Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Nematicidal Properties of Chitosan Nanoformulation Cover

Nematicidal Properties of Chitosan Nanoformulation

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

(A) Particle size of chitosan nanospheres. (B) Zeta potential of chitosan nanospheres.

Figure 2:

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) micrograph of chitosan nanospheres.

Figure 3:

FT-IR spectroscopy of 1% chitosan nanospheres formulation.

Figure 4:

Scanning Electron Microscope images of chitosan nanospheres treated eggs (left side) and chitosan nanospheres untreated eggs (right side).

Table 1.

Effect of chitosan nanospheres on the egg hatching of M. incognita

TreatmentsNumber of hatched juveniles (Mean of four replications)
24 h48 h72 h
Mean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed value
Chitosan nanospheres at 100 ppm12.50b (3.31)16.50b (4.84)41.50b (6.29)
Chitosan nanospheres at 500 ppm10.50b (3.09)14.16b (3.61)26.50b (4.79)
Chitosan nanospheres at 1000 ppm0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)
Chitosan nanospheres at 5000 ppm0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)
Control- tap water38.83c (6.21)61.66c (7.85)84.80c (17.27)
SEd0.720.461.12
CD (p=0.01%)2.291.483.88

* Figures in parentheses are square root transformed value. In a column, means followed by common different from each other at 1% level by DMRT.

Table 2.

Effect of chitosan nanospheres on M. incognita juvenile mortality

TreatmentsJuvenile mortality in percentage (Mean of four replications)
24 h48 h72 h
Chitosan nanospheres at 100 ppm13.00b (5.40)21.5c (3.47)26.5c (5.10)
Chitosan nanospheres at 500 ppm27.25 b (5.14)31.25b (5.67)28.25c (5.26)
Chitosan nanospheres at 1000 ppm29.00 b (5.85)36.00b (5.96)46.25b (6.70)
Chitosan nanospheres at 5000 ppm100.00a (10.02)10.00a (10.02)100.00a (10.02)
Control0.00c (0.707)0.00d (0.70)0.00d (0.70)
SEd1.520.720.55
CD (p=0.01%)4.482.141.64

* Figures in parentheses are square root transformed value. In a column, means followed by common alphabet are significantly different from each other at 1% level by DMRT.

Figure 5:

Efficacy of different doses of chitosan nanospheres (1%) on M. incognita under pot culture conditions.

Table 3.

Effect chitosan nanospheres against root knot nematode, M. incognita under pot culture conditions

TreatmentsMean of three replications
Number of galls/5g of rootsNumber of egg masses/5g of rootsNumber of females/5g of rootsNumber of J2/100 cc of soil
Mean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed value
Chitosan nanospheres 1ml/plant+ M. incognita13.30a (3.51)11.67bcd (3.32)17.67cd (4.25)48.60bc (12.06)
Chitosan nanospheres 2ml/plant+ M. incognita10.00a (3.12)6.00b (2.53)14.60b (3.87)28.30ab (5.36)
Chitosan nanospheres 3ml/plant+ M. incognita15.00a (3.87)7.33bc (2.73)17.60cd (4.25)40.30bc (6.38)
Chitosan 1ml/plant+ M. incognita18.00a (4.28)19.00c (4.41)22.30f (4.76)62.00bcd (7.90)
Chitosan 2ml/plant + M. incognita17.00a (4.25)10.00bcd (3.22)16.67c (4.13)46.70bc (6.86)
Chitosan 3ml/plant + M. incognita17.60a (3.34)10.66bcd (3.30)17.90d (4.19)44.70bc (6.66)
Velum prime 0.5ml/plant + M. incognita25.67a (4.87)15.67de (3.95)19.30e (4.44)32.67bc (5.75)
P. lilacinum 1g/plant+M. incognita17.67a (4.25)13.39cde (1.37)18.67e (4.44)50.60bc (7.14)
Chitosan nanospheres without nematode Inoculums0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)0.00a (0.70)
Untreated control61.30c (7.83)37.16f (6.04)43.67g (6.63)105.60cd (10.21)
SEd0.960.470.062.26
CD (p=0.01%)2.731.360.186.44

* Figures in parentheses are square root transformed value. In a column, means followed by common alphabet are significantly different from each other at 1% level by DMRT.

Table 4.

Effect of chitosan nanospheres against root knot nematode, M. incognita under field conditions

TreatmentsMean of three replications
Number of galls/5g of roots1Number of egg masses/5g of roots1Number of females/5g of roots1Number of J2/100 cc of soil1Fruit weight (kg)/plot2Fruit weight (tonne)/ha2
Mean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed valueMean and transformed value
Chitosan nanospheres (1%)-5ml/plant5.61ab (2.29)3.34b (1.82)18.31b (4.26)50.63c (7.11)95a (18.75)14.25
Chitosan nanospheres (2%)-5ml/plant3.31a (1.81)0.99ab (1.14)17.38b (4.16)35.00b (5.90)89.5b (11.87)13.42
Chitosan (1%) - 5ml/plant11.25b (3.10)3.62b (1.93)20.90b (4.54)58.54e (7.61)86bc (7.5)12.90
Chitosan (2%)-5ml/plant4.91ab (2.30)1.88ab (1.52)17.79b (4.19)48.75b (6.92)83cd (3.75)12.45
Velum prime 500ml/acre2.83a (1.60)0.09a (0.75)11.42a (3.35)30.45a (5.47)99a (23.75)14.85
Carbofuran 3G- 1kg ai/ha7.32b (2.95)1.43ab (1.35)23.20b (4.78)54.23d (7.34)89b (11.25)13.35
Untreated control44.00c (0.62)22.3c (4.77)57.25c (7.57)165.80f (12.73)80d12.00
SEd0.460.370.370.102.28
CD (p=0.05%)1.000.800.800.224.90

* 1 and 2-Figures in parentheses are square root transformed value and increased over control respectively. In a column, means followed by common alphabet are significantly different from each other at 1% level by DMRT.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2023-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2023
Published on: Aug 24, 2023
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 R. Mouniga, B. Anita, A. Lakshmanan, A. Shanthi, G. Karthikeyan, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.