References
- Pontone G, Rossi A, Guglielmo M, et al. Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging—part I. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23:299-314. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab293
- Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah ASV, et al. Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1759-1768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.026
- Cordoni G, Di Paolantonio D, Savo MT, et al. Multidetector computed tomography and aortic stenosis: the emerging potential of bridging morphology and severity grading. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15:3233. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15243233
- Pergola V, Cozac DA, Savo MT, et al. Prognostic significance of severe mitral annular calcification in aortic stenosis: implications for aortic valve replacement outcome. IJC Heart Vasc. 2025;59:101720. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101720
- Mattesi G, Savo MT, De Amicis M, et al. Coronary artery calcium score: we know where we are but not where we may be. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2023;94. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2023.2720
- Godoy M, Mugharbil A, Anastasius M, et al. Cardiac computed tomography evaluation of valvular heart disease in transcatheter interventions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21:154. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1241-6
- Pergola V, Pradegan N, Cozza E, et al. Redefining CAV surveillance strategies: benefits of CCTA vs ICA. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025;19:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.07.004
- Linde JJ, Kelbæk H, Hansen TF, et al. Coronary CT angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:453-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.012
- Abdelrahman KM, Chen MY, Dey AK, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography: from clinical uses to emerging technologies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1226-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.076
- Dawson LP, Smith K, Cullen L, et al. Care models for acute chest pain that improve outcomes and efficiency. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:2333-2348. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.380
- Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
- Maroules CD, Rybicki FJ, Ghoshhajra BB, et al. Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: SCCT expert consensus document. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023;17:146-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.09.003
- Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. The RAPID-CTCA trial (Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease with CTCA): a multicentre randomised trial protocol. Trials. 2016;17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1717-2
- Lee KK, Bularga A, O’Brien R, et al. Troponin-guided coronary computed tomographic angiography after exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:1407-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.055
- Gray AJ, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography in adults presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome: the RAPID-CTCA randomized controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2022;26:1-114. doi: 10.3310/IRWI5180
- Wang KL, Meah MN, Bularga A, et al. Early computed tomography coronary angiography and preventative treatment in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial. Am Heart J. 2023;266:138-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.09.003
- Wang KL, Roobottom C, Smith JE, et al. Presentation cardiac troponin and early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022;11:570-579. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac057
- Kofoed KF, Kelbæk H, Hansen PR, et al. Early versus standard care invasive examination and treatment of patients with nonST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the VERDICT randomized controlled trial. Circulation. 2018;138:2741-2750. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037152
- Kofoed KF, Engstrøm T, Sigvardsen PE, et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:1044-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.037
- Serruys PW, Hara H, Garg S, et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for complete assessment of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:713-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.019
- Aziz W, Morgan H, Demir OM, et al. Prospective randomised trial of emergency cardiac computerised tomography (PROTECCT). Heart. 2022;108:1972-1978. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320990
- Dedic A, Lubbers MM, Schaap J, et al. Coronary CT angiography for suspected acute coronary syndrome in the era of high sensitivity troponins: randomized multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.045
- Smulders MW, Kietselaer BLJH, Wildberger JE, et al. Initial imaging-guided strategy versus routine care in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2466-2477. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.027
- Elzanaty A, Maraey A, Khalil M, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus standard of care for evaluation of NSTE-ACS: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2021;42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0192
- Kong H, Yang A, He Y. Coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care for evaluation of NSTE-ACS: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023;17:S5-S6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2023.05.019
- Tateishi K, Mano T, Aoyama R, et al. Clinical benefits of coronary computed tomography angiography for evaluating low-risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Rep. 2025;7:705-714. doi: 10.1253/circrep.cr-25-0114
- Barbosa MF, Canan A, Xi Y, et al. Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography and standard of care for evaluating acute chest pain: living systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023;5:e230022. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230022
- Popovic B, Ducrocq G, Elbez Y, et al. Clinical significance of culprit vessel occlusion in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2023;188:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.013
- Fernando H, Duffy SJ, Low A, et al. Totally occluded culprit coronary artery in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2021;156:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.043
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138:e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617
- Cocco M, Campo G, Guiducci V, et al. Complete vs culprit-only revascularization in older patients with myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84:2014-2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.07.028
- Rao SV, O’Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025;151:e771-e862. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309
- Meah MN, Tzolos E, Wang KL, et al. Plaque burden and 1-year outcomes in acute chest pain: results from the multicenter RAPID-CTCA trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1916-1925. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.04.024
- Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M, et al. Low-attenuation noncalcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography predicts myocardial infarction: results from the SCOT-HEART trial. Circulation. 2020;141:1452-1462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044720
- Reinhardt SW, Lin CJ, Novak E, et al. Noninvasive cardiac testing vs clinical evaluation alone in acute chest pain: secondary analysis of the ROMICAT-II randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7360
- Pergola V, Cabrelle G, Mattesi G, et al. Added value of CCTA-derived features to predict MACEs in stable patients undergoing coronary computed tomography. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12:1446. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061446
- Ahmadi A, Argulian E, Leipsic J, et al. From subclinical atherosclerosis to plaque progression and acute coronary events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1608-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.012
- Baskaran L, Dutta U, Wang X, et al. Accelerating drug translation: role of coronary computed tomography angiography plaque imaging candidates as surrogate biomarkers. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;18:912-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.03.017
- Puchner SB, Liu T, Mayrhofer T, et al. High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:684-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.039
- Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, et al. Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.07.003
- Savo MT, De Amicis M, Cozac DA, et al. Comparative prognostic value of coronary calcium score and perivascular fat attenuation index in coronary artery disease. J Clin Med. 2024;13:5205. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175205
- Sun JT, Sheng XC, Feng Q, et al. Pericoronary fat attenuation index is associated with vulnerable plaque components and local immune-inflammatory activation in patients with nonST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e022879. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022879
- Tan N, Dey D, Marwick TH, et al. Pericoronary adipose tissue as a marker of cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:913-923. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.12.021
- Oikonomou EK, Marwan M, Desai MY, et al. Non-invasive detection of coronary inflammation using computed tomography and prediction of residual cardiovascular risk (CRISP CT study): post-hoc analysis of prospective outcome data. Lancet. 2018;392:929-939. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31114-0
- Halaţiu VB, Benedek I, Rodean IP, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography-derived modified Duke index is associated with peri-coronary fat attenuation index and predicts severity of coronary inflammation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60:765. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050765
- Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang A, et al. The role of epicardial and pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics in identifying patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from unstable angina. Heliyon. 2023;9:e15738. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15738
- Lu Y, Wang Q, Liu H, et al. Differentiation of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from unstable angina using coronary computed tomography angiography: the role of imaging features and pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics. Cardiol J. 2025;32:291-300. doi: 10.5603/CJ.98559
- Gibbons RJ. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:378. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2206973
- Chew DP, Scott IA, Cullen L, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:895-951. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.789
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Treatment pathways for people hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome: summary. Canberra: AIHW; 2026. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/heart-stroke-vascular-diseases/treatment-pathways-for-people-hospitalised-for-acu/contents/summary
- Meier D, Andreini D, Cosyns B, et al. Usefulness of FFR-CT to exclude haemodynamically significant lesions in high-risk NSTE-ACS. EuroIntervention. 2025;21:73-81. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00779
- Warren J, Dawson L, McCollom T, et al. Application and performance of CT-fractional flow reserve in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2025;247:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.019
- Baggiano A, Maragna R, Mushtaq S, et al. Resource and outcome impact of routine availability of computed tomography perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;26:1140-1149. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf119
- Hinderks MJ, Sliwicka O, Salah K, et al. Accuracy of dynamic stress CT myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;41:83-92. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03292-8
- Hlatky MA, Wilding S, Stuart B, et al. Randomized comparison of chest pain evaluation with FFRCT or standard care: factors determining US costs. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2023;17:52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.09.005
- Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, et al. Deep learning enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022;4:e256-e265. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00022-X
- Wenzl FA, Kofoed KF, Simonsson M, et al. Extension of the GRACE score for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: development and validation study in ten countries. Lancet Digit Health. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.landig.2025.100907
- Chandrashekhar Y, Blankstein R, Shaw LJ, et al. Quantitative coronary plaque analysis in clinical practice: 2025 ACC scientific statement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.11.008
- Feuchtner GM, Lacaita PG, Bax JJ, et al. AI-quantitative CT coronary plaque features associate with a higher relative risk in women: CONFIRM2 registry. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;18:e018235. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018235
- Narula J, Stuckey TD, Nakazawa G, et al. Prospective deep learning-based quantitative assessment of coronary plaque by computed tomography angiography compared with intravascular ultrasound: the REVEALPLAQUE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024;25:1287-1295. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae115
- Lorenzatti D, Filtz A, Pina P, et al. Validation of a fully automated deep learning-enabled solution for CCTA atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis quantification in a diverse real-world cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024;18:507-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.03.012
- Nieman K, García-García HM, Hideo-Kajita A, et al. Standards for quantitative assessments by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024;18:429-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.05.232
- Kay FU, Canan A, Kukkar V, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of onpremise automated coronary CT angiography analysis based on Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System 2.0. Radiology. 2025;315. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242087
- Xu PP, Hu B, Zhou F, et al. An artificial intelligence model integrating culprit lesion diagnosis and risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;87:103415. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103415
- Slipczuk L, Blankstein R, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al. State of the art: evaluation and medical management of nonobstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2025;152:443-466. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001394
- Moser LJ, Demmert TT, Klambauer K, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography to diagnose acute spontaneous coronary artery dissection. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2025.09.002
- Pagonis C, Sandstedt M, Dworeck C, et al. An in-depth analysis of coronary computed tomography angiography segmental findings in acute spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a prospective multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025;19:559-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2025.08.002
- Pergola V, Continisio S, Mantovani F, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: the emerging role of coronary computed tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24:839-850. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead060
- Crousillat D, Sarma A, Wood M, et al. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: current knowledge, research gaps, and innovative research initiatives: JACC Advances Expert Panel. JACC Adv. 2024;3:101385. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101385
- Drazner MH, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT, et al. 2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on strategies and criteria for the diagnosis and management of myocarditis: a report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85:391-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.080
- Faggiano A, Gherbesi E, Carugo S, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial computed tomography-derived extracellular volume in severe aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025;26:518-531. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae324
- Sørgaard MH, Kristensen AT, Eskesen K, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for interventional triage in acute coronary syndrome: design of the randomized TRACTION trial. Am Heart J. 2025:107325. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.107325