Table 1
Effect of pathogens, acting alone or combined, on the root system volume (in mm3) of passion fruits plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Treatments | Interactions and assays | |
|---|---|---|
| Meloidogyne incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 1500 aa | 1400 b |
| M. incognita | 1000 a | 1700 b |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 1000 a | 1400 b |
| Uninoculated control | 1000 a | 2900 a |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 1800 a | 1100 a |
| M. incognita | 1000 b | 1100 a |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 1000 b | 1100 a |
| Uninoculated control | 1200 b | 1100 a |
| M. incognita-Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 1000 a | 1000 a |
| M. incognita | 1400 a | 1400 a |
| M. incognita-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 1000 a | 1000 a |
| Uninoculated control | 1300 a | 1200 a |
| Meloidogyne javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 1500b c | 1000 a |
| M. javanica | 2400 ab | 1000 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 1400 bc | 1000 a |
| Uninoculated control | 2400 a | 1000 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 1800 a | 1100 a |
| M. javanica | 2000 a | 1300 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 1000 b | 1000 a |
| Uninoculated control | 2400 a | 1300 a |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | ||
| 1 | 2 | |
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 2300 a | 1000 a |
| M. javanica | 2400 a | 1000 a |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 2100 a | 1000 a |
| Uninoculated control | 2600 a | 1000 a |
Table 2
Effect of the parasitism by Meloidogyne incognita or M. javanica on the volume of lesioned tissue in the collar-stem region (in mm3) caused by Neocosmospora sp. (311 or 511) or Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 in passion fruit plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Treatments | Assays | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 62.78 aa | 41.99 a |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 101.94 a | 30.23 a |
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 82.64 a | 36.04 a |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 72.24 a | 38.03 a |
| 1 | 2 | |
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 167.58 a | 20.77 a |
| M. incognita-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 84.64 a | 28.56 a |
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 162.42 a | 47.79 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 95.55 a | 33.13 a |
| 1 | 2 | |
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 111.24 a | 49.21 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 90.22 a | 40.82 a |
| 1 | 2 | |
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 127.06 a | 18.26 a |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 125.41 a | 29.76 a |
Table 3
Severity of shoot symptoms, ranked on a 1–5 scale, induced by pathogens acting alone or combined in passion fruits plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Treatments | Interactions and assays | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Meloidogyne incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 3.1 ba | 3.5 b | |
| M. incognita | 0.9 a | 1.4 a | |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 3.3 b | 3.4 b | |
| Uninoculated control | 1 a | 1 a | |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 2 b | 3.2 bc | |
| M. incognita | 2.3 b | 3 b | |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 2 b | 3.8 c | |
| Uninoculated control | 1 a | 1 a | |
| M. incognita-Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 3.6 c | 3 b | |
| M. incognita | 2.3 b | 3 b | |
| M. incognita-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 2.7 bc | 3 b | |
| Uninoculated control | 1 a | 1 a | |
| Meloidogyne javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 3.7 c | 3 b | |
| M. javanica | 2.6 b | 3 b | |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 | 3.3 bc | 3.2 b | |
| Uninoculated control | 1 a | 1 a | |
| Meloidogyne javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 2.4 b | 3 b | |
| M. javanica | 2 b | 3 b | |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | 2.1 b | 3.2 b | |
| Uninoculated control | 1 a | 1 a | |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | |||
| 1 | 2 | ||
| F. nirenbergiae F022 | 3.1 b | 3 b | |
| M. javanica | 3 b | 3 b | |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 3 b | 3.3 b | |
| Uninoculated control | 2 a | 1 a | |
Table 4
Effect of the parasitism by Neocosmospora sp. (311 or 511) or Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 on the Pf and RF of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica in passion fruit plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Treatments | Variables and assays | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pf | RF | |||
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. incognita | 1570 aa | 677 b | 0.44 a | 0.19 b |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora 311 | 1180 b | 1835 a | 0.33 b | 0.52 a |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. incognita | 549 a | 1070 a | 0.15 a | 0.3 a |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora 511 | 260 b | 1178 a | 0.07 b | 0.33 a |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. incognita | 210 b | 1040 a | 0.06 b | 0.29 a |
| M. incognita-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 414 a | 780 a | 0.11 a | 0.22 a |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. javanica | 1387 a | 1820 a | 0.39 a | 0.52 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora 311 | 445 b | 1560 a | 0.12 b | 0.44a |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. javanica | 465 b | 2140 a | 0.13 b | 0.61 a |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora 511 | 602 a | 2260 a | 0.17 a | 0.64 a |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| M. javanica | 230 a | 1410 a | 0.06 a | 0.41 a |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | 155 b | 1120 a | 0.04 b | 0.32 a |

Figure 1
Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Neocosmospora sp. 311, acting alone or combined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in the assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.

Figure 2
Effect of Meloidogyne javanica and Neocosmospora sp. 311, acting alone orcombined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in the assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.

Figure 3
Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Neocosmospora sp. 511, acting alone or combined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.

Figure 4
Effect of Meloidogyne javanica and Neocosmospora sp. 511, acting alone or combined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.

Figure 5
Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium nirenbergiae 022, acting alone or combined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in the assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.

Figure 6
Effect of Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium nirenbergiae 022, acting alone or combined, on the growth of passion fruit plants cultivated in a growth chamber, in the assays 1 (dotted column) and 2 (brick-pattern column). F: parasitism by fungus only; N: parasitism by nematode only; F + N: parasitism by fungus and nematode; C: noninoculated control. Columns with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments according to the Tukey test at 5%. Values are mean of 10 replicates per treatment for each assay.
Table S1
. P values obtained in the Shapiro–Wilk test at 5% for the effect of pathogens, acting alone or combined, on passion fruit plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Assays | Variables and interactions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | RSM | PL | SL | RSV | |
| Meloidogyne incognita -Neocosmopora sp. 311 | |||||
| 1 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 6.53 × 10–9 |
| 2 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.005 |
| M. incognita Neocosmopora sp. 511 | |||||
| 1 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 5.61 × 10–6 |
| 2 | 0.69 | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.07 | 3.74 × 10–12 |
| M. incognita Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 | |||||
| 1 | 0.27 | 0.46 | 0.2 | 0.71 | 7.74 × 10–6 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 0.52 | 0.81 | 0.24 | 5.21 × 10–6 |
| Meloidogyne javanica -Neocosmopora sp. 311 | |||||
| 1 | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.55 | 0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 0.17 | 0.79 | 0.33 | 1.84 × 10–12 |
| M. javanica- Neocosmopora sp. 511 | |||||
| 1 | 0.08 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.4 | 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.14 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 4.26 × 10–8 |
| M. javanica -F. nirenbergiae F022 | |||||
| 1 | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.046 |
| 2 | 0.63 | 0.4 | 0.63 | 0.38 | 1.84 × 10–12 |
Table S2
. P values obtained in the Shapiro–Wilk test at 5% for the VLT in the collar-stem region and LL caused by Neocosmospora sp. (311 or 511) or Fusarium nirenbergiae F022, and for the Pf and RF of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica, in passion fruit plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays (1 and 2).
| Assays | Variables and interactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLT | LL | Pf | RF | |
| M. incognita-Neocosmopora sp. 311 | ||||
| 1 | 0.12 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| 2 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 1.74 × 10–5 | 1.74 × 10–5 |
| M. incognita-Neocosmopora sp. 511 | ||||
| 1 | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| M. incognita-F. nirenbergiae F022 | ||||
| 1 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 2 | 0.38 | 0.89 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| M. javanica-Neocosmopora sp. 311 | ||||
| 1 | 0.36 | 0.59 | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| 2 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| M. javanica-Neocosmopora sp. 511 | ||||
| 1 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 2 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | ||||
| 1 | 0.95 | 0.00063 | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| 2 | 0.12 | 0.0047 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Table S3
Mean squares obtained in ANOVA for the effect of pathogens, acting alone or combined, on passion fruit plants cultivated in replicated growth chamber assays.
| Parameters | Variables and interactions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | RSM | PL | SL | |
| Meloidogyne incognita- Neocosmospora sp. 311 | ||||
| Assay | 1.53* | 0.25 | 288.9** | 1.31 |
| Treatment | 5.9** | 0.39** | 209.98** | 62.61** |
| Assay × treatment | 1.03** | 0.96** | 19.49 | 18.22 |
| Residual | 0.25 | 0.09 | 19.88 | 9.78 |
| CV% | 44.7 | 54.6 | 12.13 | 17.19 |
| M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | ||||
| Assay | 0.002 | 0.02 | 33.61 | 0** |
| Treatment | 2.5** | 0.11* | 68.53** | 30.78** |
| Assay × treatment | 3.6** | 0.17** | 47.59* | 32.26** |
| Residual | 0.14 | 0.04 | 12.36 | 6.22 |
| CV% | 28.89 | 42.23 | 9.41 | 12.9 |
| M. incognita-Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 | ||||
| Assay | 0.16 | 0.24** | 224.79** | 24.16 |
| Treatment | 0.74* | 0.18** | 85.4* | 19.32 |
| Assay × treatment | 0.86* | 0.09** | 54.07 | 24.68 |
| Residual | 0.24 | 0.01 | 24.83 | 10.19 |
| CV% | 39.45 | 35.12 | 12.91 | 16.62 |
| Meloidogyne javanica- Neocosmospora sp. 311 | ||||
| Assay | 1.61* | 3.27** | 913.95** | 62.36* |
| Treatment | 5.27** | 0.5* | 100.27* | 20.24 |
| Assay × treatment | 2.86** | 0.19 | 122.88** | 5.83 |
| Residual | 0.35 | 0.18 | 29.01 | 10.72 |
| CV% | 39.13 | 54.9 | 13.11 | 15.29 |
| M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 | ||||
| Assay | 0.22 | 2.21** | 377.41** | 5.84 |
| Treatment | 1.32** | 0.74** | 72.12* | 33.86** |
| Assay × treatment | 0.11 | 0.28** | 66.3* | 27.16** |
| Residual | 0.22 | 0.04 | 19.35 | 4.53 |
| CV% | 28.39 | 32.09 | 10.80 | 9.93 |
| M. javanica-F. nirenbergiae F022 | ||||
| Assay | 1.8** | 0.48** | 1207.61** | 13.28 |
| Treatment | 0.98* | 0.08 | 16.35 | 12.57 |
| Assay × treatment | 1.07** | 0.08 | 85.72* | 21.38 |
| Residual | 0.26 | 0.05 | 27.59 | 9.59 |
| CV% | 30.45 | 41.85 | 12.82 | 15.79 |

Figure S1
(A) Aspect of passion fruit plants in growth chamber assay to investigate fungusnematode interactions; (B) width of collar lesion caused by Fusarium nirenbergiae F022; (C) length of collar lesions caused by F. nirenbergiae F022 (two stems on the left) and Neocosmospora sp.; (D) fungus re-isolation from lesioned tissues.

Figure S2
Range of symptoms observed in passion fruit plants in growth chamber assays to investigate the interactions Meloidogyne incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 311 (top row); M. incognita-Neocosmospora sp. 511 (middle row); and M. incognita-Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 (bottom row). (A) non-inoculated control; (B) parasitized by nematode only; (C) parasitized by fungus only; (D) co-parasitized by nematode and fungus.

Figure S3
Range of symptoms observed in passion fruit plants in growth chamber assays to investigate the interactions Meloidogyne javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 311 (top row); M. javanica-Neocosmospora sp. 511 (middle row); and M. javanica-Fusarium nirenbergiae F022 (bottom row). (A) non-inoculated control; (B) parasitized by nematode only; (C) parasitized by fungus only; (D) co-parasitized by nematode and fungus.