References
- Aksnes, D. W., Leeuwen, T. N. V., & Sivertsen, G. (2014). The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1391–1401.
- Aurell, E., & Ekeberg, M. (2012). Inverse Ising inference using all the data. Physical Review Letters, 108(9), 090201.
- Bongioanni, I., Daraio, C., & Ruocco G. (2014). A quantitative measure to compare the disciplinary profiles of research systems and their evolution over time. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 710–727.
- Balassa, B. (2010). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage, Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123.
- Bruzzone, L., Roli F., & Serpico S. B. (1995). An extension of the Jeffreys-Matusita distance to multiclass cases for feature selection. IEEE Transations on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 33(6), 1318–1321.
- Bound, K. (2008). Brazil: The natural knowledge-economy. DEMOS. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/Brazil_NKE_web.pdf.
- Daraio, C., Fabbri F., Gavazzi, G., Izzo, M. G., Leuzzi, L., Quaglia, G., & Ruocco, G. (2017). Assessing the interdependencies between scientific disciplinary profiles at the country level: A pseudo-likelihood approach. 2017 ISSI Conference Proceedings. China: Wuhan University, 2017, 1448–1459.
- Ding, J., Ahlgren, P., Yang, L., & Yue, T. (2018). Disciplinary structures in Nature, Science, and PNAS: journal and country levels. Scientometrics (3), 1–36.
- Everitt, B., Landau, S. & Leese, M. (2001). Cluster Analysis (Forth Edition.). London: Arnold.
- Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). “Triad” or “tetrad”? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74(1), 71–88.
- Glänzel, W., Leta, J., & Thijs, B. (2006). Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study, Scientometrics, 67(1), 67–86.
- Glänzel, W., & Schlemmer, B. (2007). National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003): An exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 70(2), 267–275.
- Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: Theory, measurement, and practice. Books, 30(4), 379–379.
- Harzing, A. W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 29–42.
- Julio, C. R. P., Maria, M. L. E., & Dirce, M. T. Z. (1998). Brazilian sciences and government funding at the state of Sao Paulo. Scientometrics, 43(2), 177–188.
- Kaufman, L. & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. DBLP, New York: Wiley.
- King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311–6.
- Kozlowski, J., Radosevic, S., & Ircha, D. (1999). History matters: the inherited disciplinary structure of the post-communist science in countries of central and Eastern Europe and its restructuring. Scientometrics, 45(1), 137–166.
- Li, N. (2017). Evolutionary patterns of national disciplinary profiles in research: 1996–2015. Scientometrics, 111(1), 1–28.
- Liang, L. M., Havemann, F., Heinz, M., & Wagner-Dobler, R. (2006). Structural similarities between science growth dynamics in China and in western countries. Scientometrics, 66(2), 311–325.
- Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2014). Are there global shifts in the world science base? Analysing the catching up and falling behind of world regions. Scientometrics, 101(3), 1897–1924.
- Schulz P. A, & Manganote E. J. T. (2012). Revisiting country research profiles: learning about the scientific cultures. Scientometrics, 93(2), 517–531.
- Salton, G., & McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Schmoch, U., Licht, G., & Reinhard, M. (eds.) (2000). Wissens-und technologietransfer in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
- Shibayama, S. (2011). Distribution of academic research funds: a case of Japanese national research grant. Scientometrics, 88(1), 43–60.
- Raan, A. F. J. V. (2003). The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Technikfolgenabschautzung - Theorie und Praxis(1), 20–29.
- Wu, J. (2015). Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 183–196.
- Yang, L. Y., Yue, T., Ding, J. L., & Han, T. (2012). A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 93(2), 497–516.
- Yue, H. J. (2008). Prediction and relative dynamic performance on field of research of China. Studies in Science of Science, 26(3), 530–538.
- Zhu, W. T. (2006). A study on NSFC’s interdisciplinary research funding system. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China. 20(3), 184–189.