Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relationship of Resistance-Related Enzyme Activity and Salicylic Acid Content in Phalaenopsis Species with Different Levels of Resistance to Dickeya dadantii Cover

Relationship of Resistance-Related Enzyme Activity and Salicylic Acid Content in Phalaenopsis Species with Different Levels of Resistance to Dickeya dadantii

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The development of soft-rot disease symptoms among four species: (A) SrSD on infected leaves at 0–18 hours post-inoculation (HPI), D. dadantii colony-forming units (CFU) in infected leaves at 18 HPI, (B) the area under disease progress curve in four Phalaenopsis species at various HPI
The development of soft-rot disease symptoms among four species: (A) SrSD on infected leaves at 0–18 hours post-inoculation (HPI), D. dadantii colony-forming units (CFU) in infected leaves at 18 HPI, (B) the area under disease progress curve in four Phalaenopsis species at various HPI

Figure 2

Percentage of lignin content in dry weight of Phalaenopsis species resistant (P. amboinensis) and very susceptible (P. amabilis) of D. dadantii at 12 HPI. There is no significant difference between the two species based on the Student’s T-test
Percentage of lignin content in dry weight of Phalaenopsis species resistant (P. amboinensis) and very susceptible (P. amabilis) of D. dadantii at 12 HPI. There is no significant difference between the two species based on the Student’s T-test

The reaction of four Phalaenopsis species to D_ dadantii inoculation

Species6 HPI12 HPI18 HPI

SrSD (mm)DS (%)RCSrSD (mm)DS (%)RCSrSD (mm)DS (%)RC
P. amboinensis0.5 ± 0.1d7 ± 0.0R0.6 ± 0.5d7 ± 0.1R1.3 ± 0.8c20 ± 0.1R
P. pantherina2.7 ± 1.3c30 ± 0.1MR4.4 ± 3.2c50 ± 0.4MS7.9 ± 7.1b70 ± 0.5S
P. schilleriana4.4 ± 0.6b50 ± 0.0MS10.1 ± 2.5b93 ± 0.2VS15.4 ± 4.7a100 ± 0.2VS
P. amabilis7.9 ± 0.4a83 ± 0.1VS14.3 ± 1.4a100 ± 0.0VS20.0 ± 1.5a100 ± 0.0VS

POD, PAL, and SA content in P_ amabilis and P_ amboinensis 12 hours post-inoculation

Resistance level to dadantii D.TreatmentPOD (unit·min−1·mg−1 protein × 10−4)PAL (unit·min−1·mg−1 protein × 10−4)SA (ppm of fresh sample)
very susceptibleP. amabilis non-inoculated15.30 ± 6.93a12.20 ± 1.60a5.26 ± 0.22a
P. amabilis inoculated14.96 ± 11.78a10.78 ± 7.59a5.32 ± 0.46a

resistantP. amboinensis non-inoculated2.35 ± 0.22b1.54 ± 0.16b12.56 ± 2.83b
P. amboinensis inoculated1.64 ± 0.83b1.26 ± 0.44b12.88 ± 2.14b
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2021-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 44
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2021
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2021
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 I Putu Wahyu Sanjaya, Dewi Sukma, Sudarsono Sudarsono, Ming-Tsair Chan, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.