Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Plectus of the Prairie: A Case Study of Taxonomic Resolution from a Nematode Biodiversity Survey Cover

Plectus of the Prairie: A Case Study of Taxonomic Resolution from a Nematode Biodiversity Survey

Open Access
|Oct 2022

Full Article

Current surveys of nematode diversity frequently apply DNA barcoding or metabarcoding as a method of assessment (Floyd et al., 2002; Treonis et al., 2018; Schenk and Fontaneto, 2020). The objective of the survey generally dictates the assessment method of choice. If the objective is to assess functional diversity, e.g., trophic groups, molecular methods may not be required and traditional morphological evaluation may be adequate (Hodda and Wanless, 1994; Bloemers et al., 1997). If taxon/species diversity is a goal, then a method of greater taxonomic resolution, such as DNA barcoding, may be necessary. And, if the scope of the survey requires multiple comparisons across broad geographic regions and scales, then a metabarcoding approach may be optimal (Porter and Hajibabaei, 2018; Brunbjerg et al., 2019; Arribas et al., 2021). Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, but one common feature of the molecular methods is the need for referral to a DNA database. In this study we chose a single taxon, Plectus Bastian, 1865, and used three standard methods of diversity assessment, to determine the extent to which method and database composition influence taxonomic resolution and the selection of reportable taxonomic units.

Plectus species were examined from 15 remnant (never plowed) tallgrass prairie sites outside of Lincoln, Nebraska. These 15 sites, located within a larger restoration project called the Lancaster County Prairie Corridor, were designed to maximize habitat continuity. The sites have been variously managed by burning, grazing, or mowing, resulting in communities of different species compositions representing a range of vegetation “quality” with regard to native tallgrass prairie plants (Chamberlain and Ingram, 2012). In the terrestrial nematode survey, Plectus stood out as a taxon present in all samples, across the variety of management regimes, and relatively abundant in each of the sampled sites. Plectus is considered a cosmopolitan genus, found in soils and freshwater habitats, and many Plectus species are reported to have a worldwide distribution (Overgaard, 1967; de Goede and Bongers, 1994; Sohlenius et al., 1996; Holovachov, 2004; Iliev and Ilieva, 2016; Naumova et al., 2017). In the first major study of nematode diversity in North American grasslands, Orr and Dickerson (1966) identified six Plectus species from the Flint Hills of Kansas, the present-day location of the Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Reserve (Knapp, 1998). These included P. acuminatus Bastian, 1865, P. armatus Butschli, 1873, P. assimilis Butschli, 1873, P. parietinus Bastian, 1865, P. rhizophilus de Mann, 1880, and P. varians Maggenti, 1961.

Most known Plectus species are parthenogenetic, while some readily undergo anhydrobiosis, and can be recovered from extreme habitats including Antarctic dry valleys (Kagoshima et al., 2012; Adams et al., 2014), arctic tundra, and high alpine (Porazinska et al., 2021). They are not known from marine sediments. There are 76 species in the genus (Schmidt-Rhaesa et al., 2013). In GenBank, there are 22 Plectus species represented with a Linnaean binomial, and 57 Plectus DNA sequences that lack an assigned species name. In SILVA, the ribosomal RNA database, there are 14 Plectus species with a Linnaean binomial and approximately 20 isolates that lack an assigned species name.

There were two objectives for this Plectus case study.

  • To determine the level of taxonomic resolution provided by each assessment method as it applies to Plectus specimens collected from the 15 remnant Prairie Corridor sites. The three assessment methods included a traditional morphological approach, barcoding using 18S and COI genetic markers, and metabarcoding using 18S.

  • To molecularly compare Plectus diversity and identity of Prairie Corridor specimens, with GenBank accessions and specimens collected by the authors from other grassland and non-grassland habitats across a broad geographic scale.

Materials and Methods
Soil collection and nematode isolation

Fifteen sites were sampled within the 16-km-long Prairie Corridor (Fig. 1). The 15 sites were selected because, as remnant prairies, they had never been plowed or converted to agricultural production. Each site ranged from 0.8 ha to 1.2 ha in size, and soil cores were taken from a 40 m × 40 m square in the center of each site following a protocol to ensure standardized soil sampling at each location (Neher et al., 1995). Soil cores were taken at regular intervals throughout the 40 m × 40 m grid at a depth of approximately 20 cm using an Oakfield Soil Corer (Oakfield Apparatus, Oakfield, Wisconsin) with a 2.5-cm diameter. All soil cores from a single 40 m × 40 m square were bulked and stored at 8°C prior to nematode extraction.

Figure 1

Map of Nebraska and location of the 16-km-long Lancaster County Prairie Corridor. Orange dots indicate the 15 remnant prairie sites.

Morphological approach

Nematodes were extracted from 200 cc of soil via the sieving and sugar centrifugation method (Jenkins, 1964). Nematodes were counted, and a total of 150 nematodes was identified to genus using morphological characters. Twenty-five of the 150 nematodes were photographed at ×200 and ×400 magnifications to serve as photographic vouchers, and immediately processed for DNA barcoding to preserve the linkage between DNA and morphology. Voucher images were taken of the full body, head, and tail with a Leica DC300 video camera (leica-microsystems.com) mounted on a Leica DMLB light microscope with differential interference contrast. The taxonomic keys and compendia of Andrassy (1985), Bongers (1989), Ebsary (1985), Holovachov and De Ley (2006), Holovachov (2014), and Maggenti (1961) were used for a morphology-based identification of Plectus species. DNA was extracted from the photographed specimens by rupturing the nematode in an 18-mL droplet of sterilized water, which was stored at -22°C until PCR (Powers et al., 2014). Plectus specimens from additional sites (a total of 95 specimens from 28 sites) including two well-studied tallgrass prairies, Konza and Nine-Mile Prairies, were added to expand taxonomic breadth and facilitate comparisons across broader geographic regions and ecosystems (Table 1).

Table 1

Specimen collection information.

GroupNIDSpeciesSiteLocationMarkerGB Accession #
1N11040Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208981
1N11213Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208968
1N11461Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208969
1N11211Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208970
1N11110Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208971
1N11042Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208973
1N11146Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208976
1N11041Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208977
1N11526Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208978
1N11142Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208979
1N11215Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208980
1N11161Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208982
1N11035Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208983
1N11034Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208984
1N11109Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208985
1N11121Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208986
1N11140Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208987
1N11216Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208989
1N11227Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208990
1N11218Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208992
1N11473Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208993
1N11209Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208988
1N12079Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208991
1N11107Plectus frigophilusLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208972
1N11033Plectus frigophilusLake BonneyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208974
1N11047Plectus frigophilusGarwood ValleyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP208975
2N11873Plectus sp. 2Barley fieldHall County, MTCOIOP208994
2N11874Plectus sp. 2Barley fieldHall County, MTCOIOP208995
3N13530Plectus sp. 3Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209006
3N13357Plectus sp. 3Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209005
3N13255Plectus sp. 3Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209004
3N13045Plectus sp. 3Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209003
3N11765Plectus sp. 3Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209001
3N13543Plectus sp. 3Becker PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209000
3N11764Plectus sp. 3Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209002
3N13030Plectus sp. 3Semani PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP208999
3N12485Plectus sp. 3Eggerling Soybean FieldPrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP208998
3N13239Plectus sp. 3Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP208996 OP205456
3P194018Plectus sp. 3Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP208997
aN11865Plectus sp.Arctic PreserveUtqiaghk, AKCOIOP209007
4N13608Plectus sp. 4Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209009
4N13280Plectus sp. 4Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209008 OP205457
5KU759331.1Plectus parietinusGenBankCOIKU759331.1
5KU759327.1Plectus parietinusGenBankCOIKU759327.1
5KU759330.1Plectus parietinusGenBankCOIKU759330.1
6N13176Plectus sp. 6Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209010 OP205453
6N13287Plectus sp. 6Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209011
6N13425Plectus sp. 6Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209012
6N13614Plectus sp. 6Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209013
aN8809Plectus sp.Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209014
7N1023Plectus sp. 7LeConte ATBI SiteGreat Smoky Mountains Nat’l ParkCOIOP209016
7N4342Plectus sp. 7Brushy Mountain ATBI SiteGreat Smoky Mountains Nat’l ParkCOIOP209015
8N8808Plectus sp. 8Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209017
8N8817Plectus sp. 8Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209018
8N8828Plectus sp. 8Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209019
9N4244Plectus sp. 9Canyonlands SouthBig Thicket National Preserve, TXCOIOP209020
9N9213Plectus sp. 9Maddron BaldGreat Smoky Mountains Nat’l ParkCOIOP209021
9N9237Plectus sp. 9Maddron BaldGreat Smoky Mountains Nat’l ParkCOIOP209022
9N8797Plectus sp. 9Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209023
10N8706Plectus sp. 10LesundMøre og Romsdal, NorwayCOIOP209024
aN9166Plectus sp.Brendan C. Byrne State ForestBurlington County, NJCOIOP209025
11P87048Plectus sp. 11Haughton CraterDevon Island, CanadaCOIOP209026
11P88010Plectus sp. 11Haughton CraterDevon Island, CanadaCOIOP209027
aP89090Plectus sp.Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209028
aP86098Plectus sp.Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209029
aP89089Plectus sp.Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209030
12KU759349.1Plectus parvusGenBankCOIKU759349.1
12KU759350.1Plectus parvusGenBankCOIKU759350.1
12KU759348.1Plectus parvusGenBankCOIKU759348.1
13N11013Plectus murrayiLake HoareMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209035
13N11018Plectus murrayi.Lake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209036
13N11028Plectus murrayiLake FryxellMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209037
13N11185Plectus murrayiTaylor ValleyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209038
13N11199Plectus murrayiScott BaseBotany Bay, AntarcticaCOIOP209039
13N11719Plectus murrayiLake Miers ValleyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209040
13N9870Plectus murrayiScott BaseBotany Bay, AntarcticaCOIOP209031
13N9873Plectus murrayiScott BaseBotany Bay, AntarcticaCOIOP209032
13N9880Plectus murrayiTaylor ValleyMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209033
13N9892Plectus murrayiHjorth HillMcMurdo Dry Valleys, AntarcticaCOIOP209034
aN9135Plectus sp.Tipple TrailMedicine Bow-Routt Nat’l Forest, WYCOIOP209041
14N8916Plectus sp. 14Snowy RangeMedicine Bow-Routt Nat’l Forest, WYCOIOP209042
14N8869Plectus sp. 14Happy Jack TrailMedicine Bow-Routt Nat’l Forest, WYCOIOP209043
14N8874Plectus sp. 14Happy Jack TrailMedicine Bow-Routt Nat’l Forest, WYCOIOP209044
15N12416Plectus sp. 15Island LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209045
15N12419Plectus sp. 15Island LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209046
15N12414Plectus sp. 15Island LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209047
15N12402Plectus sp. 15Island LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209048
16N12101Plectus sp. 16Border LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209049
16N12128Plectus sp. 16Gimlet LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209050
16N12228Plectus sp. 16Bean LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209051
aN8576Plectus sp.El Yunque National ForestPuerto RicoCOIOP209052
aN8582Plectus sp.El Yunque National ForestPuerto RicoCOIOP209053
aN9089Plectus sp.Henning Conservation AreaTaney County, MOCOIOP209054
aP30012Plectus sp.Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209055
17N13180Plectus sp. 17Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209056 OP205467
17N13460Plectus sp. 17Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209057
aN11872Plectus sp.Arctic PreserveUtqiaghk, AKCOIOP209058
aN8374Plectus sp.Dombas/Hjelle SeterOppland, NorwayCOIOP209060
aN9370Plectus sp.Happy Jack TrailMedicine Bow-Routt Nat’l Forest, WYCOIOP209059
aN8689Plectus sp.HjerkinnOppland, NorwayCOIOP209061
aN9059Plectus sp.ŁukęcinWest Pomerania, PolandCOIOP209062
aN11847Plectus sp.Arctic PreserveUtqiaghk, AKCOIOP209063
18P89028Plectus sp. 18Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209066
18P89030Plectus sp. 18Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209064
18N13465Plectus sp. 18Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209065
18P117056Plectus sp. 18Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209067
19N9339Plectus sp. 19Drury-Mincy Conserv. AreaTaney County, MOCOIOP209068
19N12733Plectus sp. 19Twin Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209069
19P89081Plectus sp. 19Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209070
20P90058Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209071
20P90062Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209072
20P90057Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209073
20N13403Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209074
20N13479Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209075
20N13486Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209076
20N13444Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209077
20N13440Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209078
20N13329Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209083 OP205458
20N13344Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209084 OP205459
20N13225Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209082 OP205455
20N13203Plectus sp. 20Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209081 OP205454
20N13133Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209080
20N13118Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209079 OP205452
20N13369Plectus sp. 20Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209085 OP205460
20N13471Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209086
20N13491Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209087
20N13587Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209088
20N13598Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209089
20N13601Plectus sp. 20Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209090
20N13622Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209091
20N13628Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209092
20N13638Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209093
20N13641Plectus sp. 20Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209094
20P86052Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209095
20P89091Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209096
20P90059Plectus sp. 20Nine-Mile PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209097
20N12697Plectus sp. 20Honvlez PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209098
aP89023Plectus sp.Haughton CraterDevon Island, CanadaCOIOP209099
aP87033Plectus sp.Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209100
aN12491Plectus sp.Eggerling Soybean FieldPrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOIOP209101
aN12114Plectus sp.Border LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOI 18SOP209102 OP205470
aN13101Plectus sp.Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NECOI 18SOP209103 OP205471
aN12159Plectus sp.Kokjohn LakeNebraska Sandhills, Garden County, NECOIOP209104
aN9790Plectus sp.Formerly cultivated landVolcanoes Nat’l Park, RwandaCOIOP209105
aP195005Plectus sp.Konza PrairieRiley County, KSCOIOP209106
N13211Plectus sp.Pioneers Park PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NE18SOP205461
N13250Plectus sp.Spring Creek PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NE18SOP205462
N13370Wilsonema sp.Eggerling PrairiePrairie Corridor, Lancaster County, NE18SOP205469
P133013Anaplectus sp.La Selva Biological StationCosta Rica18SOP205466
P134037Plectus sp.La Selva Biological StationCosta Rica18SOP205463
P137018Plectus aquatilisLa Selva Biological StationCosta Rica18SOP205450
P140029Plectus aquatilisLa Selva Biological StationCosta Rica18SOP205451
P151063Wilsonema sp.La Selva Biological StationCosta Rica18SOP205468
P183015Plectus sp.Heredia ProvinceCosta Rica18SOP205464
P183018Plectus sp.Heredia ProvinceCosta Rica18SOP205465

aSpecimen not assigned to a group.

DNA barcoding

The 25 selected nematode specimens from each site were DNA barcoded targeting specific DNA regions of two different genetic loci, the COI mitochondrial protein coding gene and the 18S ribosomal DNA. The COI primers used were JB3 (5¢-TTTTTTGGGCATCCTGAGGTTTAT-3¢) (Bowles et al., 1992) and JB5 (5¢-AGCACCTAAACTTAAAACATAATGAAAATG-3¢) (Derycke et al., 2005), which produce a 393-bp product once primers are trimmed. PCR was conducted in 0.5-mL thin-wall microcentrifuge tubes containing 30 mL of total volume consisting of 9 mL of the ruptured nematode template, 1.2 mL of double distilled water, 2.4 mL of the forward primer, 2.4 mL of the reverse primer, and 15 mL of JumpStart RED Taq ReadyMix (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. St. Louis, Missouri, U. S. A.) at a 0.05 U/mL final enzyme concentration. The initial hot start at 94°C for 5 min was followed by 35 cycles of 30 sec of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 50°C for 30 sec, and extension at 72°C for 90 sec. The final extension occurred once at 72°C for 5 min. Successful PCR products were extracted prior to DNA sequencing from a 7% 1X TAE agarose gel, cleaned using Gel/PCR DNA Fragments Extraction Kit (IBI Scientific, Dubuque, Iowa, U.S.A.), and sent to Eton BioSciences for sequencing in both directions.

The 18S primers were 18s1.2a (5¢-CGATCAGATACCGCCCTAG-3¢) and 18sr2b (5¢-TACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTAAT-3¢), which produce a 593-bp product once primers are trimmed. 18s1.2a is the slightly re-designed 18s1.2 primer that was originally designed using consensus arthropod sequences (Mullin et al., 2003), while 18sr2b is the somewhat redesigned reverse complement of primer rDNA2 from Vrain et al. (1992). This primer set amplifies approximately 630 bp of the 3¢ portion of the 18S ribosomal DNA. PCR amplification of 5 mL of ruptured nematode template was conducted using the same conditions as the COI genetic marker, and 18S amplicon verification, cleaning, and sequencing was as described above.

Metabarcoding

Nematodes were extracted from a separate 100-cc subsample using soil via sieving and sugar centrifugation method (Jenkins, 1964). Once extracted, all nematodes in each sample were counted under an inverted microscope. Counted nematodes were reduced to 0.5-mL volume, transferred to bead-beating tubes of the PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), and processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA of nematodes was processed for amplicon sequencing using the V6–V8 region with NF1-18sr2b primers (Porazinska et al., 2009) producing a 360-bp product using the same PCR protocols. PCR conditions followed protocols of the Earth Microbiome Project (http://www.earthmicrobiome.org/protocols-and-standards/) (Amaral-Zettler et al., 2009, Bellemain et al., 2010, Caporaso et al., 2012). Three technical replicates were amplified for each sample, visualized with gel electrophoresis, pooled, and sent for multiplexing, library preparation, and sequencing (HiSeq 300, paired-end) at the Hubard Center for Genome Sequencing at the University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH. Qiime2 was used to remove the primer regions of the demultiplexed sequences using cutadapt (Martin, 2011). In vsearch, forward and reverse reads were joined with join-pairs (Rognes et al., 2016), joined sequences were filtered for quality with quality-filter q-score-joined, and chimeras were checked with uchime-denovo (Bokulich et al., 2013). Sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 99% similarity. An in-house curated ARB-SILVA SSU database v.111 (Quast et al., 2012; Yilmaz et al., 2014) was used to assign taxonomy to all OTUs with BLAST. Nematode identified sequences were reassigned taxonomy against a nematode curated database based on ARB-SILVA v.138 (Gattoni et al. in review) and further processed using head–tail patterns (Porazinska et al., 2010) to generate “species-equivalent” OTUs and filtered again to retain only OTUs with a match to Plectus. All OTUs identified as Plectus were further verified with BLAST at NCBI.

Data processing and analysis

To perform phylogenetic analyses and assess haplotype relationships among barcoded sequences of Plectus, traces of barcode sequences of nematode specimens were edited using CodonCode Aligner Version 9.0 (http://www.codoncode.com). Sixteen published COI and 29 18S sequences of Plectus were downloaded from GenBank. All DNA sequences from this study (from COI and 18S barcoding and 18S metabarcoding), NCBI, and other prairie sites were aligned with MEGAX v.10.2.6 to produce two separate (COI and 18S) alignments. Both alignments were subjected to analysis using a character-based maximum likelihood (ML) approach. ML trees were built using GTR + G + I (COI) and K2 + G + I (18S) models, both with 1,000 boot strap repetitions, and both with gap treatments using “Use all sites.” Each initial MEGAX alignment used MUSCLE with gap opening (−1,000) and gap extend (−500) and UPGMB clustering method parameters. COI haplotype groups were generally defined by the bootstrap values of ≥99, a within-group distance that did not exceed 6%, and the distance to the nearest neighbor was greater than the within-group distance. Within- and between-COI clade genetic distances were calculated in MEGAX using p-distance with the assumption of uniform rates for 124 sequences, each with 393 nucleotide positions.

Results
Morphological approach

Plectus was recovered from all 15 of the remnant prairie sites investigated in this study using morphology and DNA barcoding, and from only 12 sites using metabarcoding. On an average, there were seven Plectus specimens per 150 nematodes at each site. In total, 101 Plectus corridor specimens were recorded from the sites and 44 of these were analyzed using a combination of morphological and molecular approaches. All Plectus observed were either females or juveniles. Of the 44 specimens that were analyzed by a combination of morphology and molecular approaches, 40% were juveniles and 60% females. Two general morphological phenotypes were observed during the microscopic sorting of corridor specimens: one with a short-tailed body, a ratio (tail length divided by anal body width) <3.0, and an amphid diameter relative to neck width ratio average of 0.14; and one with a relatively long tail with a ratio >5.0 and an amphid diameter to neck width ratio average of 0.26 (Fig. 2 and Table 2).

Figure 2

Two general Plectus morphotypes. (A, C) Illustrate the small amphid, short-tailed type; (B, D) Illustrate the large amphid, long-tailed type.

Table 2

Prairie Corridor specimen measurements from images.

GroupNIDTaxonStageInitial characterization
Voucher measurements in micrometer
AmphidTailTail lengthAnal body widthc´ ratioAmphid widthNeck width at amphidAmphid/ neck width (%)
3NIDPlectusFSmall,Short6526.72.42190.11
12485sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short35152.32.517.50.14
13239sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short62282.2NANANA
13543sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short7029.42.42.5NANA
13030sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short6128.92.12.516.60.15
13045sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short6527.52.4NANANA
13255sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short6628.92.3217.50.11
13357sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short6325.22.5216.20.12
13530sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short6328.92.22170.12
13538sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short70292.42.5120.21
11764sp. 3round
3NIDPlectusJSmall,Short74342.22120.17
11765sp. 3round
4NIDPlectusJSmall,Short77253.12.5170.15
13280sp. 4round
4NIDPlectusFSmall,Short9433.62.8220.40.10
13608sp. 4round
6NIDPlectusJSmall,Short7227.62.6315.70.19
13176sp. 6round
6NIDPlectusJSmall,Short7527.22.82.5170.15
13287sp. 6round
6NIDPlectusJSmall,Short9233.62.7318.30.16
13425sp. 6round
17NIDPlectusFLarge,Long12933.23.9417.90.22
13180sp. 17round
17NIDPlectusFLarge,Long12028.54.2520.40.25
13460sp. 17round
18NIDPlectusFLarge,Long91.617.45.33.513.60.26
13465sp. 18round
19NIDPlectusFLarge,Long105185.83.312.50.26
12733sp. 19round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long92.5175.43.5140.25
13403sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9418.35.13.515.30.23
13479sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long8518.34.6414.50.28
13486sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long8816.25.4414.90.27
13444sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusJLarge,Long102205.1415.30.26
13440sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9418.75.0314.90.20
13118sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusJLarge,Long11020.85.34.516.20.28
13133sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9719.64.93.514.90.23
13203sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long98175.84.514.90.30
13225sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9620.44.7414.90.27
13329sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusJLarge,Long7813.65.73.511.50.30
13344sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long100175.9414.50.28
13369sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9417.95.2413.60.29
13471sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9919.65.0NANANA
13491sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9319.14.93.515.70.22
13587sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long7817.94.4413.60.29
13598sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9118.35.03.5140.25
13601sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long8816.25.44.5140.32
13622sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long108205.43.514.90.23
13628sp. 20round
20NIDPlectusFLarge,Long9218.35.03.414.90.23
13641sp. 20round

To extend comparisons beyond morphology, a second morphological assessment was conducted based on the results of DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of COI sequences of voucher specimens. In this “reverse taxonomy” approach (Kanzaki et al., 2012), a phylogenetic tree of 20 clades of Plectus-derived COI haplotypes were recognized and subjected to further analysis (Fig. 3). Five of the 20 clades contained two or more Corridor specimens in both maximum likelihood and neighbor joining analyses. Two clades, referred to as Clades 3 and 20, contained a majority of specimens from the Corridor. Clade 3, a short-tailed morphotype, contained 10 Prairie Corridor specimens plus 1 specimen from Konza Prairie. Clade 20, a long-tailed morphotype, contained 24 Prairie Corridor specimens and six specimens from Nine-Mile Prairie. The remaining clades that contained two or more Prairie Corridor specimens were Clades 4, 6, and 17, comprised of two, four, and three specimens, respectively. Images of representative specimens from each of the corridor clades plus selected specimens from clades outside the Prairie Corridor are presented in Figures 47. Figure 4 illustrates a comparison of entire bodies and shows dramatic body length differences among the clades. Notable in the body length comparisons is the indication that there appear to be large and small versions of each of the two identified morphotypes. For example, the Clade 3 female in Figure 4 is 3/4ths the length of the female in Clade 4. However their ratios and amphid width to neck width ratios are very similar (Table 2). In Clade 20, the female body length is <2/3rds of the female body length in Clade 17. Again, the ratios and amphid/ neck width ratios between the females in Clades 17 and 20 are similar. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate in profile the cephalic region, stoma, and pharynx. In both figures the more heavily expanded sclerotized anterior portion of the stoma is seen in Clades 3, 4, and 6, whereas a longer, more tapered stoma is seen in Clades 17 and 20. Higher magnification in Figure 6 provides a clearer indication of amphid aperture size and amphid location on the anterior body region. The smaller amphid aperture relative to neck width is seen in Clades 3, 4, and 6. Clades 17 and 20 are characterized by larger amphid apertures relative to neck width. Figure 7 illustrates relative tail shape and length. Shorter tails relative to anal body width are evident in Clades 3, 4, and 6. Longer tails relative to anal body widths can be seen in both Clades 17 and 20. Table 2 presents measurements of tails and amphids for individual specimens in the aforementioned Prairie Corridor clades.

Figure 3

ML COI phylogenetic tree of Plectus specimens. Brackets denote the 20 major haplotype groups. Habitat type for each of these groups is indicated, as well as tail length-amphid size morphology for the Prairie Corridor groups. Taxon labels include the Nematode Identification Number, the genus name, and sample location. GenBank accessions are labeled with their accession number and complete name. Some haplotype groups were collapsed when identical sequences represented the group. Red numbers represent the bootstrap values from 1,000 iterations. All 44 Prairie Corridor specimens are labeled as such. ML, maximum likelihood.

Figure 4

A representation of body length and overall morphology from select haplotype groups. NID and group numbers correspond to placement on the COI tree.

Figure 5

Select anterior body morphology of different haplotype groups.

Figure 6

Representative cephalic regions and stomas of seven haplotype groups. Groups 3, 4, and 6 display offset cephalic regions and relatively small diameter amphids, compared to the continuous head regions and larger amphid diameters of groups 8, 9, 17, and 20. Heavier anterior sclerotization of the stoma is seen in groups 3 and 4 compared to the long, tapered stomas of 8, 9, 17, and 20.

Figure 7

Relative tail lengths and anal body widths in different haplotype groups.

DNA Barcoding approach

There were 16 COI Plectus accessions retrieved from GenBank that were included in the phylogenetic analyses. Additionally, 95 specimens from a University of Nebraska repository, representing collections from 1998 to 2021, were amplified and barcoded to provide additional systematic and biogeographic context for the Plectus COI phylogenetic tree. Two Plectus species from Antarctica, Clade 1 and Clade 13, as well as international specimens from Rwanda, Poland, Ireland, and Canada, were included in the phylogenetic tree. Clade 3 included one additional member from outside the corridor, a specimen from Konza Prairie in Kansas (Knapp, 1998). Clade 20 had six additional members from outside the corridor, all from 9-Mile Prairie in Nebraska. Table 3 presents the morphometrics from select non-corridor clades used for comparative purposes in the phylogenetic trees.

Table 3

Measurements of non-Prairie Corridor Plectus specimens.

Taxon (n)Group 16 (3) keys to Plectus aquatilisGroup 14 (3) keys to P. cirratusGroup 9 (4) keys to P. cirratusGroup 8 (3) keys to Plectus longicaudatusGroup 13 (5) keys to P. murrayiGroup 15 (4) keys to P. palustris
L1,394.9 ± 191.01,170.6 ± 78.41,032.7 ± 111.3696.8 ± 35.1883.8 ± 25.71,642.0 ± 141.5
(1,183–1,646)(1,071–1,262)(874–1,176)(654–740)(840–917)(1,411–1,778)
Tail156.7 ± 15.3123.8 ± 10.1104.1 ± 10.8100.2 ± 6.9101.3 ± 5.2224.7 ± 17.8
length(145–178)(110–135)(88–117)(91–107)(94–109)(200–246)
a21.5 ± 0.727.3 ± 3.424.6 ± 2.526.7 ± 1.923.0 ± 0.834.2 ± 3.0
(20.8–22.5)(22.7–30.7)(20.6–27.2)(24.5–29.2)(22.0–24.2)(31.0–38.9)
b4.5 ± 0.33.7 ± 0.14.0 ± 0.23.6 ± 0.04.1 ± 0.14.8 ± 0.3
(4.2–4.9)(3.7–3.8)(3.6–4.1)(3.6–3.7)(4.0–4.2)(4.3–5.0)
c8.9 ± 0.59.5 ± 0.59.9 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.28.7 ± 0.37.3 ± 0.2
(8.2–9.2)(8.8–10.0)(9.8–10.1)(6.7–7.2)(8.3–9.1)(7.1–7.6)
4.8 ± 0.15.0 ± 0.54.2 ± 0.38.1 ± 0.94.8 ± 0.38.1 ± 0.4
(4.6–4.9)(4.4–5.5)(4.0–4.7)(6.9–8.7)(4.1–5.1)(7.6–8.7)
V%49.6 ± 0.949.8 ± 0.749.9 ± 0.947.9 ± 0.548.1 ± 0.446.2 ± 0.5
(48.4–50.5)(48.8–50.6)(49.0–51.3)(47.2–48.5)(47.8–48.9)(45.7–47.0)
V–A/T3.5 ± 0.33.8 ± 0.34.0 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.22.9 ± 0.1
(3.1–3.8)(3.4–4.1)(3.8–4.1)(2.6–2.8)(3.3–3.8)(2.8–3.1)
LR W/H2.5 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.32.7 ± 0.12.0 ± 0.42.3 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.2
(2.0–2.8)(2.3–3.0)(2.6–2.8)(1.5–2.3)(2.1–2.7)(1.6–2.2)
rec/abw0.8 ± 0.11.2 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.21.9 ±0.21.0 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.1
(0.7–0.9)(1.1–1.3)(0.8–1.3)(1.7–2.2)(0.7–1.1)(1.1–1.3)
Ceph3.5 ± 0.6 (3–4)3.5 ± 0.9 (3–5)3.7 ± 0.8 (3–5)3.2 ± 0.1 (3–3)3.4 ± 0.5 (3–4)3.0 ± 0.2 (3–3)
set L
Ceph5.9 ± 0.6 (5–7)5.8 ± 0.8 (5–7)6.5 ± 1.0 (5–8)5.1 ± 0.5 (4–6)5.5 ± 0.8 (5–7)6.0 ± 1.0 (5–7)
set pos
Set L/26.5 ± 5.525.5 ± 3.129.1 ± 5.338.7 ± 9.431.3 ± 6.124.5 ± 1.9
lrw%(19.3–32.7)(22.3–29.7)(22.4–35.2)(31.6–52.0)(21.2–39.5)(22.9–27.7)
Amphid3.5 ± 0.4 (3–4)3.3 ± 0.2 (3–3)3.5 ± 0.5 (3–4)3.1 ± 0.1 (3–3)2.5 ± 0.2 (2–3)3.4 ± 0.3 (3–4)
W
Amp0.9 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.00.8 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.2
L/W(0.8–1.0)(0.9–0.9)(0.6–0.9)(0.6–0.9)(0.9–1.2)(0.8–1.3)
Amphid12.3 ± 0.510.3 ± 1.413.0 ± 1.18.4 ± 0.6 (8–9)11.2 ± 1.114.2 ± 0.5
pos(12–13)(8–12)(12–15)(10–13)(13–15)
Amp W/19.9 ± 2.818.6 ± 2.519.8 ± 2.826.6 ± 0.915.5 ± 2.018.5 ± 2.1
head%(17.5–23.9)(15.2–20.9)(15.8–23.3)(25.5–27.7)(13.2–18.5)(16.0–21.7)
Stoma L24.3 ± 0.124.3 ± 3.524.1 ± 4.318.3 ± 2.221.4 ± 3.827.0 ± 2.1
(24–24)(19–28)(20–31)(17–21)(16–27)(24–30)
Stoma7.4 ±1.26.7 ± 2.07.3 ± 2.15.5 ± 0.78.7 ± 3.59.5 ± 1.3
L/W(6.1–8.9)(4.6–9.5)(4.2–9.5)(4.8–6.2)(6.0–15.4)(7.5–10.9)
Sto W/21.8 ±1.826.7 ± 7.824.6 ±7.331.9 ± 2.221.3 ± 4.820.8 ± 2.1
head%(19.3–23.5)(16.2–34.7)(19.7–37.2)(29.7–34.1)(12.3–26.7)(18.3–24.1)
Prosto/30.3 ± 2.024.8 ± 7.032.1 ± 4.131.2 ± 1.022.8 ± 4.430.8 ± 2.7
sto%(27.8–32.7)(18.3–34.6)(27.8–38.8)(29.9–32.4)(15.7–28.6)(27.8–35.1)
Exc56.3 ± 0.854.1 ± 0.853.9 ± 3.554.1 ± 1.657.2 ± 0.756.2 ± 0.7
Pore%(55.6–57.4)(53.1–55.1)(48.3–57.1)(52.5–55.7)(56.4–58.5)(55.4–57.0)
Cerv208.9 ± 50.2192.1 ± 27.3147.2 ± 13.690.0 ± 0.0130.9 ± 3.2202.3 ± 8.3
papilla(167–279)(165–229)(134–170)(90–90)(126–134)(191–214)
Body1.7 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.01.6 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.01.3 ± 0.11.5 ± 0.2
ann W(1.3–2.0)(1.1–1.2)(1.4–1.7)(0.9–1.1)(1.2–1.4)(1.2–1.7)
G’1%25.0 ± 1.719.6 ± 2.920.5 ± 2.714.0 ± 0.716.6 ± 2.220.0 ± 2.0
(23.3–26.7)(15.9–23.0)(16.5–23.3)(12.9–14.6)(13.5–19.8)(17.9–22.4)
G’2%25.5 ± 2.818.7 ± 3.118.2 ± 3.217.1 ± 2.618.0 ± 3.420.1 ± 2.0
(22.7–28.2)(14.7–22.4)(13.4–21.3)(14.3–20.5)(14.4–22.3)(17.0–22.2)
Spin1.5 ± 0.11.7 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.11.1 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.6
L/W(1.3–1.6)(1.5–2.0)(1.1–1.4)(0.6–1.6)(0.8–1.9)(1.3–2.8)

The seven clades with the Prairie Corridor species (Clades 3, 4, 6, 17, 18, 19, and 20) were exclusively comprised of specimens collected from native prairie habitats. Plectus specimens from the New Jersey Pine Barrens (Clade 8), Great Smoky Mountains (Clade 7), Medicine Bow National Forest in Wyoming (Clade 14), Devon Island, Canada (Clade 11), the Antarctic Dry Valleys (Clades 1, 13), and the Alkaline Lakes in the western Sandhills of Nebraska (Clades 15, 16) all exhibited location-specific Plectus taxa. Only a single clade, Clade 9, had well-supported, closely related sequences collected from geographically distant sites. This clade included a mountaintop heath bald in the Great Smoky Mountains, the New Jersey Pine Barrens, and Big Thicket National Preserve in Texas.

Genetic distances within and between the 20 COI Clades are presented in Table 4. Although sample sizes varied, the two Antarctic clades were notable for low levels of within-group polymorphism. Between-group mean pairwise genetic distance varied from 0.0458 to 0.1806 for the 20 clades. The lower value represents mean genetic distance between specimens from different lakes in the western Nebraska Sandhills that were initially separated due to non-overlapping morphological characteristics (Table 3). The highest distance value is between specimens from a wheat field in Montana and Clade 19, a geographically heterogeneous group of grassland specimens.

Table 4

Within-a and between-group distances.

Plectus frigophilusPlectus sp. 2Plectus sp. 3Plectus sp. 4Plectus sp. 6Plectus sp. 7Plectus sp. 8Plectus sp. 9Plectus sp. 10Plectus sp. 11
Plectus frigophilus0.01445
Plectus sp. 20.1454690.0458
Plectus sp. 30.1323300.1051490.02642
Plectus sp. 40.1440870.1526720.1532990.00254
Plectus sp. 60.1649020.1444020.1424190.1367680.00636
Plectus sp. 70.1619540.1526720.1627060.1539440.1698470
Plectus sp. 80.1478040.1522480.1487070.1480070.1554280.0949960.00339
Plectus sp. 90.1586460.1647580.1720450.1234100.1526720.1335880.1473710.00763
Plectus sp. 100.1464560.1488550.1499380.1157760.1571250.1246820.1187450.086514n/cb
Plectus sp. 110.1467440.1507630.1467030.1310430.1634860.1412210.1543680.1138680.1246820.03053
Plectus murrayi0.1479020.1665450.1551000.1381860.1754130.1563270.1631390.1007690.1231200.100899
Plectus sp. 140.1425990.1497030.1477790.1395250.1554280.1416450.1399490.1185330.1060220.114080
Plectus sp. 150.1733920.1615780.1726860.1513990.1749360.1450380.1535200.1284990.1145040.133588
Plectus sp. 160.1696330.1700590.1682880.1522480.1664550.1433420.1467350.1327400.1162000.120865
Plectus sp. 170.1659020.1768450.1649230.1374050.1444020.1539440.1726040.1450380.1386770.131679
Plectus sp. 180.1635220.1749360.1708850.1463100.1577610.1526720.1586090.1488550.1316790.132316
Plectus sp. 190.1760550.1806620.1693560.1522480.1605170.1467350.1535200.1516120.1340120.133164
Plectus sp. 200.1751470.1723920.1660650.1482190.1607600.1563980.1652430.1573970.1302250.128862
Plectus sp. 50.1305180.1485510.1431980.1073370.1630430.1630430.1500600.1567030.1422100.151721
Plectus sp. 120.1477650.1612320.1568680.1326990.1612320.1548910.1621380.1109600.1349640.101449
Plectus murrayiPlectus sp. 14Plectus sp. 15Plectus sp. 16Plectus sp. 17Plectus sp. 18Plectus sp. 19Plectus sp. 20Plectus sp. 5Plectus sp. 12
Plectus sp. 130.0012
Plectus sp. 140.1209080.00339
Plectus sp. 150.1149390.1187450
Plectus sp. 160.1226020.1212890.0458020.00679
Plectus sp. 170.1410010.1382530.1463100.1488550.01018
Plectus sp. 180.1457310.1446140.1367680.1189570.1367680.00382
Plectus sp. 190.1341930.1331640.1475830.1379700.1242580.1083550.05513
Plectus sp. 200.1460960.1313760.1342240.1282870.1380410.0888770.0884220.00837
Plectus sp. 50.1376810.1476450.1322460.1373790.1648550.1578350.1702900.1699990.01993
Plectus sp. 120.1005430.1216790.1231880.1286230.1322460.1435690.1367750.1420480.1494570.06612

awithin-group distance values in bold.

bNot able to be calculated.

Figure 8 displays the 18S tree with individual barcodes generated by Sanger sequencing, GenBank accessions, and sequences generated by metabarcoding. Sequences from split template specimens that were also barcoded with COI are identified by their Clade number following their genus name as designated on the COI phylogenetic tree. There was little nucleotide sequence differentiation among Prairie Corridor Plectus specimens for the 18S NF1 region, with only two specimens (NID 13101 and NID 13180) exhibiting sequence variation when compared to other Prairie Corridor specimens. The COI barcoded specimens of Clades 2, 3, 6, 17, and 20 all produced identical 18S sequence for the NF1 region (Fig. 8). GenBank accessions of seven different named species also exhibited identical 18S sequence in the NF1 region.

Figure 8

ML tree of 18S sequences. OTUs from metabarcoding are highlighted in yellow. Sanger sequences from the prairie corridor are highlighted in green. Numbers following the genus name correspond to COI clade. GenBank accessions are included with their full species name. ML, maximum likelihood; OTUs, operational taxonomic units.

Metabarcoding approach

There were 19 OTUs representing Plectida produced by the NF1 metabarcoding analysis. Not all of these could be classified as members of the genus Plectus, but could be assigned to a higher taxon within the order Plectida. Plectus OTU1 matched the 18S sequence that characterized the majority of specimens sequenced by Sanger sequencing and 12 GenBank accessions. OTU 6 matched N13101, a Plectus singleton on the COI tree. Other OTU sequences matched different plectid genera such as Anaplectus and Tylocephalus, in addition to other unidentified taxa.

Discussion

The North American Prairies are known for their rich plant and animal diversity (Savage, 2011). Surveys of prairie nematodes have supported the idea of high biotic diversity (Orr and Dickerson, 1966; Todd et al., 2006). Since the initial, historical nematode surveys were conducted using traditional morphological approaches as visualized by light microscopy, it could be expected that molecular approaches will provide equivalent, or even higher, diversity estimates. This expectation was met, although determination of specimen species identity in the seven prairie clades and additional prairie singletons on the COI tree was difficult.

We selected Plectus as a case study of nematode diversity as revealed by different assessment methods, because of its frequent occurrence within the 15 remnant prairie sites in the Lancaster County Prairie Corridor. Orr and Dickerson (1966) identified seven Plectus species from tallgrass prairie in Kansas and applied Latin binomials for six of them. Most of these species were initially described from England or Europe, in the second half of the 19th century. Their presence in the native tallgrass prairies of North America may reflect the resolution of early morphological keys rather than an example of widespread dispersal of a microbial-feeding nematode. Our initial microscopic examination recognized two Plectus morphotypes primarily differentiated by their tail length and the size of their amphid apertures. Further taxonomic discrimination by morphology was hampered by the high percentage of juveniles in these sites (in the case of Clade 6, only juveniles were observed) and the limited amount of morphological information we could obtain from photographic vouchers. Therefore, we employed reverse taxonomy, an approach where the phylogenetic trees define the taxonomic units and provide the structure in which to investigate taxonomic identity of groups in greater detail. This approach sorted the Prairie Corridor specimens iinto seven groups among 20 total groups of Plectus specimens representing multiple habitats and locations. Over 70% of the 45 barcode-analyzed Plectus specimens from the Prairie Corridor fell into two clades, Clades 3 and 20. The taxonomic identities of these groups, however, were not matched by reference sequences in GenBank. There are six GenBank species of Plectus with Linnaean binomials on the COI phylogenetic tree, and three of them are located in multiple clades. The greatest similarity between a GenBank specimen and a Prairie Corridor specimen is found in Clade 4, which is in a sister group relationship with Clade 5; and the latter is represented by three Plectus parietinus (KU759327, KU759330, and KU759331). These specimens were collected from moss in a German beech forest (Schenk et al., 2016) and exhibit a weak bootstrap support value of 61 and a pairwise group dissimilarity of 10.7% with Clade 4. Could the Prairie Corridor Clade 4 actually be P. parietinus?

Morphologically, Prairie Corridor specimens in Clades 3, 4, and 6 resemble P. parietinus. The dichotomous key and notes of Maggenti (1961) lead to a P. parietinus designation based on the set-off lip region, a tail length less than six anal body diameters, an amphid diameter of 2.5 mm, and a subdorsal seta near the tail tip (Fig. 9). The values in the keys of Andrássy (1985), Bongers (1989), and Ebsary (1985) specify values of 3 to 4, whereas the corresponding Prairie Corridor specimen values were smaller, with ratios of 2 to 3. The key of Andrássy also emphasizes the strongly sclerotized anterior part of the stoma as characteristic of P. parietinus. A comparison of the mean COI pairwise dissimilarity values of Clades 3, 4, and 6 indicates that these are between 13.7% and 15.3%. These dissimilarity values are roughly equivalent to many pairwise comparisons across the 20-clade COI tree, suggesting that genetic distance alone is insufficient for distinguishing among these clades. Given the information, at best we can say that members of these three clades morphologically resemble P. parietinus, but do not constitute an exact match morphologically or genetically.

Figure 9

Scanning electron micrograph of short-tailed specimen exhibiting caudal setae near tail terminus on dorsal surface.

The most common Plectus haplotype group in the Prairie Corridor was Clade 20. Clade 20 is represented by 28 specimens from the Prairie Corridor and Nine-Mile Prairie. Prairie Corridor Clades 17, 18, 19, and 20 belong to the long-tailed, large amphid morphotype (Fig. 10). There are no COI sequences that are closely related to Clade 20 in GenBank. Morphologically, keys lead to an identification of P. rhizophilus based on a lip region that is not set-off, a measurement of >4, an amphid diameter that is approximately one quarter of the neck width, and cephalic setae that do not reach the apex of the lip region. Body length of Clade 20 is within the range for P. rhizophilus, but specimens in Clade 17 exceed the reported length for that species.

Figure 10

Scanning Electron Micrograph of corresponding heads and tails of long-tailed morphotype (A, B) and short-tailed morphotypes (C, D and E, F).

Species identification for specimens outside the Prairie Corridor could be considered educated guesses at best. There are two clades that are distinctive based on morphology and location. The two Antarctic clades represent well-studied, homogeneous species known only from specific habitats on the Antarctic continent (Kito et al., 1991). Plectus frigophilus Kirjanova, 1958, (Clade 1) inhabits the sediment of glacial lakes whereas Plectus murrayi (Clade 13) is most often found on moss and cyanobacterial mats along glacial melt streams. Another non-corridor clade that is distinctive in this dataset is Clade 8, which is characterized by a relatively short body length (<900 mm) and a long, slender tail with value >8. The specimens key and conform in form to P. longicaudatus Butschli, 1873, with the exception that the tail is not curved or twisted in the distal third portion and the body length exceeds the measurements of Yeates (1988) and Andrássy (1985). In general, North American species may have some morphological similarities with described European taxa, but without direct sequence comparisons with unimpeachably identified reference specimens, we cannot be certain of their species identity. Therefore, until more detailed studies are conducted on individual species, in our opinion it is best to designate these taxonomically uncertain species as Plectus sp. followed by their clade number.

The uniformity in 18S sequence in the NF1 region indicates that neither DNA barcoding nor metabarcoding analysis based on this portion of 18S alone will allow discrimination among Plectus species of the Prairie Corridor. The inability of 18S to discriminate among Plectus species has been noted by other authors (Shokoohi et al., 2013; Schenk et al., 2016). The limitation of 18S in metabarcoding assessments of diversity, which will bias measurements toward greater uniformity, could be countered by the development of a metabarcording approach incorporating mitochondrial genes.

COI haplotype groups may provide insight into Plectus phylogeography. There appears to be a fairly high level of regional localization within the Plectus COI clades and negligible evidence for long distance dispersal or cosmopolitan distribution. This is unexpected because Plectus is a bacterial feeder and presumably can feed on a range of bacteria. Given that many species are parthenogenetic and may readily enter an anhydrobiotic state, observation of geographically widespread identical COI haplotypes might be expected. We did not observe this. There may be physiological or ecological factors that structure Plectus populations. In this study, most of the sampled nematodes were from native plant communities and unlikely to have been affected by anthropogenic disturbances associated with cultivated soils. Agricultural soils, however, are well-known to harbor plant-parasitic nematodes with cosmopolitan distributions. Future studies using a taxonomic marker like COI coupled to detailed morphological and ecological analyses, should lead to a greater understanding of Plectus diversity and the factors that structure their populations.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: May 31, 2022
Published on: Oct 29, 2022
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Abigail Borgmeier, Kaitlin Gattoni, Tim Harris, Rebecca Higgins, Peter Mullin, Dorota Porazinska, Kirsten Powers, David Wedin, Thomas Powers, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.