Have a personal or library account? Click to login
First report of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) from Greece Cover

First report of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 (Nematoda: Longidoridae) from Greece

Open Access
|Jul 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Light micrographs of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece (A–O). (A) Whole female, (B–D) female anterior regions, (E) detail of female reproductive system, (F) vulval region, (G) detail of basal bulb, and (H–O) female tail regions. a, anus; gr, guiding ring; ov, ovary; svn, ventrosublateral nucleus; V, vulva (Scale bars: A = 200 mm, B–O = 20 mm).
Light micrographs of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece (A–O). (A) Whole female, (B–D) female anterior regions, (E) detail of female reproductive system, (F) vulval region, (G) detail of basal bulb, and (H–O) female tail regions. a, anus; gr, guiding ring; ov, ovary; svn, ventrosublateral nucleus; V, vulva (Scale bars: A = 200 mm, B–O = 20 mm).

Figure 2

Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion domains of 28S rDNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G). Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site. PP. posterior probabilities.
Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion domains of 28S rDNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G). Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site. PP. posterior probabilities.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from ITS1 rDNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + G). Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site. PP, posterior probabilities.
Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from ITS1 rDNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + G). Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site. PP, posterior probabilities.

Figure 4

Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus trees as inferred from cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI mtDNA gene) sequence alignments under the TIM1 + G model. Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are in bold letters. PP, posterior probabilities.
Phylogenetic relationships of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece within the genus Longidorus. Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus trees as inferred from cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI mtDNA gene) sequence alignments under the TIM1 + G model. Posterior probabilities more than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are in bold letters. PP, posterior probabilities.

Morphometrics of Longidorus leptocephalus Hooper, 1961 from Greece and type population_

Thessaloniki, GreeceHighfield, Scotland
CharacteraFemalesFemale paratypes
N1016
L (mm)4.9 ± 0.43 (4.25–5.53)4.2 (3.6–4.6)
A99.9 ± 8.1 (90.1–113.0)96.0 (83.0–121.0)
B14.3 ± 1.6 (12.2–17.3)12.0 (11.7–12.4)
C110.2 ± 17.4 (83.4–131.7)96.0 (78.0–105.0)
c’1.4 ± 0.1 (1.2–1.5)1.25
db2.8 ± 0.1 (2.6–2.9)
d’c2.0 ± 0.1 (1.9–2.1)
V49.0 ± 2.9 (45.1–55.0)54.0 (52.0–57.0)
Odontostyle length65.4 ± 4.3 (58.0–69.5)64 (60–70)
Odontophore length44.9 ± 5.0 (38–52)46 (41–56)
Total stylet length110.3 ± 8.3 (96–118)
Anterior end to guiding ring26.9 ± 1.0 (25.0–28.5)30 (29–32)
Hyaline part of tail14.7 ± 1.7 (12–17)
Body width at level of:
lip region9.7 ± 0.4 (9–10)
guiding ring19.0 ± 0.4 (18.0–19.5)
Anus32.5 ± 1.7 (29–35)
Tail length44.8 ± 3.9 (41.5–51.0)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2022
Published on: Jul 29, 2022
Published by: Society of Nematologists, Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Ilenia Clavero-Camacho, Carolina Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, Maria Kormpi, Juan E. Palomares-Rius, Emmanuel A. Tzortzakakis, Pablo Castillo, Antonio Archidona-Yuste, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.