Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changing and challenging dimensions of principal autonomy in South Australia: A lived experience phenomenological analysis of the courage to care Cover

Changing and challenging dimensions of principal autonomy in South Australia: A lived experience phenomenological analysis of the courage to care

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. Ashenden, D. (2016). The educational consequences of the peace. Inside Story, July 20, 2016.
  2. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company.
  3. Bills, A. (2020). A case for radical pragmatic leaders and personalised learning schools: Risky public policy business. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  4. Cobbold, T. (2020). Funding gap between public and private schools will accelerate over the next decade. SOS Australia: Fighting for Equity in Education, November 8,
  5. Collins, C., & Yates, L. (2009). Curriculum policy in South Australia since the 1970s: The quest for commonality. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 125–140.
  6. Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.
  7. Day, C. (2017). Teachers’ worlds and work: Understanding complexity, building quality. Routledge.
  8. Department for Education. (2018). Strategic Plan towards 2028. Accessed 1 December 2020. State Government of South Australia.
  9. Dolan, C. (2020a). Paradox and the school leader: The struggle for the soul of the principal in neoliberal times. Springer Nature.
  10. Dolan, C. (2020b). Paradox in the lives and work of principals. Report commissioned by the Australian Secondary Principals’ Association, Adelaide.
  11. Dusseldorps. (2015). Review Report of Alberton Primary School. https://www.dusseldorp.org.au/2015/07/15/school-changes/ Accessed 12th October, 2020.
  12. Gale, T. (2001). Critical policy sociology: Historiography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 379–393.
  13. Giles, D. L., Bills, A., & Otero, G. (2015). Pedagogical approaches for developing relational sensibilities in educational leaders. Reflective Practice, 16(6), 744–752.
  14. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
  15. Hargreaves, A. (2005). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In Extending educational change (pp. 278–295). Springer.
  16. Kaminsky, J.S. (1981). The “freedom and authority memorandum”: A philosophical addendum in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 187–200.
  17. Lingard, B. (2013). Politics, policies and pedagogies in education: The selected works of Bob Lingard. Routledge.
  18. MacDonald, K., Keddie, A., Blackmore, J., Mahoney, C., Wilkinson, J., Gobby, B., Neische, R., & Eacott, S. (2021). School autonomy reform and social justice: A policy overview of Australian public education (1970s to present). The Australian Educational Researcher, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00482-4
  19. Maister, D. H. (1999). True professionalism: The courage to care about your people, your clients, and your career. Simon and Schuster.
  20. McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge.
  21. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world's most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Co.
  22. Nias, J. (1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306.
  23. Reid, A. (2017). South Australian Public Education Statement. Department for Education, Government of South Australia. https://www.education.sa.gov.au/department/about-department/public-education-statement_ Accessed 1 November 2020.
  24. Reid, A. (2020). Changing Australian education: How policy is taking us backwards and what can be done about it. Routledge.
  25. Santoro, D. A. (2021). Demoralized: Why teachers leave the profession they love and how they can stay. Harvard Education Press.
  26. Smith, S. J. (1997). The phenomenology of educating physically. In D. Vandenburg (Ed.), Phenomenology and educational discourse (pp. 119–144). Heinemann.
  27. Stengel, B. S. (2018). Practicing courage in a communal key. Educational Theory, 68(2), 213–233.
  28. Teese, R. (2006). Condemned to innovate: Policy. [There is a need to rethink the role of disadvantaged schools. An edited version of a speech delivered to the NSW Priority Schools Funding Program Conference in August 2005. Paper in: Getting Smart: The Battle for Ideas in Education. Schultz, Julianne (ed.).]. Griffith Review, (11), 149–159.
  29. Thomson, P. (2010). Headteacher autonomy: A sketch of a Bourdieuian field analysis of position and practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 5–20.
  30. Trout, M. (2018). Embodying care: Igniting a critical turn in a teacher educator's relational practice. Studying Teacher Education, 14(1), 39–55.
  31. van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
  32. Welch, A. R. (1998). The cult of efficiency in education: Comparative reflections on the reality and the rhetoric. Comparative Education, 34(2), 157–175.
  33. Wilson, H. S., & Hutchinson, S. A. (1991). Triangulation of qualitative methods: Heideggerian hermeneutics and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 1(2), 263–276.
  34. Windle, J. (2014). The rise of school choice in education funding reform. Educational Policy, 28(2), 306–324.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jelpp-2021-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1178-8704 | Journal ISSN: 1178-8690
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 95
Published on: Apr 13, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Andrew Bills, Nigel Howard, Michael Bell, published by New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.