Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A comparison of citation disciplinary structure in science between the G7 countries and the BRICS countries Cover

A comparison of citation disciplinary structure in science between the G7 countries and the BRICS countries

Open Access
|Sep 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Cluster analysis outcome of citation disciplinary structure of 21countries (2013).
Cluster analysis outcome of citation disciplinary structure of 21countries (2013).

Figure 2

RCij1993 and RCij2013 values across fields for Brazil and China.
RCij1993 and RCij2013 values across fields for Brazil and China.

The mapping from ESI classes to science fields_

Field(full)Field(abb.)ESI class
Agricultural SciencesAGRAgricultural Sciences
Environment/EcologyENVEnvironment/Ecology
GeosciencesGEOGeosciences
EngineeringENGComputer Science Engineering Materials Science
BiologyBIOBiology & Biochemistry Microbiology Molecular Biology & Genetics Plant & Animal Science
MedicineMEDClinical Medicine Immunology Neuroscience & Behavior Pharmacology & Toxicology Psychiatry/Psychology
MathematicsMATMathematics
ChemistryCHEChemistry
PhysicsPHYPhysics
Space ScienceSPASpace Science

Similarity values based on citation disciplinary structures in 1993 and 2013_

CountrySim(VCi1993, VCi2013)CountrySim(VCi1993, VCi2013)
Brazil0.739Italy0.942
Canada0.971Japan0.950
China0.907Russia0.951
France0.978South Africa0.963
Germany0.969United Kingdom0.968
India0.974United States0.982

Jeffreys-Matusita distances between publication and citation disciplinary structure and vector means within G7 and BRICS countries_

countryDist(VPi2013, VCi2013)Mean(VPi2013)Mean(VCi2013)
United States2.119.225.3
Russia1.92.61.1
Brazil1.32.51.5
India1.23.62.4
China1.014.813.8
United Kingdom0.84.35.4
Japan0.84.63.6
Germany0.75.05.9
France0.53.94.4
Italy0.43.53.8
South Africa0.40.60.4
Canada0.32.93.2

Journal and publication volume by publication year_

Publication year# journals# publications
19933,221436,440
20133,221634,994
Total3,2211,071,434

RCij2013 values for 21 countries (2013)_

FieldCHEENGMATPHYAGRGEOENVBIOMEDSPA
Australia1.72.61.51.52.94.15.22.93.32.4
Brazil0.90.91.50.94.40.81.51.61.40.8
Canada2.22.72.62.03.13.94.63.54.02.8
China24.823.717.516.014.112.610.79.36.43.0
France3.73.36.14.73.45.83.83.83.56.1
Germany6.23.95.38.03.76.15.06.15.78.6
India4.53.61.72.93.21.82.12.01.11.4
Iran1.82.51.81.01.80.70.70.50.50.4
Italy2.43.24.93.74.83.82.53.04.45.0
Japan5.23.02.85.82.33.21.64.64.03.4
Republic of Korea3.34.51.83.03.00.81.12.12.10.8
Netherlands1.11.10.81.31.81.72.22.03.22.1
Poland1.00.92.11.11.30.61.00.90.60.6
Russia1.00.62.32.60.21.60.30.50.11.7
South Africa0.30.20.50.20.60.40.80.40.30.6
Spain3.12.93.12.47.22.43.82.62.33.0
Switzerland1.31.11.21.80.82.02.21.51.51.4
Taiwan1.32.81.01.31.40.70.70.81.00.4
Turkey0.61.31.70.61.70.60.70.40.90.2
United Kingdom3.74.24.04.43.06.95.86.27.38.2
United States18.917.319.623.115.027.926.432.534.937.5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 30
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 24, 2018
Published on: Sep 3, 2018
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Ting Yue, Liying Yang, Per Ahlgren, Jielan Ding, Shuangqing Shi, Rainer Frietsch, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.