash & Takara. (2010). Syllable structure and extrametricality: A typological and phonetic study. Studies in Language, 34 (1), 131-166.10.1075/sl.34.1.15gor
  55. Gordon, M. (2011). Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In M. van Ostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (pp. 924-948). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0039
  56. Gordon, M & Latifa, N. (2012). Acoustic correlates of prominence in Tashlhiyt Berber. University of California, Santa Barbar. Retrieved from http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/gordon/Gordon&Nafi_2012_Tashlhiyt.pdf10.1016/j.wocn.2012.04.003
  57. Gouskova, M. (2001). Falling sonority onsets, loanwords, and syllable contact. In
  58. M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, & S. Neuvel (Eds.), CLS 37: Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 1: The main session. Chicago: CLS.
  59. Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H. (2003). Understanding phonology (1st ed.). London, UK: Hodder Arnold.
  60. Halle, M., & Vergnaud, J. R. (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  61. Harrington, J., & Cox, F. (1984b). The syllable and phonotactic constraints. In the syllable and the foot [Course material]. Retrieved from http://clas.mq.edu.au/phonetics/phonology/syllable/syllable.pdf
  62. Haugen, E. (1956). Syllabification in Kutenai. International Journal of American Linguistics, (22), 196-201.10.1086/464366
  63. Hawkins, P. (1992). Introducing phonology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Hutchinson.
  64. Hayes, B. (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules (Revised version of 1980 doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology). Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
  65. Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13 (2), 227-276.
  66. Hayes, B. (1985). Iambic and Trochaic Rhythm in Stress Rules: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 429-446). Retrieved from http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/
  67. Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  68. Hillenbrand, J. Laura A. Getty, Clark, M. J & Wheeler, K (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Acoustical Society of America, 97 (5). Retrieved from http://homepages.wmich.edu/~hillenbr/Papers/HillenbrandGettyClarkWheeler.pdf10.1121/1.411872
  69. Hualde, J. (1991). Basque phonology. London, UK: Routledge.
  70. Hualde, J. (1999). Basque accentuation. In van der Hulst, H. (Ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe (pp.947-993). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
  71. Hussain, S. (2005). Phonological processing for Urdu text to speech system. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/research/papers.htm
  72. Hussain, S. (2010). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu (Doctoral dissertation, Northwest University USA). Islamabad. National Language Authority, Pakistan.
  73. Hyman, L. M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Larry M. Hyman (Ed.), Studies in stress and accent, 37-82. SCOPIL #4. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. http://gsil.scling.org/list.html#SCOPIL:_Southern_California_Occasional_
  74. Isačenko, A. & Schädlich, H. J. (1970). A model of standard German intonation. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783111354873
  75. Itô, J. (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7 (2), 217-259. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4047731 International Phonetic Associations. (1999). Handbook of the international phonetic association. Washington: DC.10.1007/BF00138077
  76. Jatoi, N. A. (1983). Linguistics and Sindhi language, (2nd ed.). Hyderabad, Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology.
  77. Jatoi, N. A (1996). Linguistics and Sindhi language (Ilm Lisan Ain Sindhi Zaban) (3rd ed.). Hyderabad, Pakistan: Institute of Sindhology, Sindh University Press.
  78. Jones, D. (1972). An outline of English phonetics (9th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Heffer & Sons.
  79. Kabak, B. & Vogel, I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18, 315-360.10.1017/S0952675701004201
  80. Kachru, Y. (2006). Hindi. (London oriental and African language library, Vol. 12). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamin Publishing Company.10.1075/loall.12
  81. Kager, R. (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.
  82. (1992a) Shapes of the generalized trochee. In J. Mead (ed.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 11, 298-311.
  83. Keerio, A. (2010). Acoustic analysis of Sindhi speech-pre-curser for an ASR system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
  84. Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  85. Kidder, E. (2008). Tone, intonation, stress and duration in Navajo. Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics, Linguistic Theory at the University of Arizona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10150/126405
  86. Kleber, F. & Klipphahn, N. (n.d.). An acoustic investigation of secondary stress in
  87. German: Institute of phonetics and digital speech processing, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.ipds.unikiel.de/pub_exx/aipuk/aipuk_37/37_1_KleberKlipphahn.pdf
  88. Kochanski, G., Grabe, E., Coleman, J., & Rosner, B. (2005). Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118 (2),1038-1054. Retrieved from http://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/Fall_2007/cogs501/Kochanski2005.pdf10.1121/1.1923349
  89. Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  90. Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics (4th ed.). Los Angelos, CA: Harcourt
  91. College Publishers.
  92. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  93. Lewis, M. P, Gary, F.S & Charles, D. F (eds.), (2016). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, nineteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Oneline version: http://www.ethnologue.com.
  94. Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 35, 1773-1781.10.1121/1.1918816
  95. McDonough, J. (2003). The Navajo sound system. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-0207-3
  96. McMahon, A. (2002). An introduction to English phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  97. Mehrotra, R. C. (1965). Stress in Hindi. Indian Linguistics, 26.
  98. Masica, C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.
  99. Moore, R. R. (1965). A study of Hindi intonation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan.
  100. Nair, R. (1999). Syllables and word edges (Doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  101. Nair. R. (2001). Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Hindi: Papers from the Proceedings of SALA 18th Roundtable (1st ed.). Motilal Banarsidas.
  102. Nayyar, S. (2000-2001). Syllable stress in Urdu. In CRULP Annual Student Report (pp. 202-206). Center for Research in Urdu Language Processing. Retrieved from http://www.cle.org.pk/resources/reports/streport02.htm#script
  103. Nihalani, P. (1995). Illustrations of the IPA: Sindhi. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 25 (2), 95-98.10.1017/S0025100300005235
  104. Parker, S. (2002). Quantifying the sonority hierarchy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
  105. Parker, S. (2011). Sonority. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. In van Ostendorp, Marc, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.), Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0049
  106. Retrieved from http://www.companiontophonology.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405184236_chunk_g978140518423651
  107. Parsons, T. W. (1987). Voice and speech processing. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
  108. Pickett, J. M. (1999). The acoustics of speech communication, fundamentals, speech perception, theory, and technology, USA.
  109. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Doctoral dissertation). MIT, Cambridge.
  110. Pierrehumbert, J., & Nair, R. (1996). Implication of Hindi prosodic structure. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and Methods, 2, 549-584. Retrieved from http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/~jbp/publications/implications_hindi.pdf
  111. PIE. (2000). Introduction to proto-Indo-European stress. Retrieved from http://www.oocities.org/caraculiambro/Caraculiambro/Stress.html
  112. Puri, V. (2013). Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.
  113. Raphael, L. J., Gloria, J. B., & Katherine, S. H. (2006). Speech science primer: physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (5th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  114. Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2009). Phonetics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  115. Roach, P. (2004). English phonetics and phonology. India: Replika Press.
  116. Sapir, E. & Swadesh, M. (1960). Yana dictionary (University of California publications in linguistics, Vol. 22). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  117. Singh, R. (1985). Prosodic adaptation in inter-phonology. Lingua, 67, 269-282.10.1016/0024-3841(85)90001-4
  118. Wang, H., & Heuven, V. (2006). Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers. In J. M. Van de Weijer & B. Los (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 237-248). Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/8597/05.pdf?sequence=1510.1075/avt.23.23wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2018-0023 | Journal eISSN: 1339-4584 | Journal ISSN: 1339-4045
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 52
Published on: Jan 25, 2019
Published by: SlovakEdu, o.z.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2019 Abdul Malik Abbasi, Habibullah Pathan, Mansoor Ahmed Channa, published by SlovakEdu, o.z.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.