Delayed recognition: recent developments and a proposal to study this phenomenon as a fuzzy concept

Rousseau, Ronald

doi:10.2478/jdis-2018-0011

Abstract

Purpose

New developments in the study of delayed recognition are discussed.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on these new developments a method is proposed to characterize delayed recognition as a fuzzy concept.

Findings

A benchmark value of 0.333 corresponding with linear growth is obtained. Moreover, a case is discovered in which an expert found delayed recognition several years before citation analysis could discover this phenomenon.

Research limitations

As all citation studies also this one is database dependent.

Practical implications

Delayed recognition is turned into a fuzzy concept.

Originality/value

The article presents a new way of studying delayed recognition.

References

Bornmann, L., Ye, A.Y., & Ye, F.Y. (2018). Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores. Scientometrics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2772-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). On Sleeping Beauties, Princes and other tales of citation distributions ... Research Evaluation, 19(3), 195–202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burrell, Q.L. (2005). Are “Sleeping Beauties” to be expected? Scientometrics, 65(3), 381–389.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cole, S. (1970). Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 286–306.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Du, J. & Wu, Y. (2016). A bibliometric framework for identifying “Princes” who wake up the “Sleeping Beauty” in challenge-type scientific discoveries. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(1), 50–68.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Du, J. & Wu, Y. (2017). A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of ISSI 2017—The 16^th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Wuhan University, China, (148–157).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Du, J. & Wu, Y. (2018). A parameter-free index for identifying under-cited sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2780-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
El Aichouchi, A., & Gorry, P. (2018). Paul Hagenmüller’s contribution to solid state chemistry: A scientometric analysis. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 262(June), 156–163.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garfield, E. (1970). Would Mendel’s work have been ignored if the Science Citation Index was available 100 years ago? Current Contents. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, 1962–1973 (p. 69–70) 1973, Philadelphia, ISI.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition—Why? Current Contents, 21. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol.4, 1979–1980 (p.488–493) 1980, Philadelphia, ISI.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B., & Thijs, B. (2003). Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics, 58(3), 571–586.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu, X.J., Zhang, Y.N., Hu, X.Y., & Rousseau, R. (2018). Hibernators, their awakeners and the roles of subsequent authoritative citers. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(1), 103–113.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu, X.J. & Rousseau, R. (2018). Do citation chimeras exist? The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (submitted).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426–7431.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leakey, L.S.B., Tobias, P. V., & Napier, J. R. (1964). A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202(4927), 7–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, J., & Ye, F.Y. (2012). The phenomenon of all-elements-sleeping-beauties in scientific literature. Scientometrics, 92(3), 795–799.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Otte, E. & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romans, L.J. (1986). Massive N = 2a supergravity in ten dimensions. Physics Letters B, 169(4), 374–380.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sugimoto, C. R., & Mostafa, J. (2018). A note of concern and context: On careful use of terminologies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 347–348.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tobias, P.V. (1996). Premature discoveries in science with especial reference to “Australopithecus” and “Homo Habilis”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 140(1), 49–64.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Raan, A.F.J. (2004). Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467–472.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Raan, A.F.J. (2015). Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping Beauties may be sleeping innovations. PLoS ONE, 10(10): e0139786.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Raan, A.F.J. (2017). Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions? Scientometrics, 110(3), 1123–1156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ye, F.Y., & Bornmann, L. (2018). “Smart girls” versus “sleeping beauties” in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 69(3), 359–367.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zirkle, C. (1964). Some oddities in the delayed discovery of Mendelism. Journal of Heredity, 55(2), 65–72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article