Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Design and intelligent control of a low-cost, sEMG-driven, 3D-printed robotic hand prosthesis: A three-tier benchmarking framework with novel robustness metrics Cover

Design and intelligent control of a low-cost, sEMG-driven, 3D-printed robotic hand prosthesis: A three-tier benchmarking framework with novel robustness metrics

Open Access
|Oct 2026
Read online

References

  1. World Health Organization. Standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  2. European Commission, CORDIS. Turning disabilities into possibilities. Adams Hand project results in brief. 2020. Available from: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/421813-turning-disabilities-into-possibilities.
  3. Cordella F, Ciancio AL, Sacchetti R, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016;10:209. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00209.
  4. Farina D, Jiang N, Rehbaum H, et al. The extraction of neural information from the surface EMG for the control of upper-limb prostheses: emerging avenues and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2014;22(4):797–809. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2305111.
  5. Resnik L, Klinger SL, Etter K. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2014;38(6):492–504. doi:10.1177/0309364613506913.
  6. Belter JT, Segil JL, Dollar AM, Weir RF. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2013;50(5):599–618. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188.
  7. Zuniga J, Katsavelis D, Peck J, et al. Cyborg beast: a low-cost 3D-printed prosthetic hand for children with upper-limb differences. BMC Research Notes. 2015;8:10. doi:10.1186/s13104-015-0971-9.
  8. Dally C, Johnson D, Canon M, Ritter S, Mehta K. Characteristics of a 3D-printed prosthetic hand for use in developing countries. In: 2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC). IEEE; 2015. p. 267–270.
  9. Merletti R, Parker P. Electromyography: Physiology, Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
  10. Advancer Technologies. MyoWare Muscle Sensor datasheet. 2020. Available from: https://www.advancertechnologies.com.
  11. Parajuli N, Sreenivasan N, Bifulco P, et al. Real-time EMG based pattern recognition control for hand prostheses: a review on existing methods, challenges and future implementation. Sensors. 2019;19(20):4596. doi:10.3390/s19204596.
  12. Jaramillo-Yáñez A, Benalcázar ME, Mena-Maldonado E. Real-time hand gesture recognition using surface electromyography and machine learning: a systematic literature review. Sensors. 2020;20(9):2467. doi:10.3390/s20092467.
  13. Scheme E, Englehart K. Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2011;48(6):643–659. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0177.
  14. Campbell E, Phinyomark A, Scheme E. Current trends and confounding factors in myoelectric control: limb position and contraction intensity. Sensors. 2020;20(6):1613. doi:10.3390/s20061613.
  15. Côté-Allard U, Fall CL, Drouin A, et al. Deep learning for electromyographic hand gesture signal classification using transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2019;27(4):760–771. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2896269.
  16. Pizzolato S, Tagliapietra L, Cognolato M, Reggiani M, Müller H, Atzori M. Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186132.
  17. Controzzi M, Clemente F, Barone D, Ghionzoli A, Cipriani C. The SSSA-MyHand: a dexterous lightweight myoelectric hand prosthesis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2017;25(5):459–468. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2578980.
  18. Betthauser JL, Hunt CL, Osborn LE, et al. Limb position tolerant pattern recognition for myoelectric prosthesis control with adaptive sparse representations from extreme learning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2018;65(4):770–778. doi:10.1109/TBME.2017.2719400.
  19. Gusman J, Mastora K, Khairi A. Design of EMG-controlled prosthetic hand using MyoWare muscle sensor. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS). IEEE; 2019. p. 198–202.
  20. Langevin G. InMoov – open-source 3D-printed life-size robot. 2014. Available from: https://inmoov.fr.
  21. Tavakoli M, Benussi C, Lopes PA, et al. Robust hand gesture recognition with a double channel surface EMG wearable armband and SVM classifier. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2018;46:121–130. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.010.
  22. Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott RN. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1993;40(1):82–94. doi:10.1109/10.204774.
  23. Oskoei MA, Hu H. Myoelectric control systems – a survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2007;2(4):275–294. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2007.07.009.
  24. Hargrove LJ, Englehart K, Hudgins B. A comparison of surface and intramuscular myoelectric signal classification. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2007;54(5):847–853. doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.889202.
  25. Adewuyi AA, Hargrove LJ, Kuiken TA. Evaluating EMG feature and classifier selection for application to partial-hand prosthesis control. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2016;10:15. doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00015.
  26. Gokgoz E, Subasi A. Comparison of decision tree algorithms for EMG signal classification using DWT. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2015;18:138–144. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2014.12.005.
  27. Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C. Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012;39(8):7420–7431. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.102.
  28. Atzori M, Cognolato M, Müller H. Deep learning with convolutional neural networks applied to electromyography data: a resource for the classification of movements for prosthetic hands. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 2016;10:9. doi:10.3389/fnbot.2016.00009.
  29. Simão M, Neto P, Gibaru O. EMG-based online classification of gestures with recurrent neural networks. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2019;128:45–51. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2019.07.021.
  30. Prakash A, Sahi AK, Sharma N, Sharma S. Force myography controlled multifunctional hand prosthesis for upper-limb amputees. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2020;62:102122. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102122.
  31. Sravya R, Lakshmi BS, Kumar PR. EMG signal classification using MyoWare sensor and machine learning for prosthetic hand control. In: 2021 International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC). IEEE; 2021. p. 1–6.
  32. Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2002;16:321–357. doi:10.1613/jair.953.
  33. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
  34. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
  35. Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1937;32(200):675–701. doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522.
  36. Nemenyi PB. Distribution-free multiple comparisons [PhD thesis]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 1963.
  37. Phinyomark A, Quaine F, Charbonnier S, Serviere C, Tarpin-Bernard F, Laurillau Y. EMG feature evaluation for improving myoelectric pattern recognition robustness. Expert Systems with Applications. 2013;40(12):4832–4840. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.02.023.
  38. Scheme E, Fougner A, Stavdahl Ø, Chan ADC, Englehart K. Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control. In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2010. p. 6337–6340.
  39. Jiang N, Dosen S, Müller KR, Farina D. Myoelectric control of artificial limbs – is there a need to change focus? IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2012;29(5):150–152. doi:10.1109/MSP.2012.2203480.
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 177
Submitted on: Jul 10, 2026
Published on: Oct 27, 2026
Published by: University of Oslo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Anagha Shinde, Virendra Shete, Ninad Mehendale, published by University of Oslo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.